Datasets:
Tasks:
Text Classification
Formats:
json
Languages:
English
Size:
1K - 10K
Tags:
Text Classification
Named Entity Recognition
Structured Extraction
Legal NLP
International Law
License:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -10,4 +10,73 @@ tags:
|
|
| 10 |
- Structured Extraction
|
| 11 |
- Legal NLP
|
| 12 |
- International Law
|
| 13 |
-
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
- Structured Extraction
|
| 11 |
- Legal NLP
|
| 12 |
- International Law
|
| 13 |
+
---
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
IntLawNER is an English-language named entity recognition dataset for legal
|
| 16 |
+
instrument and citation references in international-law documents. It contains
|
| 17 |
+
2,987 gold sentences drawn from three public legal-document collections.
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
## Sources
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
| Code | Collection | Gold sentences |
|
| 22 |
+
| --- | --- | ---: |
|
| 23 |
+
| `CD-ICJ` | International Court of Justice | 1,045 |
|
| 24 |
+
| `ECtHR` | European Court of Human Rights | 1,149 |
|
| 25 |
+
| `UNSC` | UN Security Council | 793 |
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
The raw source documents are not bundled. Collection URLs and acquisition
|
| 28 |
+
metadata are recorded in `data/corpus_manifest.json`. Document provenance is
|
| 29 |
+
retained in each record's `corpus` and `doc_id` fields.
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
## Annotation Schema
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
Each line is a JSON object. Core fields are:
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
```json
|
| 37 |
+
{
|
| 38 |
+
"sent_id": "stable sentence identifier",
|
| 39 |
+
"text": "sentence text",
|
| 40 |
+
"corpus": "CD-ICJ, ECtHR, or UNSC",
|
| 41 |
+
"doc_id": "source document identifier",
|
| 42 |
+
"label": [
|
| 43 |
+
{
|
| 44 |
+
"start": 0,
|
| 45 |
+
"end": 10,
|
| 46 |
+
"text": "exact span",
|
| 47 |
+
"labels": ["IL_PROVISION"]
|
| 48 |
+
}
|
| 49 |
+
]
|
| 50 |
+
}
|
| 51 |
+
```
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
## Entity Distribution
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
| Label | Count |
|
| 56 |
+
| --- | ---: |
|
| 57 |
+
| `IL_PROVISION` | 3,026 |
|
| 58 |
+
| `IL_TREATY` | 1,641 |
|
| 59 |
+
| `IL_RESOLUTION` | 1,322 |
|
| 60 |
+
| `IL_DOMESTIC_LAW` | 1,208 |
|
| 61 |
+
| `IL_CASE_CITATION` | 622 |
|
| 62 |
+
| `IL_SOFT_LAW` | 192 |
|
| 63 |
+
| `IL_COURT_INSTR` | 83 |
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
Definitions and concise examples are provided in the main README and the
|
| 66 |
+
evaluation prompt glossary under `src/evaluation/`.
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
## Intended Uses
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
- Training and evaluating legal-domain NER systems.
|
| 71 |
+
- Studying references among international, domestic, judicial, and soft-law instruments.
|
| 72 |
+
- Comparing rule-based, transformer, and prompted-LLM extraction methods.
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
The dataset is not legal advice and should not be used as the sole basis for a
|
| 75 |
+
legal decision. Performance on these three collections does not establish
|
| 76 |
+
performance on other jurisdictions, languages, document types, or time periods.
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
## Licensing
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
The original annotation layer is CC BY 4.0. Source documents retain their
|
| 81 |
+
original terms. Consult `DATA_LICENSE.md`, `NOTICE.md`, and the official source
|
| 82 |
+
before redistributing text.
|