Update README.md

README.md

@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Both source agreements are real, publicly filed credit agreements, available in
 
 The two documents were chosen to contrast: a secured leveraged term loan with an extensive covenant package and multi-jurisdiction guarantee structure, against a large investment-grade-style syndicated revolver whose collateral obligations are themselves rating-triggered. Both run to several hundred pages.
 
-**Every record is independently verifiable.** Because the agreements are public, any reader can open the cited section and check the reasoning trace against the actual contractual language — the claim and its evidence are both inspectable. Doc #1 records cite sections including 5.15 (Designation of Subsidiaries), 6.04 (Investments, Loans and Advances) and 6.07 (Dividends); Doc #2 records cite sections including 1.01 (Defined Terms) and 2.17 (Defaulting Lenders). Note that section numbering differs between the two agreements, so a section reference is only meaningful alongside its `Document ID`.
+**Every record is independently verifiable .** Because the agreements are public, any reader can open the cited section and check the reasoning trace against the actual contractual language — the claim and its evidence are both inspectable. Doc #1 records cite sections including 5.15 (Designation of Subsidiaries), 6.04 (Investments, Loans and Advances) and 6.07 (Dividends); Doc #2 records cite sections including 1.01 (Defined Terms) and 2.17 (Defaulting Lenders). Note that section numbering differs between the two agreements, so a section reference is only meaningful alongside its `Document ID`.
 
 Human Edge built this benchmark on public filings by design, so that the work can be shared, audited, and reproduced without an NDA. The full corpus draws on these same two agreements.