Data layer at release v1.0.0: frozen-snapshot notice replaces the pre-release notice; CITATION.cff version 1.0.0
Browse files- CITATION.cff +12 -4
- README.md +9 -6
- anonymization.md +8 -5
- methodology.md +9 -6
- scripts/analyze.py +16 -7
- scripts/check_release_sync.py +1 -1
- scripts/verify_dataset_card.py +1 -1
CITATION.cff
CHANGED
|
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ message: >-
|
|
| 7 |
bundle, and the commit for the tooling that produced a number. See
|
| 8 |
the dataset card's Citation section for the citation rules (snapshot not branch; name
|
| 9 |
the collection round; cite client version plus service, not the model alone).
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
title: "AI Service QoS: An Independent Outside-In Measurement Methodology, with Case Study 1 (Qwen3.8-Max / Qoder)"
|
| 12 |
authors:
|
| 13 |
- name: "2makeitwork"
|
|
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ authors:
|
|
| 15 |
# affiliation is to be added here or in any listing, archive record or citation form
|
| 16 |
# Do not attempt to resolve the handle to a person.
|
| 17 |
type: dataset
|
| 18 |
-
version: "
|
| 19 |
-
date-released: "2026-09-11" #
|
| 20 |
# doi: "" # dataset DOI, then paper-page DOI
|
| 21 |
repository-code: "https://github.com/2makeitwork/paper_ai_Qos"
|
| 22 |
repository-artifact: "https://huggingface.co/datasets/2makeitwork/paper_ai_Qos"
|
|
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ license: >-
|
|
| 24 |
CC-BY-4.0 (text, tables, figures and evidence data; see LICENSE-content.md);
|
| 25 |
MIT (executable tooling under scripts/; see LICENSE-code.md)
|
| 26 |
# A commit hash cannot be written into the commit it names, so the snapshot to cite is the
|
| 27 |
-
# tag:
|
| 28 |
keywords:
|
| 29 |
- AI service quality
|
| 30 |
- large language model service measurement
|
|
@@ -43,6 +43,14 @@ preferred-citation:
|
|
| 43 |
# url: "https://huggingface.co/papers/..." # paper page once published
|
| 44 |
institution: "Independent"
|
| 45 |
versions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 46 |
- date-released: "2026-09-11"
|
| 47 |
version: "0.3.0-pre.4"
|
| 48 |
changes: "Pre-release line. Methodology v0.1 with Case Study 1: paper section 1.4 rebuilt as a
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
bundle, and the commit for the tooling that produced a number. See
|
| 8 |
the dataset card's Citation section for the citation rules (snapshot not branch; name
|
| 9 |
the collection round; cite client version plus service, not the model alone).
|
| 10 |
+
Released 2026-09-11 as version 1.0.0 (methodology v0.1): cite the tag or the DOI, never a branch.
|
| 11 |
title: "AI Service QoS: An Independent Outside-In Measurement Methodology, with Case Study 1 (Qwen3.8-Max / Qoder)"
|
| 12 |
authors:
|
| 13 |
- name: "2makeitwork"
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
# affiliation is to be added here or in any listing, archive record or citation form
|
| 16 |
# Do not attempt to resolve the handle to a person.
|
| 17 |
type: dataset
|
| 18 |
+
version: "1.0.0" # matches the tag v1.0.0, the citable snapshot; scripts/preflight.sh --release <tag> and scripts/analyze.py both refuse if they differ
|
| 19 |
+
date-released: "2026-09-11" # the release date of version 1.0.0
|
| 20 |
# doi: "" # dataset DOI, then paper-page DOI
|
| 21 |
repository-code: "https://github.com/2makeitwork/paper_ai_Qos"
|
| 22 |
repository-artifact: "https://huggingface.co/datasets/2makeitwork/paper_ai_Qos"
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
CC-BY-4.0 (text, tables, figures and evidence data; see LICENSE-content.md);
|
| 25 |
MIT (executable tooling under scripts/; see LICENSE-code.md)
|
| 26 |
# A commit hash cannot be written into the commit it names, so the snapshot to cite is the
|
| 27 |
+
# tag: v1.0.0. Zenodo's GitHub integration mints the version DOI from the release page.
|
| 28 |
keywords:
|
| 29 |
- AI service quality
|
| 30 |
- large language model service measurement
|
|
|
|
| 43 |
# url: "https://huggingface.co/papers/..." # paper page once published
|
| 44 |
institution: "Independent"
|
| 45 |
versions:
|
| 46 |
+
- date-released: "2026-09-11"
|
| 47 |
+
version: "1.0.0"
|
| 48 |
+
changes: "Formal release of methodology v0.1 with Case Study 1. The contribution is positioned
|
| 49 |
+
as a novelty of perspective rather than of method: the instruments are shared with prior
|
| 50 |
+
external measurement, while the vantage — the paying user's side, published as a stratified
|
| 51 |
+
public aggregate that checks a provider against its own quality-of-service claim without its
|
| 52 |
+
cooperation — is occupied by none of them. Section 7.1 states the institution this serves and
|
| 53 |
+
the two design duties not yet discharged."
|
| 54 |
- date-released: "2026-09-11"
|
| 55 |
version: "0.3.0-pre.4"
|
| 56 |
changes: "Pre-release line. Methodology v0.1 with Case Study 1: paper section 1.4 rebuilt as a
|
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -41,11 +41,14 @@ configs:
|
|
| 41 |
path: evidence/logs/timeout_resume_events.csv
|
| 42 |
---
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-
> **
|
| 45 |
-
>
|
| 46 |
-
>
|
| 47 |
-
>
|
| 48 |
-
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
**AI Service QoS — Independent Measurement of What Users Actually Receive** — methodology v0.1, and the first data product of an independent, outside-in measurement framework. The system measured here is **Case Study 1**, not the subject: the framework claims provider neutrality and one provider is not proof of it — a second provider measured with *these same definitions and no new ones* is the test (paper section 7, Stage 3).
|
| 51 |
|
|
@@ -81,7 +84,7 @@ recomputed from these files rather than taken on trust.
|
|
| 81 |
The whole published repository was downloaded back into an empty directory and compared file by
|
| 82 |
file with the tag it was built from — which is exactly what `scripts/check_release_sync.py` does,
|
| 83 |
so this is re-checkable by a reader rather than autobiographical. Measured 2026-09-11 against tag
|
| 84 |
-
`
|
| 85 |
is this card with its three internal-instruction lines removed, and the source repository's own
|
| 86 |
`README.md` is a different document, its homepage. The hub holds one file no tag contains: the
|
| 87 |
`.gitattributes` it created with the repository. The generated table ends with a line carrying a
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
path: evidence/logs/timeout_resume_events.csv
|
| 42 |
---
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
+
> **Released 2026-09-11 as v1.0.0** (methodology v0.1). This snapshot is frozen: later
|
| 45 |
+
> corrections and additions ship as a new version with a new tag, never as an edit to the bytes a
|
| 46 |
+
> citation points at — cite the tag or the Digital Object Identifier, not a branch. Two version
|
| 47 |
+
> numbers mean two different things here: the tag names this public snapshot, while *methodology
|
| 48 |
+
> v0.1* names the definitions, which stay unchanged until a second provider has been measured
|
| 49 |
+
> (section 7). Every figure quoted in this document set is asserted against the shipped evidence by
|
| 50 |
+
> `scripts/analyze.py`, which fails when a number and the evidence disagree and warns when a file
|
| 51 |
+
> is edited after the date above.
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
**AI Service QoS — Independent Measurement of What Users Actually Receive** — methodology v0.1, and the first data product of an independent, outside-in measurement framework. The system measured here is **Case Study 1**, not the subject: the framework claims provider neutrality and one provider is not proof of it — a second provider measured with *these same definitions and no new ones* is the test (paper section 7, Stage 3).
|
| 54 |
|
|
|
|
| 84 |
The whole published repository was downloaded back into an empty directory and compared file by
|
| 85 |
file with the tag it was built from — which is exactly what `scripts/check_release_sync.py` does,
|
| 86 |
so this is re-checkable by a reader rather than autobiographical. Measured 2026-09-11 against tag
|
| 87 |
+
`v1.0.0`: **every data-layer file agrees byte for byte**, `README.md` included — that file
|
| 88 |
is this card with its three internal-instruction lines removed, and the source repository's own
|
| 89 |
`README.md` is a different document, its homepage. The hub holds one file no tag contains: the
|
| 90 |
`.gitattributes` it created with the repository. The generated table ends with a line carrying a
|
anonymization.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
|
|
| 1 |
# Anonymization policy
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-
> **
|
| 4 |
-
>
|
| 5 |
-
>
|
| 6 |
-
>
|
| 7 |
-
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Everything under `evidence/` is produced by `scripts/anonymize.py`, which
|
| 10 |
builds a deterministic pseudonym map from the raw dump and refuses to finish
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
# Anonymization policy
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
+
> **Released 2026-09-11 as v1.0.0** (methodology v0.1). This snapshot is frozen: later
|
| 4 |
+
> corrections and additions ship as a new version with a new tag, never as an edit to the bytes a
|
| 5 |
+
> citation points at — cite the tag or the Digital Object Identifier, not a branch. Two version
|
| 6 |
+
> numbers mean two different things here: the tag names this public snapshot, while *methodology
|
| 7 |
+
> v0.1* names the definitions, which stay unchanged until a second provider has been measured
|
| 8 |
+
> (section 7). Every figure quoted in this document set is asserted against the shipped evidence by
|
| 9 |
+
> `scripts/analyze.py`, which fails when a number and the evidence disagree and warns when a file
|
| 10 |
+
> is edited after the date above.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Everything under `evidence/` is produced by `scripts/anonymize.py`, which
|
| 13 |
builds a deterministic pseudonym map from the raw dump and refuses to finish
|
methodology.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
|
|
| 1 |
# Methodology
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-
> **
|
| 4 |
-
>
|
| 5 |
-
>
|
| 6 |
-
>
|
| 7 |
-
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> **Methodology v0.1** — the concepts below are frozen. The stage ladder to v0.5, a second provider and a continuous observatory is `paper_ai_QoS.md` section 7.
|
| 10 |
|
|
@@ -28,7 +31,7 @@ and real conversation identifiers):
|
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
| Step | Command | Result of the attempt |
|
| 30 |
|---|---|---|
|
| 31 |
-
| Derived statistics from the published evidence | `python3 scripts/analyze.py` | **reproduces exactly.**
|
| 32 |
| Card against files | `python3 scripts/verify_dataset_card.py` | **reproduces exactly**, eight checks, in either repository |
|
| 33 |
| Log extracts from the pinned snapshot | `LOGSRC=<snapshot>/logs scripts/collect_evidence.sh` then `scripts/anonymize.py` | **does not reproduce the frozen bundle.** Of 24 published items, 4 matched byte for byte, 11 differed, and 9 were not produced at all (`evidence/screenshots/`, `evidence/user_statements.md`, four extracts, two statistics files, the round-2 directory) |
|
| 34 |
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
# Methodology
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
+
> **Released 2026-09-11 as v1.0.0** (methodology v0.1). This snapshot is frozen: later
|
| 4 |
+
> corrections and additions ship as a new version with a new tag, never as an edit to the bytes a
|
| 5 |
+
> citation points at — cite the tag or the Digital Object Identifier, not a branch. Two version
|
| 6 |
+
> numbers mean two different things here: the tag names this public snapshot, while *methodology
|
| 7 |
+
> v0.1* names the definitions, which stay unchanged until a second provider has been measured
|
| 8 |
+
> (section 7). Every figure quoted in this document set is asserted against the shipped evidence by
|
| 9 |
+
> `scripts/analyze.py`, which fails when a number and the evidence disagree and warns when a file
|
| 10 |
+
> is edited after the date above.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> **Methodology v0.1** — the concepts below are frozen. The stage ladder to v0.5, a second provider and a continuous observatory is `paper_ai_QoS.md` section 7.
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
| Step | Command | Result of the attempt |
|
| 33 |
|---|---|---|
|
| 34 |
+
| Derived statistics from the published evidence | `python3 scripts/analyze.py` | **reproduces exactly.** 58 assertions pass. The output file ends with a content hash plus a second-precision timestamp, and when the hash is unchanged the file is not rewritten at all — so running the checks cannot dirty the tree, and two copies with the same hash hold the same statistics whatever their stamps say |
|
| 35 |
| Card against files | `python3 scripts/verify_dataset_card.py` | **reproduces exactly**, eight checks, in either repository |
|
| 36 |
| Log extracts from the pinned snapshot | `LOGSRC=<snapshot>/logs scripts/collect_evidence.sh` then `scripts/anonymize.py` | **does not reproduce the frozen bundle.** Of 24 published items, 4 matched byte for byte, 11 differed, and 9 were not produced at all (`evidence/screenshots/`, `evidence/user_statements.md`, four extracts, two statistics files, the round-2 directory) |
|
| 37 |
|
scripts/analyze.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -302,24 +302,33 @@ else:
|
|
| 302 |
print(" SKIP no drift check: the paper and the case report are not in this "
|
| 303 |
"checkout (data-layer repository)")
|
| 304 |
|
| 305 |
-
# ----
|
| 306 |
NOTICE_DATE = "2026-09-11"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 307 |
PUB_DOCS = [doc for doc in (EV.parent / n for n in
|
| 308 |
("paper_ai_QoS.md", "report_qwenAliServiceQuality.md", "README.md", "abstract.md",
|
| 309 |
"methodology.md", "anonymization.md", "ask_vendor.md", "DATA_REQUEST.md",
|
| 310 |
"DATASET_CARD.md", "zenodo/README.md")) if doc.exists()]
|
| 311 |
notice_problems = [doc.name for doc in PUB_DOCS
|
| 312 |
-
if
|
| 313 |
if PUB_DOCS:
|
| 314 |
-
check("
|
| 315 |
notice_problems, [])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 316 |
late = [doc.name for doc in PUB_DOCS
|
| 317 |
if datetime.fromtimestamp(doc.stat().st_mtime).date() > datetime.strptime(NOTICE_DATE, "%Y-%m-%d").date()]
|
| 318 |
if late:
|
| 319 |
-
print(" ADVISORY: edited after the
|
| 320 |
-
"
|
| 321 |
else:
|
| 322 |
-
print(" SKIP
|
| 323 |
|
| 324 |
# ---- authorship: one handle, no institution, anywhere in the public set ----
|
| 325 |
BYLINE = "independent, unaffiliated"
|
|
@@ -342,7 +351,7 @@ if byline_docs:
|
|
| 342 |
check("archive metadata carries the pseudonym with an empty affiliation", bad, [])
|
| 343 |
|
| 344 |
# ---- published documents must not send a reader to a file that is not published ----
|
| 345 |
-
PRIVATE = ["PUBLICATION.md", "prior-works.md", "
|
| 346 |
DISCLOSED = ["not published", "not part of", "deliberately", "private", "ignored",
|
| 347 |
"working notes", "kept local", "no reading obligation"]
|
| 348 |
private_problems = []
|
|
|
|
| 302 |
print(" SKIP no drift check: the paper and the case report are not in this "
|
| 303 |
"checkout (data-layer repository)")
|
| 304 |
|
| 305 |
+
# ---- release notice: one text, one version, present everywhere ----
|
| 306 |
NOTICE_DATE = "2026-09-11"
|
| 307 |
+
RELEASED = "1.0.0" # the released version; CITATION.cff must carry this same string
|
| 308 |
+
NOTICE_MARK = f"**Released {NOTICE_DATE} as v{RELEASED}**"
|
| 309 |
PUB_DOCS = [doc for doc in (EV.parent / n for n in
|
| 310 |
("paper_ai_QoS.md", "report_qwenAliServiceQuality.md", "README.md", "abstract.md",
|
| 311 |
"methodology.md", "anonymization.md", "ask_vendor.md", "DATA_REQUEST.md",
|
| 312 |
"DATASET_CARD.md", "zenodo/README.md")) if doc.exists()]
|
| 313 |
notice_problems = [doc.name for doc in PUB_DOCS
|
| 314 |
+
if NOTICE_MARK not in doc.read_text(errors="replace")]
|
| 315 |
if PUB_DOCS:
|
| 316 |
+
check(f"release notice {NOTICE_MARK} present in every published document",
|
| 317 |
notice_problems, [])
|
| 318 |
+
# The version lives in two places, so one is checked against the other: a notice that names a
|
| 319 |
+
# version CITATION.cff does not would send a citation to a snapshot that is not this one.
|
| 320 |
+
cff = EV.parent / "CITATION.cff"
|
| 321 |
+
cff_found = re.search(r'^version: "([^"]+)"', cff.read_text(errors="replace"), re.M) if cff.exists() else None
|
| 322 |
+
if cff.exists():
|
| 323 |
+
check("CITATION.cff and the release notices carry the same version",
|
| 324 |
+
cff_found.group(1) if cff_found else "unreadable", RELEASED)
|
| 325 |
late = [doc.name for doc in PUB_DOCS
|
| 326 |
if datetime.fromtimestamp(doc.stat().st_mtime).date() > datetime.strptime(NOTICE_DATE, "%Y-%m-%d").date()]
|
| 327 |
if late:
|
| 328 |
+
print(" ADVISORY: edited after the release date — a released snapshot is frozen, so "
|
| 329 |
+
"these edits belong in the next version: " + ", ".join(sorted(late)))
|
| 330 |
else:
|
| 331 |
+
print(" SKIP release notice check: no published documents in this checkout (data layer)")
|
| 332 |
|
| 333 |
# ---- authorship: one handle, no institution, anywhere in the public set ----
|
| 334 |
BYLINE = "independent, unaffiliated"
|
|
|
|
| 351 |
check("archive metadata carries the pseudonym with an empty affiliation", bad, [])
|
| 352 |
|
| 353 |
# ---- published documents must not send a reader to a file that is not published ----
|
| 354 |
+
PRIVATE = ["PUBLICATION.md", "prior-works.md", "methodology_guidance"]
|
| 355 |
DISCLOSED = ["not published", "not part of", "deliberately", "private", "ignored",
|
| 356 |
"working notes", "kept local", "no reading obligation"]
|
| 357 |
private_problems = []
|
scripts/check_release_sync.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ STAMP_RE = re.compile(r"sha256:([0-9a-f]{64})")
|
|
| 64 |
ALWAYS_BAD = ("Paste this file", "How to publish", "how to publish")
|
| 65 |
# Names of files that stay on the author's workstation. Naming one is acceptable only on a
|
| 66 |
# line that says so, which is what the source repository's own document table does.
|
| 67 |
-
PRIVATE_NAMES = ("PUBLICATION.md", "prior-works.md", "
|
| 68 |
DISCLOSED_WORDS = ("not published", "not part of", "deliberately", "private", "ignored",
|
| 69 |
"working notes", "kept local", "no reading obligation", "local-only")
|
| 70 |
|
|
|
|
| 64 |
ALWAYS_BAD = ("Paste this file", "How to publish", "how to publish")
|
| 65 |
# Names of files that stay on the author's workstation. Naming one is acceptable only on a
|
| 66 |
# line that says so, which is what the source repository's own document table does.
|
| 67 |
+
PRIVATE_NAMES = ("PUBLICATION.md", "prior-works.md", "methodology_guidance")
|
| 68 |
DISCLOSED_WORDS = ("not published", "not part of", "deliberately", "private", "ignored",
|
| 69 |
"working notes", "kept local", "no reading obligation", "local-only")
|
| 70 |
|
scripts/verify_dataset_card.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ def check_licenses(yaml_text: str) -> None:
|
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
INTERNAL_MARKERS = ("Paste this file", "How to publish", "how to publish",
|
| 132 |
-
"PUBLICATION.md", "prior-works.md", "
|
| 133 |
# A fenced command is an instruction the reader will try. Every script it names must be
|
| 134 |
# present in whichever repository this card is published into, or the line has to say who it
|
| 135 |
# belongs to - which is how the tools/ gate and the paste-in note escaped into the open.
|
|
|
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
INTERNAL_MARKERS = ("Paste this file", "How to publish", "how to publish",
|
| 132 |
+
"PUBLICATION.md", "prior-works.md", "methodology_guidance")
|
| 133 |
# A fenced command is an instruction the reader will try. Every script it names must be
|
| 134 |
# present in whichever repository this card is published into, or the line has to say who it
|
| 135 |
# belongs to - which is how the tools/ gate and the paste-in note escaped into the open.
|