text
stringlengths
0
4.99k
\"PSNR of low resolution image and high resolution image is %.4f\" % bicubic_psnr
)
print(\"PSNR of predict and high resolution is %.4f\" % test_psnr)
plot_results(lowres_img, index, \"lowres\")
plot_results(highres_img, index, \"highres\")
plot_results(prediction, index, \"prediction\")
print(\"Avg. PSNR of lowres images is %.4f\" % (total_bicubic_psnr / 10))
print(\"Avg. PSNR of reconstructions is %.4f\" % (total_test_psnr / 10))
PSNR of low resolution image and high resolution image is 28.2682
PSNR of predict and high resolution is 29.7881
png
png
png
PSNR of low resolution image and high resolution image is 23.0465
PSNR of predict and high resolution is 25.1304
png
png
png
PSNR of low resolution image and high resolution image is 25.4113
PSNR of predict and high resolution is 27.3936
png
png
png
PSNR of low resolution image and high resolution image is 26.5175
PSNR of predict and high resolution is 27.1014
png
png
png
PSNR of low resolution image and high resolution image is 24.2559
PSNR of predict and high resolution is 25.7635
png
png
png
PSNR of low resolution image and high resolution image is 23.9661
PSNR of predict and high resolution is 25.9522
png
png
png
PSNR of low resolution image and high resolution image is 24.3061
PSNR of predict and high resolution is 26.3963
png
png
png
PSNR of low resolution image and high resolution image is 21.7309
PSNR of predict and high resolution is 23.8342
png
png
png
PSNR of low resolution image and high resolution image is 28.8549
PSNR of predict and high resolution is 29.6143
png
png
png
PSNR of low resolution image and high resolution image is 23.9198
PSNR of predict and high resolution is 25.2592
png
png
png
Avg. PSNR of lowres images is 25.0277
Avg. PSNR of reconstructions is 26.6233
Deep dive into location-specific and channel-agnostic involution kernels.
Introduction
Convolution has been the basis of most modern neural networks for computer vision. A convolution kernel is spatial-agnostic and channel-specific. Because of this, it isn't able to adapt to different visual patterns with respect to different spatial locations. Along with location-related problems, the receptive field of...
To address the above issues, Li et. al. rethink the properties of convolution in Involution: Inverting the Inherence of Convolution for VisualRecognition. The authors propose the \"involution kernel\", that is location-specific and channel-agnostic. Due to the location-specific nature of the operation, the authors say ...
This example describes the involution kernel, compares two image classification models, one with convolution and the other with involution, and also tries drawing a parallel with the self-attention layer.