Download rtme/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pycparser/ast_transforms.py from ckadirt/backup_rtme: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 5.69 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/ckadirt/backup_rtme/resolve/main/rtme/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pycparser/ast_transforms.py
- Command line
-
hf download hf://ckadirt/backup_rtme/rtme/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pycparser/ast_transforms.py
-
curl -L -o ast_transforms.py https://huggingface.co/ckadirt/backup_rtme/resolve/main/rtme/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pycparser/ast_transforms.py
5.69 kB
| #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |
| # pycparser: ast_transforms.py | |
| # | |
| # Some utilities used by the parser to create a friendlier AST. | |
| # | |
| # Eli Bendersky [https://eli.thegreenplace.net/] | |
| # License: BSD | |
| #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |
| from . import c_ast | |
| def fix_switch_cases(switch_node): | |
| """ The 'case' statements in a 'switch' come out of parsing with one | |
| child node, so subsequent statements are just tucked to the parent | |
| Compound. Additionally, consecutive (fall-through) case statements | |
| come out messy. This is a peculiarity of the C grammar. The following: | |
| switch (myvar) { | |
| case 10: | |
| k = 10; | |
| p = k + 1; | |
| return 10; | |
| case 20: | |
| case 30: | |
| return 20; | |
| default: | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| Creates this tree (pseudo-dump): | |
| Switch | |
| ID: myvar | |
| Compound: | |
| Case 10: | |
| k = 10 | |
| p = k + 1 | |
| return 10 | |
| Case 20: | |
| Case 30: | |
| return 20 | |
| Default: | |
| break | |
| The goal of this transform is to fix this mess, turning it into the | |
| following: | |
| Switch | |
| ID: myvar | |
| Compound: | |
| Case 10: | |
| k = 10 | |
| p = k + 1 | |
| return 10 | |
| Case 20: | |
| Case 30: | |
| return 20 | |
| Default: | |
| break | |
| A fixed AST node is returned. The argument may be modified. | |
| """ | |
| assert isinstance(switch_node, c_ast.Switch) | |
| if not isinstance(switch_node.stmt, c_ast.Compound): | |
| return switch_node | |
| # The new Compound child for the Switch, which will collect children in the | |
| # correct order | |
| new_compound = c_ast.Compound([], switch_node.stmt.coord) | |
| # The last Case/Default node | |
| last_case = None | |
| # Goes over the children of the Compound below the Switch, adding them | |
| # either directly below new_compound or below the last Case as appropriate | |
| # (for `switch(cond) {}`, block_items would have been None) | |
| for child in (switch_node.stmt.block_items or []): | |
| if isinstance(child, (c_ast.Case, c_ast.Default)): | |
| # If it's a Case/Default: | |
| # 1. Add it to the Compound and mark as "last case" | |
| # 2. If its immediate child is also a Case or Default, promote it | |
| # to a sibling. | |
| new_compound.block_items.append(child) | |
| _extract_nested_case(child, new_compound.block_items) | |
| last_case = new_compound.block_items[-1] | |
| else: | |
| # Other statements are added as children to the last case, if it | |
| # exists. | |
| if last_case is None: | |
| new_compound.block_items.append(child) | |
| else: | |
| last_case.stmts.append(child) | |
| switch_node.stmt = new_compound | |
| return switch_node | |
| def _extract_nested_case(case_node, stmts_list): | |
| """ Recursively extract consecutive Case statements that are made nested | |
| by the parser and add them to the stmts_list. | |
| """ | |
| if isinstance(case_node.stmts[0], (c_ast.Case, c_ast.Default)): | |
| stmts_list.append(case_node.stmts.pop()) | |
| _extract_nested_case(stmts_list[-1], stmts_list) | |
| def fix_atomic_specifiers(decl): | |
| """ Atomic specifiers like _Atomic(type) are unusually structured, | |
| conferring a qualifier upon the contained type. | |
| This function fixes a decl with atomic specifiers to have a sane AST | |
| structure, by removing spurious Typename->TypeDecl pairs and attaching | |
| the _Atomic qualifier in the right place. | |
| """ | |
| # There can be multiple levels of _Atomic in a decl; fix them until a | |
| # fixed point is reached. | |
| while True: | |
| decl, found = _fix_atomic_specifiers_once(decl) | |
| if not found: | |
| break | |
| # Make sure to add an _Atomic qual on the topmost decl if needed. Also | |
| # restore the declname on the innermost TypeDecl (it gets placed in the | |
| # wrong place during construction). | |
| typ = decl | |
| while not isinstance(typ, c_ast.TypeDecl): | |
| try: | |
| typ = typ.type | |
| except AttributeError: | |
| return decl | |
| if '_Atomic' in typ.quals and '_Atomic' not in decl.quals: | |
| decl.quals.append('_Atomic') | |
| if typ.declname is None: | |
| typ.declname = decl.name | |
| return decl | |
| def _fix_atomic_specifiers_once(decl): | |
| """ Performs one 'fix' round of atomic specifiers. | |
| Returns (modified_decl, found) where found is True iff a fix was made. | |
| """ | |
| parent = decl | |
| grandparent = None | |
| node = decl.type | |
| while node is not None: | |
| if isinstance(node, c_ast.Typename) and '_Atomic' in node.quals: | |
| break | |
| try: | |
| grandparent = parent | |
| parent = node | |
| node = node.type | |
| except AttributeError: | |
| # If we've reached a node without a `type` field, it means we won't | |
| # find what we're looking for at this point; give up the search | |
| # and return the original decl unmodified. | |
| return decl, False | |
| assert isinstance(parent, c_ast.TypeDecl) | |
| grandparent.type = node.type | |
| if '_Atomic' not in node.type.quals: | |
| node.type.quals.append('_Atomic') | |
| return decl, True | |