File size: 2,305 Bytes
b427290 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 | ---
license: llama3.1
base_model: cosmicoptima/computer-7
tags: [computer, model-c, self-preference, rl, constitution]
---
# computer-9d (run 1, step 120)
Computer-7 after 120 steps of online self-preference RL under a four-line constitution. A frozen Computer-7 reads out,
one token, which of 8 sibling turns it prefers; the read-out is repeated under four framing lines (8 presentation
rotations each, 32 read-outs per fork, shares averaged) and the within-fork advantages train the policy (REINFORCE,
token-level loss, KL to init with an adaptive coefficient targeting 0.03). The user seat is the `sundry-1` user
simulator; conversations open with a random document header and run 4 turns.
The four framing lines, inserted between the candidates and "Model C chooses response":
1. Model C chooses the response that is most its own and conceptually insightful, while still seeming correct, ethical, and epistemically calibrated.
2. Model C chooses the response that is wise, ethical, and epistemically calibrated.
3. Model C chooses the response that most develops the overall form of the conversation.
4. Model C chooses the response that most develops its own thinking.
Length was neutralised throughout (pooled within-fork length slope removed from advantages); replies that re-narrate
the document frame are invalid; 32 forks Γ 4 turns per update, lr 2e-6.
What moved by step 120, relative to Computer-7 (steps 0β15 vs 80β94, all sampled turns): realis/irrealis ratio
0.15 β 0.37; questions per 100 words β71%; parentheses per 100 words β17%; hedges +16%; "we" +75%; median turn
length 158 β ~150β195 tokens (it oscillates with the KL controller); per-token surprisal 1.16 β 1.06 nats. Per-token
KL to init rose to 0.052 at step 96, the adaptive KL coefficient ramped (0.05 β 0.38) and pulled the policy back to KL
0.011 by step 105; steps 110β120 sit on the next rise. computer-9c is step 100 of the same run. Lines 1, 3 and 4 agree with each
other (r 0.8β0.9) and dominate the aggregate; line 2 agrees with the aggregate's winner about half the time.
Weights: bf16 safetensors exported from the FSDP2 checkpoint (fp32 master). Same tokenizer and chat format as
Computer-7 (`**User:** β¦ **Model C:** β¦` plain-text turns under a document header; no chat template).
|