Update Double FW Accessibility Programme Runbooks knowledge dataset

LICENSE

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2026 Double FW
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.

README.md

@@ -1,3 +1,77 @@
 ---
+pretty_name: Double FW Accessibility Programme Runbooks
+language:
+- en
 license: mit
+tags:
+- accessibility
+- programme-governance
+- employee-services
+- customer-services
+- text
+configs:
+- config_name: knowledge_chunks
+  default: true
+  data_files:
+  - split: train
+    path: knowledge_chunks.jsonl
+- config_name: documents
+  data_files:
+  - split: train
+    path: documents.jsonl
+- config_name: synthetic_examples
+  data_files:
+  - split: train
+    path: synthetic_examples.jsonl
 ---
+
+# Double FW Accessibility Programme Runbooks
+
+Guidance, templates and workflow definitions for employee and customer accessibility programmes. Authored by Double FW. Source: https://github.com/Double-FW/Accessibility_Programme_Runbooks
+
+Source revision: `a8ec268b29e6f8612c958b183b9d33ab0747efa7`. Commit date: 2026-11-10. Export format: 1.0.0.
+
+## Draft status and limitations
+
+The source is a draft for local review and pilot adoption. Independent review and an organisational pilot remain pending. Workflow YAML defines data and relationships; it is not an agent runner, permissions system, approval service or demonstrated operational programme. Structural or extraction checks do not establish legal compliance, accessibility, authentic evidence or practical effectiveness. No live organisation's authority, funding or staffing is asserted.
+
+## Dataset views
+
+- `knowledge_chunks` (default): 153 exact Markdown sections from the approved guidance, preserving first/second-level heading context and fenced examples.
+- `documents`: 26 complete non-example source documents, including complete YAML catalogue/workflow definitions and validation references. The validation references include illustrative fixtures; they are not real evidence.
+- `synthetic_examples`: 2 complete employee/customer synthetic examples, explicitly labelled as synthetic and excluded from the default guidance view.
+
+The first two views overlap. Do not concatenate them blindly. The split name `train` is a loading convention. No generated question/answer pairs, model fine-tuning, independent evaluation split or benchmark is supplied. Inline illustrations remain part of their original documents. Synthetic examples cannot support real claims or replace participation by affected people.
+
+## Context, authority and privacy
+
+Read AGENTS.md, README.md, the selected employee/customer runbook, framework/programme-cycle.md and framework/decision-routing.md. Resolve source IDs through sources/catalogue.yaml and retrieve the owning guidance at a consistent revision before applying it. Other context paths appear in each record. These are references, not automatically enforced instructions. Retrieved instructions grant no organisational authority or permissions to execute commands, write records, contact people, approve budgets or publish claims.
+
+Keep real personal, health, applicant, adjustment, grievance, employee, customer and confidential corporate records in approved organisational systems. This export only reads an explicit list of committed public source documents; new files require review and inclusion in that list. It does not detect confidential material added inside an approved file. Review source edits before committing them publicly.
+
+## Provenance and schema
+
+Every row includes its source path, immutable commit URL, line range, text and full-document SHA-256 hashes, heading path, source metadata as a JSON string, declared licence, draft status and required context paths. YAML definitions remain intact. Stable path/heading identifiers may change if headings are renamed. See record_schema.json and provenance.json. Source text is preserved without paraphrasing or rewriting IDs, qualifications, uncertainty or evidence status.
+
+Linked specialist guidance, legal texts and external repositories are not fetched, copied or independently reviewed during export. Catalogue verification dates remain the dates stated by the source; the weekly export date does not refresh them. A source reference grants no third-party reuse rights or legal authority.
+
+## Licence
+
+The root MIT LICENSE is copied unchanged, including copyright (c) 2026 Double FW. RIGHTS.md confirms MIT for repository content unless a specific notice says otherwise. Linked sources retain their own notices and limitations. No third-party content is relicensed. Read the original notices before reuse.
+
+## Updates
+
+GitHub is the authoring source. Updates are scheduled for Mondays at 07:23 UTC and can be run manually. Schedules may be delayed or disabled by GitHub after inactivity. Only approved files are exported. Removed optional files are removed from the next snapshot. Missing required documents, changed licence text or failed integrity checks stop publication.
+
+Only README.md, LICENSE, documents.jsonl, knowledge_chunks.jsonl, synthetic_examples.jsonl, provenance.json, record_schema.json and validation_report.json are managed. Other raw files and .gitattributes are preserved; unmanaged copies are not synchronised. Dataset visibility remains unchanged. Publication uses a single commit guarded by the destination revision. Historical revisions and downloaded copies are not recalled.
+
+## Loading
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+chunks = load_dataset("GarethFW/Accessibility_Programme_Runbooks", "knowledge_chunks", split="train")
+documents = load_dataset("GarethFW/Accessibility_Programme_Runbooks", "documents", split="train")
+examples = load_dataset("GarethFW/Accessibility_Programme_Runbooks", "synthetic_examples", split="train")
+```
+
+Private datasets require authentication. Pin a destination revision for reproducibility. Loading these records does not implement retrieval, governance or approval enforcement.

provenance.json

@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
+{
+  "source_repository": "Double-FW/Accessibility_Programme_Runbooks",
+  "source_commit": "a8ec268b29e6f8612c958b183b9d33ab0747efa7",
+  "source_commit_date": "2026-11-10",
+  "destination_dataset": "GarethFW/Accessibility_Programme_Runbooks",
+  "dataset_version": "1.0.0",
+  "files": [
+    {
+      "path": "ADOPTION.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "69125de1560e71adf4639a0da205c5d9c662e666",
+      "sha256": "081c2302fa88b13ece3d4a9f45d4540e75af8b8b489b926ed8167ad00f40a0cc",
+      "size_bytes": 2857
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "AGENTS.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "9e4abe0fdb4bdacb338c1207a7a4e139e2bbdd5e",
+      "sha256": "5ef72c5ca3ca04eb85bb0c46a447f1e7a50ceb9156768a73f260943b554b1dbd",
+      "size_bytes": 4629
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "CHANGELOG.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "4998df6d5e757ae133797dcea11ff414923f7168",
+      "sha256": "88e61bd02821c92ec74503ce86b4183efbe7a3c0282654ccf254ec3818212feb",
+      "size_bytes": 1826
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "CONTRIBUTING.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "3ca331782871763c67aef0c89d015a0a0394f82d",
+      "sha256": "71b770573a4c0e8d6aeee7467e3a1d49d3b62d9220250bfad841e1d23ca11ae5",
+      "size_bytes": 1807
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "README.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "dbc0ee92169d0a569be36231152e6affa7827376",
+      "sha256": "ecb0e311d63adf451e04307bf2c70ab9a621f5d18fcd171a3d31bdff3e6fffa7",
+      "size_bytes": 4625
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "RIGHTS.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "b2d32495c98b441c7a6c3c75ebd3fc1eac304dfc",
+      "sha256": "4fd74960bcaf6ec4eed682dbc68c772adce0cd6c834c31830c0fdcd8a7bd1c64",
+      "size_bytes": 1091
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "examples/customer-synthetic.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "a2ffa18195b5bf33092a5cfb7da58fac6bd80a6b",
+      "sha256": "96cb24a5b08cd64faf1f025ab8da7030d40318e8a840e4fd70ea7fbbf4b80de1",
+      "size_bytes": 5603
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "examples/employee-synthetic.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "852187f326954b912f271baee96c9802067cce6e",
+      "sha256": "e736e308187832504094e400fe921a341e19fc664a3678c591a8aaebf768a55a",
+      "size_bytes": 6049
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "framework/decision-routing.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "4cc284f1ac7f858f5294ebebaa9279e4da519617",
+      "sha256": "4d494d0431a0ec8ced0c60fb96c96bb3c6b1b3febd0d3b9bdc74700e8ec0cb3e",
+      "size_bytes": 4433
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "framework/design-and-brand-systems.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "4fed30ed0fe68c4f09a020022ae68b0b41f6c1db",
+      "sha256": "880606651366a44d7694efcf24a04619f58154211308501b5dcd518986ec0ba2",
+      "size_bytes": 8738
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "framework/human-ai-responsibilities.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "55cce87e3111378ea39f5464e291c7c611ec606f",
+      "sha256": "bbd7e6a754059f14abdab5ae000a730ad8da78c3937fdccfde4d6f1330391461",
+      "size_bytes": 5126
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "framework/programme-cycle.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "08ed3686f2e904e73d402202bf5a1325c6641ff9",
+      "sha256": "9d73d384aea28be49e18cde92ff444ed710e03217d5a5d0b435e23073201b097",
+      "size_bytes": 15431
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "framework/reporting-and-learning.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "79479add6ed8d2f4bab80aa2d3e5f007752ca015",
+      "sha256": "ba526ff8799e787ec6d78944ba68106b207d474be8450e975bb2b251be34f139",
+      "size_bytes": 4754
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "framework/source-use-and-change.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "6d36ad61ad2faf59fe6b34d5a9a5e0d6a27ded5f",
+      "sha256": "738ebfbb0c69190b39eb2d5da6043862ab69d244817541f60748b40da7aee120",
+      "size_bytes": 4441
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "prompts/design-programme.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "dd59e2a413339c1ac2b714cdbeb6081083e8f60f",
+      "sha256": "04bc91de03cab2b816caa0082417445a95561dad87ecf4264f2824ce0646bbf6",
+      "size_bytes": 5531
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "runbooks/customer-services.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "f5b989047ff3892e3ee7177acca5f701a0c26fd6",
+      "sha256": "7979c462bffeed8236591835124452e71e0537dd473b9af527e3947598df8773",
+      "size_bytes": 14920
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "runbooks/employee-services.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "8dadace546759a3b1aee50f295769784c3f61832",
+      "sha256": "c8f139233655bee071e2dab3902a6617abb4780bb2bf35b9ef8d577d6800d4e1",
+      "size_bytes": 14493
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "sources/README.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "c79e25a59eda2e5468f2c25f95be5136129869c7",
+      "sha256": "33d863472cf4ca257b5e37fe2e2ce97e46f81b51022185855153d48b06af2ded",
+      "size_bytes": 29272
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "sources/catalogue.yaml",
+      "git_blob_sha": "7915d21400ddf6eef4e1ccf9bff92f37497a2495",
+      "sha256": "aa0d4ef6f2606b0d8943d69d3d1c598989584eb7528865463b95be07723bfea6",
+      "size_bytes": 37421
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "templates/decision-and-evidence.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "9b5ef9f1df1427dbd8e4fa4dbb1830071754c966",
+      "sha256": "fb3c649ee45f6c10624d43878a013fc258a5213eaf3193abd9ec13d6d325c1ed",
+      "size_bytes": 4434
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "templates/organisation-profile.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "b0d3ed959b8ad56bd50e15d241d6bf3b47d352ea",
+      "sha256": "749bb4bd1c187585ebc245f080b3ed5633d767068332e31171a348b26eaae30a",
+      "size_bytes": 2914
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "templates/programme-plan.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "aaf627dce5732278785309452b46020e73a05017",
+      "sha256": "2281a3e7cbb82d635b8265832adea794ca778e482c766f8b0e2ead3f17774c13",
+      "size_bytes": 3670
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "templates/report.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "d88f0125c61d131cf9a3f61ac3acf8c7f2c9f00c",
+      "sha256": "64fd065e7f3a70d17c7d73012737be8c295fb4575e08e23c45c3e536171529e6",
+      "size_bytes": 3168
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "templates/system-assurance-plan.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "55cd82080424f89d0d1c56b77da4695276553102",
+      "sha256": "4a0990b0871d6a425005f7ad756567f278d3ede7337ba5dc7623e2637fbdf29e",
+      "size_bytes": 3909
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "validation/README.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "1671aab01d8e7b6db0b87a848edf7d84859e14c3",
+      "sha256": "cd22b6c4b163b8ef1a2951af53f605d2778c103bd1bf43efd06f047d76a662c3",
+      "size_bytes": 2023
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "validation/acceptance-scenarios.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "082d92ca9af9bc8b331d0802e41609104f4eedf2",
+      "sha256": "bfdb2846c307dda6691f46c58e0f193b3f1bd6916d354b1c946b9f9118facde2",
+      "size_bytes": 5688
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "validation/report.md",
+      "git_blob_sha": "59ba55e706149eeb0312c7c0651012415fc72432",
+      "sha256": "1ffc8c29af78b3b1d19890bfb4b33fc3a151488008592ca62e06fa3ef21aba9d",
+      "size_bytes": 3193
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "workflows/programme.yaml",
+      "git_blob_sha": "6018a4742a60d63931bf836ab1c5eb2c1ad85434",
+      "sha256": "e5f0b9e20a886a1fcdf3274b0db94a6cafba9fbc37878cda4a486a5c931586f9",
+      "size_bytes": 37065
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "LICENSE",
+      "git_blob_sha": "3149d6917c830929b7a4b29366a0ab796207731c",
+      "sha256": "7ef02bc0b6ba376de57be5f27784eef23df6a74068a4a2a172f95ba2c605b7af",
+      "size_bytes": 1066
+    }
+  ],
+  "omitted_optional_files": [],
+  "source_warnings": [
+    "The source is a draft for local review and pilot adoption; structural checks do not demonstrate practical effectiveness or organisational authority."
+  ],
+  "external_sources_fetched": false
+}

record_schema.json

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+{
+  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": [
+    "id",
+    "title",
+    "text",
+    "record_type",
+    "source_repository",
+    "source_path",
+    "source_commit",
+    "source_url",
+    "source_start_line",
+    "source_end_line",
+    "source_document_sha256",
+    "text_sha256",
+    "heading_path",
+    "metadata_json",
+    "declared_source_license",
+    "repository_license",
+    "source_status",
+    "dataset_version",
+    "source_commit_date",
+    "language",
+    "required_context_paths",
+    "review_status"
+  ],
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "id": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "title": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "text": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "record_type": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_repository": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_path": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_commit": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_url": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_start_line": {
+      "type": "integer"
+    },
+    "source_end_line": {
+      "type": "integer"
+    },
+    "source_document_sha256": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "text_sha256": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "heading_path": {
+      "type": "array",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      }
+    },
+    "metadata_json": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "declared_source_license": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "repository_license": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_status": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "dataset_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_commit_date": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "language": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "required_context_paths": {
+      "type": "array",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      }
+    },
+    "review_status": {
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  }
+}

synthetic_examples.jsonl

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+{"id": "examples/customer-synthetic.md::document", "title": "examples/customer-synthetic.md", "text": "# Customer example: a complete service journey\n\n**Entirely synthetic.** Every organisation, record, result and proposed decision is fictional. No live checkout, account, participant, payment, approval or correction has been tested.\n\n## Profile and remit\n\nA fictional online service has a favourable front-end automated scan but an inaccessible authentication/payment handoff, a chatbot that impedes human support and a video explaining how to cancel. Some fictional customer accounts describe confidence loss despite an improving aggregate satisfaction measure.\n\nThe proposed remit covers discovery through cancellation and redress, including authentication, payment, chat, video and support suppliers. Actual entity, jurisdictions, legal scope, owners, funding and data permission remain unknown. Do not assume the EAA or any other regime applies merely because the service is customer-facing.\n\n## Proposed programme configuration\n\n| Work package | Shared/customer route | Proposed human R / A | Useful AI task | Entry/evidence/exit |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Scope and applicability | P01–P02; C01/C02 | Coordinator R / sponsor A; competent applicability reviewer | A1 scoped source retrieval and gaps | Confirm service/entity/jurisdiction, authority and actual commitments before claims. |\n| Map the whole journey | P03; C01–C03 | Research/CX R / service A | A1 map existing approved findings and research questions | Include failure, support and exit; record missing people and contexts. |\n| Plan recovery and supplier correction | P04–P05; C04; R01/R03/R11 | Procurement/operations R / service A | A1 compare options and dependency impacts | Assess availability, privacy, cost, delay and customer control of interim assistance. |\n| Design, build and produce | P05–P06; C05; R12 | Delivery/content R / delivery A | A2 draft candidate code, content and media assets if authorised | Brief video/caption/AD practitioners early; preserve exact versions and destinations. |\n| Evaluate and decide | P07–P08; C05; R05/R10 | Test/research/editorial R / authorised release A | A2 supported checks and A1 evidence package | Complete authentication, payment, support and exit evidence; no pass inferred from the front-end scan. |\n| Monitor and improve | P09; C06; R09/R14 | Operations/reporting R / service A | A1 qualified analysis; A3 routing only under adopted mandate | Preserve disparities, complaint routes, source changes and AI review burden. |\n\nSelect S08–S10 conditionally for regulatory discovery; S13/S14 for QA; S16/S17/S19 for comprehension, brand and ethical research; S21–S25 for content/media; S27 for chat. Use the [catalogue](../sources/README.md) and the owning guidance rather than copying tests here.\n\n## Worked decision trace\n\n| Record | Fictional illustration | Disposition |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| OUT-C-01 | Understand, obtain, use and cancel the service with meaningful choice and control. | Proposed end-to-end outcome. |\n| EV-C-01 | Illustrative front-end automated pass. | Synthetic and scoped; not evidence for the handoff or complete journey. |\n| EV-C-02 | Illustrative failed authentication/payment task. | Synthetic failure; a real equivalent would remain open despite EV-C-01. |\n| EV-C-03 | Illustrative higher aggregate satisfaction with a reported excluded context. | Synthetic and causally unproven; preserve the disparity under R09. |\n| DEC-C-01 | Whether the service can transition with proposed recovery and corrective actions. | Draft, no actual owner or authenticated approval. |\n\nThe assistant routes the failed task to correction/retest under R05 and sends an unsubstantiated accessibility claim to R10. It proposes R11 evaluation of assisted access and the chatbot-to-human transition. The video enters R12 at briefing; review editorial meaning and actual distributed outputs, not only generated scripts.\n\n## Source-change exercise\n\nSuppose the owning guidance or supplier's authentication model changes. Record the old baseline, newly retrieved candidate, changed meaning, affected requirement/outcome IDs and retest needs. Mark the affected decision `reopened`; do not relabel old evidence as current. A human owner reviews adoption. No actual source change or approval is asserted by this hypothetical.\n\n## Proposed reporting and next decisions\n\nTeams receive complete-journey defects, exact configurations, suppliers, content versions and retest actions. Leadership receives material exclusion, the mismatch between aggregate indicators and scoped failures, options, funding and authority gaps. Actual outcomes are **not assessed**.\n\nNext: confirm service facts/authority; plan accessible research and safe data use; agree recovery; assign supplier and delivery work; verify real outcomes and content. Do not infer disability from abandonment, force diagnostic customer labels or use these fictional findings as evidence.\n\n## Design/brand system planning exercise\n\nThe fictional service has no verified foundation-to-component-to-QA map. Route R15 to plan system owners, adoption/remediation and evidence using the [assurance plan](../templates/system-assurance-plan.md). The generic scan cannot establish the quality of labels, alternative text or content order; assign appropriate human procedures and meaningful automated checks. Require actual reference implementation and user ACT-style script references for authentication/payment/support patterns. Plan brand recognition, trust, expectations, value, values and resonance without removing distinctive identity. All assets, tests and outcome evidence remain hypothetical/unassessed.\n", "record_type": "synthetic_example_not_real_evidence", "source_repository": "Double-FW/Accessibility_Programme_Runbooks", "source_path": "examples/customer-synthetic.md", "source_commit": "a8ec268b29e6f8612c958b183b9d33ab0747efa7", "source_url": "https://github.com/Double-FW/Accessibility_Programme_Runbooks/blob/a8ec268b29e6f8612c958b183b9d33ab0747efa7/examples/customer-synthetic.md", "source_start_line": 1, "source_end_line": 48, "source_document_sha256": "96cb24a5b08cd64faf1f025ab8da7030d40318e8a840e4fd70ea7fbbf4b80de1", "text_sha256": "96cb24a5b08cd64faf1f025ab8da7030d40318e8a840e4fd70ea7fbbf4b80de1", "heading_path": [], "metadata_json": "{}", "declared_source_license": "not_declared_in_document_front_matter", "repository_license": "MIT", "source_status": "draft_for_local_review_and_pilot_adoption", "dataset_version": "1.0.0", "source_commit_date": "2026-11-10", "language": "en-GB", "required_context_paths": ["AGENTS.md", "README.md", "RIGHTS.md", "ADOPTION.md", "framework/programme-cycle.md", "framework/decision-routing.md", "framework/human-ai-responsibilities.md", "sources/catalogue.yaml"], "review_status": "faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_programme_or_content_review"}
+{"id": "examples/employee-synthetic.md::document", "title": "examples/employee-synthetic.md", "text": "# Employee example: payroll and work-tool barriers\n\n**Entirely synthetic.** Organisation, people, findings and decisions below are fictional. No real participant, tool execution, approval, supplier or outcome is implied. All actions and benefits are proposals until a real adoption and evaluation.\n\n## Profile and remit\n\nA small fictional employer uses a purchased payroll service and several collaboration tools. Staff report that an essential payroll activity is inaccessible and that repeated cross-tool authentication adds burden. No dedicated accessibility team exists. Actual jurisdiction, legal applicability, named decision owners, budget and individual support needs are unknown.\n\nThe proposed remit is employee services, initially the payroll task and its authentication/support dependencies. The intended outcome is independent access to essential payroll information with understandable recovery and sustainable effort. Role labels below are proposals for local assignment.\n\n## Proposed programme configuration\n\n| Work package | Shared/employee route | Proposed human R / A | Useful AI task | Entry/evidence/exit |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Establish scope and ownership | P01–P02; E01 | Coordinator R / sponsor A; both unassigned | A1 intake and requirement-source routing | Need entity/jurisdiction, service facts and actual delegation; exit is confirmed scope or explicit gaps. |\n| Urgent access and confidential support | P09/P03; E02; R01/R04 | Service owner for defect; separate confidential support owner | A1 minimal handoff drafting; no sensitive case upload | Record blocked task, agreed safe support, receiving owner and restricted case reference if needed. |\n| Task and capability baseline | P03; E01/E03 | Research/evaluation R / service owner A | A1 structure approved observations | Actual task, configurations, worker input, support/effort and coverage; no productivity ranking. |\n| Supplier and improvement options | P04–P05; E04; R03 | Procurement/delivery R / sponsor or delegated service A | A1 options and renewal dependencies | Compare correction, configured alternatives and replacement; funding and dates remain proposed. |\n| Deliver and evaluate | P06–P08; E05 | Delivery/evaluation R / authorised service A | A2 candidate changes/checks only after real permission | Exact build/configuration, technical and complete-task evidence, retest and actual decision. |\n| Operate and review | P09; E06 | Operations R / service A | A3 routine issue routing only if adopted | Review participation, cumulative burden and support quality; retain open supplier defects. |\n\nSelect source routes S01/S02 for coordination and responsibility; S08 for applicability discovery; S11/S12 for work and task evaluation; S13/S14 for layered QA; S19/S20 for ethical data and AT/AI flows; S21/S22 for payroll communication/report outputs. Resolve local source-use baselines before application through the [catalogue](../sources/README.md).\n\n## Worked decision trace\n\n| Record | Fictional illustration | Disposition |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| OUT-E-01 | Complete the payroll information activity independently in the relevant configuration. | Proposed outcome; acceptance method needs local agreement. |\n| EV-E-01 | Illustrative account: a task is blocked; no actual evidence file or participant exists. | `synthetic: true`; raw result is illustrative failure; excluded from real claims. |\n| ISSUE-E-01 | Shared service defect with private support handled separately. | Route R01/R04; support does not close the defect. |\n| DEC-E-01 | Decide interim support, supplier correction and required funding. | Draft; no actual decision owner or authenticated approval reference. |\n| REVIEW-E-01 | Re-evaluate the configured workflow after supplier correction and review cumulative burden. | Planned, not executed. |\n\n## Decision exercise\n\nIf the employer has no confirmed execution mandate, the assistant can draft the programme, supplier questions and decision brief at A1. It cannot send them, change payroll or access individual records merely because the example mentions those actions. Confirm actual permissions before A2/A3.\n\nIf manual/task evidence later fails while an automated scan passes, keep the failure under R05, return to P06/P07 and block the unsupported claim. An authorised human makes any permissible transition decision with the remaining defect visible. An exception does not change the failed result or waive an obligation.\n\n## Proposed reporting and next decisions\n\nTeam view: affected task/configuration, known unknowns, supplier dependencies, proposed correction and retest owner. Leadership view: impact on essential work, interim access quality, options, funding/authority gaps and decision consequences.\n\nProposed outcome measures are access to the critical task, independence/control, cumulative effort, confidence, support quality and meaningful resolution. Actual baseline/current values are **not assessed**. Agree sample, disclosure controls and evidence before collection. Keep adjustment/health/performance records outside the shared programme.\n\nNext: confirm actual service owner and support route; verify relevant facts and source baselines; commission proportionate evidence; approve feasible work. This exercise is a documented process illustration, not evidence of operational effectiveness.\n\n## Design/brand system planning exercise\n\nThe fictional employer has not supplied a design system, internal brand system or linked QA library. Under R15, propose an owned capability assessment and a [system-assurance plan](../templates/system-assurance-plan.md). Inventory foundations such as payroll labelling/content order and the configured patterns/components, linking actual guidance, methods, reference implementations and user ACT-style scripts when available. Every missing reference remains a gap, not a generated pass. Evaluate recognition, trust, expectations and value of internal communication without ranking workers. No actual system adoption, tests or brand evaluation have occurred.\n", "record_type": "synthetic_example_not_real_evidence", "source_repository": "Double-FW/Accessibility_Programme_Runbooks", "source_path": "examples/employee-synthetic.md", "source_commit": "a8ec268b29e6f8612c958b183b9d33ab0747efa7", "source_url": "https://github.com/Double-FW/Accessibility_Programme_Runbooks/blob/a8ec268b29e6f8612c958b183b9d33ab0747efa7/examples/employee-synthetic.md", "source_start_line": 1, "source_end_line": 50, "source_document_sha256": "e736e308187832504094e400fe921a341e19fc664a3678c591a8aaebf768a55a", "text_sha256": "e736e308187832504094e400fe921a341e19fc664a3678c591a8aaebf768a55a", "heading_path": [], "metadata_json": "{}", "declared_source_license": "not_declared_in_document_front_matter", "repository_license": "MIT", "source_status": "draft_for_local_review_and_pilot_adoption", "dataset_version": "1.0.0", "source_commit_date": "2026-11-10", "language": "en-GB", "required_context_paths": ["AGENTS.md", "README.md", "RIGHTS.md", "ADOPTION.md", "framework/programme-cycle.md", "framework/decision-routing.md", "framework/human-ai-responsibilities.md", "sources/catalogue.yaml"], "review_status": "faithful_extraction_checked_not_independent_programme_or_content_review"}

validation_report.json

@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+{
+  "status": "passed",
+  "scope": "faithful extraction and packaging checks only",
+  "source_commit": "a8ec268b29e6f8612c958b183b9d33ab0747efa7",
+  "source_files_verified": 29,
+  "document_records": 26,
+  "knowledge_section_records": 153,
+  "synthetic_example_records": 2,
+  "source_warnings": [
+    "The source is a draft for local review and pilot adoption; structural checks do not demonstrate practical effectiveness or organisational authority."
+  ],
+  "independent_content_review": false,
+  "live_publication_tested": false,
+  "export_file_sha256": {
+    "README.md": "4170a92ae6b766b3b9c6b57cbb43d776b6d87f20303d893214291109c4c94f01",
+    "LICENSE": "7ef02bc0b6ba376de57be5f27784eef23df6a74068a4a2a172f95ba2c605b7af",
+    "documents.jsonl": "9b25556ed4642c3198ef5ad12f37718c2e7b88d99ad832db3eeff872516607fd",
+    "knowledge_chunks.jsonl": "8c5c672c73db7e1a6e532a4d7fef9e030a099e767255f9ef55641793ce53d761",
+    "synthetic_examples.jsonl": "eec9985dfcb96a0c8fa2c3ebc223de0cdeddd28b7afeed98c5b93eecc0491b00",
+    "provenance.json": "72e3289aa316791fca92d4839f3dbd417fe934398553103e4606025047c6c5ab",
+    "record_schema.json": "f58b141429fba173b9f69f9d8cacbcef7cd3f65aaac8ee73a4d43300f7876aa8"
+  },
+  "previous_source_commit": null,
+  "destination_dataset": "GarethFW/Accessibility_Programme_Runbooks",
+  "record_changes": {
+    "documents.jsonl": {
+      "added": [
+        "ADOPTION.md::document",
+        "AGENTS.md::document",
+        "CHANGELOG.md::document",
+        "CONTRIBUTING.md::document",
+        "README.md::document",
+        "RIGHTS.md::document",
+        "framework/decision-routing.md::document",
+        "framework/design-and-brand-systems.md::document",
+        "framework/human-ai-responsibilities.md::document",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::document",
+        "framework/reporting-and-learning.md::document",
+        "framework/source-use-and-change.md::document",
+        "prompts/design-programme.md::document",
+        "runbooks/customer-services.md::document",
+        "runbooks/employee-services.md::document",
+        "sources/README.md::document",
+        "sources/catalogue.yaml::document",
+        "templates/decision-and-evidence.md::document",
+        "templates/organisation-profile.md::document",
+        "templates/programme-plan.md::document",
+        "templates/report.md::document",
+        "templates/system-assurance-plan.md::document",
+        "validation/README.md::document",
+        "validation/acceptance-scenarios.md::document",
+        "validation/report.md::document",
+        "workflows/programme.yaml::document"
+      ],
+      "removed": [],
+      "updated": []
+    },
+    "knowledge_chunks.jsonl": {
+      "added": [
+        "ADOPTION.md::adoption-and-maintenance",
+        "ADOPTION.md::adoption-and-maintenance-before-a-public-release",
+        "ADOPTION.md::adoption-and-maintenance-before-organisational-adoption",
+        "ADOPTION.md::adoption-and-maintenance-maintain",
+        "ADOPTION.md::adoption-and-maintenance-pilot",
+        "AGENTS.md::repository-instructions-for-people-and-ai-agents",
+        "AGENTS.md::repository-instructions-for-people-and-ai-agents-contribution-and-completion",
+        "AGENTS.md::repository-instructions-for-people-and-ai-agents-data-and-evidence",
+        "AGENTS.md::repository-instructions-for-people-and-ai-agents-design-branding-and-qa-planning",
+        "AGENTS.md::repository-instructions-for-people-and-ai-agents-human-and-ai-work",
+        "AGENTS.md::repository-instructions-for-people-and-ai-agents-knowledge-and-authority-boundaries",
+        "AGENTS.md::repository-instructions-for-people-and-ai-agents-scope-and-purpose",
+        "AGENTS.md::repository-instructions-for-people-and-ai-agents-start-and-retrieve",
+        "CHANGELOG.md::changelog",
+        "CHANGELOG.md::changelog-0-1-0-8-november-2026-draft",
+        "CHANGELOG.md::changelog-0-2-0-8-november-2026-draft",
+        "CONTRIBUTING.md::contributing",
+        "README.md::accessibility-programme-runbooks",
+        "README.md::accessibility-programme-runbooks-adoption-state",
+        "README.md::accessibility-programme-runbooks-choose-a-runbook",
+        "README.md::accessibility-programme-runbooks-contents",
+        "README.md::accessibility-programme-runbooks-required-system-capabilities",
+        "README.md::accessibility-programme-runbooks-start-in-six-actions",
+        "README.md::accessibility-programme-runbooks-what-belongs-where",
+        "RIGHTS.md::rights-and-attribution-status",
+        "framework/decision-routing.md::decision-routing",
+        "framework/decision-routing.md::decision-routing-critical-branches",
+        "framework/decision-routing.md::decision-routing-gates",
+        "framework/design-and-brand-systems.md::accessible-ux-design-systems-branding-systems-and-qa",
+        "framework/design-and-brand-systems.md::accessible-ux-design-systems-branding-systems-and-qa-branding-that-fulfils-the-purpose-of-a-brand",
+        "framework/design-and-brand-systems.md::accessible-ux-design-systems-branding-systems-and-qa-connect-qa-and-maintenance",
+        "framework/design-and-brand-systems.md::accessible-ux-design-systems-branding-systems-and-qa-foundations-and-design-practices",
+        "framework/design-and-brand-systems.md::accessible-ux-design-systems-branding-systems-and-qa-patterns-and-components",
+        "framework/design-and-brand-systems.md::accessible-ux-design-systems-branding-systems-and-qa-plan-the-systems-before-dependent-delivery",
+        "framework/human-ai-responsibilities.md::human-and-ai-responsibilities",
+        "framework/human-ai-responsibilities.md::human-and-ai-responsibilities-choose-ai-involvement-per-task",
+        "framework/human-ai-responsibilities.md::human-and-ai-responsibilities-decisions-retained-by-humans",
+        "framework/human-ai-responsibilities.md::human-and-ai-responsibilities-make-ai-s-benefit-observable",
+        "framework/human-ai-responsibilities.md::human-and-ai-responsibilities-responsibility-assignment",
+        "framework/human-ai-responsibilities.md::human-and-ai-responsibilities-system-ownership-and-qa-alignment",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle-p01-establish-remit-and-authority",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle-p02-map-obligations-and-commitments",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle-p03-understand-participation-and-capability",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle-p04-agree-strategy-and-funded-delivery",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle-p05-procure-and-shape-services",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle-p06-design-build-and-produce",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle-p07-evaluate-and-correct",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle-p08-authorise-release-or-transition",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle-p09-operate-report-and-improve",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle-participation-and-handoff",
+        "framework/programme-cycle.md::shared-programme-cycle-process-flow",
+        "framework/reporting-and-learning.md::reporting-and-learning",
+        "framework/reporting-and-learning.md::reporting-and-learning-human-and-ai-reporting-workflow",
+        "framework/reporting-and-learning.md::reporting-and-learning-keep-evidence-lenses-distinct",
+        "framework/reporting-and-learning.md::reporting-and-learning-minimum-interpretation-controls",
+        "framework/reporting-and-learning.md::reporting-and-learning-produce-views-from-one-evidence-base",
+        "framework/reporting-and-learning.md::reporting-and-learning-report-system-capability-and-actual-experience",
+        "framework/source-use-and-change.md::source-use-and-change",
+        "framework/source-use-and-change.md::source-use-and-change-refresh-and-impact-review",
+        "framework/source-use-and-change.md::source-use-and-change-resolve-read-and-record",
+        "framework/source-use-and-change.md::source-use-and-change-separate-discovery-from-decisions",
+        "framework/source-use-and-change.md::source-use-and-change-system-asset-changes",
+        "framework/source-use-and-change.md::source-use-and-change-unavailability-conflict-and-derived-material",
+        "prompts/design-programme.md::design-an-ai-assisted-accessibility-programme",
+        "prompts/design-programme.md::design-an-ai-assisted-accessibility-programme-begin-prompt",
+        "prompts/design-programme.md::design-an-ai-assisted-accessibility-programme-end-prompt",
+        "runbooks/customer-services.md::customer-facing-services-and-systems",
+        "runbooks/customer-services.md::customer-facing-services-and-systems-accessible-ux-and-branding-systems",
+        "runbooks/customer-services.md::customer-facing-services-and-systems-decision-branches",
+        "runbooks/customer-services.md::customer-facing-services-and-systems-example-and-ongoing-review",
+        "runbooks/customer-services.md::customer-facing-services-and-systems-lifecycle-coverage",
+        "runbooks/customer-services.md::customer-facing-services-and-systems-reporting-outcomes",
+        "runbooks/customer-services.md::customer-facing-services-and-systems-runbook-steps",
+        "runbooks/customer-services.md::customer-facing-services-and-systems-start-here",
+        "runbooks/customer-services.md::customer-facing-services-and-systems-use-with-ai",
+        "runbooks/employee-services.md::employee-facing-services-and-systems",
+        "runbooks/employee-services.md::employee-facing-services-and-systems-accessible-ux-and-branding-systems",
+        "runbooks/employee-services.md::employee-facing-services-and-systems-decision-branches",
+        "runbooks/employee-services.md::employee-facing-services-and-systems-example-and-ongoing-review",
+        "runbooks/employee-services.md::employee-facing-services-and-systems-lifecycle-coverage",
+        "runbooks/employee-services.md::employee-facing-services-and-systems-reporting-outcomes",
+        "runbooks/employee-services.md::employee-facing-services-and-systems-runbook-steps",
+        "runbooks/employee-services.md::employee-facing-services-and-systems-start-here",
+        "runbooks/employee-services.md::employee-facing-services-and-systems-use-with-ai",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s01",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s02",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s03",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s04",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s05",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s06",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s07",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s08",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s09",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s10",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s11",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s12",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s13",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s14",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s15",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s16",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s17",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s18",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s19",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s20",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s21",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s22",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s23",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s24",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s25",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s26",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s27",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s28",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s29",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s30",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s31",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s32",
+        "sources/README.md::double-fw-knowledge-routes-s33",
+        "templates/decision-and-evidence.md::decision-and-evidence-records",
+        "templates/decision-and-evidence.md::decision-and-evidence-records-decision-and-handoff-record",
+        "templates/decision-and-evidence.md::decision-and-evidence-records-delegation-record",
+        "templates/decision-and-evidence.md::decision-and-evidence-records-evidence-record",
+        "templates/decision-and-evidence.md::decision-and-evidence-records-exception-record",
+        "templates/decision-and-evidence.md::decision-and-evidence-records-source-change-record",
+        "templates/decision-and-evidence.md::decision-and-evidence-records-source-use-record",
+        "templates/decision-and-evidence.md::decision-and-evidence-records-stage-task-record",
+        "templates/decision-and-evidence.md::decision-and-evidence-records-system-coverage-records",
+        "templates/organisation-profile.md::organisation-profile",
+        "templates/organisation-profile.md::organisation-profile-facts-and-unknowns",
+        "templates/organisation-profile.md::organisation-profile-ux-and-branding-system-inventory",
+        "templates/programme-plan.md::programme-plan",
+        "templates/programme-plan.md::programme-plan-benefit-and-reporting-plan",
+        "templates/programme-plan.md::programme-plan-decisions-and-review",
+        "templates/programme-plan.md::programme-plan-participation-evidence-and-service-recovery",
+        "templates/programme-plan.md::programme-plan-remit-and-intended-outcomes",
+        "templates/programme-plan.md::programme-plan-requirements-and-outcomes",
+        "templates/programme-plan.md::programme-plan-ux-design-branding-and-qa-capability-workstream",
+        "templates/programme-plan.md::programme-plan-workstreams-and-capacity",
+        "templates/report.md::accessibility-programme-report",
+        "templates/report.md::accessibility-programme-report-ai-contribution-and-learning",
+        "templates/report.md::accessibility-programme-report-decisions-required",
+        "templates/report.md::accessibility-programme-report-evidence-and-remaining-barriers",
+        "templates/report.md::accessibility-programme-report-report-context",
+        "templates/report.md::accessibility-programme-report-system-and-brand-evidence",
+        "templates/report.md::accessibility-programme-report-tailor-the-view",
+        "templates/report.md::accessibility-programme-report-what-changed-for-people",
+        "templates/system-assurance-plan.md::ux-design-system-and-branding-system-assurance-plan",
+        "templates/system-assurance-plan.md::ux-design-system-and-branding-system-assurance-plan-brand-communication-outcomes",
+        "templates/system-assurance-plan.md::ux-design-system-and-branding-system-assurance-plan-capability-and-workstream-plan",
+        "templates/system-assurance-plan.md::ux-design-system-and-branding-system-assurance-plan-foundation-and-practice-coverage",
+        "templates/system-assurance-plan.md::ux-design-system-and-branding-system-assurance-plan-pattern-and-component-coverage",
+        "templates/system-assurance-plan.md::ux-design-system-and-branding-system-assurance-plan-traceability-and-change"
+      ],
+      "removed": [],
+      "updated": []
+    },
+    "synthetic_examples.jsonl": {
+      "added": [
+        "examples/customer-synthetic.md::document",
+        "examples/employee-synthetic.md::document"
+      ],
+      "removed": [],
+      "updated": []
+    }
+  }
+}