Hugging Face
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Buckets
new
Docs
Enterprise
Pricing
Website
Tasks
HuggingChat
Collections
Languages
Organizations
Community
Blog
Posts
Daily Papers
Hardware
Learn
Discord
Forum
GitHub
Solutions
Team & Enterprise
Hugging Face PRO
Enterprise Support
Inference Providers
Inference Endpoints
Storage Buckets
Log In
Sign Up
👋
Open to Work
chaoliang yan
PRO
chaoliangUNSW
3
8
Follow
irdor's profile picture
Galoserranoabad's profile picture
2 followers
·
5 following
https://jevstyle.com
ChaoliangY96601
lawrence3699
chaoliang-yan-a7061a370
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
replied
to
their
post
about 8 hours ago
Jev-style decisions on your laptop: Jev-Style-0.8B-Decision-v3 Give it any text and a question. It returns a calibrated probability for every option in one forward pass: pick one, yes/no, or a score. No text generation, nothing to parse. On data it never trained on: • Banking77, all 77 intents in one pass (400 test rows): 68.2% vs 49.2% for the best official Laya checkpoint (+19.0, paired 95% CI +14.0 to +24.0) • tweet_topic, zero-shot: 75.5% vs 63.2% for English Laya, within 4 points of Jev (79.3%), and better calibrated than Jev (ECE 0.027 vs 0.063) • JevBench v1.4.1, 231 public items, zero-shot: 64.1%, ahead of every Qwen3.5-0.8B-based system on the board; ahead of Laya (58.4%) too, though that lead is inside the CI Jev is still ahead on all three. v3 is the open, local option that gets closest: 0.53 GB in 4-bit, runs on CPU. Typed decisions (in-domain): 79.2% vs 76.6% for Laya typed, both trained on the same train split (paired CI +1.1 to +4.2). Read this as agreement with the dataset's teacher labels, not decision skill: • teacher-noise reference: one draw from the teacher's own distribution matches the gold label 65.9% of the time (test split); the dataset card puts teacher self-agreement at 73.5% • on the teacher's near-ties, v3 and Laya typed score the same (51.7% vs 51.7%); v3's lead comes from cases where the teacher is clear • Jev's 72.7% there is zero-shot, so not a like-for-like comparison Also: up to 25,600 tokens per call (98.3% on real 24K-token documents); about 44 ms per short decision on an M1 Max; one read of a document answers every question in one call; ahead of Laya multilingual in 51 of 51 languages. Try it in your browser, no install: https://huggingface.co/spaces/chaoliangUNSW/jev-style-v3 Model (transformers, with GGUF and MLX builds linked): https://huggingface.co/chaoliangUNSW/Jev-Style-0.8B-Decision-v3 Apache-2.0. Not affiliated with TypeSafe, Jev or Laya. Thanks to @dipankarsarkar for pushing on the typed-decisions framing.
new
activity
about 8 hours ago
chaoliangUNSW/Jev-Style-Qwen3.5-2B-Decision-v2-GGUF:
Bad Answers with Ollama
liked
a model
about 10 hours ago
chaoliangUNSW/Jev-Style-0.8B-Decision-v3
View all activity
Organizations
None yet
chaoliangUNSW
's datasets
1
Sort: Recently updated
chaoliangUNSW/MacJev-0.8B-Decision-Data
Preview
•
Updated
about 20 hours ago
•
1