Replace analysis tests with modular report suite
Browse files- tests/test_analysis/__init__.py +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-311.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/conftest.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/conftest.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_aggregate.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_aggregate.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_citation_audit.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_compare.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_compare.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_cot_audit.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_cot_audit.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_depth.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_depth.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_solvability.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_solvability.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_stats.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_stats.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_sufficiency.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_sufficiency.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc +0 -0
- tests/test_analysis/conftest.py +33 -8
- tests/test_analysis/test_A_reports.py +9 -0
- tests/test_analysis/test_B_reports.py +6 -0
- tests/test_analysis/test_C_reports.py +6 -0
- tests/test_analysis/test_D_reports.py +7 -0
- tests/test_analysis/test_F_reports.py +9 -0
- tests/test_analysis/test_aggregate.py +0 -165
- tests/test_analysis/test_analysis.py +10 -0
- tests/test_analysis/test_citation_audit.py +0 -180
- tests/test_analysis/test_compare.py +0 -116
- tests/test_analysis/test_cot_audit.py +0 -76
- tests/test_analysis/test_depth.py +0 -66
- tests/test_analysis/test_letters_reports.py +28 -0
- tests/test_analysis/test_solvability.py +0 -37
- tests/test_analysis/test_stats.py +0 -59
- tests/test_analysis/test_sufficiency.py +0 -49
tests/test_analysis/__init__.py
DELETED
|
File without changes
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-311.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (151 Bytes)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/conftest.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (955 Bytes)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/conftest.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (955 Bytes)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_aggregate.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (31.8 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_aggregate.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (31.8 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_citation_audit.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (22.2 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_compare.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (18.7 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_compare.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (18.7 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_cot_audit.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (12.2 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_cot_audit.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (12.2 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_depth.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (7.83 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_depth.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (7.83 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_solvability.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (6.83 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_solvability.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (6.83 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_stats.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (14.6 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_stats.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (14.6 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_sufficiency.cpython-311-pytest-8.3.5.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (6.97 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/__pycache__/test_sufficiency.cpython-311-pytest-9.1.1.pyc
DELETED
|
Binary file (6.97 kB)
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/conftest.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,12 +1,37 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
"""Shared
|
| 2 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
from pathlib import Path
|
| 4 |
-
import
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-
|
| 12 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
"""Shared fixtures and helpers for report-export tests."""
|
| 2 |
+
import json
|
| 3 |
+
import tempfile
|
| 4 |
+
import unittest
|
| 5 |
from pathlib import Path
|
| 6 |
+
from analysis.letters_reports import analyze_modular, export_reports, load_profile as load
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
+
def vlm(letter,qid=1,score=1.0,protocol="base",model="m",frames=32):
|
| 9 |
+
r={"model":model,"protocol":protocol,"condition":protocol,"question_id":qid,"scene":"s","dataset":"d","question_type":"count","score":score,"frame_count":frames,"input_token_count":10,"output_token_count":2,"generation_seconds":1.0,"answer_given":"x","full_prompt":"p"}
|
| 10 |
+
if letter=="A": r["frame_selection"]="uniform"
|
| 11 |
+
elif letter in "BC": r.update(input_selection="uniform",spatial_code_format="explicit",depth="metric",tracking="tracking")
|
| 12 |
+
elif letter=="D": r["spatial_code_format"]="explicit"
|
| 13 |
+
return r
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
+
def put(root,relative,record):
|
| 16 |
+
p=root/relative; p.parent.mkdir(parents=True,exist_ok=True); p.write_text(json.dumps(record)); return p
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
+
class ReportTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
| 19 |
+
def setUp(self): self.temp=tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(); self.root=Path(self.temp.name)
|
| 20 |
+
def tearDown(self): self.temp.cleanup()
|
| 21 |
+
def directory(self,letter,records):
|
| 22 |
+
d=self.root/letter; d.mkdir()
|
| 23 |
+
for i,r in enumerate(records): put(d,f"{i}.json",r)
|
| 24 |
+
return d
|
| 25 |
+
def symbolic(self,future=False):
|
| 26 |
+
d=self.root/("F_future" if future else "F"); d.mkdir(exist_ok=True)
|
| 27 |
+
prefix="perceived/metric/tracking/uniform/32/explicit" if future else "metric/tracking/uniform/32/explicit"
|
| 28 |
+
put(d,f"{prefix}/s/1.json",{"model":"symbolic","condition":"metric:tracking:uniform:32:explicit","question_id":1,"scene":"s","dataset":"d","question_type":"count","score":1.0,"spatial_code_format":"explicit","depth":"metric","tracking":"tracking","input":"uniform","number_of_frames":32})
|
| 29 |
+
return d
|
| 30 |
+
def ground_truth_symbolic(self):
|
| 31 |
+
d=self.root/"F"; d.mkdir()
|
| 32 |
+
put(d,"ground truth/explicit/s/1.json",{"model":"symbolic","condition":"ground truth:explicit","question_id":1,"scene":"s","dataset":"d","question_type":"count","score":1.0,"spatial_code_format":"explicit"})
|
| 33 |
+
return d
|
| 34 |
+
def analyze(self,letters,dirs,pairs=(),protocols=("base",)):
|
| 35 |
+
profiles={l:load(l) for l in letters}; per,combined=analyze_modular({l:dirs[l] for l in letters},profiles,protocols,pairs)
|
| 36 |
+
paths=export_reports(per,combined,self.root/"reports")
|
| 37 |
+
return per,combined,{p.name for p in paths}
|
tests/test_analysis/test_A_reports.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
from conftest import ReportTestCase,vlm
|
| 2 |
+
from analysis import A_reports
|
| 3 |
+
class TestAReports(ReportTestCase):
|
| 4 |
+
def test_A_report_and_controlled_frame_comparison(self):
|
| 5 |
+
d=self.directory("A",[vlm("A",frames=32),vlm("A",frames=64)])
|
| 6 |
+
result=A_reports.generate(d,["base"],self.root/"reports")
|
| 7 |
+
self.assertEqual(result["path"].name,"A_report.json")
|
| 8 |
+
self.assertEqual(len(result["report"]["cells"]),2)
|
| 9 |
+
self.assertEqual(len(result["report"]["within_harness_comparisons"]),1)
|
tests/test_analysis/test_B_reports.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
from conftest import ReportTestCase,vlm
|
| 2 |
+
from analysis import B_reports
|
| 3 |
+
class TestBReports(ReportTestCase):
|
| 4 |
+
def test_B_report_contains_spatial_cell(self):
|
| 5 |
+
result=B_reports.generate(self.directory("B",[vlm("B")]),["base"],self.root/"reports")
|
| 6 |
+
self.assertEqual(result["path"].name,"B_report.json"); self.assertEqual(len(result["report"]["cells"]),1)
|
tests/test_analysis/test_C_reports.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
from conftest import ReportTestCase,vlm
|
| 2 |
+
from analysis import C_reports
|
| 3 |
+
class TestCReports(ReportTestCase):
|
| 4 |
+
def test_C_report_is_exported(self):
|
| 5 |
+
result=C_reports.generate(self.directory("C",[vlm("C")]),["base"],self.root/"reports")
|
| 6 |
+
self.assertEqual(result["path"].name,"C_report.json"); self.assertEqual(len(result["report"]["cells"]),1)
|
tests/test_analysis/test_D_reports.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
from conftest import ReportTestCase,vlm
|
| 2 |
+
from analysis import D_reports
|
| 3 |
+
class TestDReports(ReportTestCase):
|
| 4 |
+
def test_D_report_is_ground_truth_code_report(self):
|
| 5 |
+
result=D_reports.generate(self.directory("D",[vlm("D")]),["base"],self.root/"reports")
|
| 6 |
+
self.assertEqual(result["path"].name,"D_report.json")
|
| 7 |
+
self.assertEqual(result["report"]["manifest"]["profile"]["input_source"],"ground_truth")
|
tests/test_analysis/test_F_reports.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
from conftest import ReportTestCase
|
| 2 |
+
from analysis import F_reports
|
| 3 |
+
class TestFReports(ReportTestCase):
|
| 4 |
+
def test_F_legacy_and_future_perceived_layouts(self):
|
| 5 |
+
for future in (False,True):
|
| 6 |
+
result=F_reports.generate(self.symbolic(future),(),self.root/("future" if future else "legacy"))
|
| 7 |
+
self.assertEqual(result["path"].name,"F_report.json")
|
| 8 |
+
cell=next(iter(result["report"]["cells"].values()))
|
| 9 |
+
self.assertEqual(cell["identity"]["source"],"perceived")
|
tests/test_analysis/test_aggregate.py
DELETED
|
@@ -1,165 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
"""Tests for analysis/aggregate.py -- per-category scores + stats, shared across A/B/C."""
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
import json
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
from analysis import aggregate as harness_analysis
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
def _record(
|
| 9 |
-
model="qwen3.5-2b", condition="uniform:16", question_type="object_counting",
|
| 10 |
-
answer_expected="4", metric="MRA:.5:.95:.05", score=1.0, generation_seconds=1.0,
|
| 11 |
-
input_token_count=100, output_token_count=4, hit_token_limit=False,
|
| 12 |
-
reasoning_token_count=None, forced=None,
|
| 13 |
-
):
|
| 14 |
-
return {
|
| 15 |
-
"model": model,
|
| 16 |
-
"condition": condition,
|
| 17 |
-
"question_type": question_type,
|
| 18 |
-
"answer_expected": answer_expected,
|
| 19 |
-
"metric": metric,
|
| 20 |
-
"score": score,
|
| 21 |
-
"generation_seconds": generation_seconds,
|
| 22 |
-
"input_token_count": input_token_count,
|
| 23 |
-
"output_token_count": output_token_count,
|
| 24 |
-
"hit_token_limit": hit_token_limit,
|
| 25 |
-
"reasoning_token_count": reasoning_token_count,
|
| 26 |
-
"forced": forced,
|
| 27 |
-
}
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
-
def test_results_dirs_cover_every_harness():
|
| 31 |
-
assert set(harness_analysis.RESULTS_DIRS) == {"A", "B", "C", "D", "E"}
|
| 32 |
-
from harness.A import RESULTS_DIR as a_dir
|
| 33 |
-
from harness.B import RESULTS_DIR as b_dir
|
| 34 |
-
from harness.C import RESULTS_DIR as c_dir
|
| 35 |
-
from harness.D import RESULTS_DIR as d_dir
|
| 36 |
-
|
| 37 |
-
assert harness_analysis.RESULTS_DIRS["A"] == a_dir
|
| 38 |
-
assert harness_analysis.RESULTS_DIRS["B"] == b_dir
|
| 39 |
-
assert harness_analysis.RESULTS_DIRS["C"] == c_dir
|
| 40 |
-
assert harness_analysis.RESULTS_DIRS["D"] == d_dir
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
-
|
| 43 |
-
def test_iter_records_reads_every_json_under_results_dir(tmp_path):
|
| 44 |
-
scene_dir = tmp_path / "qwen3.5-2b" / "uniform" / "16" / "scene0001_00"
|
| 45 |
-
scene_dir.mkdir(parents=True)
|
| 46 |
-
(scene_dir / "0.json").write_text(json.dumps(_record()))
|
| 47 |
-
(scene_dir / "1.json").write_text(json.dumps(_record(question_type="object_size_estimation")))
|
| 48 |
-
records = list(harness_analysis.iter_records(tmp_path))
|
| 49 |
-
assert len(records) == 2
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
def test_iter_records_returns_empty_for_missing_dir(tmp_path):
|
| 53 |
-
assert list(harness_analysis.iter_records(tmp_path / "does-not-exist")) == []
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
def test_condition_key_groups_by_model_and_condition():
|
| 57 |
-
key = harness_analysis._condition_key(_record(model="qwen3.5-4b", condition="selective:64"))
|
| 58 |
-
assert key == "qwen3.5-4b/selective:64"
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
def test_aggregate_groups_by_model_and_condition():
|
| 62 |
-
records = [
|
| 63 |
-
_record(model="qwen3.5-2b", condition="uniform:16"),
|
| 64 |
-
_record(model="qwen3.5-2b", condition="uniform:16", question_type="object_size_estimation"),
|
| 65 |
-
_record(model="qwen3.5-4b", condition="uniform:16"),
|
| 66 |
-
]
|
| 67 |
-
aggregated = harness_analysis.aggregate(records)
|
| 68 |
-
assert set(aggregated) == {"qwen3.5-2b/uniform:16", "qwen3.5-4b/uniform:16"}
|
| 69 |
-
assert aggregated["qwen3.5-2b/uniform:16"]["count"] == 2
|
| 70 |
-
assert aggregated["qwen3.5-4b/uniform:16"]["count"] == 1
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
-
def test_aggregate_computes_official_scores_via_the_real_scorer():
|
| 74 |
-
records = [_record(score=1.0), _record(score=0.0, question_type="object_size_estimation")]
|
| 75 |
-
aggregated = harness_analysis.aggregate(records)
|
| 76 |
-
official = aggregated["qwen3.5-2b/uniform:16"]["official"]
|
| 77 |
-
assert official["object_counting_MRA:.5:.95:.05"] == 100.0
|
| 78 |
-
assert official["object_size_estimation_MRA:.5:.95:.05"] == 0.0
|
| 79 |
-
assert official["overall"] == 50.0
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
def test_aggregate_computes_latency_and_token_stats():
|
| 83 |
-
records = [
|
| 84 |
-
_record(generation_seconds=1.0, input_token_count=100, output_token_count=4),
|
| 85 |
-
_record(generation_seconds=3.0, input_token_count=200, output_token_count=8),
|
| 86 |
-
]
|
| 87 |
-
aggregated = harness_analysis.aggregate(records)
|
| 88 |
-
stats = aggregated["qwen3.5-2b/uniform:16"]
|
| 89 |
-
assert stats["generation_seconds"]["mean"] == 2.0
|
| 90 |
-
assert stats["generation_seconds"]["total"] == 4.0
|
| 91 |
-
assert stats["input_token_count"]["mean"] == 150.0
|
| 92 |
-
assert stats["output_token_count"]["mean"] == 6.0
|
| 93 |
-
|
| 94 |
-
|
| 95 |
-
def test_aggregate_computes_hit_token_limit_rate():
|
| 96 |
-
records = [
|
| 97 |
-
_record(hit_token_limit=True), _record(hit_token_limit=True), _record(hit_token_limit=False),
|
| 98 |
-
]
|
| 99 |
-
aggregated = harness_analysis.aggregate(records)
|
| 100 |
-
assert aggregated["qwen3.5-2b/uniform:16"]["hit_token_limit_rate"] == 2 / 3
|
| 101 |
-
|
| 102 |
-
|
| 103 |
-
def test_aggregate_omits_forced_stats_when_no_records_used_extended():
|
| 104 |
-
aggregated = harness_analysis.aggregate([_record()])
|
| 105 |
-
assert "forced_rate" not in aggregated["qwen3.5-2b/uniform:16"]
|
| 106 |
-
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
-
def test_aggregate_includes_forced_stats_for_extended_records():
|
| 109 |
-
records = [
|
| 110 |
-
_record(reasoning_token_count=50, forced=True),
|
| 111 |
-
_record(reasoning_token_count=10, forced=False),
|
| 112 |
-
]
|
| 113 |
-
aggregated = harness_analysis.aggregate(records)
|
| 114 |
-
stats = aggregated["qwen3.5-2b/uniform:16"]
|
| 115 |
-
assert stats["forced_rate"] == 0.5
|
| 116 |
-
assert stats["reasoning_token_count"]["mean"] == 30.0
|
| 117 |
-
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
def test_aggregate_returns_empty_dict_for_no_records():
|
| 120 |
-
assert harness_analysis.aggregate([]) == {}
|
| 121 |
-
|
| 122 |
-
|
| 123 |
-
def test_flatten_rows_splits_key_and_includes_official_and_summary_columns():
|
| 124 |
-
records = [_record(model="qwen3.5-2b", condition="uniform:16")]
|
| 125 |
-
aggregated = harness_analysis.aggregate(records)
|
| 126 |
-
rows = harness_analysis.flatten_rows(aggregated)
|
| 127 |
-
assert len(rows) == 1
|
| 128 |
-
row = rows[0]
|
| 129 |
-
assert row["model"] == "qwen3.5-2b"
|
| 130 |
-
assert row["condition"] == "uniform:16"
|
| 131 |
-
assert row["count"] == 1
|
| 132 |
-
assert row["official_overall"] == 100.0
|
| 133 |
-
assert row["generation_seconds_mean"] == 1.0
|
| 134 |
-
assert row["hit_token_limit_rate"] == 0.0
|
| 135 |
-
assert "forced_rate" not in row
|
| 136 |
-
|
| 137 |
-
|
| 138 |
-
def test_flatten_rows_includes_forced_columns_for_extended_records():
|
| 139 |
-
records = [_record(reasoning_token_count=50, forced=True)]
|
| 140 |
-
aggregated = harness_analysis.aggregate(records)
|
| 141 |
-
row = harness_analysis.flatten_rows(aggregated)[0]
|
| 142 |
-
assert row["forced_rate"] == 1.0
|
| 143 |
-
assert row["reasoning_token_count_mean"] == 50.0
|
| 144 |
-
|
| 145 |
-
|
| 146 |
-
def test_write_csv_round_trips_through_a_real_file(tmp_path):
|
| 147 |
-
import csv
|
| 148 |
-
|
| 149 |
-
records = [
|
| 150 |
-
_record(model="qwen3.5-2b", condition="uniform:16"),
|
| 151 |
-
_record(model="qwen3.5-4b", condition="uniform:16", reasoning_token_count=20, forced=False),
|
| 152 |
-
]
|
| 153 |
-
aggregated = harness_analysis.aggregate(records)
|
| 154 |
-
csv_path = tmp_path / "out.csv"
|
| 155 |
-
harness_analysis.write_csv(aggregated, csv_path)
|
| 156 |
-
|
| 157 |
-
with csv_path.open(encoding="utf-8") as stream:
|
| 158 |
-
rows = list(csv.DictReader(stream))
|
| 159 |
-
assert len(rows) == 2
|
| 160 |
-
assert {row["model"] for row in rows} == {"qwen3.5-2b", "qwen3.5-4b"}
|
| 161 |
-
qwen2b_row = next(row for row in rows if row["model"] == "qwen3.5-2b")
|
| 162 |
-
assert qwen2b_row["official_overall"] == "100.0"
|
| 163 |
-
assert qwen2b_row["forced_rate"] == ""
|
| 164 |
-
qwen4b_row = next(row for row in rows if row["model"] == "qwen3.5-4b")
|
| 165 |
-
assert qwen4b_row["forced_rate"] == "0.0"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/test_analysis.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
import json
|
| 2 |
+
from conftest import ReportTestCase,vlm
|
| 3 |
+
from analysis.letters_reports import load_profile as load
|
| 4 |
+
class TestAnalysisDirectory(ReportTestCase):
|
| 5 |
+
def test_arbitrary_subset_exports_letter_and_combined_files(self):
|
| 6 |
+
dirs={l:self.directory(l,[vlm(l)]) for l in "AC"}; _,_,names=self.analyze("AC",dirs)
|
| 7 |
+
self.assertEqual(names,{"A_report.json","C_report.json","AC_report.json"})
|
| 8 |
+
for name in names: json.loads((self.root/"reports"/name).read_text())
|
| 9 |
+
def test_E_is_excluded(self):
|
| 10 |
+
with self.assertRaises(ValueError): load("E")
|
tests/test_analysis/test_citation_audit.py
DELETED
|
@@ -1,180 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
"""Tests for analysis/citation_audit.py."""
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
import json
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
from analysis import citation_audit
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
def _write_code(path, table, objects=None):
|
| 9 |
-
code = {"closest classes distance meters from": table}
|
| 10 |
-
if objects is not None:
|
| 11 |
-
code["objects"] = objects
|
| 12 |
-
path.write_text(json.dumps(code))
|
| 13 |
-
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
-
def _write_record(results_dir, i, **kwargs):
|
| 16 |
-
record = {
|
| 17 |
-
"model": "m", "question_type": "object_abs_distance", "condition": "base:x",
|
| 18 |
-
"scene": "scene", "question_id": i,
|
| 19 |
-
}
|
| 20 |
-
record.update(kwargs)
|
| 21 |
-
(results_dir / "scene" / f"{i}.json").write_text(json.dumps(record))
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
def _three_class_code(path):
|
| 25 |
-
"""chair<->table = 1.46, chair<->lamp = 3.0 -- two distinct real entries, so an
|
| 26 |
-
answer can be "faithful to some entry" while still being the WRONG pair."""
|
| 27 |
-
_write_code(
|
| 28 |
-
path,
|
| 29 |
-
{
|
| 30 |
-
"chair": {
|
| 31 |
-
"table": {"distance": "1.46 meters", "closeness rank": 1},
|
| 32 |
-
"lamp": {"distance": "3.0 meters", "closeness rank": 2},
|
| 33 |
-
},
|
| 34 |
-
"table": {"chair": {"distance": "1.46 meters", "closeness rank": 1}},
|
| 35 |
-
"lamp": {"chair": {"distance": "3.0 meters", "closeness rank": 1}},
|
| 36 |
-
},
|
| 37 |
-
objects={"chair": {"count": 1}, "table": {"count": 1}, "lamp": {"count": 1}},
|
| 38 |
-
)
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
def test_audit_classifies_correct_pair(tmp_path):
|
| 42 |
-
code_path = tmp_path / "scene.json"
|
| 43 |
-
_three_class_code(code_path)
|
| 44 |
-
results_dir = tmp_path / "results"
|
| 45 |
-
(results_dir / "scene").mkdir(parents=True)
|
| 46 |
-
question = "distance between the chair and the table ("
|
| 47 |
-
_write_record(results_dir, 0, answer_given="1.46", spatial_code_path=str(code_path),
|
| 48 |
-
question=question)
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
summary = citation_audit.audit(results_dir, "m")
|
| 51 |
-
assert summary["total_answered"] == 1
|
| 52 |
-
assert summary["breakdown"]["correct_pair"] == 1
|
| 53 |
-
assert summary["correct_pair_rate"] == 1.0
|
| 54 |
-
assert summary["examples"] == [] # only non-correct answers are collected
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
-
def test_audit_classifies_wrong_entry_when_answer_matches_a_different_real_pair(tmp_path):
|
| 58 |
-
"""The critical distinction this module exists for: citing SOME real table value
|
| 59 |
-
is not the same as citing the CORRECT one. An answer of 3.0 for "chair and table"
|
| 60 |
-
(whose real answer is 1.46) is a real citation of the chair/lamp pair instead --
|
| 61 |
-
faithful citation discipline, wrong pair."""
|
| 62 |
-
code_path = tmp_path / "scene.json"
|
| 63 |
-
_three_class_code(code_path)
|
| 64 |
-
results_dir = tmp_path / "results"
|
| 65 |
-
(results_dir / "scene").mkdir(parents=True)
|
| 66 |
-
question = "distance between the chair and the table ("
|
| 67 |
-
_write_record(results_dir, 0, answer_given="3.0", spatial_code_path=str(code_path),
|
| 68 |
-
question=question, answer_expected="1.5")
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
summary = citation_audit.audit(results_dir, "m")
|
| 71 |
-
assert summary["breakdown"]["wrong_entry"] == 1
|
| 72 |
-
assert summary["breakdown"]["correct_pair"] == 0
|
| 73 |
-
assert summary["examples"][0]["kind"] == "wrong_entry"
|
| 74 |
-
assert summary["examples"][0]["answer_given"] == 3.0
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
|
| 77 |
-
def test_audit_classifies_computed_or_guessed_when_both_objects_detected_but_answer_matches_nothing(tmp_path):
|
| 78 |
-
code_path = tmp_path / "scene.json"
|
| 79 |
-
_three_class_code(code_path)
|
| 80 |
-
results_dir = tmp_path / "results"
|
| 81 |
-
(results_dir / "scene").mkdir(parents=True)
|
| 82 |
-
question = "distance between the chair and the table ("
|
| 83 |
-
_write_record(results_dir, 0, answer_given="9.99", spatial_code_path=str(code_path),
|
| 84 |
-
question=question)
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
-
summary = citation_audit.audit(results_dir, "m")
|
| 87 |
-
assert summary["breakdown"]["computed_or_guessed"] == 1
|
| 88 |
-
assert summary["examples"][0]["kind"] == "computed_or_guessed"
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
|
| 91 |
-
def test_audit_classifies_missing_class_separately_from_wrong_entry(tmp_path):
|
| 92 |
-
"""A question naming an object that was never detected at all (no class match in
|
| 93 |
-
the code) is NOT the same failure as citing the wrong existing entry -- no lookup
|
| 94 |
-
was ever possible, so this can't be blamed on the model's name-resolution."""
|
| 95 |
-
code_path = tmp_path / "scene.json"
|
| 96 |
-
_write_code(
|
| 97 |
-
code_path,
|
| 98 |
-
{"door": {"toilet": {"distance": "0.0 meters", "closeness rank": 1}}},
|
| 99 |
-
objects={"door": {"count": 1}, "toilet": {"count": 1}},
|
| 100 |
-
)
|
| 101 |
-
results_dir = tmp_path / "results"
|
| 102 |
-
(results_dir / "scene").mkdir(parents=True)
|
| 103 |
-
_write_record(
|
| 104 |
-
results_dir, 0, answer_given="0.58", spatial_code_path=str(code_path),
|
| 105 |
-
question="distance between the door and the ceiling light (",
|
| 106 |
-
)
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
-
summary = citation_audit.audit(results_dir, "m")
|
| 109 |
-
assert summary["examples"][0]["kind"] == "missing_class"
|
| 110 |
-
assert summary["breakdown"]["missing_class"] == 1
|
| 111 |
-
assert summary["breakdown"]["wrong_entry"] == 0
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
|
| 114 |
-
def test_audit_skips_other_models_and_other_question_types(tmp_path):
|
| 115 |
-
code_path = tmp_path / "scene.json"
|
| 116 |
-
_three_class_code(code_path)
|
| 117 |
-
results_dir = tmp_path / "results"
|
| 118 |
-
(results_dir / "scene").mkdir(parents=True)
|
| 119 |
-
question = "distance between the chair and the table ("
|
| 120 |
-
_write_record(results_dir, 0, model="other", answer_given="1.46",
|
| 121 |
-
spatial_code_path=str(code_path), question=question)
|
| 122 |
-
_write_record(results_dir, 1, question_type="object_counting", answer_given="3",
|
| 123 |
-
spatial_code_path=str(code_path), question=question)
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
summary = citation_audit.audit(results_dir, "m")
|
| 126 |
-
assert summary["total_answered"] == 0
|
| 127 |
-
assert summary["unanswered"] == 0
|
| 128 |
-
|
| 129 |
-
|
| 130 |
-
def test_audit_parses_answers_with_units_attached(tmp_path):
|
| 131 |
-
"""Regression: answer_given values like "1.46 meters" (units not stripped by the
|
| 132 |
-
adapter) must still count as answered and be checked against the table -- an
|
| 133 |
-
early version used bare float() and silently misclassified every such answer as
|
| 134 |
-
unanswered, corrupting every downstream rate."""
|
| 135 |
-
code_path = tmp_path / "scene.json"
|
| 136 |
-
_three_class_code(code_path)
|
| 137 |
-
results_dir = tmp_path / "results"
|
| 138 |
-
(results_dir / "scene").mkdir(parents=True)
|
| 139 |
-
question = "distance between the chair and the table ("
|
| 140 |
-
_write_record(results_dir, 0, answer_given="1.46 meters", spatial_code_path=str(code_path),
|
| 141 |
-
question=question)
|
| 142 |
-
_write_record(results_dir, 1, answer_given="no idea", spatial_code_path=str(code_path),
|
| 143 |
-
question=question)
|
| 144 |
-
|
| 145 |
-
summary = citation_audit.audit(results_dir, "m")
|
| 146 |
-
assert summary["total_answered"] == 1
|
| 147 |
-
assert summary["breakdown"]["correct_pair"] == 1
|
| 148 |
-
assert summary["unanswered"] == 1 # "no idea" has no number at all -- genuinely unanswered
|
| 149 |
-
|
| 150 |
-
|
| 151 |
-
def test_audit_respects_condition_prefix(tmp_path):
|
| 152 |
-
code_path = tmp_path / "scene.json"
|
| 153 |
-
_three_class_code(code_path)
|
| 154 |
-
results_dir = tmp_path / "results"
|
| 155 |
-
(results_dir / "scene").mkdir(parents=True)
|
| 156 |
-
question = "distance between the chair and the table ("
|
| 157 |
-
_write_record(results_dir, 0, answer_given="1.46", spatial_code_path=str(code_path),
|
| 158 |
-
question=question, condition="base:x")
|
| 159 |
-
_write_record(results_dir, 1, answer_given="1.46", spatial_code_path=str(code_path),
|
| 160 |
-
question=question, condition="512:x")
|
| 161 |
-
|
| 162 |
-
summary = citation_audit.audit(results_dir, "m", condition_prefix="base")
|
| 163 |
-
assert summary["total_answered"] == 1
|
| 164 |
-
|
| 165 |
-
|
| 166 |
-
def test_find_class_rejects_substring_false_positive():
|
| 167 |
-
"""Regression: "washer" must NOT match "dishwasher" just because the characters
|
| 168 |
-
appear inside it -- found via a real audit example (scene 44358499, question 794)
|
| 169 |
-
where "dishwasher" was never a detected class but the old substring matcher
|
| 170 |
-
silently resolved it to "washer", misclassifying a genuine missing_class case as
|
| 171 |
-
a fixable wrong_entry."""
|
| 172 |
-
code = {"objects": {"washer": {"count": 1}, "table": {"count": 1}}}
|
| 173 |
-
assert citation_audit._find_class("dishwasher", code) is None
|
| 174 |
-
|
| 175 |
-
|
| 176 |
-
def test_find_class_still_matches_legitimate_multiword_classes():
|
| 177 |
-
code = {"objects": {"trash can": {"count": 1}, "night stand": {"count": 1}}}
|
| 178 |
-
assert citation_audit._find_class("can", code) == "trash can"
|
| 179 |
-
assert citation_audit._find_class("the trash can", code) == "trash can"
|
| 180 |
-
assert citation_audit._find_class("stand", code) == "night stand"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/test_compare.py
DELETED
|
@@ -1,116 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
"""Tests for analysis/compare.py -- matched-question cross-harness comparison."""
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
from analysis import compare as analysis_compare
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
def _record(harness, question_id, score, scene="scene_a", model="qwen3.5-2b"):
|
| 7 |
-
conditions = {
|
| 8 |
-
"A": "extended:selective:32",
|
| 9 |
-
"B": "extended:explicit:relative:tracking:selective:32",
|
| 10 |
-
"C": "extended:explicit:relative:tracking:selective:32",
|
| 11 |
-
"D": "extended:explicit",
|
| 12 |
-
"E": "extended",
|
| 13 |
-
}
|
| 14 |
-
return {
|
| 15 |
-
"model": model,
|
| 16 |
-
"condition": conditions[harness],
|
| 17 |
-
"question_id": question_id,
|
| 18 |
-
"scene": scene,
|
| 19 |
-
"question_type": "object_counting",
|
| 20 |
-
"answer_expected": "4",
|
| 21 |
-
"metric": "MRA:.5:.95:.05",
|
| 22 |
-
"score": score,
|
| 23 |
-
}
|
| 24 |
-
|
| 25 |
-
|
| 26 |
-
def test_parse_a_condition_splits_protocol_selection_frames():
|
| 27 |
-
assert analysis_compare._parse_a_condition("base:uniform:16") == (
|
| 28 |
-
"base", "uniform", "16"
|
| 29 |
-
)
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
-
def test_parse_bc_condition_splits_all_six_axes():
|
| 33 |
-
assert analysis_compare._parse_bc_condition(
|
| 34 |
-
"extended:explicit:relative:tracking:selective:64"
|
| 35 |
-
) == ("extended", "explicit", "relative", "tracking", "selective", "64")
|
| 36 |
-
|
| 37 |
-
|
| 38 |
-
def test_parse_d_condition_splits_protocol_and_format():
|
| 39 |
-
assert analysis_compare._parse_d_condition("base:compact") == ("base", "compact")
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
-
def _patch_dirs(monkeypatch, by_dir):
|
| 43 |
-
from analysis.aggregate import RESULTS_DIRS
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
-
def fake_iter_records(results_dir):
|
| 46 |
-
for harness, records in by_dir.items():
|
| 47 |
-
if str(results_dir) == str(RESULTS_DIRS[harness]):
|
| 48 |
-
return list(records)
|
| 49 |
-
return []
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
monkeypatch.setattr(analysis_compare, "iter_records", fake_iter_records)
|
| 52 |
-
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
def test_compare_scores_only_the_shared_question_intersection(monkeypatch):
|
| 55 |
-
# A answered questions 1-3; B only 1-2 -- the row must be scored on {1, 2} for
|
| 56 |
-
# BOTH cells, with each cell's full count still reported.
|
| 57 |
-
_patch_dirs(monkeypatch, {
|
| 58 |
-
"A": [_record("A", 1, 1.0), _record("A", 2, 0.0), _record("A", 3, 1.0)],
|
| 59 |
-
"B": [_record("B", 1, 1.0), _record("B", 2, 1.0)],
|
| 60 |
-
})
|
| 61 |
-
rows = analysis_compare.compare()
|
| 62 |
-
row = rows[("qwen3.5-2b", "extended", "selective", "32")]
|
| 63 |
-
assert row["common_count"] == 2
|
| 64 |
-
assert row["cells"]["A"]["full_count"] == 3
|
| 65 |
-
assert row["cells"]["B_explicit:relative:tracking"]["full_count"] == 2
|
| 66 |
-
# A scored 1.0 on q1 and 0.0 on q2 -> 50.0 on the shared set (q3's 1.0 excluded).
|
| 67 |
-
assert row["cells"]["A"]["overall"] == 50.0
|
| 68 |
-
assert row["cells"]["B_explicit:relative:tracking"]["overall"] == 100.0
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
|
| 71 |
-
def test_compare_joins_d_and_e_on_model_and_protocol(monkeypatch):
|
| 72 |
-
_patch_dirs(monkeypatch, {
|
| 73 |
-
"A": [_record("A", 1, 1.0)],
|
| 74 |
-
"D": [_record("D", 1, 1.0)],
|
| 75 |
-
"E": [_record("E", 1, 0.0)],
|
| 76 |
-
})
|
| 77 |
-
rows = analysis_compare.compare()
|
| 78 |
-
row = rows[("qwen3.5-2b", "extended", "selective", "32")]
|
| 79 |
-
assert row["cells"]["D_explicit"]["overall"] == 100.0
|
| 80 |
-
assert row["cells"]["E"]["overall"] == 0.0
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
|
| 83 |
-
def test_compare_keeps_protocols_in_separate_rows(monkeypatch):
|
| 84 |
-
base_a = _record("A", 1, 1.0)
|
| 85 |
-
base_a["condition"] = "base:selective:32"
|
| 86 |
-
_patch_dirs(monkeypatch, {"A": [base_a, _record("A", 1, 0.0)]})
|
| 87 |
-
rows = analysis_compare.compare()
|
| 88 |
-
assert ("qwen3.5-2b", "base", "selective", "32") in rows
|
| 89 |
-
assert ("qwen3.5-2b", "extended", "selective", "32") in rows
|
| 90 |
-
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
def test_format_score_handles_none():
|
| 93 |
-
assert analysis_compare._format_score(None) == "-"
|
| 94 |
-
assert analysis_compare._format_score(47.5) == "47.50"
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
def test_write_csv_round_trips_through_a_real_file(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
|
| 98 |
-
import csv
|
| 99 |
-
|
| 100 |
-
_patch_dirs(monkeypatch, {
|
| 101 |
-
"A": [_record("A", 1, 1.0)],
|
| 102 |
-
"B": [_record("B", 1, 1.0)],
|
| 103 |
-
})
|
| 104 |
-
rows = analysis_compare.compare()
|
| 105 |
-
csv_path = tmp_path / "compare.csv"
|
| 106 |
-
analysis_compare.write_csv(rows, csv_path)
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
-
with csv_path.open(encoding="utf-8") as stream:
|
| 109 |
-
read_rows = list(csv.DictReader(stream))
|
| 110 |
-
assert len(read_rows) == 1
|
| 111 |
-
row = read_rows[0]
|
| 112 |
-
assert row["model"] == "qwen3.5-2b"
|
| 113 |
-
assert row["protocol"] == "extended"
|
| 114 |
-
assert row["common_count"] == "1"
|
| 115 |
-
assert row["A"] == "100.0"
|
| 116 |
-
assert row["B_explicit:relative:tracking"] == "100.0"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/test_cot_audit.py
DELETED
|
@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
"""Tests for analysis/cot_audit.py -- deterministic reasoning-trace audit (H23)."""
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
import json
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
from analysis import cot_audit
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
def test_numbers_in_extracts_floats_and_ints():
|
| 9 |
-
assert cot_audit.numbers_in("the sofa is 2.5 m from 3 chairs") == [2.5, 3.0]
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
|
| 12 |
-
def test_code_numbers_reads_nested_values_and_unit_strings():
|
| 13 |
-
code = {"objects": {"chair": {"count": 2, "instances": [{"x": "4.98 meters"}]}}}
|
| 14 |
-
numbers = cot_audit.code_numbers(code)
|
| 15 |
-
assert 2.0 in numbers
|
| 16 |
-
assert 4.98 in numbers
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
-
def _record(tmp_path, reasoning, score=0.0, question="How far is the sofa?", options=None):
|
| 20 |
-
code = {"objects": {"sofa": {"instances": [{"x coordinate": "4.98 meters"}]}}}
|
| 21 |
-
code_path = tmp_path / "code.json"
|
| 22 |
-
code_path.write_text(json.dumps(code))
|
| 23 |
-
return {
|
| 24 |
-
"question_id": 1,
|
| 25 |
-
"question_type": "object_abs_distance",
|
| 26 |
-
"score": score,
|
| 27 |
-
"reasoning_text": reasoning,
|
| 28 |
-
"spatial_code_path": str(code_path),
|
| 29 |
-
"question": question,
|
| 30 |
-
"options": options,
|
| 31 |
-
}
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
def test_audit_record_grounds_cited_code_values(tmp_path):
|
| 35 |
-
record = _record(tmp_path, "the sofa is at 4.98, so the answer is 4.98")
|
| 36 |
-
result = cot_audit.audit_record(record)
|
| 37 |
-
assert result["cited"] == 2
|
| 38 |
-
assert result["fabricated"] == 0
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
def test_audit_record_flags_fabricated_values(tmp_path):
|
| 42 |
-
record = _record(tmp_path, "the sofa is at 123.45 meters")
|
| 43 |
-
result = cot_audit.audit_record(record)
|
| 44 |
-
assert result["fabricated"] == 1
|
| 45 |
-
assert result["fabricated_values"] == [123.45]
|
| 46 |
-
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
-
def test_small_integers_are_whitelisted_as_derived_counts(tmp_path):
|
| 49 |
-
record = _record(tmp_path, "there are 7 objects in total")
|
| 50 |
-
result = cot_audit.audit_record(record)
|
| 51 |
-
assert result["fabricated"] == 0
|
| 52 |
-
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
def test_question_and_option_numbers_are_grounded(tmp_path):
|
| 55 |
-
record = _record(
|
| 56 |
-
tmp_path, "option B says 87.5", question="Which?", options=["A. 20.5", "B. 87.5"]
|
| 57 |
-
)
|
| 58 |
-
assert cot_audit.audit_record(record)["fabricated"] == 0
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
def test_audit_summary_splits_wrong_answers_by_fabrication(tmp_path):
|
| 62 |
-
records = [
|
| 63 |
-
_record(tmp_path, "answer from 4.98", score=0.0),
|
| 64 |
-
_record(tmp_path, "made up 99.99", score=0.0),
|
| 65 |
-
_record(tmp_path, "correct, 4.98", score=1.0),
|
| 66 |
-
]
|
| 67 |
-
_audits, summary = cot_audit.audit(records)
|
| 68 |
-
assert summary["audited"] == 3
|
| 69 |
-
assert summary["wrong"] == 2
|
| 70 |
-
assert summary["wrong_with_fabrication"] == 1
|
| 71 |
-
assert summary["fabrication_share_of_wrong"] == 0.5
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
def test_audit_skips_records_without_reasoning(tmp_path):
|
| 75 |
-
record = _record(tmp_path, None)
|
| 76 |
-
assert cot_audit.audit_record(record) is None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/test_depth.py
DELETED
|
@@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
"""Tests for analysis/depth.py -- solver computation-depth transfer (H25)."""
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
import json
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
from analysis import depth
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
def _gt_code():
|
| 9 |
-
return {
|
| 10 |
-
"spatial code schema": {},
|
| 11 |
-
"objects": {
|
| 12 |
-
"chair": [
|
| 13 |
-
{
|
| 14 |
-
"3D oriented bounding box": {
|
| 15 |
-
"3D oriented bounding box center coordinates": [0.0, 0.0, 0.5],
|
| 16 |
-
"3D oriented bounding box dimensions": [1.0, 1.0, 1.0],
|
| 17 |
-
"3D oriented bounding box orientation unit vectors": [
|
| 18 |
-
[1.0, 0.0, 0.0], [0.0, 0.0, 1.0], [0.0, -1.0, 0.0],
|
| 19 |
-
],
|
| 20 |
-
},
|
| 21 |
-
"first visible time": 0.0,
|
| 22 |
-
}
|
| 23 |
-
]
|
| 24 |
-
},
|
| 25 |
-
"room": {"floor boundary polygons": []},
|
| 26 |
-
}
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
def test_question_depth_counts_solver_operations(tmp_path):
|
| 30 |
-
code_path = tmp_path / "code.json"
|
| 31 |
-
code_path.write_text(json.dumps(_gt_code()))
|
| 32 |
-
record = {
|
| 33 |
-
"question_type": "object_counting",
|
| 34 |
-
"question": "How many chair(s) are in this room?",
|
| 35 |
-
"options": None,
|
| 36 |
-
"spatial_code_path": str(code_path),
|
| 37 |
-
}
|
| 38 |
-
ops = depth.question_depth(record, {})
|
| 39 |
-
assert ops is not None and ops >= 1
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
-
def test_question_depth_unreadable_code_returns_none():
|
| 43 |
-
record = {
|
| 44 |
-
"question_type": "object_counting",
|
| 45 |
-
"question": "How many chairs?",
|
| 46 |
-
"options": None,
|
| 47 |
-
"spatial_code_path": "/does/not/exist.json",
|
| 48 |
-
}
|
| 49 |
-
assert depth.question_depth(record, {}) is None
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
def test_depth_table_buckets_by_operation_count(tmp_path):
|
| 53 |
-
code_path = tmp_path / "code.json"
|
| 54 |
-
code_path.write_text(json.dumps(_gt_code()))
|
| 55 |
-
records = [
|
| 56 |
-
{
|
| 57 |
-
"question_type": "object_counting",
|
| 58 |
-
"question": "How many chair(s) are in this room?",
|
| 59 |
-
"options": None,
|
| 60 |
-
"spatial_code_path": str(code_path),
|
| 61 |
-
"score": 1.0,
|
| 62 |
-
}
|
| 63 |
-
]
|
| 64 |
-
table, pairs = depth.depth_table(records)
|
| 65 |
-
assert len(pairs) == 1
|
| 66 |
-
assert sum(stats["count"] for stats in table.values()) == 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/test_letters_reports.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
from conftest import ReportTestCase,vlm
|
| 2 |
+
from analysis import letters_reports
|
| 3 |
+
class TestLettersReports(ReportTestCase):
|
| 4 |
+
def test_arbitrary_subset_and_combined_name(self):
|
| 5 |
+
cells={l:self.directory(l,[vlm(l)]) for l in "AC"}
|
| 6 |
+
result=letters_reports.generate(cells,["base"],output_dir=self.root/"reports")
|
| 7 |
+
self.assertEqual({p.name for p in result["paths"]},{"A_report.json","C_report.json","AC_report.json"})
|
| 8 |
+
def test_DF_and_BF_semantic_alignment(self):
|
| 9 |
+
d=self.directory("D",[vlm("D")]); f=self.ground_truth_symbolic()
|
| 10 |
+
result=letters_reports.generate({"D":d,"F":f},["base"],output_dir=self.root/"df")
|
| 11 |
+
self.assertEqual(len(result["combined_report"]["cross_harness_comparisons"]),1)
|
| 12 |
+
b=self.directory("B",[vlm("B")]); perceived=self.symbolic(False)
|
| 13 |
+
result=letters_reports.generate({"B":b,"F":perceived},["base"],output_dir=self.root/"bf")
|
| 14 |
+
self.assertEqual(len(result["combined_report"]["cross_harness_comparisons"]),1)
|
| 15 |
+
def test_folded_statistical_and_solver_helpers(self):
|
| 16 |
+
self.assertEqual(letters_reports.holm_bonferroni({"a":.01,"b":.04,"c":.03}),{"a":.03,"c":.06,"b":.06})
|
| 17 |
+
a=[{"question_id":1,"score":1.0},{"question_id":2,"score":0.0}]
|
| 18 |
+
b=[{"question_id":1,"score":1.0},{"question_id":2,"score":1.0}]
|
| 19 |
+
overlap=letters_reports.solved_set_overlap({"A":a,"B":b})
|
| 20 |
+
self.assertEqual(overlap["pairs"]["A|B"]["only_B"],1)
|
| 21 |
+
vlm=[{"question_id":1,"question_type":"count","score":0.0},{"question_id":2,"question_type":"count","score":1.0}]
|
| 22 |
+
solver=[{"question_id":1,"score":1.0},{"question_id":2,"score":0.0}]
|
| 23 |
+
split=letters_reports.sufficiency_decomposition(vlm,solver)
|
| 24 |
+
self.assertEqual(split["certified"]["vlm_wrong"],1)
|
| 25 |
+
def test_pair_restriction(self):
|
| 26 |
+
cells={l:self.directory(l,[vlm(l)]) for l in "ABC"}
|
| 27 |
+
result=letters_reports.generate(cells,["base"],["A:B"],self.root/"reports")
|
| 28 |
+
self.assertTrue(all(v["letters"]==("A","B") for v in result["combined_report"]["cross_harness_comparisons"].values()))
|
tests/test_analysis/test_solvability.py
DELETED
|
@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
"""Tests for analysis/solvability.py -- solved-set overlap (H19, exploratory)."""
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
from analysis import solvability
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
def _cell(scores):
|
| 7 |
-
return [{"question_id": qid, "score": score} for qid, score in scores.items()]
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
|
| 10 |
-
def test_overlap_restricts_to_shared_questions():
|
| 11 |
-
cells = {
|
| 12 |
-
"A": _cell({1: 1.0, 2: 0.0, 3: 1.0}),
|
| 13 |
-
"B": _cell({1: 1.0, 2: 1.0}), # never answered 3
|
| 14 |
-
}
|
| 15 |
-
report = solvability.overlap(cells)
|
| 16 |
-
assert report["questions"] == 2
|
| 17 |
-
assert report["solved"] == {"A": 1, "B": 2}
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
-
def test_overlap_pairwise_jaccard_and_exclusives():
|
| 21 |
-
cells = {
|
| 22 |
-
"A": _cell({1: 1.0, 2: 1.0, 3: 0.0}),
|
| 23 |
-
"B": _cell({1: 1.0, 2: 0.0, 3: 1.0}),
|
| 24 |
-
}
|
| 25 |
-
report = solvability.overlap(cells)
|
| 26 |
-
pair = report["pairs"]["A|B"]
|
| 27 |
-
assert pair["both"] == 1
|
| 28 |
-
assert pair["only_A"] == 1
|
| 29 |
-
assert pair["only_B"] == 1
|
| 30 |
-
assert pair["jaccard"] == 1 / 3
|
| 31 |
-
assert report["solved_by_all"] == 1
|
| 32 |
-
assert report["solved_by_none"] == 0
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
|
| 35 |
-
def test_overlap_empty_intersection():
|
| 36 |
-
report = solvability.overlap({"A": _cell({1: 1.0}), "B": _cell({2: 1.0})})
|
| 37 |
-
assert report == {"questions": 0}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/test_stats.py
DELETED
|
@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
"""Tests for analysis/stats.py -- scene-clustered paired bootstrap."""
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
from analysis import stats as analysis_stats
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
def _record(question_id, score, scene):
|
| 7 |
-
return {"question_id": question_id, "score": score, "scene": scene}
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
|
| 10 |
-
def test_paired_questions_matches_on_question_id_intersection():
|
| 11 |
-
x = [_record(1, 1.0, "a"), _record(2, 0.0, "a"), _record(3, 1.0, "b")]
|
| 12 |
-
y = [_record(1, 0.0, "a"), _record(3, 1.0, "b"), _record(9, 1.0, "z")]
|
| 13 |
-
by_scene = analysis_stats.paired_questions(x, y)
|
| 14 |
-
assert by_scene == {"a": [(1.0, 0.0)], "b": [(1.0, 1.0)]}
|
| 15 |
-
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
-
def test_paired_bootstrap_returns_none_on_empty_intersection():
|
| 18 |
-
assert analysis_stats.paired_bootstrap([_record(1, 1.0, "a")], [_record(2, 1.0, "a")]) is None
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
def test_paired_bootstrap_observed_delta_is_mean_paired_difference():
|
| 22 |
-
x = [_record(1, 0.0, "a"), _record(2, 0.0, "a"), _record(3, 0.0, "b"), _record(4, 0.0, "b")]
|
| 23 |
-
y = [_record(1, 1.0, "a"), _record(2, 1.0, "a"), _record(3, 1.0, "b"), _record(4, 0.0, "b")]
|
| 24 |
-
result = analysis_stats.paired_bootstrap(x, y, iterations=200, seed=0)
|
| 25 |
-
assert result["delta"] == 0.75
|
| 26 |
-
assert result["questions"] == 4
|
| 27 |
-
assert result["scenes"] == 2
|
| 28 |
-
assert result["ci_low"] <= result["delta"] <= result["ci_high"]
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
def test_paired_bootstrap_is_deterministic_for_a_fixed_seed():
|
| 32 |
-
x = [_record(i, 0.0, f"s{i % 3}") for i in range(9)]
|
| 33 |
-
y = [_record(i, float(i % 2), f"s{i % 3}") for i in range(9)]
|
| 34 |
-
first = analysis_stats.paired_bootstrap(x, y, iterations=300, seed=7)
|
| 35 |
-
second = analysis_stats.paired_bootstrap(x, y, iterations=300, seed=7)
|
| 36 |
-
assert first == second
|
| 37 |
-
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
-
def test_paired_bootstrap_zero_delta_when_cells_identical():
|
| 40 |
-
x = [_record(i, 1.0, "a") for i in range(4)]
|
| 41 |
-
result = analysis_stats.paired_bootstrap(x, list(x), iterations=100, seed=0)
|
| 42 |
-
assert result["delta"] == 0.0
|
| 43 |
-
assert result["ci_low"] == 0.0
|
| 44 |
-
assert result["ci_high"] == 0.0
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
-
|
| 47 |
-
def test_paired_bootstrap_reports_a_floored_p_value():
|
| 48 |
-
x = [_record(i, 0.0, f"s{i % 3}") for i in range(9)]
|
| 49 |
-
y = [_record(i, 1.0, f"s{i % 3}") for i in range(9)]
|
| 50 |
-
result = analysis_stats.paired_bootstrap(x, y, iterations=200, seed=0)
|
| 51 |
-
assert result["p_value"] == 1 / 200 # every resample is positive -> floor
|
| 52 |
-
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
def test_holm_bonferroni_adjusts_and_stays_monotone():
|
| 55 |
-
adjusted = analysis_stats.holm_bonferroni({"a": 0.01, "b": 0.04, "c": 0.03})
|
| 56 |
-
assert adjusted["a"] == 0.03 # 3 * 0.01
|
| 57 |
-
assert adjusted["c"] == 0.06 # 2 * 0.03
|
| 58 |
-
assert adjusted["b"] == 0.06 # 1 * 0.04 = 0.04, raised to running max
|
| 59 |
-
assert all(value <= 1.0 for value in adjusted.values())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tests/test_analysis/test_sufficiency.py
DELETED
|
@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
"""Tests for analysis/sufficiency.py -- solver-certified decomposition (H26)."""
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
from analysis import sufficiency
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
def _solver(question_id, score):
|
| 7 |
-
return {"question_id": question_id, "score": score}
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
|
| 10 |
-
def _vlm(question_id, score, question_type="object_counting"):
|
| 11 |
-
return {"question_id": question_id, "score": score, "question_type": question_type}
|
| 12 |
-
|
| 13 |
-
|
| 14 |
-
def test_certificates_threshold():
|
| 15 |
-
certs = sufficiency.certificates([_solver(1, 1.0), _solver(2, 0.4), _solver(3, None)])
|
| 16 |
-
assert certs == {1: True, 2: False, 3: False}
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
-
def test_decompose_splits_proven_reasoning_from_information_failures():
|
| 20 |
-
solver_records = [_solver(1, 1.0), _solver(2, 1.0), _solver(3, 0.0)]
|
| 21 |
-
vlm_records = [_vlm(1, 1.0), _vlm(2, 0.0), _vlm(3, 0.0)]
|
| 22 |
-
result = sufficiency.decompose(vlm_records, solver_records)
|
| 23 |
-
assert result["questions"] == 3
|
| 24 |
-
# q1: certified + VLM correct; q2: certified + VLM wrong = PROVEN reasoning failure.
|
| 25 |
-
assert result["certified"]["count"] == 2
|
| 26 |
-
assert result["certified"]["vlm_correct"] == 1
|
| 27 |
-
assert result["certified"]["vlm_wrong"] == 1
|
| 28 |
-
# q3: uncertified -- information failure, not reasoning evidence.
|
| 29 |
-
assert result["uncertified"]["count"] == 1
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
-
def test_decompose_ignores_unmatched_and_excluded():
|
| 33 |
-
solver_records = [_solver(1, 1.0)]
|
| 34 |
-
vlm_records = [
|
| 35 |
-
_vlm(1, 1.0),
|
| 36 |
-
_vlm(2, 1.0), # solver never answered -> excluded from the join
|
| 37 |
-
_vlm(3, 1.0, question_type="obj_appearance_order"),
|
| 38 |
-
]
|
| 39 |
-
result = sufficiency.decompose(
|
| 40 |
-
vlm_records, solver_records, exclude=("obj_appearance_order",)
|
| 41 |
-
)
|
| 42 |
-
assert result["questions"] == 1
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
-
def test_decompose_empty_bucket_stats():
|
| 46 |
-
result = sufficiency.decompose([_vlm(1, 1.0)], [_solver(1, 1.0)])
|
| 47 |
-
assert result["uncertified"] == {
|
| 48 |
-
"count": 0, "mean_score": None, "vlm_correct": 0, "vlm_wrong": 0,
|
| 49 |
-
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|