File size: 7,306 Bytes
07af0b5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
fa4cdcf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
07af0b5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
fa4cdcf
 
07af0b5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
---
license: cc-by-4.0
language:
- en
- zh
task_categories:
- other
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
tags:
- agentfem
- soft-robotics
- programmable-matter
- structural-mechanics
- inverse-design
- scientific-machine-learning
pretty_name: AgentFEM Programmable Soft Rods
configs:
- config_name: multizone_v02
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: multizone-v02/train.jsonl.gz
  - split: validation
    path: multizone-v02/validation.jsonl.gz
  - split: test
    path: multizone-v02/test.jsonl.gz
  - split: zone_ood
    path: multizone-v02/zone_ood.jsonl.gz
- config_name: equilibria
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: states/train.jsonl.gz
  - split: validation
    path: states/validation.jsonl.gz
  - split: test
    path: states/test.jsonl.gz
  - split: parameter_ood
    path: states/parameter_ood.jsonl.gz
---

# AgentFEM · Programmable Soft Rods

**New: [multi-zone actuation supplement](multizone-v02/README.md)** — 4,080 additional states; 3/6/12 zones, with 8-zone holdout and mesh checks. The original 16,200-state collection remains available as `equilibria`.

**Learn shapes. Distinguish branches. Design actuation.**

![Three families of computed flexible-rod shapes](assets/overview.png)

**216 physical scenarios · 648 equilibrium sweeps · 16,200 states**

Planar flexible rods driven by end loads, three-zone intrinsic curvature, and
microscale forces. Each state contains its centerline, angle and strain fields,
control parameters, local stability, and solver evidence.

[Models & solver](https://huggingface.co/HaomingLuo/AgentFEM-Morph-Rod-Surrogates) ·
[AgentFEM](https://github.com/haoming-luo/agentfem) · [Mechanics & schema](SCHEMA.md)

## What can you study?

- Shape prediction under different actuation mechanisms.
- Multi-solution regression: identical loading can admit straight, up-bent and down-bent states.
- Bounded inverse design of endpoint positions or complete centerlines.
- Resolution sensitivity and local equilibrium stability.

This is the first data release of **AgentFEM Morph Lab**, a project on programmable
flexible structures. The JMPS microforce rod is one featured mechanism, alongside
conventional loading and distributed eigen-curvature actuation.

## Contents

| Collection | Included |
|---|---|
| End-force / end-moment rods | 72 scenarios, 5,400 equilibrium samples |
| Three-zone intrinsic-curvature rods | 72 scenarios, 5,400 equilibrium samples |
| Microforce rods | 72 scenarios, 5,400 samples across up/down/straight branches |
| Paired resolution checks | 216 pairs, 48 vs 96 angle elements |
| Native AgentFEM solids | 3 independent Figure 9 cases, actual downward solutions |
| Reproducibility | Source, tests, schema, numerical reports, hashes |

The 1D corpus is produced by the supplied NumPy/SciPy angle-FE solver. The three
2D checks use native AgentFEM/FEniCSx. Sample frames are not independent scenarios;
reversible sweeps can revisit the same shape.

## Load a sample

```python
from datasets import load_dataset
data = load_dataset("HaomingLuo/AgentFEM-Programmable-Soft-Rods", "equilibria")
sample = data["test"][0]
print(sample["controls"], sample["tip"], sample["stability"])
```

Without the datasets library:

```python
import gzip, json
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
path = hf_hub_download("HaomingLuo/AgentFEM-Programmable-Soft-Rods",
                      "states/test.jsonl.gz", repo_type="dataset")
with gzip.open(path, "rt") as f:
    sample = json.loads(next(f))
```

## Validation

- Axial extension and constant-curvature analytic checks pass.
- Energy gradient and tangent verified by finite differences.
- First continuum bifurcation load: absolute discrepancy **1.09e-8** in dimensionless p.
- Figure 9 independent BVP vs 96-element rod: centerline RMSE below **5.87e-5 L**.
- All 216 resolution pairs: maximum centerline RMSE **1.72e-4 L**.
- Three 2D equivalent-solid vs paper-continuum errors: **0.758%, 0.176%, 0.394% of L**.
- PVD and XDMF both opened and warped in ParaView; all three fields share one geometry.

Full evidence: [validation](reports/validation.json), [generation](reports/generation.json),
[native FE metrics](native_fe/native_fe_metrics.csv), [ParaView checks](native_fe/paraview_checks.json).
These measurements apply to the stated checks, not an accuracy guarantee for arbitrary rods.

## Splits and baselines

126 training / 27 validation / 27 test / 36 stiffness-OOD scenes. All sweeps,
mirrored branches and mesh pairs of a scene stay in the same partition. The test
split was not used for fitting or checkpoint selection; there is no sealed test
or geometry-OOD benchmark in this release.

| Predictor | Supplied branch? | Test centerline RMSE / L |
|---|---:|---:|
| Ordinary MLP | No | 0.27097 |
| Branch-conditioned nearest neighbor | Yes | 0.13899 |
| Branch-conditioned MLP | Yes | 0.00661 |

The ordinary MLP receives ambiguous multi-solution inputs; this is an input
identifiability demonstration, not proof of a superior neural architecture.
The conditioned MLP's mean test endpoint error is **0.00784 L**. Stiffness-OOD
centerline RMSE is **0.00941 L**. See [all baseline results](reports/baselines.json).

## Physical scope

Dimensionless, conservative planar rods; fixed clamp; force control. Stability
labels come from the constrained discrete energy Hessian. Sweeps are quasi-static
equilibria, not physical-time trajectories. The supplied inverse examples use
bounded intrinsic curvature and numerical forward verification. They do not
establish general reachability, snap-through dynamics, contact or robot hardware control.

See [SCHEMA.md](SCHEMA.md) for equations, normalization, sampling, branch semantics,
and the difference between the paper's end force p and effective resultant p+2h.

## 中文

**可编程柔性杆:从形状预测到驱动设计。**

首批包含三类问题:端力/端矩驱动、三段本征曲率驱动,以及 JMPS 论文中的
微结构驱动。216 个独立场景、648 条平衡状态扫描、16,200 个采样状态;另有
216 组网格加密对照和 3 个 AgentFEM 二维实体核验算例。

数据可用于形状预测、多解回归和逆向设计。上下弯分支及同场景的不同路径不跨
训练/测试划分。三段本征曲率是一种理想化驱动模型;当前不含真实跳跃动力学、
接触或硬件实验。二维结果实际求解得到下弯形状,未在绘图时翻转。

下载 `native_fe/paraview/` 后打开 PVD,使用 `U` 做 Warp By Vector;XDMF 的
位移为 P1 插值副本,完整 Q2 系数另存于 `native_fe/scientific/`。

## Reproduce and cite

Version **0.1.0**, seed **20261014**. Install `requirements.txt`, then follow
[SCHEMA.md](SCHEMA.md#reproduction). Native FE additionally requires AgentFEM/FEniCSx.

Data and generated figures: **CC BY 4.0**. Code: **Apache-2.0**. The paper is cited,
not redistributed or relicensed.

Theory reference: Yang Ye, Andrea Piccolroaz, Davide Bigoni,
*Three Homogenization Models for a Nonlinear Heterogeneous Rod with Microscale Dead Loading*,
[DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2026.106870](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2026.106870).

Please cite **Haoming Luo, AgentFEM Morph Lab: Programmable Soft Rods, v0.1.0 (2026)**,
the dataset URL and revision, and the theory reference when using the microforce cases.