HaseebDev commited on
Commit
87fdaa8
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 2613341

Publish validated dataset, card and quality evidence together

Browse files
Files changed (4) hide show
  1. README.md +99 -0
  2. demo.jsonl +0 -0
  3. quality-audit.json +117 -0
  4. quality-audit.md +37 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: cc-by-nc-4.0
3
+ task_categories:
4
+ - text-generation
5
+ language:
6
+ - en
7
+ tags:
8
+ - synthetic
9
+ - synthetic-data
10
+ - workflow-records
11
+ - b2b
12
+ - finance
13
+ - privacy-safe
14
+
15
+ size_categories:
16
+ - 10K<n<100K
17
+ pretty_name: Corporate Expense Audits
18
+ ---
19
+
20
+ # Corporate Expense Audits (Synthetic B2B Dataset Preview)
21
+
22
+ This synthetic workflow dataset simulates **Corporate Travel & Expense Auditing Logs** for B2B evaluation, internal testing, and prototyping.
23
+
24
+ ## About this Dataset
25
+
26
+ The daily pipeline uses AI-assisted research and blueprint review, with deterministic Python rendering for bulk records and local validation before publication. Records are variants of configured workflow scenarios. A larger row count does not establish independent real-world cases or demonstrated model-training performance.
27
+
28
+ * **Verified record count:** 10,000
29
+ * **Privacy-safe:** Contains synthetic names, phone numbers, and company identifiers.
30
+ * **Structured and checked:** Schema-validated JSONL; inspect the audit for duplicate, content, and similarity-check details.
31
+ * **Suggested workflow fit:** Enterprise ERP builders training expense approval bots.
32
+ * **Category:** Finance
33
+
34
+ ## Schema Definition
35
+
36
+ Each record contains the following fields:
37
+
38
+ * `ticket_id` (str): Unique synthetic record identifier
39
+ * `employee_name` (str): Pre-assigned Employee Name
40
+ * `expense_category` (str): Meals, Lodging, Entertainment, or Travel
41
+ * `claim_amount` (str): Value claimed in local currency
42
+ * `policy_violation_flag` (str): Flagged or Approved
43
+ * `audit_justification` (str): Detailed reasoning for approving or rejecting the expense based on policy
44
+
45
+ ---
46
+
47
+ ## Get the Commercial Version
48
+
49
+ For additional synthetic workflow records, the matching private repo is `HaseebDev/corporate_expense_audits-commercial` and is available under a **commercial license**.
50
+
51
+ * **Payment:** Lemon Squeezy hosted checkout.
52
+ * **Delivery:** Lemon Squeezy checkout with secure commercial delivery after purchase
53
+ * **Commercial package:** 100,000 records, schema documentation, and quality audit report.
54
+
55
+ **[Open the commercial access page](https://haseebdev.github.io/synthetic-data-checkout/commercial-access.html?niche=corporate_expense_audits&demo_repo=HaseebDev%2Fcorporate_expense_audits&commercial_repo=HaseebDev%2Fcorporate_expense_audits-commercial&checkout_url=https%3A%2F%2Fsyntheticdatasetlab.lemonsqueezy.com%2Fcheckout%2Fbuy%2F431fde4c-a3ff-4587-825b-7ec496b1e98e%3Fcheckout%255Bcustom%255D%255Bdataset%255D%3Dcorporate_expense_audits%26checkout%255Bcustom%255D%255Bdemo_repo%255D%3DHaseebDev%252Fcorporate_expense_audits%26checkout%255Bcustom%255D%255Bcommercial_repo%255D%3DHaseebDev%252Fcorporate_expense_audits-commercial%26utm_source%3Dhuggingface%26utm_medium%3Ddataset_card%26utm_campaign%3Dcorporate_expense_audits&commercial_records=100000)**
56
+
57
+ ## Quality Audit
58
+
59
+ # Dataset Quality Report
60
+
61
+ ## Executive Summary
62
+
63
+ | Metric | Value |
64
+ | :--- | :--- |
65
+ | Status | **PASS** |
66
+ | Quality Score | **94/100** |
67
+ | Records Audited | 10000 |
68
+ | Niche | Corporate Travel & Expense Auditing Logs |
69
+ | Category | Finance |
70
+
71
+ ## Quality Gates
72
+
73
+ | Dimension | Result |
74
+ | :--- | :--- |
75
+ | Schema Conformance | 100.0% (10000/10000) |
76
+ | Duplicate Rows | 0 |
77
+ | Duplicate Identity Values | 0 |
78
+ | Non-Synthetic Phone Risk | 0 |
79
+ | Email Address Count | 0 |
80
+ | Max Fuzzy Similarity | 0.5 |
81
+ | Average Words Per Descriptive Field | 94.59 |
82
+ | Vocabulary Diversity | 0.759 |
83
+ | Repeated Phrase Count | 78 |
84
+ | Domain Keyword Coverage | 1.0 |
85
+
86
+ ## Buyer Assurance
87
+
88
+ This dataset was checked with deterministic local tooling before publication. The audit verifies schema consistency, uniqueness, text depth, duplicate risk, repeated wording, domain terminology coverage, and obvious PII leakage patterns.
89
+
90
+ All rows receive schema and content checks. Cross-record similarity uses a bounded sample of pairs to keep generation fast; it does not establish that every possible pair is dissimilar. The score measures these automated checks, not downstream model performance or independent medical, legal, or regulatory validation.
91
+
92
+ ## Findings
93
+
94
+ - **MINOR**: 78 high-frequency non-domain four-word phrase pattern(s) detected.
95
+
96
+
97
+ ## Support
98
+
99
+ **Add me on Discord: `xomohappy` for access support, delivery questions, or product questions about this premade commercial dataset.**
demo.jsonl ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
quality-audit.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "niche_id": "corporate_expense_audits",
3
+ "niche_name": "Corporate Travel & Expense Auditing Logs",
4
+ "category": "Finance",
5
+ "record_count": 10000,
6
+ "expected_fields": [
7
+ "ticket_id",
8
+ "employee_name",
9
+ "expense_category",
10
+ "claim_amount",
11
+ "policy_violation_flag",
12
+ "audit_justification"
13
+ ],
14
+ "descriptive_fields": [
15
+ "audit_justification"
16
+ ],
17
+ "quality_score": 94,
18
+ "passed": true,
19
+ "schema": {
20
+ "valid_records": 10000,
21
+ "conformance_pct": 100.0,
22
+ "missing_fields": {},
23
+ "empty_fields": {},
24
+ "extra_fields": {}
25
+ },
26
+ "uniqueness": {
27
+ "duplicate_rows": 0,
28
+ "duplicate_identity_values": 0,
29
+ "duplicate_fields": {}
30
+ },
31
+ "text_depth": {
32
+ "field_count": 1,
33
+ "avg_chars": 691.79,
34
+ "min_chars": 565,
35
+ "avg_words": 94.59,
36
+ "min_words": 76,
37
+ "vocabulary_diversity": 0.759,
38
+ "total_tokens": 945943,
39
+ "unique_tokens": 504
40
+ },
41
+ "similarity": {
42
+ "max_similarity": 0.5,
43
+ "avg_similarity": 0.154,
44
+ "near_duplicate_pairs": 0
45
+ },
46
+ "repetition": {
47
+ "repeated_ngram_count": 78,
48
+ "repeated_ngram_rate": 0.057,
49
+ "top_repeated_phrases": [
50
+ "the itemized meal receipt",
51
+ "itemized meal receipt and",
52
+ "meal receipt and daily",
53
+ "receipt and daily allowance",
54
+ "reconcile the excess against"
55
+ ],
56
+ "frequency_threshold": 1000,
57
+ "raw_repeated_ngram_count": 9179,
58
+ "raw_repeated_ngram_rate": 0.959
59
+ },
60
+ "pii": {
61
+ "email_count": 0,
62
+ "non_synthetic_email_count": 0,
63
+ "phone_count": 0,
64
+ "non_synthetic_phone_count": 0
65
+ },
66
+ "domain": {
67
+ "keyword_set_size": 8,
68
+ "matched_keywords": [
69
+ "allowance",
70
+ "approver",
71
+ "booking",
72
+ "claim",
73
+ "expense",
74
+ "policy",
75
+ "receipt",
76
+ "reimbursement"
77
+ ],
78
+ "keyword_coverage": 1.0
79
+ },
80
+ "balance": {
81
+ "fields": {
82
+ "expense_category": {
83
+ "unique_values": 4,
84
+ "top_share": 0.334,
85
+ "values": {
86
+ "Meals": 3342,
87
+ "Travel": 3328,
88
+ "Lodging": 1666,
89
+ "Entertainment": 1664
90
+ }
91
+ },
92
+ "policy_violation_flag": {
93
+ "unique_values": 1,
94
+ "top_share": 1.0,
95
+ "values": {
96
+ "Flagged": 10000
97
+ }
98
+ }
99
+ }
100
+ },
101
+ "findings": [
102
+ {
103
+ "severity": "minor",
104
+ "message": "78 high-frequency non-domain four-word phrase pattern(s) detected."
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "content": {
108
+ "rejected_record_count": 0,
109
+ "rejections": []
110
+ },
111
+ "scenario_coverage": null,
112
+ "verification": {
113
+ "all_rows_checked": 10000,
114
+ "similarity_is_bounded": true,
115
+ "max_similarity_pairs": 20000
116
+ }
117
+ }
quality-audit.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Dataset Quality Report
2
+
3
+ ## Executive Summary
4
+
5
+ | Metric | Value |
6
+ | :--- | :--- |
7
+ | Status | **PASS** |
8
+ | Quality Score | **94/100** |
9
+ | Records Audited | 10000 |
10
+ | Niche | Corporate Travel & Expense Auditing Logs |
11
+ | Category | Finance |
12
+
13
+ ## Quality Gates
14
+
15
+ | Dimension | Result |
16
+ | :--- | :--- |
17
+ | Schema Conformance | 100.0% (10000/10000) |
18
+ | Duplicate Rows | 0 |
19
+ | Duplicate Identity Values | 0 |
20
+ | Non-Synthetic Phone Risk | 0 |
21
+ | Email Address Count | 0 |
22
+ | Max Fuzzy Similarity | 0.5 |
23
+ | Average Words Per Descriptive Field | 94.59 |
24
+ | Vocabulary Diversity | 0.759 |
25
+ | Repeated Phrase Count | 78 |
26
+ | Domain Keyword Coverage | 1.0 |
27
+
28
+ ## Buyer Assurance
29
+
30
+ This dataset was checked with deterministic local tooling before publication. The audit verifies schema consistency, uniqueness, text depth, duplicate risk, repeated wording, domain terminology coverage, and obvious PII leakage patterns.
31
+
32
+ All rows receive schema and content checks. Cross-record similarity uses a bounded sample of pairs to keep generation fast; it does not establish that every possible pair is dissimilar. The score measures these automated checks, not downstream model performance or independent medical, legal, or regulatory validation.
33
+
34
+ ## Findings
35
+
36
+ - **MINOR**: 78 high-frequency non-domain four-word phrase pattern(s) detected.
37
+