Document curated SODA final-answer release
Browse files- README.md +28 -0
- paper_coverage.json +860 -0
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -74,3 +74,31 @@ configs:
|
|
| 74 |
- split: test
|
| 75 |
path: SODA_2026/test-*
|
| 76 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 74 |
- split: test
|
| 75 |
path: SODA_2026/test-*
|
| 76 |
---
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
# TCSBench 2026: Final-answer problems
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
This release contains **290 exact-answer problems** from **142 SODA 2026 paper DAGs**. It is SODA-only, and answers are visible. The public config/split is `SODA_2026` / `test`.
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
## Coverage and curation
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
The generator requested three problems per DAG, each with a distinct theorem-like target node; quality gates did not force-fill unsuitable papers. After curation, 62 papers have three questions, 38 have two, 28 have one, and 14 have none. Thus 128 papers appear in the question rows. [`paper_coverage.json`](./paper_coverage.json) lists all source papers and their final counts.
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
This release was copied from the [original AI-Math-TCS release](https://huggingface.co/datasets/AI-Math-TCS/TCSBench_2026_ans), then the trailing answer-format instruction was removed from **every** public `problem`. The mathematical question, canonical answer, reference solution, audit fields, and `question_id` were otherwise preserved. **41 rows were excluded** because their canonical `answer` contains an integer literal of six or more decimal digits anywhere in the expression, including inside fractions or radicals. This is a textual literal rule, not an evaluation of symbolic expressions. The original source release remains available; this copy is the curated evaluation set.
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
Remaining answer types: 133 integer, 86 rational, 41 rational-expression, and 30 algebraic-expression. 1 retained row(s) have a `unicode_math` formatting flag, recorded in `format_issues`.
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
## Generation and checks
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
Problems were generated with `gpt-5.6-sol` at `xhigh` effort from a target node and its proof-relevant DAG context. Each accepted problem passed context and exact-answer eligibility checks, scaffold reduction, a proceduralness audit, an independent solve, answer-equivalence review, and a final content audit. The post-generation removal of the response-format instruction changes no mathematical assumptions or requested quantity, but these audits were not rerun on the edited string. Model-assisted audits are not a formal guarantee of mathematical correctness.
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
The `answer` column is the canonical closed-form answer; `reference_solution` explains it. `answer_symbols` and `answer_assumptions` are JSON strings used by the 0/1 grader. Exact symbolic comparison is attempted first, with `gpt-5.6-luna` at medium effort used only when exact comparison is unresolved. See the [grader](https://github.com/CohenQU/AI-Math-TCS/blob/6c1dc00/scripts/synthetic/final_answer_grader.py) and [equivalence fallback](https://github.com/CohenQU/AI-Math-TCS/blob/6c1dc00/scripts/synthetic/final_answer_equivalence.py).
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
## Provenance
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
Each row records its source paper and target node, generation settings, audit records, and the SHA-256 of the exact source DAG payload. The source is the [structurally validated SODA 2026 DAG split](https://huggingface.co/datasets/AI-Math-TCS/tcs_dags/viewer/SODA_2026/legacy_v1_6_structurally_repaired_gemini_3_8_flash) at revision `4ccf1e006ac1d6f3053049b7fcc5aa47cec8a6f8`.
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
```python
|
| 101 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
ds = load_dataset("HerrHruby/TCSBench_2026_ans", "SODA_2026", split="test")
|
| 104 |
+
```
|
paper_coverage.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,860 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
{
|
| 2 |
+
"conference": "SODA_2026",
|
| 3 |
+
"paper_count": 142,
|
| 4 |
+
"question_count": 290,
|
| 5 |
+
"papers": [
|
| 6 |
+
{
|
| 7 |
+
"paper_id": "-approximation_algorithm_general",
|
| 8 |
+
"title": "A $(2 + \\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for the general scheduling problem in quasipolynomial time",
|
| 9 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 10 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "bf876eb0802a3e273c941fcd2ec2c8a08e83a62c795cd17c862d02db1a723b85"
|
| 11 |
+
},
|
| 12 |
+
{
|
| 13 |
+
"paper_id": "algebraic_closure_matrix",
|
| 14 |
+
"title": "Algebraic Closure of Matrix Sets Recognized by 1-VASS",
|
| 15 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 16 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "5c80f4bb8cd457556e40e30188fe2e89df73ccd916ec08fef7fcf8d901eb95a7"
|
| 17 |
+
},
|
| 18 |
+
{
|
| 19 |
+
"paper_id": "algorithmic_improvements_list",
|
| 20 |
+
"title": "Algorithmic Improvements to List Decoding of Folded Reed-Solomon Codes",
|
| 21 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 22 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "d215f4ecc399ad6f533947dbc0695fbf10c633066638e1214aaabfcf0e8afccf"
|
| 23 |
+
},
|
| 24 |
+
{
|
| 25 |
+
"paper_id": "algorithms_lower_bounds",
|
| 26 |
+
"title": "Algorithms and Lower Bounds for the Maximum Overlap of Two Polygons Under Translation",
|
| 27 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 28 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "7cb8a7874f853bc7d065e063f3653449eeed8065b1aa6fe80328af4b75c331d3"
|
| 29 |
+
},
|
| 30 |
+
{
|
| 31 |
+
"paper_id": "almost_perfect_discrete",
|
| 32 |
+
"title": "(Almost) Perfect Discrete Iterative Load Balancing",
|
| 33 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 34 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "72315c15bd3cc777b17451b24128ab7ed34c4049bb38f6adad8fee34a47cd77b"
|
| 35 |
+
},
|
| 36 |
+
{
|
| 37 |
+
"paper_id": "approaching_optimality_solving",
|
| 38 |
+
"title": "Approaching Optimality for Solving Dense Linear Systems with Low-Rank Structure",
|
| 39 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 40 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "daa65fdc195d1fa686167c0a75af3413e621d4e8a3f6e7d82eab966e19d08cdf"
|
| 41 |
+
},
|
| 42 |
+
{
|
| 43 |
+
"paper_id": "approximate_counting_permutation",
|
| 44 |
+
"title": "Approximate Counting of Permutation Patterns",
|
| 45 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 46 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "ff33c620e64e58514abbac48e636874fdc16a3d745dd2f4bb2673e02e08c0502"
|
| 47 |
+
},
|
| 48 |
+
{
|
| 49 |
+
"paper_id": "approximate_light_spanners",
|
| 50 |
+
"title": "Approximate Light Spanners in Planar Graphs",
|
| 51 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 52 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "2adb952c328af79b999d89fb417058697990dacc9a448f60f1b983dde8896ac8"
|
| 53 |
+
},
|
| 54 |
+
{
|
| 55 |
+
"paper_id": "approximately_dominating_sets",
|
| 56 |
+
"title": "Approximately Dominating Sets in Elections",
|
| 57 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 58 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "9a4fda9ea00b3f26581b0f9ab55eb9ec84226c58ffb67219212ec95180a8f0cd"
|
| 59 |
+
},
|
| 60 |
+
{
|
| 61 |
+
"paper_id": "approximating_matroid_basis",
|
| 62 |
+
"title": "Approximating Matroid Basis Testing for Partition Matroids using Budget-In-Expectation",
|
| 63 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 64 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f25017eb0c0cc5e5fcea865253916bfa8c53a034787b0963d75967311c7bbb3e"
|
| 65 |
+
},
|
| 66 |
+
{
|
| 67 |
+
"paper_id": "balls_bins_infinite",
|
| 68 |
+
"title": "Balls and Bins and the Infinite Process with Random Deletions",
|
| 69 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 70 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "baafa772032fe7197a4284f5a9d3063aba3c5c3cfba1addb0dcd57f3e1ae78cc"
|
| 71 |
+
},
|
| 72 |
+
{
|
| 73 |
+
"paper_id": "better-than-2_approximation_directed",
|
| 74 |
+
"title": "A Better-Than-2 Approximation for the Directed Tree Augmentation Problem",
|
| 75 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 76 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f8695354a0ba703f6a6b2aa4a80db6b8153221714ec33fa925109693f078cfc5"
|
| 77 |
+
},
|
| 78 |
+
{
|
| 79 |
+
"paper_id": "block_size_matter",
|
| 80 |
+
"title": "Does block size matter in randomized block Krylov low-rank approximation?",
|
| 81 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 82 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "76c94b133e39458cdf811f5376dc90b2ce6aaad04bb83119378f2082d2ce923b"
|
| 83 |
+
},
|
| 84 |
+
{
|
| 85 |
+
"paper_id": "braiding_vineyards",
|
| 86 |
+
"title": "Braiding Vineyards",
|
| 87 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 88 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "6473f734d2a07d3207e4c1f61b6581d346a5e9afd907901c81add8fac29f92a0"
|
| 89 |
+
},
|
| 90 |
+
{
|
| 91 |
+
"paper_id": "broader_view_clustering",
|
| 92 |
+
"title": "A Broader View on Clustering under Cluster-Aware Norm Objectives",
|
| 93 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 94 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f3cf4ff8034023fab019339f5b8add8f02aea066c3cef975579dcd73e3e3dca7"
|
| 95 |
+
},
|
| 96 |
+
{
|
| 97 |
+
"paper_id": "burling_graphs_graphs",
|
| 98 |
+
"title": "BURLING GRAPHS IN GRAPHS WITH LARGE CHROMATIC NUMBER",
|
| 99 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 100 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "eaddae67ef4009938c95b99913296b4afe2d94df37959045e403b8013583c03e"
|
| 101 |
+
},
|
| 102 |
+
{
|
| 103 |
+
"paper_id": "catching_rats_h-minor-free",
|
| 104 |
+
"title": "Catching Rats in $H$-minor-free Graphs",
|
| 105 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 106 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "c6529fa5affdc94ee243889d3f5622f46f10773fc6b213fd0a9302ed848a92fc"
|
| 107 |
+
},
|
| 108 |
+
{
|
| 109 |
+
"paper_id": "cell-probe_lower_bounds",
|
| 110 |
+
"title": "Cell-Probe Lower Bounds via Semi-Random CSP Refutation: Simplified and the Odd-Locality Case",
|
| 111 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 112 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f8ff06c892e922f73cd1d4c39282bbc02edc8fb4df76107d47769ab8c79b5361"
|
| 113 |
+
},
|
| 114 |
+
{
|
| 115 |
+
"paper_id": "centered_colorings_minor-closed",
|
| 116 |
+
"title": "CENTERED COLORINGS IN MINOR-CLOSED GRAPH CLASSES",
|
| 117 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 118 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "9e3ff907b7e173415536e3bd6aa05d49fdb35155d837f5748002e75c646aa8c8"
|
| 119 |
+
},
|
| 120 |
+
{
|
| 121 |
+
"paper_id": "cfg_dnnf_admit",
|
| 122 |
+
"title": "#CFG and #DNNF admit FPRAS",
|
| 123 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 124 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f78a33ee44c305fe1fc40726de26191bb1a2c83ebe9a22a9b313cc547de3085f"
|
| 125 |
+
},
|
| 126 |
+
{
|
| 127 |
+
"paper_id": "classification_long-refinement_graphs",
|
| 128 |
+
"title": "A Classification of Long-Refinement Graphs for Colour Refinement",
|
| 129 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 130 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "a0712b2fd749ad3eb85ec2e50d01fd1774f65eba1634664c5574d8284d078fc1"
|
| 131 |
+
},
|
| 132 |
+
{
|
| 133 |
+
"paper_id": "coloring_3-colorable_graphs",
|
| 134 |
+
"title": "Coloring 3-Colorable Graphs with Low Threshold Rank",
|
| 135 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 136 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "9df9ba0aeb0bf22512b197834d8d1033db8a09748727424619eb3b2ed65070f5"
|
| 137 |
+
},
|
| 138 |
+
{
|
| 139 |
+
"paper_id": "combinatorial_philosopher_inequalities",
|
| 140 |
+
"title": "Combinatorial Philosopher Inequalities",
|
| 141 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 142 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "1430bc6e034667456d21954d76eecee560dbbe3447834ef783818854722926c8"
|
| 143 |
+
},
|
| 144 |
+
{
|
| 145 |
+
"paper_id": "communication_complexity_combinatorial",
|
| 146 |
+
"title": "The Communication Complexity of Combinatorial Auctions with Additional Succinct Bidders",
|
| 147 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 148 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "ca6db54df37b817988e0b2029c30df11503d3a6696f9638d9494f6b33df7ba5f"
|
| 149 |
+
},
|
| 150 |
+
{
|
| 151 |
+
"paper_id": "comparison_theorems_mixing",
|
| 152 |
+
"title": "Comparison Theorems for the Mixing Times of Systematic and Random Scan Dynamics",
|
| 153 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 154 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "e200123c6aa8b1d9000c2d2ac28d06cef5f0ef208d7fd91467c462290989f1d6"
|
| 155 |
+
},
|
| 156 |
+
{
|
| 157 |
+
"paper_id": "compatibility_fairness_nash",
|
| 158 |
+
"title": "Compatibility of Fairness and Nash Welfare under Subadditive Valuations",
|
| 159 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 160 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "7f470f6922ce777f28ee0e11eb67387ec5e8385c8b31b7cdda09a6568bf532a0"
|
| 161 |
+
},
|
| 162 |
+
{
|
| 163 |
+
"paper_id": "complexity_skolem_problem",
|
| 164 |
+
"title": "On the Complexity of the Skolem Problem at Low Orders",
|
| 165 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 166 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "6bc655ea355511bc15b7e3ed73c7b47d0fa380d32d5974f32a32688a41ef8e3c"
|
| 167 |
+
},
|
| 168 |
+
{
|
| 169 |
+
"paper_id": "computation_schrijver_kernels",
|
| 170 |
+
"title": "On the Computation of Schrijver’s Kernels",
|
| 171 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 172 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "eadd06809cc3c425be64c347ea04935bfd633b0cbdd6da6348fc4dc359f6b6e6"
|
| 173 |
+
},
|
| 174 |
+
{
|
| 175 |
+
"paper_id": "computational_complexity_property",
|
| 176 |
+
"title": "Computational Complexity in Property Testing",
|
| 177 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 178 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "14519e018e882973cd83d448f9dcf956151aa41e449375678652a9865b19a774"
|
| 179 |
+
},
|
| 180 |
+
{
|
| 181 |
+
"paper_id": "contract_design_sequential",
|
| 182 |
+
"title": "Contract Design for Sequential Actions",
|
| 183 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 184 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "90a413de2146cf59bb26019ddb9a883a9660f1591c30b9bded1729281e61f0a8"
|
| 185 |
+
},
|
| 186 |
+
{
|
| 187 |
+
"paper_id": "covering_euclidean_plane",
|
| 188 |
+
"title": "Covering the Euclidean Plane by a Pair of Trees",
|
| 189 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 190 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "12c4f546c4a6dedb42bb712a05bfddef92ac0a70aae7015ec11da16b7487d5de"
|
| 191 |
+
},
|
| 192 |
+
{
|
| 193 |
+
"paper_id": "csp_approach_graph",
|
| 194 |
+
"title": "A CSP approach to Graph Sandwich Problems",
|
| 195 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 196 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "07a6f9d48b0a9747a0a6cdf464d1e6124bc6b5a98eff1b747ee9005842638d1f"
|
| 197 |
+
},
|
| 198 |
+
{
|
| 199 |
+
"paper_id": "derandomizing_pseudopolynomial_algorithms",
|
| 200 |
+
"title": "Derandomizing Pseudopolynomial Algorithms for Subset Sum",
|
| 201 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 202 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "fec1591d67ea657262d1dc59f295a9800820cfb6c51c7bf91d128a679ff3c679"
|
| 203 |
+
},
|
| 204 |
+
{
|
| 205 |
+
"paper_id": "deterministic_dynamic_edge",
|
| 206 |
+
"title": "Deterministic Dynamic Edge Colouring",
|
| 207 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 208 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "380769133dbd6a1c2ebd333e88d2056e50ca7e8dd3044e864b54668ab6f1e361"
|
| 209 |
+
},
|
| 210 |
+
{
|
| 211 |
+
"paper_id": "deterministic_polylogarithmic_competitive",
|
| 212 |
+
"title": "A Deterministic Polylogarithmic Competitive Algorithm for Matching with Delays",
|
| 213 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 214 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "98cf7d22157ae375cf17dc31087c5f862d9c5419c6f01d8ba8882d5a10f4fa64"
|
| 215 |
+
},
|
| 216 |
+
{
|
| 217 |
+
"paper_id": "deterministically_finding_element",
|
| 218 |
+
"title": "ON DETERMINISTICALLY FINDING AN ELEMENT OF HIGH ORDER MODULO A COMPOSITE",
|
| 219 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 220 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "cadfb791c01cab6fea3343ea08b3d431d9bfe3984e778a42653c5e7d1ac932ef"
|
| 221 |
+
},
|
| 222 |
+
{
|
| 223 |
+
"paper_id": "dichotomy_orderings",
|
| 224 |
+
"title": "Dichotomy for orderings?",
|
| 225 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 226 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "79cb192fbe8f942b6a5fdc48aabdce335f83210910d41ed51df542923bf969ab"
|
| 227 |
+
},
|
| 228 |
+
{
|
| 229 |
+
"paper_id": "differentially_private_algorithms",
|
| 230 |
+
"title": "Differentially Private Algorithms for Graph Cuts: A Shifting Mechanism Approach and More",
|
| 231 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 232 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "bca94265671587627a433f4b68f7459d2fb08f4bd81f009effeb0f2d3d29e67e"
|
| 233 |
+
},
|
| 234 |
+
{
|
| 235 |
+
"paper_id": "differentially_private_quasi-concave",
|
| 236 |
+
"title": "Differentially Private Quasi-Concave Optimization: Bypassing the Lower Bound and Application to Geometric Problems",
|
| 237 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 238 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "35eab707c39e9d48400219a53478cb7d06896a52e950f716ab9ddf75237bb5fc"
|
| 239 |
+
},
|
| 240 |
+
{
|
| 241 |
+
"paper_id": "directed_disjoint_paths",
|
| 242 |
+
"title": "The Directed Disjoint Paths Problem with Congestion",
|
| 243 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 244 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "01849c7af9004a598e6d7fa8be2aed914bd1dc85412083ef398634f38e5128d6"
|
| 245 |
+
},
|
| 246 |
+
{
|
| 247 |
+
"paper_id": "disjoint_paths_expanders",
|
| 248 |
+
"title": "Disjoint Paths in Expanders in Deterministic Almost-Linear Time via Hypergraph Perfect Matching",
|
| 249 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 250 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "011494752958c77234a2a5a85fc00127a5de5190049c23eb1b39719f6e67c208"
|
| 251 |
+
},
|
| 252 |
+
{
|
| 253 |
+
"paper_id": "distributed_interactive_proofs",
|
| 254 |
+
"title": "Distributed Interactive Proofs for Planarity with Log-Star Communication",
|
| 255 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 256 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "e02cd2d29b6370b4ddec860c832e2269c9efcb11f09168c9c8659f8a7e1f940d"
|
| 257 |
+
},
|
| 258 |
+
{
|
| 259 |
+
"paper_id": "downward_self-reducibility_total",
|
| 260 |
+
"title": "Downward self-reducibility in the total function polynomial hierarchy",
|
| 261 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 262 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "035a4515f05dc0bda3c5f57f11f3a4e35a405054d3b97890809216c59c488daf"
|
| 263 |
+
},
|
| 264 |
+
{
|
| 265 |
+
"paper_id": "dynamic_3d_convex",
|
| 266 |
+
"title": "Dynamic 3D Convex Hulls Revisited and Applications",
|
| 267 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 268 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "569e3c4d1604dca34ccf30f323b674176d6150798b1bfc04f7a780f3a3747d19"
|
| 269 |
+
},
|
| 270 |
+
{
|
| 271 |
+
"paper_id": "dynamic_connectivity_expected",
|
| 272 |
+
"title": "Dynamic Connectivity with Expected Polylogarithmic Worst-Case Update Time",
|
| 273 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 274 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f05e56d7051ab06a0bda011a7b70ae8cccdf464bc9f1c9b0932789ad49712f7d"
|
| 275 |
+
},
|
| 276 |
+
{
|
| 277 |
+
"paper_id": "edge_expansion_random",
|
| 278 |
+
"title": "ON THE EDGE EXPANSION OF RANDOM POLYTOPES",
|
| 279 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 280 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "1b4df151ad06a414ae1d312a3763e0d59d2607c0e26281c32af6cca35fae3762"
|
| 281 |
+
},
|
| 282 |
+
{
|
| 283 |
+
"paper_id": "efficient_online_random",
|
| 284 |
+
"title": "Efficient Online Random Sampling via Randomness Recycling",
|
| 285 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 286 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "fcb28c2654d0acc0a48b8df91d7e47abf183ae811ea5e780a049f815254731ea"
|
| 287 |
+
},
|
| 288 |
+
{
|
| 289 |
+
"paper_id": "efficiently_constructing_sparse",
|
| 290 |
+
"title": "Efficiently Constructing Sparse Navigable Graphs",
|
| 291 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 292 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "fec0c7cd8bf1678d0f2d50f710b23311ce8fc7f371bf94ae077494fa33f5ad46"
|
| 293 |
+
},
|
| 294 |
+
{
|
| 295 |
+
"paper_id": "erd_s-p_sa",
|
| 296 |
+
"title": "The Erdős-Pósa property for circle graphs as vertex-minors",
|
| 297 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 298 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "0062d55c721b3897e71289dd5b3caa264b03c9c9f4a00049e5eff44f75e23c63"
|
| 299 |
+
},
|
| 300 |
+
{
|
| 301 |
+
"paper_id": "evasive_sets_twisted",
|
| 302 |
+
"title": "Evasive sets, twisted varieties, and container-clique trees",
|
| 303 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 304 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "c56369c9ec36da99818c2a2a12ac1a2ee0b9c9ff91b76977055c81eccc9870b9"
|
| 305 |
+
},
|
| 306 |
+
{
|
| 307 |
+
"paper_id": "excluding_line_minor",
|
| 308 |
+
"title": "Excluding a Line Minor via Design Matrices and Column Number Bounds for the Circuit Imbalance Measure",
|
| 309 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 310 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "a65a96dc8d50dc4e11ba5b57ddfa700cfb3f6a73348a5acf5d6e07a4c0dc4226"
|
| 311 |
+
},
|
| 312 |
+
{
|
| 313 |
+
"paper_id": "existence_fair_efficient",
|
| 314 |
+
"title": "Existence of Fair and Efficient Allocation of Indivisible Chores",
|
| 315 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 316 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f8db068dd0b11556e91a88782f2fa23204fb376dafb0e3b834a7afc2fd31451e"
|
| 317 |
+
},
|
| 318 |
+
{
|
| 319 |
+
"paper_id": "expander_pruning_polylogarithmic",
|
| 320 |
+
"title": "Expander Pruning with Polylogarithmic Worst-Case Recourse and Update Time",
|
| 321 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 322 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "cfb2303f2df9120895a5ccf4134801595176b5ec1efedac7922a28f3b12fe3c2"
|
| 323 |
+
},
|
| 324 |
+
{
|
| 325 |
+
"paper_id": "explicit_min-wise_hash",
|
| 326 |
+
"title": "Explicit Min-wise Hash Families with Optimal Size",
|
| 327 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 328 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "2385fd2ab3dc8d5f58ddb604987f8a8165bf5d024c351d6c2827888147536116"
|
| 329 |
+
},
|
| 330 |
+
{
|
| 331 |
+
"paper_id": "extended_vc-dimension_radon",
|
| 332 |
+
"title": "Extended VC-dimension, and Radon and Tverberg type theorems for unions of convex sets",
|
| 333 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 334 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "ac3a348d4823b83f090fda7f4ccd8fcec689ffaa5e0a4ff1bc218d7858352061"
|
| 335 |
+
},
|
| 336 |
+
{
|
| 337 |
+
"paper_id": "faster_algorithms_packing",
|
| 338 |
+
"title": "Faster algorithms for packing forests in graphs and related problems",
|
| 339 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 340 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "3e72bdf9dafaa7c64a95c4e5705accec37bf6bc9bec6f0a034018d5d03bee7e6"
|
| 341 |
+
},
|
| 342 |
+
{
|
| 343 |
+
"paper_id": "faster_estimation_average",
|
| 344 |
+
"title": "Faster Estimation of the Average Degree of a Graph Using Random Edges and Structural Queries",
|
| 345 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 346 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "44116dda9f643a3a11d86a3bea881a3afce09c3f0f497091d3534386a941135f"
|
| 347 |
+
},
|
| 348 |
+
{
|
| 349 |
+
"paper_id": "faster_negative-weight_shortest",
|
| 350 |
+
"title": "Faster Negative-Weight Shortest Paths and Directed Low-Diameter Decompositions",
|
| 351 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 352 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "b314130ab569e44ba80540067af914a381e3bb4513e1e6c8251330d35db1202c"
|
| 353 |
+
},
|
| 354 |
+
{
|
| 355 |
+
"paper_id": "faster_negative_length",
|
| 356 |
+
"title": "Faster negative length shortest paths by bootstrapping hop reducers",
|
| 357 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 358 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "e0ec2ce4316794505059f43381988b4ea50e1508e0ea2337f22365a1cb3351bb"
|
| 359 |
+
},
|
| 360 |
+
{
|
| 361 |
+
"paper_id": "feature_selection_junta",
|
| 362 |
+
"title": "Feature Selection and Junta Testing are Statistically Equivalent",
|
| 363 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 364 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "1dc73df0d12074751ede7866564be0a78c24ccb140431c42f3960fa0ade8f0ac"
|
| 365 |
+
},
|
| 366 |
+
{
|
| 367 |
+
"paper_id": "few_good_choices",
|
| 368 |
+
"title": "A FEW GOOD CHOICES",
|
| 369 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 370 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "355c7f4ee506db667a09c959251c229fa235f38361d6e091cc926e61dfaffd6a"
|
| 371 |
+
},
|
| 372 |
+
{
|
| 373 |
+
"paper_id": "finding_sparse_induced",
|
| 374 |
+
"title": "Finding sparse induced subgraphs on graphs of bounded induced matching treewidth",
|
| 375 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 376 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "c8f34a00d5b0a97832041bf9adfb9ccc58347f2ea46c5ed3f45ebc487b4b8224"
|
| 377 |
+
},
|
| 378 |
+
{
|
| 379 |
+
"paper_id": "finite_pinwheel_scheduling",
|
| 380 |
+
"title": "Finite Pinwheel Scheduling: the k-Visits Problem",
|
| 381 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 382 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "bb848e70791718c8023b4318a5f42b3a7bf2a6b75eec38c85c0e4266eb5d42d9"
|
| 383 |
+
},
|
| 384 |
+
{
|
| 385 |
+
"paper_id": "generating_pivot_gray",
|
| 386 |
+
"title": "Generating pivot Gray codes for spanning trees of complete graphs in constant amortized time",
|
| 387 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 388 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "405ba1d4fe3fe042aa3e858f32260fd4a7ecea650bf2f4309d4b1cd267638e99"
|
| 389 |
+
},
|
| 390 |
+
{
|
| 391 |
+
"paper_id": "halfspaces_hard_test",
|
| 392 |
+
"title": "Halfspaces are hard to test with relative error",
|
| 393 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 394 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "30183848095a315e81d27c9e2c113f061de0448c8d85da9baf5fe0136fe13b1f"
|
| 395 |
+
},
|
| 396 |
+
{
|
| 397 |
+
"paper_id": "hallucinating_flows_optimal",
|
| 398 |
+
"title": "Hallucinating Flows for Optimal Mechanisms",
|
| 399 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 400 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "cfd612b24e5b60611caaf1ee4b6f3ead099e024b5552c7568e09a272fe9b5605"
|
| 401 |
+
},
|
| 402 |
+
{
|
| 403 |
+
"paper_id": "hardness_approximation_shortest",
|
| 404 |
+
"title": "Hardness of Approximation for Shortest Path with Vector Costs",
|
| 405 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 406 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "ac1400ab6aa4113356416407de47c247eac3dd7fce7bb8793fc4ff125bb1cd0f"
|
| 407 |
+
},
|
| 408 |
+
{
|
| 409 |
+
"paper_id": "history-independent_load_balancing",
|
| 410 |
+
"title": "History-Independent Load Balancing",
|
| 411 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 412 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "c136d5d33d8546b5900d0de5a8890400c256907c0936e24b736d099c0eb70470"
|
| 413 |
+
},
|
| 414 |
+
{
|
| 415 |
+
"paper_id": "improved_additive_approximation",
|
| 416 |
+
"title": "Improved Additive Approximation Algorithms for APSP",
|
| 417 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 418 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "326358319788cd136da03aa67babaefb561c55788ed4adf87eafcacb632d8449"
|
| 419 |
+
},
|
| 420 |
+
{
|
| 421 |
+
"paper_id": "improved_approximation_ranking",
|
| 422 |
+
"title": "Improved Approximation for Ranking on General Graphs",
|
| 423 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 424 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "317f8fb28a1864dc40ba63f1fe82465b372e9d8e693a5a0e4adfa0494ac0fd98"
|
| 425 |
+
},
|
| 426 |
+
{
|
| 427 |
+
"paper_id": "improved_online_algorithms",
|
| 428 |
+
"title": "Improved Online Algorithms for Inventory Management Problems with Holding and Delay Costs: Riding the Wave Makes Things Simpler, Stronger, & More General",
|
| 429 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 430 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "1d979140bfd8b88b13eac7804ae4f68b1bf9e779f2cd9f6f4a3587a1c1b47bfe"
|
| 431 |
+
},
|
| 432 |
+
{
|
| 433 |
+
"paper_id": "interaction_between_skew-representability",
|
| 434 |
+
"title": "Interaction between skew-representability, tensor products, extension properties, and rank inequalities",
|
| 435 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 436 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "d367e96797ac9a18c1bfa2463b2caf60414fd39637157a2e58dcd281d3eb76ad"
|
| 437 |
+
},
|
| 438 |
+
{
|
| 439 |
+
"paper_id": "k-sum_hardness_implies",
|
| 440 |
+
"title": "k-SUM Hardness Implies Treewidth-SETH",
|
| 441 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 442 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "df4d71bc17c4cc86c9a982ac5300c7e89ef31771a16043e54b848d470859c784"
|
| 443 |
+
},
|
| 444 |
+
{
|
| 445 |
+
"paper_id": "language_generation_limit",
|
| 446 |
+
"title": "Language Generation in the Limit: Noise, Loss, and Feedback",
|
| 447 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 448 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f7416c692729e268dc2312e649530194d4e54ebd73a6a8c1176d29ee86330159"
|
| 449 |
+
},
|
| 450 |
+
{
|
| 451 |
+
"paper_id": "learning_echo_chamber",
|
| 452 |
+
"title": "Learning in an Echo Chamber: Online Learning with Replay Adversary",
|
| 453 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 454 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "d401129db110a1c7818a33ddd0a0ff62a4fa42a51822423487539ed0e06e1191"
|
| 455 |
+
},
|
| 456 |
+
{
|
| 457 |
+
"paper_id": "likelihood_existence_average",
|
| 458 |
+
"title": "Likelihood of the Existence of Average Justified Representation",
|
| 459 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 460 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "8994a7619a64051e0422e991ef365c025dfa9115001e559ceac8080fcb289239"
|
| 461 |
+
},
|
| 462 |
+
{
|
| 463 |
+
"paper_id": "lines_crossing_pairwise",
|
| 464 |
+
"title": "On Lines Crossing Pairwise Intersecting Convex Sets in Three Dimensions",
|
| 465 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 466 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "6e2efa9b5e6b96d61621b9a19fef0a4b4bbc5c76b28bd7bc2d17a62e41978985"
|
| 467 |
+
},
|
| 468 |
+
{
|
| 469 |
+
"paper_id": "listing_faces_polytopes",
|
| 470 |
+
"title": "LISTING FACES OF POLYTOPES",
|
| 471 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 472 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "1a9fa00f9339e87be7c6101dbc547c962b692bebb12d249a65f2319049d57f79"
|
| 473 |
+
},
|
| 474 |
+
{
|
| 475 |
+
"paper_id": "local_gibbs_sampling",
|
| 476 |
+
"title": "LOCAL GIBBS SAMPLING BEYOND LOCAL UNIFORMITY",
|
| 477 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 478 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "44487d32d1ec9b4229f6e7d59373fceda79bfc8d5347741307a6663a449ca210"
|
| 479 |
+
},
|
| 480 |
+
{
|
| 481 |
+
"paper_id": "low-sensitivity_matching_sampling",
|
| 482 |
+
"title": "Low-Sensitivity Matching via Sampling from Gibbs Distributions",
|
| 483 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 484 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "700d07a04ebba60cd6c60774ee5c015c5b23d1646e14e889528bf858662c9152"
|
| 485 |
+
},
|
| 486 |
+
{
|
| 487 |
+
"paper_id": "lower_bounds_csp",
|
| 488 |
+
"title": "Lower Bounds for CSP Hierarchies Through Ideal Reduction",
|
| 489 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 490 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "e2142da58c439979078677007b2f898c384dce6f653bcb5faa5b61bee7395df5"
|
| 491 |
+
},
|
| 492 |
+
{
|
| 493 |
+
"paper_id": "lower_bounds_universal",
|
| 494 |
+
"title": "LOWER BOUNDS FOR THE UNIVERSAL TSP ON THE PLANE",
|
| 495 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 496 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "d8cb04b3899b30fadfc81df18355916b44050fddfc88b7fad7aa7b4927943c48"
|
| 497 |
+
},
|
| 498 |
+
{
|
| 499 |
+
"paper_id": "matroids_equitable",
|
| 500 |
+
"title": "Matroids are Equitable*",
|
| 501 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 502 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "7c1478cd33b02279d06d68a6f095e9b229b75af6809bcea5b7bf8b8f3fca1212"
|
| 503 |
+
},
|
| 504 |
+
{
|
| 505 |
+
"paper_id": "max_bisection_harder",
|
| 506 |
+
"title": "MAX BISECTION might be harder to approximate than MAX CUT",
|
| 507 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 508 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "c54e91b6fc54d181fe28acecd9502367acc84d80f47f70106ecf3e5ec9cca1e1"
|
| 509 |
+
},
|
| 510 |
+
{
|
| 511 |
+
"paper_id": "near-complete_resolution_exponential-time",
|
| 512 |
+
"title": "A Near-Complete Resolution of the Exponential-Time Complexity of $k$-opt for the Traveling Salesman Problem",
|
| 513 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 514 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "d905c7dd99b917fd5d1639c07833284038b2118b2cb3d05fec9179fcafaa34c9"
|
| 515 |
+
},
|
| 516 |
+
{
|
| 517 |
+
"paper_id": "near-linear_time_subhypergraph",
|
| 518 |
+
"title": "Near-linear time subhypergraph counting in bounded degeneracy hypergraphs",
|
| 519 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 520 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "185195fa8b6512d8c9befca7032a15437106543d4916dd68bf09c7b38fc61aaa"
|
| 521 |
+
},
|
| 522 |
+
{
|
| 523 |
+
"paper_id": "nearly_optimal_bounds",
|
| 524 |
+
"title": "Nearly Optimal Bounds for Stochastic Online Sorting",
|
| 525 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 526 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "10dda461424cad79704b19879a499ab4d83412888112bcc1f794df3bf6819063"
|
| 527 |
+
},
|
| 528 |
+
{
|
| 529 |
+
"paper_id": "nearly_tight_bounds",
|
| 530 |
+
"title": "Nearly Tight Bounds for the Online Sorting Problem",
|
| 531 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 532 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "6807fb6cb3d2fa58551748a9e541b9fafd44d00300b6fd8d15e742cb29a25a4d"
|
| 533 |
+
},
|
| 534 |
+
{
|
| 535 |
+
"paper_id": "nearly_tight_sample",
|
| 536 |
+
"title": "Nearly Tight Sample Complexity for Matroid Online Contention Resolution",
|
| 537 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 538 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "511cb59c2b443c2c98fe9bf6d2c934c2e4d5d250be25807e5fca57333a033261"
|
| 539 |
+
},
|
| 540 |
+
{
|
| 541 |
+
"paper_id": "networked_information_aggregation",
|
| 542 |
+
"title": "Networked Information Aggregation via Machine Learning",
|
| 543 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 544 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "c097fcb5f1d998b4715feed03dbcff8f9388eab79aea58002038686d96c6c4fc"
|
| 545 |
+
},
|
| 546 |
+
{
|
| 547 |
+
"paper_id": "new_oracles_labeling",
|
| 548 |
+
"title": "New Oracles and Labeling Schemes for Vertex Cut Queries",
|
| 549 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 550 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "15b00eb2160ab4464465876169916052f5d662f9b4f949a117a800bb7345e3df"
|
| 551 |
+
},
|
| 552 |
+
{
|
| 553 |
+
"paper_id": "online_3-taxi_general",
|
| 554 |
+
"title": "Online 3-Taxi on General Metrics",
|
| 555 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 556 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "273a596f2f328680c386dc012df2666f006d5ea38410be462720c45b8a87ad6e"
|
| 557 |
+
},
|
| 558 |
+
{
|
| 559 |
+
"paper_id": "online_conformal_prediction",
|
| 560 |
+
"title": "Online Conformal Prediction with Efficiency Guarantees",
|
| 561 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 562 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "4370d96c5bb6535118610fd6ad79852531bb17e4be1a7aed233640f17870ce4c"
|
| 563 |
+
},
|
| 564 |
+
{
|
| 565 |
+
"paper_id": "online_joint_replenishment",
|
| 566 |
+
"title": "Online Joint Replenishment Problem with Arbitrary Holding and Backlog Costs",
|
| 567 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 568 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f670ba6ca6337176cd5d83a8552e34ea1e127699c0a8b8afe29eb00d8c20c153"
|
| 569 |
+
},
|
| 570 |
+
{
|
| 571 |
+
"paper_id": "online_orthogonal_vectors",
|
| 572 |
+
"title": "Online Orthogonal Vectors Revisited",
|
| 573 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 574 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "0347a6dde2d773a6240aaada59ae978ae597f5b70fa640b6dde85e82cbd40256"
|
| 575 |
+
},
|
| 576 |
+
{
|
| 577 |
+
"paper_id": "online_proportional_apportionment",
|
| 578 |
+
"title": "Online Proportional Apportionment",
|
| 579 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 580 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "965aad5b410f0dc4c865f7aa678756483b19cb25d2b8d58f3eb2b1e831faf4de"
|
| 581 |
+
},
|
| 582 |
+
{
|
| 583 |
+
"paper_id": "optimal_density_bound",
|
| 584 |
+
"title": "An Optimal Density Bound for Discretized Point Patrolling",
|
| 585 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 586 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "974116a270452ec7aaf4ce79f3ce3c684c8bb43b809eda028ba55ce5feb1eb9d"
|
| 587 |
+
},
|
| 588 |
+
{
|
| 589 |
+
"paper_id": "optimal_random_access",
|
| 590 |
+
"title": "Optimal Random Access and Conditional Lower Bounds for 2D Compressed Strings",
|
| 591 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 592 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "83ae5e9d9c77efda2a63128ebc4a51b572be1322bf784dfad7bc0242a035c245"
|
| 593 |
+
},
|
| 594 |
+
{
|
| 595 |
+
"paper_id": "optimal_rounding_two-stage",
|
| 596 |
+
"title": "Optimal Rounding for Two-Stage Bipartite Matching",
|
| 597 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 598 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "5ca3c3c7eda4b1db51cc28870998fe18981eefa9e3933b7b6ed4a339586d71e1"
|
| 599 |
+
},
|
| 600 |
+
{
|
| 601 |
+
"paper_id": "optimal_type-dependent_liquid",
|
| 602 |
+
"title": "Optimal Type-Dependent Liquid Welfare Guarantees for Autobidding Agents with Budgets",
|
| 603 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 604 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "2d5eb18547532ab2791ecc078bf2d10a584b94afee840737e3a3e7a24b5f0e65"
|
| 605 |
+
},
|
| 606 |
+
{
|
| 607 |
+
"paper_id": "parameterized_linear_formulation",
|
| 608 |
+
"title": "A parameterized linear formulation of the integer hull",
|
| 609 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 610 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "c13dd499e7d15edb72fd0660a29bf174593c20f59a6c48dbea4138fe826f4c33"
|
| 611 |
+
},
|
| 612 |
+
{
|
| 613 |
+
"paper_id": "peeling_rotten_potatoes",
|
| 614 |
+
"title": "Peeling Rotten Potatoes for a Faster Approximation of Convex Cover",
|
| 615 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 616 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "70ee07178b97965efb5545afc26a92dedad63354c7b9c777a640c9ac8986e5e3"
|
| 617 |
+
},
|
| 618 |
+
{
|
| 619 |
+
"paper_id": "perfect_matchings_random",
|
| 620 |
+
"title": "PERFECT MATCHINGS IN RANDOM SPARSIFICATIONS OF DENSE HYPERGRAPHS",
|
| 621 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 622 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "4b2966beb738398d1c64b46f36c68fc9fd6df77597bd54afa0ab2975f5af31f3"
|
| 623 |
+
},
|
| 624 |
+
{
|
| 625 |
+
"paper_id": "phase_transition_sinkhorn-knopp",
|
| 626 |
+
"title": "PHASE TRANSITION OF THE SINKHORN-KNOPP ALGORITHM",
|
| 627 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 628 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "fb7d4ebfab9712e609340d41fd57ee0cd833a21d63ea3be22b1cfcc39b5e8db6"
|
| 629 |
+
},
|
| 630 |
+
{
|
| 631 |
+
"paper_id": "polynomial-time_classical_simulation",
|
| 632 |
+
"title": "Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of Noisy Quantum Circuits with Naturally Fault-Tolerant Gates",
|
| 633 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 634 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "880980d0ef86f3ff36b2a7818685b509c2ba3cc2b889f4520589ff07c5f509f1"
|
| 635 |
+
},
|
| 636 |
+
{
|
| 637 |
+
"paper_id": "post-quantum_lower_bound",
|
| 638 |
+
"title": "A Post-Quantum Lower Bound for the Distributed Lovász Local Lemma",
|
| 639 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 640 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "ec071721a14289ef5722b79fa22e0e80a564583e70c5815866def7af39406124"
|
| 641 |
+
},
|
| 642 |
+
{
|
| 643 |
+
"paper_id": "power_matching_online",
|
| 644 |
+
"title": "The Power of Matching for Online Fractional Hedonic Games",
|
| 645 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 646 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "e317440cc44afd2f2a8367c7987680f9b2b38ff5b0ef289533d192c66163d5c0"
|
| 647 |
+
},
|
| 648 |
+
{
|
| 649 |
+
"paper_id": "problems_optimization_computational",
|
| 650 |
+
"title": "PROBLEMS FROM OPTIMIZATION AND COMPUTATIONAL ALGEBRA EQUIVALENT TO HILBERT’S NULLSTELLENSATZ",
|
| 651 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 652 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "80e00474a114719064992c8a987755bebaeba2bc139d70d60d68ae023feec824"
|
| 653 |
+
},
|
| 654 |
+
{
|
| 655 |
+
"paper_id": "prophet_inequality_samples",
|
| 656 |
+
"title": "Prophet Inequality from Samples: Is the More the Merrier?",
|
| 657 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 658 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "4474f6ebcb63451595437362d9a457450d3d8d2ef32dcb624cf4e0926ff20aae"
|
| 659 |
+
},
|
| 660 |
+
{
|
| 661 |
+
"paper_id": "quantum_advantage_solving",
|
| 662 |
+
"title": "Quantum Advantage via Solving Multivariate Polynomials",
|
| 663 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 664 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "a1ee4ce9cdf8dca9a08544934ccde254141f5a1e551f7398c61a637013b13e33"
|
| 665 |
+
},
|
| 666 |
+
{
|
| 667 |
+
"paper_id": "quantum_chromatic_gap",
|
| 668 |
+
"title": "On the quantum chromatic gap",
|
| 669 |
+
"num_questions": 0,
|
| 670 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f77843a14fb97ef0934b6f2ef3cc114162e8051e9e9e60347b5a5fd4b5ffe662"
|
| 671 |
+
},
|
| 672 |
+
{
|
| 673 |
+
"paper_id": "quantum_state_preparation",
|
| 674 |
+
"title": "Quantum State Preparation with Optimal T-Count",
|
| 675 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 676 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "d61b06f6248607c8fd42df69ba54c9a81f16ae801058557b19c03e8ec96c17e2"
|
| 677 |
+
},
|
| 678 |
+
{
|
| 679 |
+
"paper_id": "quasi-polynomial_bound_minimal",
|
| 680 |
+
"title": "A quasi-polynomial bound for the minimal excluded minors for a surface",
|
| 681 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 682 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "2dd4cd40de317a9eed32941fdeb976951de1f82c6a58dfcf89c5d76f94c1ceb6"
|
| 683 |
+
},
|
| 684 |
+
{
|
| 685 |
+
"paper_id": "rapid_mixing_glauber",
|
| 686 |
+
"title": "Rapid Mixing of Glauber Dynamics for Monotone Systems via Entropic Independence",
|
| 687 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 688 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "face6dfad4e0d04bb6c78c344e310b2b2611610474e6a21f113da66c7f6515fe"
|
| 689 |
+
},
|
| 690 |
+
{
|
| 691 |
+
"paper_id": "recognizing_leaf_powers",
|
| 692 |
+
"title": "Recognizing Leaf Powers and Pairwise Compatibility Graphs is NP-Complete",
|
| 693 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 694 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f5980e4647a2e3c09816f83bc543e2e51b827f63303c71d59c2ae9fe95567741"
|
| 695 |
+
},
|
| 696 |
+
{
|
| 697 |
+
"paper_id": "robust_equilibria_shared",
|
| 698 |
+
"title": "Robust Equilibria in Shared Resource Allocation via Strengthening Border’s Theorem",
|
| 699 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 700 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "7226ee267da41f4e99762b9bd1e98caad660cdef5a9b3cff3796e10a4062376e"
|
| 701 |
+
},
|
| 702 |
+
{
|
| 703 |
+
"paper_id": "rumour_spreading_depends",
|
| 704 |
+
"title": "RUMOUR SPREADING DEPENDS ON THE LATENT GEOMETRY AND DEGREE DISTRIBUTION IN SOCIAL NETWORK MODELS",
|
| 705 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 706 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "43bb472d8db00c3a448c3bcb7e579c5cec10fd14236a805b1565a198522ddee1"
|
| 707 |
+
},
|
| 708 |
+
{
|
| 709 |
+
"paper_id": "selfish_local_online",
|
| 710 |
+
"title": "Selfish, Local and Online Scheduling via Vector Fitting",
|
| 711 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 712 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "102b5fa072aad4f5827814dab3b6c45ca482b0a1b75b3c1fed38769a05d0545c"
|
| 713 |
+
},
|
| 714 |
+
{
|
| 715 |
+
"paper_id": "separations_between_oblivious",
|
| 716 |
+
"title": "Separations between Oblivious and Adaptive Adversaries for Natural Dynamic Graph Problems",
|
| 717 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 718 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "53b671260d0ee7fdfc52c6c9a3863f054d00974e557239948f54d876e66442f5"
|
| 719 |
+
},
|
| 720 |
+
{
|
| 721 |
+
"paper_id": "short_circuit_walks",
|
| 722 |
+
"title": "Short circuit walks in fixed dimension",
|
| 723 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 724 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "02c5da9b4caf82fea87eec711a207498b613483370f7d7028e39860db36f42f7"
|
| 725 |
+
},
|
| 726 |
+
{
|
| 727 |
+
"paper_id": "shortcuts_transitive-closure_spanners",
|
| 728 |
+
"title": "Shortcuts and Transitive-Closure Spanners Approximation",
|
| 729 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 730 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "40f3111f73e8c793f69cf77dbf826edc4a1e59fa04f8c1bd920a523bd267d2f2"
|
| 731 |
+
},
|
| 732 |
+
{
|
| 733 |
+
"paper_id": "simple_fast_reduction",
|
| 734 |
+
"title": "A Simple and Fast Reduction from Gomory-Hu Trees to Polylog Maxflows",
|
| 735 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 736 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "3dd84e41650bf93ff501155f1df61e03ebbffe37b6c4854d7d9f212955ebb47c"
|
| 737 |
+
},
|
| 738 |
+
{
|
| 739 |
+
"paper_id": "smooth_trade-off_tensor",
|
| 740 |
+
"title": "Smooth Trade-off for Tensor PCA via Sharp Bounds for Kikuchi Matrices",
|
| 741 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 742 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "72a671cbd97e64a3b22abcfe4d8f5b98a562c9a7e7b11849f05d4ea084b02d80"
|
| 743 |
+
},
|
| 744 |
+
{
|
| 745 |
+
"paper_id": "space-efficient_k-mismatch_text",
|
| 746 |
+
"title": "Space-Efficient $k$-Mismatch Text Indexes",
|
| 747 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 748 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "448e7b462c6aa5bb8ef9c8b8a0aca88b832d88485507d8d8f3b50c02d1d88804"
|
| 749 |
+
},
|
| 750 |
+
{
|
| 751 |
+
"paper_id": "sparsifying_cayley_graphs",
|
| 752 |
+
"title": "Sparsifying Cayley Graphs on Every Group",
|
| 753 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 754 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "ba170b7c00bfd793abfb92dd8773e88a6de7d93166bd42a22b03396951ba9eb2"
|
| 755 |
+
},
|
| 756 |
+
{
|
| 757 |
+
"paper_id": "sparsifying_sums_positive",
|
| 758 |
+
"title": "Sparsifying Sums of Positive Semidefinite Matrices",
|
| 759 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 760 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "9e24f4732b6a771b90f1b5277c4e6258bd5bdaf7766393e299658b0c537d7024"
|
| 761 |
+
},
|
| 762 |
+
{
|
| 763 |
+
"paper_id": "strongly_polynomial_parallel",
|
| 764 |
+
"title": "Strongly Polynomial Parallel Work-Depth Tradeoffs for Directed SSSP",
|
| 765 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 766 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "1de96b6068069adce2c7b02e33315737d7b50b3a61a9e5c4178943e215e3833e"
|
| 767 |
+
},
|
| 768 |
+
{
|
| 769 |
+
"paper_id": "sublinear_metric_steiner",
|
| 770 |
+
"title": "Sublinear Metric Steiner Forest via Maximal Independent Set",
|
| 771 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 772 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "42ad6d1b6f32e20c6b7dfa3e7360b3cff9f527ec4c3b4a982efe69961afc0123"
|
| 773 |
+
},
|
| 774 |
+
{
|
| 775 |
+
"paper_id": "succinct_dynamic_rank",
|
| 776 |
+
"title": "Succinct Dynamic Rank/Select: Bypassing the Tree-Structure Bottleneck",
|
| 777 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 778 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "1594670813fcfc2d43bd3b6defc60d0499ca3bccd4c20977d0377379ee05889a"
|
| 779 |
+
},
|
| 780 |
+
{
|
| 781 |
+
"paper_id": "tight_differentially_private",
|
| 782 |
+
"title": "Tight Differentially Private PCA via Matrix Coherence",
|
| 783 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 784 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "05dfdc6eae40c588cd97f3dd9bab2520df51c05ad9f1c4169cd7c09d261afcfb"
|
| 785 |
+
},
|
| 786 |
+
{
|
| 787 |
+
"paper_id": "time-biased_random_walks",
|
| 788 |
+
"title": "Time-Biased Random Walks and Robustness of Expanders",
|
| 789 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 790 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "6ed8f8aeb1da66af289bf5de9390e89b1d5689460bfdf93038eac170f2f66cf2"
|
| 791 |
+
},
|
| 792 |
+
{
|
| 793 |
+
"paper_id": "tree_covers_size",
|
| 794 |
+
"title": "Tree covers of size 2 for the Euclidean plane",
|
| 795 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 796 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "f6ec129d7f6e108a37c4121108b945e68ef22e27a554687dafbe9a13035219aa"
|
| 797 |
+
},
|
| 798 |
+
{
|
| 799 |
+
"paper_id": "tree_embedding_high",
|
| 800 |
+
"title": "Tree Embedding in High Dimensions: Dynamic and Massively Parallel",
|
| 801 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 802 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "300fd4aed137dcfe9f66fd7f1c140bacf530ad1dc356461fd3ea4b41cddcbe20"
|
| 803 |
+
},
|
| 804 |
+
{
|
| 805 |
+
"paper_id": "truly_subcubic_combinatorial",
|
| 806 |
+
"title": "A Truly Subcubic Combinatorial Algorithm for Induced 4-Cycle Detection",
|
| 807 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 808 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "e9fbeb451ccfea73aa481b1a3f57c8d6245e5faead450d1938f44d5d8952fc1f"
|
| 809 |
+
},
|
| 810 |
+
{
|
| 811 |
+
"paper_id": "unbounded_error_correcting",
|
| 812 |
+
"title": "Unbounded Error Correcting Codes",
|
| 813 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 814 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "16b83f2dd5a104e59c67852c7869d60ce18940b0eb982c3117e808a5b58a3c16"
|
| 815 |
+
},
|
| 816 |
+
{
|
| 817 |
+
"paper_id": "unconditional_lower_bound",
|
| 818 |
+
"title": "An unconditional lower bound for the active-set method in convex quadratic maximization",
|
| 819 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 820 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "b878596eeb059ec703b8cb3fd342e5e093b7763f95cd21a1afa3c65446214a28"
|
| 821 |
+
},
|
| 822 |
+
{
|
| 823 |
+
"paper_id": "universal_connection_schedules",
|
| 824 |
+
"title": "Universal Connection Schedules for Reconfigurable Networking",
|
| 825 |
+
"num_questions": 3,
|
| 826 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "c1349eff0d6bfcaf23b6c94b6e96728c725c68893867b3a07b0b28aa4776b2a7"
|
| 827 |
+
},
|
| 828 |
+
{
|
| 829 |
+
"paper_id": "vizing_theorem_deterministic",
|
| 830 |
+
"title": "Vizing’s Theorem in Deterministic Almost-Linear Time",
|
| 831 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 832 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "06a02c5c7e1a6cbfd6ce91043ab7b7b6dbe0e57e34b743be46299d5637dcedd8"
|
| 833 |
+
},
|
| 834 |
+
{
|
| 835 |
+
"paper_id": "weighted_k-server_admits",
|
| 836 |
+
"title": "Weighted $k$-Server Admits an Exponentially Competitive Algorithm",
|
| 837 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 838 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "706d707b7a834758ec6123a26359015cf6289a56cc5d2c66df1fb40cd94f5337"
|
| 839 |
+
},
|
| 840 |
+
{
|
| 841 |
+
"paper_id": "weighted_pseudorandom_generators",
|
| 842 |
+
"title": "Weighted Pseudorandom Generators for Read-Once Branching Programs via Weighted Pseudorandom Reductions",
|
| 843 |
+
"num_questions": 2,
|
| 844 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "141757d9fd4b897ebca19e762f69eb94f84828a77fed5656172d90559fa7c47c"
|
| 845 |
+
},
|
| 846 |
+
{
|
| 847 |
+
"paper_id": "well-separated_pair_decomposition",
|
| 848 |
+
"title": "A well-separated pair decomposition for low density graphs",
|
| 849 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 850 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "479feffc4c761a2e22f3ba65d11384d5146ac773d13d2bf1ded1fe722bac11b0"
|
| 851 |
+
},
|
| 852 |
+
{
|
| 853 |
+
"paper_id": "you_almost_beat",
|
| 854 |
+
"title": "You (Almost) Can’t Beat Brute Force for 3-Matroid Intersection",
|
| 855 |
+
"num_questions": 1,
|
| 856 |
+
"source_dag_sha256": "fa397e8fdd26deee1a4c2cc85325662f6a11f1c5a67628255a4fa976e91e1d31"
|
| 857 |
+
}
|
| 858 |
+
],
|
| 859 |
+
"removed_big_number_questions": 41
|
| 860 |
+
}
|