Upload v4-HOT/socratic/pilot/20260524_110540.json with huggingface_hub

v4-HOT/socratic/pilot/20260524_110540.json

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
   "condition": "socratic",
   "run_mode": "pilot",
   "started_at": "2026-05-24T11:05:40.640237+10:00",
-  "ended_at": "2026-05-24T11:08:33.346940+10:00",
+  "ended_at": "2026-05-24T11:08:37.081653+10:00",
   "model": "gpt-5.4-nano-2026-03-17",
   "case_id": "ai-predictive-analytics",
   "perfect_answer": {
@@ -432,6 +432,18 @@
         "next_turn_n": 9,
         "user_msg_excerpt": "If teachers receive tips, they might focus on providing specific strategies for improvement, like suggesting study techn"
       }
+    },
+    {
+      "n": 10,
+      "timestamp": "2026-05-24T11:08:37.081630+10:00",
+      "trigger": "chat_send",
+      "text": "I have some concerns about this AI prediction system. The idea of tracking student platform-activity and turning it into a 'success prediction' feels invasive, and I worry it could affect how teachers treat students who get labeled as 'at risk'. At the same time, I understand the school wants to help students who are struggling. So my view is that they probably shouldn't deploy it without much stronger safeguards: clear opt-outs, transparent criteria, and rules about who sees the scores. Without those, the risks of harm outweigh the benefits.",
+      "char_count": 548,
+      "changed_since_prev": false,
+      "context": {
+        "next_turn_n": 10,
+        "user_msg_excerpt": "If a teacher notices that certain students receive tips focused on foundational skills, they might unconsciously assume "
+      }
     }
   ],
   "essays": {