Docs: explain LeanTransitionCorpus for ATP training
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -13,10 +13,55 @@ configs:
|
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
# LeanTransitionCorpus
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
-
not the complete planned corpus.
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Format
|
| 22 |
|
|
@@ -37,6 +82,28 @@ Null stays null; an empty object stays the JSON string `{}`.
|
|
| 37 |
identity of the provenance-based proof key plus `step_index`, prefixed by
|
| 38 |
`ltc-v2:`. The earlier colliding source IDs are not retained in another column.
|
| 39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40 |
Each shard is round-trip compared against every original JSON row before upload.
|
| 41 |
Remote bytes are streamed back and checked for SHA-256 and size at a pinned commit.
|
| 42 |
`manifests/batches/` records verified shard hashes/revisions, original batch
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
# LeanTransitionCorpus
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
> **Status: incremental upload in progress.** This repository is useful now, but
|
| 17 |
+
> it is not the complete planned corpus. Counts, source coverage, and shard
|
| 18 |
+
> inventory will grow as verified batches are added.
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
LeanTransitionCorpus is a dataset for training and studying automated theorem
|
| 21 |
+
proving systems in Lean. Its unit of data is one tactic transition: the proof state
|
| 22 |
+
before a tactic, the tactic that was executed, and the resulting state. This makes
|
| 23 |
+
it suitable for tactic prediction, proof-state representation learning, premise
|
| 24 |
+
selection, retrieval, verification, and trajectory-level training.
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
Many Lean datasets expose a theorem, tactic, and pretty-printed goal strings. This
|
| 27 |
+
corpus retains those human-readable views, but also preserves richer information
|
| 28 |
+
from Lean's elaborator: the tactic `Syntax` tree, resolved identifiers, recursive
|
| 29 |
+
Lean `Expr` trees, local context, metavariables, universe metavariables, source
|
| 30 |
+
ranges, and premise/context information. The extra representations make it
|
| 31 |
+
possible to investigate models that use Lean's internal structure rather than
|
| 32 |
+
recovering it from printed text.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
Original source and environment provenance are retained per row. The repository's
|
| 35 |
+
MIT metadata applies to this packaging; source corpus licenses and restrictions
|
| 36 |
+
remain applicable and are not replaced by this card.
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
## Source datasets
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
The extraction pipeline draws from pinned snapshots of the following Lean sources.
|
| 41 |
+
Rows identify their origin in `source_dataset`, `source_url`, `repo_commit`, and
|
| 42 |
+
toolchain columns. Coverage is incremental: a source listed here may have less
|
| 43 |
+
published coverage than another at any point in time.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
| Source | Role in the corpus |
|
| 46 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 47 |
+
| NuminaMath-CoT | Lean formalizations from the Numina mathematical reasoning corpus. This is the source of the initial uploaded seed. |
|
| 48 |
+
| DeepSeek-Prover | Lean proof data used to broaden theorem and tactic coverage. |
|
| 49 |
+
| Goedel Lean Workbook | Lean workbook proofs, retained as a separately attributable source. |
|
| 50 |
+
| Mathlib | The pinned Mathlib snapshot supplies the theorem-proving environment and contributes directly extracted Mathlib theorems. |
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
## How the data is produced
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
For each selected theorem, the extractor runs the matching pinned Lean and Mathlib
|
| 55 |
+
environment, records the sequence of tactic-state transitions, and canonicalizes
|
| 56 |
+
the result into one row per transition. It validates internal-state structure and
|
| 57 |
+
continuity between adjacent transitions, assigns deterministic splits, and keeps
|
| 58 |
+
provenance needed to trace a row back to its source theorem and environment.
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
Rows are written as Parquet shards. Before publication, every shard is checked
|
| 61 |
+
against its source rows; uploaded bytes are read back and verified at an immutable
|
| 62 |
+
Hugging Face revision. Batch manifests record shard hashes, source-batch identity,
|
| 63 |
+
and extraction evidence. A `replay_status` value records whether an additional
|
| 64 |
+
replay check was performed; publication alone does not mean replay certification.
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
## Format
|
| 67 |
|
|
|
|
| 82 |
identity of the provenance-based proof key plus `step_index`, prefixed by
|
| 83 |
`ltc-v2:`. The earlier colliding source IDs are not retained in another column.
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
+
## Schema in plain language
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
Each row is a single ordered step within a proof. The fields fall into these groups:
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
| Fields | Meaning |
|
| 90 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 91 |
+
| `example_id`, `proof_id`, `step_index`, `split`, `schema_version` | Stable identity, position in the proof, dataset split, and format version. `example_id` is globally unique; `proof_id` alone may not be. |
|
| 92 |
+
| `source_dataset`, `source_url`, `repo_commit`, `file_path`, `lean_version`, `mathlib_version`, `extractor_version`, `pantograph_version`, `provenance` | Where the theorem came from and the exact environment and extraction provenance needed to reproduce or audit it. |
|
| 93 |
+
| `theorem_name`, `theorem_statement_raw`, `theorem_source_raw`, `namespace`, `imports` | The theorem and its surrounding Lean source context. |
|
| 94 |
+
| `state_before_raw`, `tactic_raw`, `state_after_raw` | The familiar human-readable goal display and tactic text for the transition. |
|
| 95 |
+
| `state_before_structured`, `state_after_structured` | Parsed versions of the displayed proof states. |
|
| 96 |
+
| `state_before_internal`, `state_after_internal` | Lean's detailed elaborator state: active goals, local declarations, targets, metavariables, universe metavariables, and recursive expressions. |
|
| 97 |
+
| `atomic_tactics`, `tactic_internal` | The tactic's atomic view and its full Lean `Syntax` representation, including identifier resolution, premise references, and nested tactic structure when available. |
|
| 98 |
+
| `used_premises`, `available_context`, `source_start`, `source_end` | Referenced declarations, candidate context, and the tactic's source span. |
|
| 99 |
+
| `terminal`, `terminal_marker`, `terminal_raw` | Whether this step closes the proof and the source/display marker associated with closure. |
|
| 100 |
+
| `theorem_fingerprint`, `state_fingerprint`, `transition_fingerprint` | Deterministic hashes useful for deduplication, grouping, and integrity checks. |
|
| 101 |
+
| `replay_status`, `replay_error` | Result of optional replay validation; `not_run` means no independent replay was attempted. |
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
The recursive structures are stored as lossless JSON strings in Parquet. Parse them
|
| 104 |
+
with `json.loads` when you need their tree structure; leave them as strings for
|
| 105 |
+
text-only training baselines.
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
Each shard is round-trip compared against every original JSON row before upload.
|
| 108 |
Remote bytes are streamed back and checked for SHA-256 and size at a pinned commit.
|
| 109 |
`manifests/batches/` records verified shard hashes/revisions, original batch
|