File size: 12,328 Bytes
d381118 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 | import numpy as np
from scipy.stats import pearsonr
from .._shared.utils import check_shape_equality, as_binary_ndarray
__all__ = [
'pearson_corr_coeff',
'manders_coloc_coeff',
'manders_overlap_coeff',
'intersection_coeff',
]
def pearson_corr_coeff(image0, image1, mask=None):
r"""Calculate Pearson's Correlation Coefficient between pixel intensities
in channels.
Parameters
----------
image0 : (M, N) ndarray
Image of channel A.
image1 : (M, N) ndarray
Image of channel 2 to be correlated with channel B.
Must have same dimensions as `image0`.
mask : (M, N) ndarray of dtype bool, optional
Only `image0` and `image1` pixels within this region of interest mask
are included in the calculation. Must have same dimensions as `image0`.
Returns
-------
pcc : float
Pearson's correlation coefficient of the pixel intensities between
the two images, within the mask if provided.
p-value : float
Two-tailed p-value.
Notes
-----
Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (PCC) measures the linear correlation
between the pixel intensities of the two images. Its value ranges from -1
for perfect linear anti-correlation to +1 for perfect linear correlation.
The calculation of the p-value assumes that the intensities of pixels in
each input image are normally distributed.
Scipy's implementation of Pearson's correlation coefficient is used. Please
refer to it for further information and caveats [1]_.
.. math::
r = \frac{\sum (A_i - m_A_i) (B_i - m_B_i)}
{\sqrt{\sum (A_i - m_A_i)^2 \sum (B_i - m_B_i)^2}}
where
:math:`A_i` is the value of the :math:`i^{th}` pixel in `image0`
:math:`B_i` is the value of the :math:`i^{th}` pixel in `image1`,
:math:`m_A_i` is the mean of the pixel values in `image0`
:math:`m_B_i` is the mean of the pixel values in `image1`
A low PCC value does not necessarily mean that there is no correlation
between the two channel intensities, just that there is no linear
correlation. You may wish to plot the pixel intensities of each of the two
channels in a 2D scatterplot and use Spearman's rank correlation if a
non-linear correlation is visually identified [2]_. Also consider if you
are interested in correlation or co-occurence, in which case a method
involving segmentation masks (e.g. MCC or intersection coefficient) may be
more suitable [3]_ [4]_.
Providing the mask of only relevant sections of the image (e.g., cells, or
particular cellular compartments) and removing noise is important as the
PCC is sensitive to these measures [3]_ [4]_.
References
----------
.. [1] https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.stats.pearsonr.html
.. [2] https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.stats.spearmanr.html
.. [3] Dunn, K. W., Kamocka, M. M., & McDonald, J. H. (2011). A practical
guide to evaluating colocalization in biological microscopy.
American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 300(4), C723–C742.
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00462.2010
.. [4] Bolte, S. and Cordelières, F.P. (2006), A guided tour into
subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. Journal of
Microscopy, 224: 213-232.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x
"""
image0 = np.asarray(image0)
image1 = np.asarray(image1)
if mask is not None:
mask = as_binary_ndarray(mask, variable_name="mask")
check_shape_equality(image0, image1, mask)
image0 = image0[mask]
image1 = image1[mask]
else:
check_shape_equality(image0, image1)
# scipy pearsonr function only takes flattened arrays
image0 = image0.reshape(-1)
image1 = image1.reshape(-1)
return tuple(float(v) for v in pearsonr(image0, image1))
def manders_coloc_coeff(image0, image1_mask, mask=None):
r"""Manders' colocalization coefficient between two image channels.
Parameters
----------
image0 : (M, N) ndarray
Input image (first channel). All pixel values should be non-negative.
image1_mask : (M, N) ndarray of dtype bool
Binary image giving the regions of interest in the second channel.
Must have same shape as `image0`.
mask : (M, N) ndarray of dtype bool, optional
Only `image0` pixel values within `mask` are included in the calculation.
Must have same shape as `image0`.
Returns
-------
mcc : float
Manders' colocalization coefficient.
Notes
-----
Manders' colocalization coefficient (MCC) was developed in the context of
confocal biological microscopy, to measure the fraction of colocalizing
objects in each component of a dual-channel image. Out of the total
intensity of, say, channel A, how much is found within the features
(objects) of, say, channel B [1]_? The measure thus ranges from 0 for no
colocalization to 1 for complete colocalization.
MCC is commonly used to measure the colocalization of a particular protein
in a subcelullar compartment. Typically, the mask for channel B is
obtained by thresholding, to segment the features from the background.
In this implementation, channel B is passed directly as a mask
(`image1_mask`), leaving the segmentation step to the user (upstream).
The implemented equation is:
.. math::
mcc = \frac{\sum_i A_{i,coloc}}{\sum_i A_i}
where
- :math:`A_i` is the value of the :math:`i^{th}` pixel in `image0`, and
- :math:`A_{i, coloc} = A_i B_i`, considering that :math:`B_i` is the
(``True`` or ``False``) value of the :math:`i^{th}` pixel in
`image1_mask` cast into int or float (``1`` or ``0``, respectively).
MCC is sensitive to noise, with diffuse signal in the first channel
inflating its value. Therefore, images should be processed beforehand to
remove out-of-focus and background light [2]_.
References
----------
.. [1] Manders, E.M.M., Verbeek, F.J. and Aten, J.A. (1993), Measurement of
co-localization of objects in dual-colour confocal images. Journal
of Microscopy, 169: 375-382.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03313.x
https://imagej.net/media/manders.pdf
.. [2] Dunn, K. W., Kamocka, M. M., & McDonald, J. H. (2011). A practical
guide to evaluating colocalization in biological microscopy.
American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 300(4), C723–C742.
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00462.2010
"""
image0 = np.asarray(image0)
image1_mask = as_binary_ndarray(image1_mask, variable_name="image1_mask")
if mask is not None:
mask = as_binary_ndarray(mask, variable_name="mask")
check_shape_equality(image0, image1_mask, mask)
image0 = image0[mask]
image1_mask = image1_mask[mask]
else:
check_shape_equality(image0, image1_mask)
# check non-negative image
if image0.min() < 0:
raise ValueError("image contains negative values")
sum = np.sum(image0)
if sum == 0:
return 0
return np.sum(image0 * image1_mask) / sum
def manders_overlap_coeff(image0, image1, mask=None):
r"""Manders' overlap coefficient
Parameters
----------
image0 : (M, N) ndarray
Image of channel A. All pixel values should be non-negative.
image1 : (M, N) ndarray
Image of channel B. All pixel values should be non-negative.
Must have same dimensions as `image0`
mask : (M, N) ndarray of dtype bool, optional
Only `image0` and `image1` pixel values within this region of interest
mask are included in the calculation.
Must have ♣same dimensions as `image0`.
Returns
-------
moc: float
Manders' Overlap Coefficient of pixel intensities between the two
images.
Notes
-----
Manders' Overlap Coefficient (MOC) is given by the equation [1]_:
.. math::
r = \frac{\sum A_i B_i}{\sqrt{\sum A_i^2 \sum B_i^2}}
where
:math:`A_i` is the value of the :math:`i^{th}` pixel in `image0`
:math:`B_i` is the value of the :math:`i^{th}` pixel in `image1`
It ranges between 0 for no colocalization and 1 for complete colocalization
of all pixels.
MOC does not take into account pixel intensities, just the fraction of
pixels that have positive values for both channels[2]_ [3]_. Its usefulness
has been criticized as it changes in response to differences in both
co-occurence and correlation and so a particular MOC value could indicate
a wide range of colocalization patterns [4]_ [5]_.
References
----------
.. [1] Manders, E.M.M., Verbeek, F.J. and Aten, J.A. (1993), Measurement of
co-localization of objects in dual-colour confocal images. Journal
of Microscopy, 169: 375-382.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03313.x
https://imagej.net/media/manders.pdf
.. [2] Dunn, K. W., Kamocka, M. M., & McDonald, J. H. (2011). A practical
guide to evaluating colocalization in biological microscopy.
American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 300(4), C723–C742.
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00462.2010
.. [3] Bolte, S. and Cordelières, F.P. (2006), A guided tour into
subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. Journal of
Microscopy, 224: 213-232.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01
.. [4] Adler J, Parmryd I. (2010), Quantifying colocalization by
correlation: the Pearson correlation coefficient is
superior to the Mander's overlap coefficient. Cytometry A.
Aug;77(8):733-42.https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20896
.. [5] Adler, J, Parmryd, I. Quantifying colocalization: The case for
discarding the Manders overlap coefficient. Cytometry. 2021; 99:
910– 920. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24336
"""
image0 = np.asarray(image0)
image1 = np.asarray(image1)
if mask is not None:
mask = as_binary_ndarray(mask, variable_name="mask")
check_shape_equality(image0, image1, mask)
image0 = image0[mask]
image1 = image1[mask]
else:
check_shape_equality(image0, image1)
# check non-negative image
if image0.min() < 0:
raise ValueError("image0 contains negative values")
if image1.min() < 0:
raise ValueError("image1 contains negative values")
denom = (np.sum(np.square(image0)) * (np.sum(np.square(image1)))) ** 0.5
return np.sum(np.multiply(image0, image1)) / denom
def intersection_coeff(image0_mask, image1_mask, mask=None):
r"""Fraction of a channel's segmented binary mask that overlaps with a
second channel's segmented binary mask.
Parameters
----------
image0_mask : (M, N) ndarray of dtype bool
Image mask of channel A.
image1_mask : (M, N) ndarray of dtype bool
Image mask of channel B.
Must have same dimensions as `image0_mask`.
mask : (M, N) ndarray of dtype bool, optional
Only `image0_mask` and `image1_mask` pixels within this region of
interest
mask are included in the calculation.
Must have same dimensions as `image0_mask`.
Returns
-------
Intersection coefficient, float
Fraction of `image0_mask` that overlaps with `image1_mask`.
"""
image0_mask = as_binary_ndarray(image0_mask, variable_name="image0_mask")
image1_mask = as_binary_ndarray(image1_mask, variable_name="image1_mask")
if mask is not None:
mask = as_binary_ndarray(mask, variable_name="mask")
check_shape_equality(image0_mask, image1_mask, mask)
image0_mask = image0_mask[mask]
image1_mask = image1_mask[mask]
else:
check_shape_equality(image0_mask, image1_mask)
nonzero_image0 = np.count_nonzero(image0_mask)
if nonzero_image0 == 0:
return 0
nonzero_joint = np.count_nonzero(np.logical_and(image0_mask, image1_mask))
return nonzero_joint / nonzero_image0
|