File size: 11,134 Bytes
a9b8f37
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
---

pretty_name: TinySFT
language:
- en
- zh
license: other
task_categories:
- text-generation
tags:
- sft
- chain-of-thought
- reasoning-effort
- tool-calling
- agentic
size_categories:
- 100K<n<1M
configs:
- config_name: default
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: data/train-*.parquet
---


# TinySFT

TinySFT contains 848,063 supervised fine-tuning samples for **SFT of small models**. Each sample includes a system message, preserves the native tool-calling structure, and every assistant turn carries a `reasoning_effort` label (`none` / `low` / `high` / `max`) indicating how much thinking that turn should require.

The dataset has 848,063 rows / 980,750 assistant turns / 1 parquet file, about 1.4 GiB in total. Rows are globally shuffled; each file is a random sample of the full corpus. The maximum length per row is 8,000 length units (≈ tokens).

## Quick Start

```python

from datasets import load_dataset



ds = load_dataset('CodonProject/TinySFT', split='train')

```

```python

cols = ['id', 'source', 'subset', 'domain', 'language', 'system',

        'system_synth', 'tool_json', 'session', 'n_turns', 'n_assistant',

        'effort_none', 'effort_low', 'effort_high', 'effort_max', 'est_len']

ds = ds.select_columns(cols)



row = ds[0]

print(row['system'][:200])

for turn in row['session']:

    print(turn['role'], turn['reasoning_effort'], len(turn['cot']))

```

Tool-calling argument schemas differ across sources, so they are stored as JSON strings and must be parsed by the user:

```python

import json



for name in row['tool_json']:        # declared tools

    spec = json.loads(name)



for turn in row['session']:          # tool calls issued by the model

    if turn['tool_call_json']:

        for call in json.loads(turn['tool_call_json']):

            print(call.get('name'), call.get('param') or call.get('arguments'))

```

## Fields

| Column | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| `id` | int64 | Row identifier, unique across the dataset |
| `type` | str | Always `"SFT"` |
| `source` | str | Source dataset `owner/name` |
| `subset` | str | Source subset name (only some sources have it; otherwise an empty string) |
| `domain` | str | `agentic` / `medical` / `math` / `general` / `science` / `code` / `safety` / `psychology` |
| `language` | str | `en` or `zh` |
| `system` | str | System message, always non-empty |
| `system_synth` | bool | `true` = the original sample had no system message; this one was written based on the domain |
| `tool_json` | list&lt;str&gt; | Declared tool schemas, each element is a JSON string; empty list = no tools used |
| `session` | list&lt;struct&gt; | Conversation turns, see below |
| `n_turns` / `n_assistant` | int32 | Total turns / assistant turns |
| `effort_none` … `effort_max` | int32 | Number of assistant turns in this row for each effort level, convenient for direct filtering in SQL |
| `est_len` | int32 | Estimated length for this row (length unit ≈ token), max 8000 |
| `dropped_turns` / `cut_chars` | int32 | Number of turns dropped / characters cut to meet the length limit; both 0 means kept as is |
| `system_cut` / `tools_cut` | bool | Whether the system / tool declarations were truncated |
| `file_idx` / `offset` | int32 / int64 | Used to trace back to the source file and row offset |

Each turn in `session` has the following structure:

| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| `role` | str | `human` (user) / `model` (assistant) / `tool_response` (tool return) |
| `content` | str | Turn content |
| `cot` | str | Thought block for this turn; empty string when `reasoning_effort == "none"` |
| `reasoning_effort` | str | Only present on `role == "model"` turns: `none` / `low` / `high` / `max` |
| `tool_call_json` | str | Tool call issued in this turn (JSON string); empty string if none |

## What Is `reasoning_effort`?



It is a reasoning-effort label on each assistant turn, indicating how much thinking should be spent on that turn.



| Level | Meaning | Turns | Share | Average `cot` characters |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| `none` | No thought block; the model directly answers or issues a tool call (`cot` is always empty). | 158,131 | 16.1% | 0 |

| `low` | Short thinking: one or two sentences to confirm constraints or directly apply a known solution, without elaboration. | 376,072 | 38.3% | 489 |

| `high` | Medium thinking: step-by-step derivation or bullet-point planning, but without exhaustive enumeration or repeated self-checking. | 352,051 | 35.9% | 1,233 |

| `max` | Long thinking: comparing multiple approaches, item-by-item enumeration and verification, drafting first and then looking for counterexamples, or long-horizon tool planning. | 94,496 | 9.6% | 4,439 |



## Common Filters



```python

# Samples with at least one turn of high/max thinking

ds_deep = ds.filter(lambda r: r['effort_high'] + r['effort_max'] > 0)

# Samples with tool declarations (agentic / tool calling)
ds_tools = ds.filter(lambda r: len(r['tool_json']) > 0)

# Chinese / English only
ds_zh = ds.filter(lambda r: r['language'] == 'zh')

ds_en = ds.filter(lambda r: r['language'] == 'en')

# Avoid long samples; suitable for models with short context
ds_short = ds.filter(lambda r: r['est_len'] <= 2048)

# Single-turn QA only
ds_single = ds.filter(lambda r: r['n_assistant'] == 1)

# Extract effort per turn for length-bucketed training
def turns(rows):
    for row in rows:

        for turn in row['session']:

            if turn['role'] == 'model':

                yield {

                    'effort': turn['reasoning_effort'],

                    'cot_chars': len(turn['cot']),

                    'domain': row['domain'],

                }

```


## Scale and Distribution

### By Domain

| Domain | Rows | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Math (`math`) | 401,504 | 47.3% |
| General (`general`) | 141,394 | 16.7% |
| Medical (`medical`) | 101,775 | 12.0% |
| Tool / multi-turn agent (`agentic`) | 96,593 | 11.4% |
| Science (`science`) | 69,435 | 8.2% |
| Psychology (`psychology`) | 15,328 | 1.8% |
| Code (`code`) | 12,670 | 1.5% |
| Safety / values (`safety`) | 9,364 | 1.1% |

### By Language

| Language | Rows | Share |
|---|---|---|
| English (`en`) | 696,496 | 82.1% |
| Chinese (`zh`) | 151,567 | 17.9% |

## Example

```json

{

  "id": 9896351587098,

  "type": "SFT",

  "source": "cs-giung/math-think-sft-mini",

  "subset": "",

  "domain": "math",

  "language": "en",

  "system": "You are a careful mathematical problem solver. Work through the problem step by step and state the final answer clearly.",

  "system_synth": true,

  "system_cut": false,

  "tools_cut": false,

  "tool_json": [],

  "session": [

    {

      "role": "human",

      "content": "Can the number of diagonals of a polygon be exactly twice the number of its sides?",

      "cot": "",

      "reasoning_effort": "",

      "tool_call_json": ""

    },

    {

      "role": "model",

      "content": "To determine if a polygon can have exactly twice as many diagonals as its number of sides, let's analyze the relationship mathematically.\n\n### Step 1: Understanding the Formula for Diagonals\nThe number of diagonals \\( D … [849 more chars]",

      "cot": "First, I recall that the number of diagonals in a polygon can be calculated using the formula \\( \\frac{n(n - 3)}{2} \\), where \\( n \\) is the number of sides.\nThe problem states that the number of diagonals is exactly twi… [576 more chars]",

      "reasoning_effort": "low",

      "tool_call_json": ""

    }

  ],

  "n_turns": 2,

  "n_assistant": 1,

  "effort_none": 0,

  "effort_low": 1,

  "effort_high": 0,

  "effort_max": 0,

  "est_len": 626,

  "dropped_turns": 0,

  "cut_chars": 0,

  "file_idx": 9,

  "offset": 746937114

}

```

## About the Content

- **Tool samples**: 39,495 rows (4.7%). `tool_json` contains tool declarations, `tool_call_json` in `session` contains the model's calls, and `tool_response` turns contain execution results. Tool names and parameter schemas preserve each source's native format.
- **Supplemented system messages**: 727,277 rows (85.8%). These source samples originally had no system message. A 1–2 sentence short system message was written based on domain and language, marked with `system_synth: true`, so users can choose whether to include it.
- **Tool result length limit is 2000 characters**; longer results (e.g., full articles or complete files) are truncated. This is the largest source of information loss in long trajectories.
- **Reasoning labels are generated by rule-based heuristics**, based on length, structure, and wording signals (self-correction, verification, multiple approaches, planning, number of tool turns, and domain difficulty). This method is an approximate annotation, not human annotation; within the same level, the depth of thinking may still vary, especially at the `low` / `high` boundary.

## Sources

| Source | Rows | Language | Domain |
|---|---|---|---|
| `cs-giung/math-think-sft-mini` | 352,425 | en | math |
| `CodonProject/Organic-Reasoning-195k#general` | 68,832 | zh | general+math+science+psychology+medical+code+agentic |
| `lingshu-medical-mllm/ReasonMed` | 65,329 | en | medical |
| `Glint-Research/Complete-FABLE.5-traces-2M` | 57,213 | en | agentic |
| `zake7749/OpenScience-Chinese-Reasoning-SFT` | 49,999 | zh | science |
| `r0b0tlab/qwen3.8-max-distillation-50k` | 49,758 | en | general |
| `faunix/Qwen3.8-27B-Distillation-40K` | 39,994 | en | general |
| `zake7749/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Tool-Calling` | 28,271 | en | agentic |
| `CodonProject/Organic-Reasoning-195k#values_safety` | 27,032 | zh | science+safety+psychology+medical+code+math+agentic |
| `stindardlogic/math-reasoning-sft-100k` | 19,786 | en | math |
| `qiaojin/PubMedQA` | 19,656 | en | medical |
| `OysterCoreAI/SFT-General-Simplified.Chinese-10K` | 10,049 | zh | general |
| `TeichAI/Ox-Alpha-10k` | 9,954 | en | general |
| `FreedomIntelligence/medical-o1-reasoning-SFT` | 8,183 | en | medical |
| `r0b0tlab/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-agentic` | 8,097 | en | agentic |
| `CodonProject/Organic-Reasoning-195k#math` | 7,966 | zh | math+science+code |
| `CodonProject/Organic-Reasoning-195k#psychology` | 6,970 | zh | psychology+medical+science |
| `nvidia/Nemotron-SFT-SWE-v3.5` | 5,115 | en | code |
| `hotdogs/code-analysis-sft-qwen38-v2` | 4,375 | en | code |
| `zake7749/Qwen-3.5-Reasonlite-Verified` | 4,310 | en | general |
| `TeichAI/DeepSeek-v4-Pro-Agent` | 2,575 | en | agentic |
| `CodonProject/Organic-Reasoning-195k#frontier` | 1,893 | zh | science+code+math+psychology+medical+agentic |
| `TeichAI/Fable-5-Cursor-Traces` | 244 | en | agentic |
| `Glint-Research/Fable-5-traces` | 30 | en | agentic |
| `greghavens/kimi-k3-coding-and-debugging-traces` | 7 | en | code |

Each source's original copyright and license are on its own dataset page. This dataset is a derivative work of these sources and does not declare a separate unified license; please follow each source's terms when using it.