Datasets:
File size: 7,575 Bytes
4f8d813 215739d f90f9c9 4f8d813 f90f9c9 215739d f90f9c9 215739d f90f9c9 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 | ---
license: apache-2.0
pretty_name: OpenRelief — Food-Security Forecasting Dataset
task_categories:
- time-series-forecasting
- text-generation
tags:
- food-security
- ipc
- famine-early-warning
- time-series
- humanitarian
- llm-annotation
language:
- en
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
---
# OpenRelief
A retrospective research dataset and benchmark pairing district-level food-security
histories with national context, built to study **FEWS NET IPC phase forecasting**
and **time-series-to-language supervision** — teaching a language model to connect
historical signals into a written, evidence-cited rationale rather than just a number.
Built for the **Temporal AI Challenge**. Source code, frontend and full documentation:
[github.com/luk-huebner/OpenRelief](https://github.com/luk-huebner/OpenRelief).
## Task
Given six months of history across 21 channels (food-security indices, prior IPC
assessments, shipping, conflict, rainfall, staple prices), predict the FEWS NET IPC
phase (1 Minimal → 5 Famine) three calendar months ahead, with a generated rationale,
cross-domain hypotheses and recommended actions.
## Dataset at a glance
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Dataset version | `8142c89de89cb862117d6a814be515b9f00312bb960e33cf7e994a99ed124bd3` |
| Train | 9,065 examples / 16 countries (cutoffs through Dec 2022) |
| Validation | 2,503 examples / 16 countries (Jan–Jul 2023 cutoffs) |
| Test | 2,230 examples / 14 countries (Aug–Dec 2023 cutoffs, target exactly +3 months) |
| Channels | 21 (six monthly observations each, plus observed-value masks) |
| Test label support | Phase 1: 854 · Phase 2: 976 · Phase 3: 395 · Phase 4: 5 · Phase 5: 0 |
| Annotation coverage | 2,781 / 9,065 training records (30.7%) — partial, not complete |
Prepared arrays live under `artifacts/dataset/` and `artifacts/multimodal/`
(`inputs.jsonl`, `targets.jsonl`, `manifest.json`). Loaders verify dataset checksums
against the version above before use.
### Sources
- **HFID** — district panel: FEWS NET IPC labels, normalized FCS/rCSI.
- **IMF PortWatch** — national shipping/port-call volumes.
- **ACLED** — national conflict events and fatalities.
- **CHIRPS** — country-average rainfall.
- **WFP** — national staple-food price series, with commodity/unit metadata.
National covariates are aggregated to country level; only FCS/rCSI and the IPC label
are at district (admin2) resolution. The benchmark assumes one-month release lags for
HFID/PortWatch/ACLED/WFP and two months for CHIRPS — it does not establish what could
actually have been forecast in real time. Full provenance:
[SOURCES.md](https://github.com/luk-huebner/OpenRelief/blob/main/docs/SOURCES.md),
[DATASET_CARD.md](https://github.com/luk-huebner/OpenRelief/blob/main/docs/DATASET_CARD.md).
## Annotations
`gpt-5.6-terra` generated structured training supervision for 2,781 of the 9,065
training examples: precursor claims (with channel citations), cross-domain hypotheses,
a written rationale, driver-cited recommended actions, and an uncertainty/confidence
note. **The teacher was given the true future IPC phase** — this is retrospective
supervision, not independent forecasting reasoning, and hypotheses are not proven
causes. Unannotated training examples train on an empty rationale/action target
(phase-only supervision).
Three fully worked examples — one deterioration, one persistent crisis, one
improvement, each with its input charts, generated hypotheses, verbatim rationale and
recommended actions — are in the
[annotation atlas](https://github.com/luk-huebner/OpenRelief/blob/main/docs/examples/annotation-atlas/README.md)
(exact examples: `docs/examples/annotation-atlas/examples.json`). It is an editorial
illustration of three selected cases, not a representative quality sample.
## Model results (this repo's `gpu-results/`)
`OpenTSLM/llama-3.2-1b-tsqa-sp` (Llama 3.2 1B backbone), fine-tuned with LoRA
(rank 16, alpha 32) on the 2,781 annotated training examples.
**Fine-tuning is not optional.** The untouched pretrained checkpoint, evaluated on the
full 2,230-example test set with no LoRA at all, produced **0% valid JSON output** —
it never attempts the task's output format. See `gpu-results/pretrained-fulltest/`.
**Source ablation** (256-example eval cohort, one source's channels dropped at a
time — see caveat below):
| Run | Macro-F1 | Accuracy |
|---|---:|---:|
| All sources (baseline) | 0.7199 | 0.7344 |
| Drop conflict (ACLED) | 0.7428 | 0.7617 |
| Drop rainfall (CHIRPS) | 0.7286 | 0.7500 |
| Drop prices (WFP) | 0.7300 | 0.7500 |
| **Drop shipping (PortWatch)** | **0.5826** | 0.7852 |
Dropping PortWatch (shipping) is the only ablation that meaningfully hurts the model —
a 0.14 macro-F1 drop, far outside the noise band of the other three. Full writeup:
[FINDING-portwatch-signal.md](https://github.com/luk-huebner/OpenRelief/blob/main/docs/FINDING-portwatch-signal.md).
*Caveat:* the ablation table above is a 256-example cohort with only one phase-4
example and no phase-5 examples in the full test set at all — do not read this as
demonstrated famine prediction. The clearer, full-test-set wins are the
pretrained-vs-fine-tuned gap above and the PortWatch ablation signal; match sample IDs
before comparing across cohorts. See
[STATUS.md](https://github.com/luk-huebner/OpenRelief/blob/main/docs/STATUS.md) for
the full, currently-known comparison table.
The fine-tuned LoRA adapter (`gpu-results/all-sources/best_model.pt`, SHA-256
`a10343caa152d1c3aa55b6dc9b40e11603067babeac44909001d1597a3e84e10`) is deployed as a
live inference endpoint that powers the project's demo frontend.
## Repository layout
```
artifacts/dataset/ prepared inputs.jsonl / targets.jsonl / manifest.json
artifacts/multimodal/ multimodal-formatted version of the same splits
artifacts/annotation-cache/ cached per-example teacher annotation responses
artifacts/*.manifest.json acquisition manifests per source connector
gpu-results/ fine-tuning + ablation runs (see table above)
all-sources/ baseline checkpoint, losses, benchmark, best_model.pt
ablation-{acled,chirps,wfp,portwatch}/ one-source-dropped reruns
pretrained-fulltest/ untouched-checkpoint baseline, full test set
manifest.json git commit + image digest + launch command per run
refrences/ background reading + one raw source CSV
```
## Limitations
- National-level signals (shipping, conflict, rainfall, price) do not prove
district-level exposure; only FCS/rCSI and the IPC label are district-resolution.
- FCS/rCSI normalization direction is undocumented — numeric movement is not given a
severity interpretation.
- No phase-5 test examples exist and only five phase-4 examples — this dataset does
not support a claim of demonstrated famine prediction.
- Ablation effects are associative, measured against removed input channels, not
causal claims.
- Historical publication timestamps and revisions are unavailable; assumed release
lags are a modeling choice, not an observed fact.
## License and reuse
Repository code is Apache-2.0. Access to an upstream source here does not imply
unrestricted redistribution rights over that source's original data — retain IMF
PortWatch terms, ACLED terms of use, WFP source metadata, CHIRPS attribution and
geoBoundaries attribution as applicable to each channel. See
[DATASET_CARD.md](https://github.com/luk-huebner/OpenRelief/blob/main/docs/DATASET_CARD.md#access-reuse-and-reproducibility)
for the full statement.
|