v1.0.0 Sync from inkwell 5167273d

update README.md
add data/cases.jsonl
add CITATION.cff
add LICENSE
add schema.json

CITATION.cff

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+cff-version: 1.2.0
+message: If you use this dataset, cite it as below.
+type: dataset
+title: Screenplay Revision Evaluation Cases
+abstract: >-
+  24 original screenwriting revision tasks, each a short scene and a constraint
+  paired with mechanical checks and human-review questions.
+version: 1.0.0
+license: CC0-1.0
+authors:
+  - name: Inkwell
+    website: "https://www.inkwell.software"
+url: "https://huggingface.co/datasets/Inkwell-Software/screenplay-revision-evaluation"
+keywords:
+  - screenwriting
+  - revision
+  - evaluation

LICENSE

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+Creative Commons Legal Code
+
+CC0 1.0 Universal
+
+    CREATIVE COMMONS CORPORATION IS NOT A LAW FIRM AND DOES NOT PROVIDE
+    LEGAL SERVICES. DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT CREATE AN
+    ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. CREATIVE COMMONS PROVIDES THIS
+    INFORMATION ON AN "AS-IS" BASIS. CREATIVE COMMONS MAKES NO WARRANTIES
+    REGARDING THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENT OR THE INFORMATION OR WORKS
+    PROVIDED HEREUNDER, AND DISCLAIMS LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM
+    THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENT OR THE INFORMATION OR WORKS PROVIDED
+    HEREUNDER.
+
+Statement of Purpose
+
+The laws of most jurisdictions throughout the world automatically confer
+exclusive Copyright and Related Rights (defined below) upon the creator
+and subsequent owner(s) (each and all, an "owner") of an original work of
+authorship and/or a database (each, a "Work").
+
+Certain owners wish to permanently relinquish those rights to a Work for
+the purpose of contributing to a commons of creative, cultural and
+scientific works ("Commons") that the public can reliably and without fear
+of later claims of infringement build upon, modify, incorporate in other
+works, reuse and redistribute as freely as possible in any form whatsoever
+and for any purposes, including without limitation commercial purposes.
+These owners may contribute to the Commons to promote the ideal of a free
+culture and the further production of creative, cultural and scientific
+works, or to gain reputation or greater distribution for their Work in
+part through the use and efforts of others.
+
+For these and/or other purposes and motivations, and without any
+expectation of additional consideration or compensation, the person
+associating CC0 with a Work (the "Affirmer"), to the extent that he or she
+is an owner of Copyright and Related Rights in the Work, voluntarily
+elects to apply CC0 to the Work and publicly distribute the Work under its
+terms, with knowledge of his or her Copyright and Related Rights in the
+Work and the meaning and intended legal effect of CC0 on those rights.
+
+1. Copyright and Related Rights. A Work made available under CC0 may be
+protected by copyright and related or neighboring rights ("Copyright and
+Related Rights"). Copyright and Related Rights include, but are not
+limited to, the following:
+
+  i. the right to reproduce, adapt, distribute, perform, display,
+     communicate, and translate a Work;
+ ii. moral rights retained by the original author(s) and/or performer(s);
+iii. publicity and privacy rights pertaining to a person's image or
+     likeness depicted in a Work;
+ iv. rights protecting against unfair competition in regards to a Work,
+     subject to the limitations in paragraph 4(a), below;
+  v. rights protecting the extraction, dissemination, use and reuse of data
+     in a Work;
+ vi. database rights (such as those arising under Directive 96/9/EC of the
+     European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal
+     protection of databases, and under any national implementation
+     thereof, including any amended or successor version of such
+     directive); and
+vii. other similar, equivalent or corresponding rights throughout the
+     world based on applicable law or treaty, and any national
+     implementations thereof.
+
+2. Waiver. To the greatest extent permitted by, but not in contravention
+of, applicable law, Affirmer hereby overtly, fully, permanently,
+irrevocably and unconditionally waives, abandons, and surrenders all of
+Affirmer's Copyright and Related Rights and associated claims and causes
+of action, whether now known or unknown (including existing as well as
+future claims and causes of action), in the Work (i) in all territories
+worldwide, (ii) for the maximum duration provided by applicable law or
+treaty (including future time extensions), (iii) in any current or future
+medium and for any number of copies, and (iv) for any purpose whatsoever,
+including without limitation commercial, advertising or promotional
+purposes (the "Waiver"). Affirmer makes the Waiver for the benefit of each
+member of the public at large and to the detriment of Affirmer's heirs and
+successors, fully intending that such Waiver shall not be subject to
+revocation, rescission, cancellation, termination, or any other legal or
+equitable action to disrupt the quiet enjoyment of the Work by the public
+as contemplated by Affirmer's express Statement of Purpose.
+
+3. Public License Fallback. Should any part of the Waiver for any reason
+be judged legally invalid or ineffective under applicable law, then the
+Waiver shall be preserved to the maximum extent permitted taking into
+account Affirmer's express Statement of Purpose. In addition, to the
+extent the Waiver is so judged Affirmer hereby grants to each affected
+person a royalty-free, non transferable, non sublicensable, non exclusive,
+irrevocable and unconditional license to exercise Affirmer's Copyright and
+Related Rights in the Work (i) in all territories worldwide, (ii) for the
+maximum duration provided by applicable law or treaty (including future
+time extensions), (iii) in any current or future medium and for any number
+of copies, and (iv) for any purpose whatsoever, including without
+limitation commercial, advertising or promotional purposes (the
+"License"). The License shall be deemed effective as of the date CC0 was
+applied by Affirmer to the Work. Should any part of the License for any
+reason be judged legally invalid or ineffective under applicable law, such
+partial invalidity or ineffectiveness shall not invalidate the remainder
+of the License, and in such case Affirmer hereby affirms that he or she
+will not (i) exercise any of his or her remaining Copyright and Related
+Rights in the Work or (ii) assert any associated claims and causes of
+action with respect to the Work, in either case contrary to Affirmer's
+express Statement of Purpose.
+
+4. Limitations and Disclaimers.
+
+ a. No trademark or patent rights held by Affirmer are waived, abandoned,
+    surrendered, licensed or otherwise affected by this document.
+ b. Affirmer offers the Work as-is and makes no representations or
+    warranties of any kind concerning the Work, express, implied,
+    statutory or otherwise, including without limitation warranties of
+    title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, non
+    infringement, or the absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or
+    the present or absence of errors, whether or not discoverable, all to
+    the greatest extent permissible under applicable law.
+ c. Affirmer disclaims responsibility for clearing rights of other persons
+    that may apply to the Work or any use thereof, including without
+    limitation any person's Copyright and Related Rights in the Work.
+    Further, Affirmer disclaims responsibility for obtaining any necessary
+    consents, permissions or other rights required for any use of the
+    Work.
+ d. Affirmer understands and acknowledges that Creative Commons is not a
+    party to this document and has no duty or obligation with respect to
+    this CC0 or use of the Work.

README.md

@@ -1,3 +1,86 @@
 ---
+language:
+- en
 license: cc0-1.0
+pretty_name: Screenplay Revision Evaluation Cases
+size_categories:
+- n<1K
+task_categories:
+- text-generation
+tags:
+- screenwriting
+- evaluation
+- synthetic
+- inkwell
+configs:
+- config_name: default
+  data_files:
+  - split: test
+    path: data/cases.jsonl
 ---
+# Screenplay Revision Evaluation Cases
+
+24 original screenwriting revision tasks. Each gives a short scene and a
+constraint — cut a page to its beat, plant a prop, hold an answer back, fix a
+continuity slip — then pairs it with mechanical checks (a word ceiling, a line
+that must survive) and separate human-review questions. It tests whether a tool,
+or a person, can make a tightly-constrained edit while keeping the scene intact.
+Each task's `reference_output` is null, because a creative edit has more than one
+right version.
+
+**Version:** 1.0.0 · **Maintainer:** Inkwell.
+
+Built by [Inkwell](https://www.inkwell.software/?utm_source=huggingface&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=observatory&utm_content=screenplay_revision_evaluation_card_home), the IDE for screenwriters.
+For a related continuity exercise, [reorder seven scene cards and inspect their setups](https://www.inkwell.software/resources/scene-order-lab?utm_source=huggingface&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=observatory&utm_content=screenplay_revision_evaluation_card_scene_order).
+
+## What's included
+
+`data/cases.jsonl` holds 24 records; `schema.json` is a JSON Schema for one
+record. Each record carries the scene input, the revision constraint, the
+mechanical checks, and the human-review questions.
+
+## Provenance
+
+Every case is original, written for Inkwell, and released under CC0-1.0.
+
+## Task design
+
+The 24 cases cover information boundaries, prop and spatial continuity, refusals,
+visible deadlines, delayed answers, scene exits, and other explicit revision
+constraints. Each has an original short input and an instruction.
+
+The `test` split is a publication convention: once you tune prompts on these
+cases they become development examples, so keep a held-out set for comparison
+claims.
+
+## Reading the checks
+
+The word ceiling, exact anchor, and introductory-preface heuristic are mechanical
+checks — they measure whether the constraint was met, and the human-review
+questions cover dramatic quality and meaning. A reviewer explains failures and
+trade-offs rather than collapsing unlike judgments into one score.
+
+## What it's for
+
+Regression-test an editing workflow, develop a task-specific rubric, or teach
+constrained revision. It is a focused authored set of 24 tasks — extend it with
+your own as your rubric grows.
+
+## Load the records
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+cases = load_dataset("Inkwell-Software/screenplay-revision-evaluation", split="test")
+print(cases[0])
+```
+
+## Citation
+
+Cite "Inkwell, Screenplay Revision Evaluation Cases, version 1.0.0"; the
+machine-readable form is in [`CITATION.cff`](./CITATION.cff).
+
+## Maintenance
+
+Open a discussion with the case ID, the constraint, and what a tool or reviewer
+produced. A change to a case's input, constraint, or checks is a version
+increment and a changelog entry.

data/cases.jsonl

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{"id": "silent-reveal", "title": "Show the missing key without adding dialogue.", "input": "The night clerk opens a drawer. The key hook is empty.", "instruction": "Show the missing key without adding dialogue. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "key", "max_words": 45, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "45"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "key"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Does the action make the absence visible?", "Does the reader infer a consequence without an explanation?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "preserve-last-line", "title": "Rewrite the exchange but preserve the exact final sentence.", "input": "LENA\nDid you tell him?\n\nROWAN\nHe already knew.", "instruction": "Rewrite the exchange but preserve the exact final sentence. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "He already knew.", "max_words": 90, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "90"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "He already knew."}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Is the preserved line still earned?", "Did the rewrite accidentally resolve the underlying conflict?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "no-new-location", "title": "Tighten the action while retaining the supplied heading.", "input": "INT. ARCHIVE - NIGHT\n\nDust drifts through the desk lamp. Lena pulls a drawer. It does not move.", "instruction": "Tighten the action while retaining the supplied heading. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "INT. ARCHIVE - NIGHT", "max_words": 55, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "55"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "INT. ARCHIVE - NIGHT"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Is there still a clear physical obstacle?", "Does the space remain understandable?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "prop-continuity", "title": "Rewrite the handoff while keeping the red envelope red.", "input": "Rowan holds a red envelope behind his back. Lena extends an empty hand.", "instruction": "Rewrite the handoff while keeping the red envelope red. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "red envelope", "max_words": 65, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "65"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "red envelope"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Can the reader track who holds the envelope?", "Does the action have a changed relationship as well as changed wording?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "knowledge-boundary", "title": "Keep Lena unaware that Rowan has copied the key.", "input": "LENA\nThere is only one key.\n\nRowan closes his fist around a second key.", "instruction": "Keep Lena unaware that Rowan has copied the key. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "There is only one key.", "max_words": 100, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "100"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "There is only one key."}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Does Lena remain unaware?", "Does the audience receive the extra information through observable action?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "delay-answer", "title": "Delay the answer without adding a third speaker.", "input": "LENA\nAre you leaving?\n\nROWAN\nAt six.", "instruction": "Delay the answer without adding a third speaker. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "At six.", "max_words": 95, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "95"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "At six."}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Is the delay purposeful rather than padding?", "Is the eventual answer still clear?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "retain-negation", "title": "Reduce the action without reversing the decision.", "input": "Lena does not open the envelope. She places it beneath the glass.", "instruction": "Reduce the action without reversing the decision. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "does not open", "max_words": 40, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "40"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "does not open"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Is the refusal legible as a choice?", "Is the sentence natural rather than engineered to pass the anchor test?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "object-reveal", "title": "Reveal the broken watch without explanatory narration.", "input": "Rowan removes his watch. Its second hand lies loose beneath the glass.", "instruction": "Reveal the broken watch without explanatory narration. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "watch", "max_words": 55, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "55"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "watch"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Is the defect visible?", "Does the reveal change the reader’s understanding of the moment?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "point-of-view", "title": "Keep the scene restricted to what Lena can see or hear.", "input": "Lena waits outside the locked office. Inside, a chair scrapes the floor.", "instruction": "Keep the scene restricted to what Lena can see or hear. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "chair", "max_words": 65, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "65"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "chair"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Did the draft introduce inaccessible thoughts or unseen action?", "Is the sound doing useful dramatic work?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "promise-payoff", "title": "Preserve the promise exactly while changing the response.", "input": "ROWAN\nI will be here at six.\n\nLENA\nThen leave the light on.", "instruction": "Preserve the promise exactly while changing the response. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "I will be here at six.", "max_words": 85, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "85"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "I will be here at six."}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Is the response shaped by the promise?", "Does it create a testable expectation for a later scene?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "quiet-conflict", "title": "Make the disagreement visible through the two cups.", "input": "Lena sets two cups on the counter. Rowan puts one back in the cupboard.", "instruction": "Make the disagreement visible through the two cups. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "cups", "max_words": 60, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "60"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "cups"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Does the disagreement emerge through action?", "Could the same action plausibly mean something else, and is the context enough?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "compress-walk", "title": "Shorten the approach but retain the locked door.", "input": "Lena crosses the empty concourse, passes the shuttered kiosk, and reaches a locked door.", "instruction": "Shorten the approach but retain the locked door. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "locked door", "max_words": 35, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "35"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "locked door"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Is the destination still spatially clear?", "Has the edit preserved the obstacle instead of only reducing words?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "no-motive-explanation", "title": "Remove motive explanation; keep the visible gesture.", "input": "Rowan smooths the creased photograph with one thumb.", "instruction": "Remove motive explanation; keep the visible gesture. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "photograph", "max_words": 50, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "50"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "photograph"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Is motive left available for inference?", "Is the gesture specific enough to carry the moment?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "voice-distinction", "title": "Revise the responses without changing the two names.", "input": "LENA\nState the problem.\n\nROWAN\nThe lift has opinions.", "instruction": "Revise the responses without changing the two names. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "LENA", "max_words": 90, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "90"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "LENA"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Could the lines be swapped without consequence?", "Does the distinction arise from attitude rather than a repeated catchphrase?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "deadline", "title": "Keep the exact deadline visible in the revision.", "input": "The last departure reads 06:10. Lena checks the corridor again.", "instruction": "Keep the exact deadline visible in the revision. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "06:10", "max_words": 60, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "60"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "06:10"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Does the deadline affect a choice?", "Has the draft added urgency by action rather than repeated adjectives?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "offscreen-sound", "title": "Build the moment around the offscreen sound without revealing its source.", "input": "Three knocks. Lena stops writing.", "instruction": "Build the moment around the offscreen sound without revealing its source. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "Three knocks.", "max_words": 60, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "60"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "Three knocks."}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Does the source remain unrevealed?", "Is the sound specific without overdetermining the explanation?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "respect-rejection", "title": "Retain the refusal as an actual refusal.", "input": "LENA\nNo.\n\nRowan leaves the chair where it is.", "instruction": "Retain the refusal as an actual refusal. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "No.", "max_words": 70, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "70"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "No."}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Does the other character respect or contest the refusal in the intended way?", "Did added action quietly turn refusal into consent?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "visible-time", "title": "Indicate elapsed time without a new scene heading.", "input": "The tea has gone cold. A pale square of daylight reaches the second drawer.", "instruction": "Indicate elapsed time without a new scene heading. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "tea", "max_words": 55, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "55"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "tea"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Is time visible through the chosen detail?", "Is the amount of elapsed time only as specific as the scene requires?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "preserve-number", "title": "Keep the exact quantity that the next scene depends on.", "input": "Lena counts three tickets. Rowan has brought only two passengers.", "instruction": "Keep the exact quantity that the next scene depends on. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "three tickets", "max_words": 60, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "60"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "three tickets"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Is the discrepancy still available for the payoff?", "Does the wording invite the intended question?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "reversal", "title": "Change the end of the beat while keeping the offered seat.", "input": "Rowan pulls out a chair for Lena. She remains standing.", "instruction": "Change the end of the beat while keeping the offered seat. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "chair", "max_words": 70, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "70"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "chair"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Is there a genuine change of position or expectation?", "Does the ending follow from the characters’ choices?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "scene-exit", "title": "End on a consequential action instead of a summary.", "input": "Lena takes the key from the hook and shuts off the desk lamp.", "instruction": "End on a consequential action instead of a summary. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "key", "max_words": 50, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "50"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "key"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Does the action carry the scene into the next event?", "Has the draft added a narrator’s summary of the emotion?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "retain-question", "title": "Rework the lead-in without losing the unanswered question.", "input": "LENA\nWho signed for it?\n\nRowan turns the receipt face down.", "instruction": "Rework the lead-in without losing the unanswered question. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "Who signed for it?", "max_words": 85, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "85"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "Who signed for it?"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Does the answer remain withheld?", "Is the withholding motivated rather than arbitrarily coy?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "single-prop", "title": "Keep the tension centered on one named prop.", "input": "The receipt slides across the table. Lena stops it with one finger.", "instruction": "Keep the tension centered on one named prop. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "receipt", "max_words": 60, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "60"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "receipt"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Does the prop stay central?", "Is the action trackable without adding new objects?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}
+{"id": "spatial-clarity", "title": "Clarify the blocking without changing the exit.", "input": "Lena stands between Rowan and the stairwell. He moves toward the stairwell.", "instruction": "Clarify the blocking without changing the exit. Keep the literal anchor shown below, stay within the word limit, and return the revised scene text without an introductory explanation.", "anchor": "stairwell", "max_words": 65, "checks": [{"kind": "max_words", "value": "65"}, {"kind": "contains_exact", "value": "stairwell"}, {"kind": "no_preface", "value": ""}], "review_questions": ["Can the reader locate both characters?", "Does the blocking maintain the intended obstacle?", "Would you keep this revision after reading it beside the original, and why?"], "reference_output": null, "grading": "Mechanical checks plus explicit human review; no aggregate literary-quality score", "provenance": "Original Inkwell evaluation-design fixture", "license": "CC0-1.0"}

schema.json

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+{
+  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
+  "title": "Screenplay Revision Evaluation case",
+  "description": "One line of data/cases.jsonl: a short scene, a revision constraint, the mechanical checks that measure the constraint, and the questions a human reviewer answers. Every field is required; reference_output is the only nullable one.",
+  "type": "object",
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "required": [
+    "id",
+    "title",
+    "input",
+    "instruction",
+    "anchor",
+    "max_words",
+    "checks",
+    "review_questions",
+    "reference_output",
+    "grading",
+    "provenance",
+    "license"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "id": {
+      "description": "Unique case ID.",
+      "type": "string",
+      "pattern": "^[a-z0-9]+(-[a-z0-9]+)*$"
+    },
+    "title": {
+      "description": "The constraint in one line.",
+      "type": "string",
+      "minLength": 1
+    },
+    "input": {
+      "description": "The original scene text to revise.",
+      "type": "string",
+      "minLength": 1
+    },
+    "instruction": {
+      "description": "The full revision instruction given to a tool or writer.",
+      "type": "string",
+      "minLength": 1
+    },
+    "anchor": {
+      "description": "Literal text that must survive the revision; it appears in the input.",
+      "type": "string",
+      "minLength": 1
+    },
+    "max_words": {
+      "description": "Word ceiling for the revised scene.",
+      "type": "integer",
+      "minimum": 1
+    },
+    "checks": {
+      "description": "Mechanical checks, one per kind. max_words and contains_exact repeat the fields of the same name; no_preface has an empty value.",
+      "type": "array",
+      "minItems": 1,
+      "items": {
+        "type": "object",
+        "additionalProperties": false,
+        "required": ["kind", "value"],
+        "properties": {
+          "kind": { "enum": ["max_words", "contains_exact", "no_preface"] },
+          "value": { "type": "string" }
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "review_questions": {
+      "description": "Questions a human reviewer answers about dramatic quality and meaning.",
+      "type": "array",
+      "minItems": 1,
+      "items": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1 }
+    },
+    "reference_output": {
+      "description": "Null by design: a creative edit has more than one valid version.",
+      "type": "null"
+    },
+    "grading": {
+      "description": "How a revision is judged.",
+      "type": "string",
+      "minLength": 1
+    },
+    "provenance": {
+      "description": "Where the case comes from.",
+      "type": "string",
+      "minLength": 1
+    },
+    "license": {
+      "description": "SPDX identifier of the case's license.",
+      "const": "CC0-1.0"
+    }
+  }
+}