Datasets:
Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,37 +1,48 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
dtype: string
|
| 12 |
-
- name: defect
|
| 13 |
-
dtype: string
|
| 14 |
-
- name: negatives
|
| 15 |
-
dtype: string
|
| 16 |
-
splits:
|
| 17 |
-
- name: train
|
| 18 |
-
num_bytes: 608513
|
| 19 |
-
num_examples: 1079
|
| 20 |
-
- name: validation
|
| 21 |
-
num_bytes: 76394
|
| 22 |
-
num_examples: 134
|
| 23 |
-
- name: test
|
| 24 |
-
num_bytes: 76566
|
| 25 |
-
num_examples: 136
|
| 26 |
-
download_size: 230801
|
| 27 |
-
dataset_size: 761473
|
| 28 |
-
configs:
|
| 29 |
-
- config_name: default
|
| 30 |
-
data_files:
|
| 31 |
-
- split: train
|
| 32 |
-
path: data/train-*
|
| 33 |
-
- split: validation
|
| 34 |
-
path: data/validation-*
|
| 35 |
-
- split: test
|
| 36 |
-
path: data/test-*
|
| 37 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: unknown
|
| 3 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 4 |
+
- text-generation
|
| 5 |
+
tags:
|
| 6 |
+
- preference
|
| 7 |
+
- dpo
|
| 8 |
+
- reward-model
|
| 9 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 10 |
+
- 1K<n<10K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
---
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
# SENTIMENT_ANALYSIS
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
A preference dataset for **SENTIMENT_ANALYSIS**, harvested from real, human-labelled sources and curated by an automated harvesting harness with an LLM quality gate.
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
## Format
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
Standard preference / DPO schema — each row:
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
| column | meaning |
|
| 22 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 23 |
+
| `prompt` | the request (originally `text`) |
|
| 24 |
+
| `chosen` | the human-preferred response |
|
| 25 |
+
| `rejected` | a worse response to the same prompt |
|
| 26 |
+
| `source` | the dataset/URL the row was harvested from |
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
## Splits
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
80/10/10 `train` / `validation` / `test` (seeded shuffle): train:1079 / validation:134 / test:136
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
## Stats
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
- **Rows:** 1349
|
| 35 |
+
- **Distinct sources:** 3
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
### Sources
|
| 38 |
+
- `Jean-Baptiste/financial_news_sentiment_mixte_with_phrasebank_75`
|
| 39 |
+
- `SetFit/amazon_polarity`
|
| 40 |
+
- `cardiffnlp/tweet_eval (sentiment)`
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
## Provenance
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
**`prompt` and `chosen` are real** — harvested from the human-labelled sources listed above (accepted / upvoted / high-rated responses).
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
**`rejected` is partly synthetic.** Most sources retain only the accepted answer, so where no genuine low-scored counterpart existed the negative was generated by defect injection: an LLM rewrites that row's own `chosen` with exactly one flaw introduced (omission, factual error, wrong remedy, unsupported claim, or misprioritisation) at matched length. Rows carrying a `defect` column are the generated ones; rows without it kept a negative that was present in the source.
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
Rows passed a per-row check (negative is unique, not a stub, not spliced from `chosen`) and a whole-corpus gate for repeated negatives, length shortcuts, train/eval leakage and bag-of-words separability.
|