Datasets:
Devilishcode
/
hacking

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
text
stringlengths
0
1.99k
3/70: Teleco numbers
Name: Mad Hatter 51
Date: 5:36 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987
Would most(all) of the Teleco numbers(i.e. 99xx series) be non-suped? That
would seem at semi-logical atleast, eh?
-Hatter
4/70: Tuning Fork
Name: Knight Lightning 2
Date: 7:34 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987
How succesful would you be if you tried to use a tuning fork to simulate 2600
Hertz? And if so, what would be good to use for MF? Fun, no? Heh!
Also, what does anyone know about the 508 NPA.
:Knight Lightning
5/70: Supvision Xlation
Name: Doom Prophet 21
Date: 10:13 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987
The best way to box is to pull a cat's tail after making a call, then get a
rubber band and twang it in your teeth like Snoopy for MF.
Since we were talking about supervision a little bit, I went through some
stuff I had on translations. What I think makes a number unsupervised (besies
the fact that there is no return of supervision, or reverse battery
signalling) is the charging translation in the terminating office. The
screening code of a chart class (charges and route are determined by the chart
class I believe) that denotes the call charge type would register to not make
either a detailed or bulk AMA entry at the toll office (if the number is 1+
for someone), since it as if the number never answered. A 'detailed' AMA entry
shows the calling and called numbers, whereas a bulk AMA entry shows only the
calling number.
Something else about translations, it doesn't mean an 800 to POTS or special
BTN when people talk about ESS translations, but the information on particular
Directory Numbers that finds and identifies the line equipment of the called
number (calling also I believe) that would provide any special info that is
needed by the switch to process the call, for example, whether a call is
coming from one or two party lines, or whether it is a four party line with
full selective ringing (which can't be tested by MLT equipment which is why I
remember it). If no translation influenced the way the call is processed, then
how would the switch know to route tthe calling party to an operator for ONI
if the calling line was more than two party (with the specifications talkd
about earlier about the R and T leads status determining the billing also
taken into consideration).
Anyway, this post is basically correct but if anyone finds any errors then
please correct me.
Doom
6/70: Things
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
Date: 10:41 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987
Well, RC's on an ESS are called translations too, at least when done by an
RC-MAC clerk. RC data involving a line that is changed can be called
translations. Don't ask me why this is so, but it's what I've heard.
Does anyone here know what an ANIF-7 is? As far as I can tell, it is an ANI
failure to TSPS, but that's all I know about it...it can probably happen
anytime, but I do know that it was a specific problem with an early 5ESS
generic.
Oh yeah, another unsuped signusoid is at (618)235+0090..this was found by
Syntax Error a long time ago. A neat thing about these 'tone sweeps' is that
if you call through an OCC that uses an OUTWATS line that is set up on an
inband signalling trunk, the OUTWATS linne will be trunked from the other end.
This happens as the tone gets near 2600Hz, but it is more sensitive on an OCC
switch, as something like 2710 and 2500 will also reset or trunk their
equipment, or at least that's what I've found.
Phantom
7/70: FALFALAFL
Name: Taran King 1
Date: 11:01 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987
I'd like to congradulate Doom Prophet on his extremely witty response to KL's
absolutely out-of-place post. REFRAIN
Question...Most test numbers are unsuped, but I have at least one tone sweep
that I can think of off-hand that is suped. What would be the purpose either
way? Later
-TK