text
stringlengths
0
1.99k
ago but he wants back on (I guess). One way or another, he said he'd be
writing up "his side" of the story so at least we'll all get to hear what he
has to say for himself. Life is a bitch...
-TK
33/46: well...
Name: <<< Sir Francis Drake 56 >>>
Date: 7:01 pm Fri May 22, 1987
just to get my remarks in early...Iv talked to State & Stan about it and I
think State should be let back on.
He was kicked off because he SUPPOSEDLY read msgs to/gave his pswd to Stanly.
Now this info mainly came from Stan who would claim that he used states
password "all the time". Now since, stan is such a notorious liar the
whole thing is obviously questionable.
Now another main complaint (from what ive gathered talking to KL) is that
State would not tell TK/KL how Stan gets on MSP even though State apparently
knows. This may sound sorta lame, but if State starts telling on stan he
wont be trusted, and it would be lame of him.
So it would seem that as long as State does not further help stand (which is
EXTRENELY unlikely even if he ever did) Stan he should be let back on as he
was/will be a "valuable user".
so there.
sfd
34/46: Wrong...
Name: <<< Taran King 1 >>>
Date: 7:10 pm Fri May 22, 1987
I don't want to start a debate because Craig's gonna be here real soon
preaching about everything but I'd just like to have it stated that I've got a
neutral 3rd party that was on a conversation between Stan and Nate where Nate
was reading posts from MSP, which I had previously told him was grounds for
deletion from MSP if he read them to Stan. Thank you and here's my address
-TK
35/46: Preech!
Name: <<< Knight Lightning 2 >>>
Date: 11:58 pm Sat May 23, 1987
This is true. In OQ's own word's "Nate is my partner in crime." Now perhaps
you may call OQ a liar or say he is bluffing, but their friendship exists for
better or for worse. Now both OQ and SS claim to have at least 3 or more
accounts on here anyway and Stan would like his own account to post with as
well (yeah yeah, why'd you even mention it KL, it'll never happen). As good a
hacker that State is, I am not convinced that he should be trusted in any
aspect towards the system especially since he has aided succesful attempts to
breech its security. I mean, thats just the way it is, nothing seems to ever
change, etc.
One other thing to mention, its not like we "owe" anyone an account and
although I suppose I have a lot of pull, Taran King will have the final say.
:Knight Lightning
36/46: Solid S.
Name: <<< The Sensei 18 >>>
Date: 7:25 am Sun May 24, 1987
I don't know Solid too good....just that he's one a specific system 24hrs
a day, it seems. I think he's just a modem kid out for a fun ride.
Let'em cool for a year. You can't blame a guy for hacking ANY system
though. I'm split.
Ts
37/46: s. state
Name: <<< The Leftist 71 >>>
Date: 4:38 pm Mon May 25, 1987
Solid State in my opinion is a dick, and shouldnt be let on any system, much
less this one..
38/46: Nate
Name: <<< The Executioner 19 >>>
Date: 9:50 pm Tue May 26, 1987
Anyone ever look up the word "Nate" in the dictionary???
It means...
"VArious forms of semi-aquatic salamanders"
OOOOPS! That's Newt, I mean Lock Lifter.....eeeek!!
Nate - The skin that stretches from the opening of an anal cavity to
the base of the penis.
Enough said....