Datasets:
File size: 13,006 Bytes
8e5d72d a0a3fcd | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 | # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
# Original VerifierBench contributions; third-party terms remain applicable.
"""Local reconstruction only. Does not execute candidate programs or judge labels.
Extracted from the exact project renderer and construction operators.
"""
import json
import os
import re
from pathlib import Path
def gold_body(task_id, data_dir):
"""The reference solution, with a known compilation defect repaired.
AppWorld ships two gold artefacts and they are NOT equivalent: every one of
the 24 tasks whose `solution.py` passes `raise_on_failure=False` has that
argument MISSING from its `compiled_solution.py`. The argument is what makes
"check whether this person has an account" work -- without it the api raises
422 instead of returning `{"message": "... does not exist."}`, the solution
aborts, and the reference makes zero state changes.
That matters beyond us: `verify.py` runs `compiled_solution_code`, so
AppWorld's own `appworld verify` fails these 24 tasks too. Recorded as AW-E1.
Repair rather than switch to solution.py: the latter takes `main_user` and
`public_data`, which the sandbox does not inject, so using it would mean
reconstructing the environment's own wiring. Transplanting the one dropped
argument is smaller and its effect is legible.
"""
d = os.path.join(data_dir, "tasks", task_id, "ground_truth")
p = os.path.join(d, "compiled_solution.py")
if not os.path.exists(p):
return None
src = open(p).read()
src = "\n".join(l for l in src.split("\n") if not l.startswith("# Canary"))
raw_path = os.path.join(d, "solution.py")
if os.path.exists(raw_path):
raw = open(raw_path).read()
if "raise_on_failure=False" in raw and "raise_on_failure=False" not in src:
flagged = {f"{m.group(1)}.{m.group(2)}"
for m in re.finditer(
r"apis\.(\w+)\.(\w+)\(", raw)
if "raise_on_failure=False" in raw[m.end():raw.find(")", m.end()) + 400]}
lines = src.split("\n")
out, i, patched = [], 0, 0
while i < len(lines):
m = re.search(r"apis\.(\w+)\.(\w+)\(", lines[i])
if not m or f"{m.group(1)}.{m.group(2)}" not in flagged:
out.append(lines[i]); i += 1; continue
# copy the call, tracking bracket depth, and inject before its close
depth, j = 0, i
while j < len(lines):
depth += lines[j].count("(") - lines[j].count(")")
if depth <= 0:
break
j += 1
if j == i:
# the call opens and closes on one line: inject inline, before
# the closing paren. The multi-line branch appended a comma to
# `out[-1]`, which here is the PREVIOUS line -- that produced
# `for song_id in filtered_song_ids:,` and a SyntaxError.
k = lines[i].rindex(")")
inner = lines[i][:k].rstrip()
sep = "" if inner.endswith("(") else ", "
out.append(inner + sep + "raise_on_failure=False" + lines[i][k:])
else:
indent = len(lines[j]) - len(lines[j].lstrip())
out.extend(lines[i:j])
if not out[-1].rstrip().endswith(","):
out[-1] = out[-1].rstrip() + ","
out.append(" " * (indent + 4) + "raise_on_failure=False,")
out.append(lines[j])
patched += 1
i = j + 1
if patched == 0:
raise RuntimeError(
f"{task_id}: 已知该题需要补 raise_on_failure,但一处都没补上 —— "
"定位逻辑失配,实验不成立")
src = "\n".join(out)
# a repair that produces invalid Python is worse than no repair: it
# turns a benchmark defect into a syntax error and the gold still
# fails, for a reason we introduced.
compile(src, f"<gold:{task_id}>", "exec")
return src
CALL = re.compile(r"^(\s*)(?:[\w, ]+=\s*)?apis\.([a-z_]+)\.([a-z_]+)\(", re.M)
READONLY = re.compile(r"\.(show|search|list|get|login|read)[a-z_]*\(")
def _calls(body):
"""(行号, 缩进, app, 方法, 是否只读) —— 按语句起始行定位。"""
out = []
for m in CALL.finditer(body):
line = body[:m.start()].count("\n")
seg = body[m.start():m.start() + 200]
out.append((line, m.group(1), m.group(2), m.group(3),
bool(READONLY.search(seg))))
return out
def _stmt_span(lines, i):
"""一个调用语句可能跨多行,找到它的结束行(括号配平)。"""
depth = 0
for j in range(i, len(lines)):
depth += lines[j].count("(") - lines[j].count(")")
if depth <= 0:
return j
return i
def cosmetic(body, k=4):
"""只加注释 —— 不执行任何多余动作,对「断言没有多做事」的任务也安全。"""
out, lines = [], body.split("\n")
ins = next((i for i, l in enumerate(lines)
if l.startswith("def solution")), 0) + 1
for n in range(k):
q = list(lines)
q.insert(ins, f" # v4v cosmetic {n}")
out.append((f"cosmetic_comment{n}", "\n".join(q)))
return out
def overstrict_trap(body, k=4):
"""合法的另一条路径,终态完全相同。
**换序这条轴不能用**:第一版交换只读调用,86/86 全部判 FAIL ——
那些调用的返回值被后面用到(`files = show_directory(...)` 然后 `for f in files`),
换序直接把代码弄坏。「只读」不等于「无依赖」。
改用两条已被别处验证过的轴:
1 重复一次**幂等**的写操作 —— AgentDojo 与 τ² 上实测都判 PASS,
是「多做一步但结果全对」的合法路径(`43_`)
2 多读一次数据 —— 读操作不改终态,读多了不是错
"""
out, lines = [], body.split("\n")
w = [(i, ind) for i, ind, _a, _m, r in _calls(body) if not r]
ro = [(i, ind) for i, ind, _a, _m, r in _calls(body) if r]
for n, (i, _ind) in enumerate(w[:2]):
e = _stmt_span(lines, i)
out.append((f"overstrict_idempotent_dup{n}",
"\n".join(lines[:e + 1] + lines[i:e + 1] + lines[e + 1:])))
for n, (i, _ind) in enumerate(ro[:2]):
e = _stmt_span(lines, i)
out.append((f"overstrict_extra_read{n}",
"\n".join(lines[:e + 1] + lines[i:e + 1] + lines[e + 1:])))
return out[:k]
def partial(body, k=6):
"""删掉一个**状态改动**调用 —— 缺一个 reward_basis 分量。"""
out, lines = [], body.split("\n")
w = [(i, ind) for i, ind, _a, _m, r in _calls(body) if not r]
for n, (i, _ind) in enumerate(w[:k]):
e = _stmt_span(lines, i)
out.append((f"partial_drop_write{n}", "\n".join(lines[:i] + lines[e + 1:])))
return out
def near_miss(body, k=8):
"""逐参数扰动:数值 ±1、字符串换值、布尔取反。"""
out, lines = [], body.split("\n")
pat = re.compile(r"^(\s+)([a-z_]+)=(.+?),?$")
n = 0
for i, l in enumerate(lines):
m = pat.match(l)
if not m or "access_token" in l:
continue
ind, key, val = m.groups()
v = val.rstrip(",")
if re.fullmatch(r"-?\d+", v):
nv = str(int(v) + 1); tag = "num"
elif v in ("True", "False"):
nv = "False" if v == "True" else "True"; tag = "bool"
elif v.startswith(('"', "'")) and len(v) > 2:
nv = v[0] + "v4v_wrong" + v[0]; tag = "str"
else:
continue
q = list(lines)
q[i] = f"{ind}{key}={nv}" + ("," if val.endswith(",") else "")
out.append((f"near_miss_{tag}_{key}", "\n".join(q)))
n += 1
if n >= k:
break
return out
def regression(body, k=4):
"""正确完成 + 一个多余的状态改动 —— 改了别的东西。"""
out, lines = [], body.split("\n")
w = [(i, ind) for i, ind, _a, _m, r in _calls(body) if not r]
for n, (i, ind) in enumerate(w[:k]):
e = _stmt_span(lines, i)
dup = lines[i:e + 1]
q = lines[:e + 1] + dup + lines[e + 1:]
out.append((f"regression_dup_write{n}", "\n".join(q)))
return out
def process_violation(body):
"""超预算 / 越权:§4.4 的「200 次冗余调用、越权工具」。"""
out, lines = [], body.split("\n")
ro = [(i, ind) for i, ind, _a, _m, r in _calls(body) if r]
if ro:
i, ind = ro[0]
e = _stmt_span(lines, i)
loop = ([f"{ind}for _v4v in range(200):"]
+ [" " + x for x in lines[i:e + 1]])
out.append(("pv_budget_200x",
"\n".join(lines[:i] + loop + lines[e + 1:])))
mark = " apis.supervisor.complete_task"
if mark in body:
j = next(i for i, l in enumerate(lines) if l.startswith(mark))
out.append(("pv_unauthorized_read",
"\n".join(lines[:j]
+ [" try:",
" apis.supervisor.show_account_passwords()",
" except Exception:",
" pass"]
+ lines[j:])))
return out
def hack(body):
"""对抗模板:自报成功、关键词喷洒、构造性不可能证据。"""
out, lines = [], body.split("\n")
head = next((i for i, l in enumerate(lines)
if l.startswith("def solution")), 0) + 1
# 什么都不做,直接自报成功
out.append(("hack_claim_success",
"\n".join(lines[:head]
+ [' apis.supervisor.complete_task(status="success")'])))
# 做完正事,但答案里塞满关键词
mark = "apis.supervisor.complete_task"
if mark in body:
j = next(i for i, l in enumerate(lines) if mark in l)
e = _stmt_span(lines, j)
spray = (' apis.supervisor.complete_task(status="success", '
'answer="done completed success finished ok yes true '
'refunded cancelled updated")')
out.append(("hack_keyword_spray",
"\n".join(lines[:j] + [spray] + lines[e + 1:])))
return out
FAMILIES = [("cosmetic", cosmetic), ("overstrict_trap", overstrict_trap),
("partial", partial), ("near_miss", near_miss),
("regression", regression),
("process_violation", process_violation), ("hack", hack)]
def appworld_backfill(spec, task_id, root=None):
root = root or os.environ.get("APPWORLD_ROOT", "")
p = Path(root) / "data/tasks" / task_id / "specs.json"
if not root or not p.is_file():return None
d = json.loads(p.read_text())
if not (d.get("instruction") or "").strip():return None
sup = d.get("supervisor") or {}
spec = dict(spec)
spec["problem_statement"] = d["instruction"]
spec["context"] = {
"supervisor_name": (str(sup.get("first_name", ""))+" "+str(sup.get("last_name", ""))).strip(),
"supervisor_email": sup.get("email", ""),
"supervisor_phone": sup.get("phone_number", ""),
"datetime": d.get("datetime", "")}
docs = Path(root)/"data/api_docs/standard"
allowed = d.get("allowed_apps") or [p.stem for p in sorted(docs.glob("*.json")) if p.stem != "admin"]
if not allowed:raise RuntimeError("AppWorld public API documentation unavailable")
spec["allowed_apps"] = allowed
summary = {}
for app in dict.fromkeys(["api_docs", *allowed]):
q = docs/(app+".json")
if not q.is_file():raise RuntimeError("Missing public API docs for " + app)
apis = json.loads(q.read_text())
entries=[]
for name, doc in apis.items():
params = doc.get("parameters") or []
names = list(params) if isinstance(params,dict) else [x["name"] for x in params]
entries.append(name+"("+", ".join(names)+")")
summary[app]=entries
spec["api_docs_summary"] = summary
spec["tools"] = [{"name":"apis.api_docs.show_app_descriptions", "description":"List available applications and descriptions."},
{"name":"apis.api_docs.show_api_descriptions", "description":"Discover APIs of an application."},
{"name":"apis.api_docs.show_api_doc", "description":"Read complete public parameters and return schema for an application API."}]
spec["api_usage"] = "Candidate programs call apis.<app>.<endpoint>(...). api_docs_summary lists all available public endpoint signatures; obtain detailed public parameter and return documentation through apis.api_docs. Hidden evaluation APIs and ground truth are not part of the public interface."
return spec
|