Add README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -48,16 +48,68 @@ public PRIDE submissions, used to pretrain and evaluate InstaNovo-FM.
|
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
## Layout
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-
Spectra are grouped into three confidence tiers
|
| 52 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
```
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
-
splits/
|
| 58 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 59 |
```
|
| 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
### `splits/` — start here
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
`train`, `test` and `valid` parquet, exactly as the model consumed them. The
|
|
@@ -65,6 +117,11 @@ partitions are **peptide-disjoint** 80/10/10: a peptide sequence appears in only
|
|
| 65 |
of the three, so evaluation does not reward memorisation. Rows are shuffled and have
|
| 66 |
passed the quality filters below.
|
| 67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 68 |
Use this to reproduce or extend the published results.
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
### `by_project/` — the input the splits came from
|
|
@@ -85,8 +142,10 @@ Use this to apply different quality criteria, or to re-derive the partitions wit
|
|
| 85 |
| precursor *m/z* | <= 2000 |
|
| 86 |
| modification annotation | only if resolvable to a UNIMOD identifier |
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
-
A null in any numeric field **passes** its condition, so
|
| 89 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
Measured effect on LCFM (184,607,213 -> 181,777,591 rows, 98.5% kept): retention time
|
| 92 |
removes ~2.54 M, the unresolved-modification condition ~385 k, lower offset 8,147, and
|
|
@@ -108,11 +167,32 @@ or to your own spectra, to keep a held-out set genuinely held out.
|
|
| 108 |
Join on **`registry_key`** — not on `sequence`, and not on `unmodified_peptide`:
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
```python
|
| 111 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
-
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 116 |
```
|
| 117 |
|
| 118 |
`registry_key` is `unmodified_peptide` with every `I` rewritten to `L`, which is the
|
|
@@ -188,13 +268,17 @@ by_project/lcfm/PXD012345/<instrument-run-name>.parquet
|
|
| 188 |
|
| 189 |
## Versioning
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 192 |
|
| 193 |
```python
|
| 194 |
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 195 |
-
ds = load_dataset("InstaDeepAI/InstaNovo", "hcfm_splits", revision="
|
| 196 |
```
|
| 197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 198 |
## Citation
|
| 199 |
|
| 200 |
See the InstaNovo-FM manuscript. Code, including the pipeline that produced these
|
|
|
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
## Layout
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
+
Spectra are grouped into three **confidence tiers**. Each is a Foundational Model
|
| 52 |
+
dataset named for how stringently its peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) were filtered:
|
| 53 |
+
**LCFM** (Low), **MCFM** (Medium) and **HCFM** (High). The names are relative, not
|
| 54 |
+
absolute — every labelled tier consists of high-confidence PSMs, and "low confidence"
|
| 55 |
+
marks LCFM as the broadest, least stringently filtered one, from which the stricter
|
| 56 |
+
subsets are derived. They are nested: HCFM ⊂ MCFM ⊂ LCFM. A fourth tier, **ACFM** (All
|
| 57 |
+
Confidence), is the unlabelled superset and is not published here.
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
Each tier is published twice, once under `splits/` and once under `by_project/`.
|
| 60 |
+
Which you want depends on whether you are consuming the corpus or rebuilding it:
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
- **`splits/`** — the train/validation/test partitions the model actually consumed:
|
| 63 |
+
quality-filtered, shuffled, and peptide-disjoint. Take this to reproduce or extend
|
| 64 |
+
the published results.
|
| 65 |
+
- **`by_project/`** — the same tier *before* filtering and splitting, one directory per
|
| 66 |
+
PRIDE accession. Take this to apply your own quality criteria or derive your own
|
| 67 |
+
partitions, which `splits/` cannot support because the filtering is lossy.
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
The tier sits *inside* the folder rather than above it — `splits/lcfm/`, not
|
| 70 |
+
`lcfm/splits/`. That nesting is deliberate: it means a download pattern like `--include
|
| 71 |
+
"by_project/*"` cannot stray outside the folder you named. Nested the other way,
|
| 72 |
+
`lcfm/*` would have matched both folders at once and quietly handed you ~900 GB
|
| 73 |
+
containing two overlapping copies of the same spectra, one filtered and one not.
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
```
|
| 76 |
+
InstaDeepAI/InstaNovo
|
| 77 |
+
│
|
| 78 |
+
├── splits/ FILTERED · SHUFFLED · PEPTIDE-DISJOINT
|
| 79 |
+
│ ├── hcfm/ 11 files · 11.4 GB · 3,670,113 rows
|
| 80 |
+
│ │ ├── hcfm-train-00000-of-00007.parquet … 00006-of-00007
|
| 81 |
+
│ │ ├── hcfm-validation-00000-of-00001.parquet
|
| 82 |
+
│ │ └── hcfm-test-00000-of-00003.parquet … 00002-of-00003
|
| 83 |
+
│ ├── mcfm/ 44 files · 52.5 GB · 18,255,265 rows
|
| 84 |
+
│ │ ├── mcfm-train-00000-of-00029.parquet … 00028-of-00029
|
| 85 |
+
│ │ ├── mcfm-validation-00000-of-00001.parquet
|
| 86 |
+
│ │ └── mcfm-test-00000-of-00014.parquet … 00013-of-00014
|
| 87 |
+
│ └── lcfm/ 454 files · 467.1 GB · 181,777,591 rows
|
| 88 |
+
│ ├── lcfm-train-00000-of-00293.parquet … 00292-of-00293
|
| 89 |
+
│ ├── lcfm-validation-00000-of-00019.parquet … 00018-of-00019
|
| 90 |
+
│ └── lcfm-test-00000-of-00142.parquet … 00141-of-00142
|
| 91 |
+
│
|
| 92 |
+
├── by_project/ COMPLETE TIER · NOT FILTERED · NOT SPLIT
|
| 93 |
+
│ ├── hcfm/ 15,166 files · 11.4 GB · 3,684,448 rows
|
| 94 |
+
│ │ ├── PXD000561/ 82 accessions in every tier
|
| 95 |
+
│ │ │ ├── Adult_Adrenalgland_Gel_Elite_49_f01.parquet
|
| 96 |
+
│ │ │ └── … one file per instrument run
|
| 97 |
+
│ │ └── PXD000865/ …
|
| 98 |
+
│ ├── mcfm/ 15,244 files · 51.7 GB · 18,422,236 rows
|
| 99 |
+
│ │ └── PXD000561/ … same runs, fewer rows each
|
| 100 |
+
│ └── lcfm/ 15,286 files · ~450 GB · 184,607,213 rows
|
| 101 |
+
│ └── PXD000561/ …
|
| 102 |
+
│
|
| 103 |
+
├── peptide_registry.parquet 5,613,657 peptides and their split
|
| 104 |
+
│
|
| 105 |
+
└── manifests/
|
| 106 |
+
└── empty_runs.csv 162 runs with no PSMs at their threshold
|
| 107 |
```
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
+
**Pick one tier, from one folder.** Because the tiers are nested, a second tier
|
| 110 |
+
re-downloads the same spectra at a stricter threshold — and `splits/*` or
|
| 111 |
+
`by_project/*` fetches all three, roughly 531 GB and 510 GB.
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
### `splits/` — start here
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
`train`, `test` and `valid` parquet, exactly as the model consumed them. The
|
|
|
|
| 117 |
of the three, so evaluation does not reward memorisation. Rows are shuffled and have
|
| 118 |
passed the quality filters below.
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
+
`hcfm_splits`: 2,459,391 train / 178,997 validation / 1,031,725 test. The 80/10/10 ratio
|
| 121 |
+
is over peptides, not spectra — a peptide's spectra all land in one split, and peptides
|
| 122 |
+
differ in how many spectra they have, so the row proportions differ from the peptide
|
| 123 |
+
proportions.
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
Use this to reproduce or extend the published results.
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
### `by_project/` — the input the splits came from
|
|
|
|
| 142 |
| precursor *m/z* | <= 2000 |
|
| 143 |
| modification annotation | only if resolvable to a UNIMOD identifier |
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
+
A null in any numeric field **passes** its condition, so a reimplementation that
|
| 146 |
+
discards nulls instead would produce a different dataset. These tiers contain no nulls
|
| 147 |
+
in any filtered field, so the two behave identically here — but the distinction matters
|
| 148 |
+
if you apply the same criteria to new data.
|
| 149 |
|
| 150 |
Measured effect on LCFM (184,607,213 -> 181,777,591 rows, 98.5% kept): retention time
|
| 151 |
removes ~2.54 M, the unresolved-modification condition ~385 k, lower offset 8,147, and
|
|
|
|
| 167 |
Join on **`registry_key`** — not on `sequence`, and not on `unmodified_peptide`:
|
| 168 |
|
| 169 |
```python
|
| 170 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
# hcfm is the smallest tier (11.4 GB); swap in mcfm or lcfm when you need more.
|
| 173 |
+
runs = load_dataset("InstaDeepAI/InstaNovo", "hcfm_by_project", split="full")
|
| 174 |
+
registry = load_dataset("InstaDeepAI/InstaNovo", "peptide_registry", split="full")
|
| 175 |
+
|
| 176 |
+
labelled = runs.to_polars().join(
|
| 177 |
+
registry.to_polars(), left_on="registry_key", right_on="peptide", how="left"
|
| 178 |
+
)
|
| 179 |
+
```
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
+
Both calls download and cache from the Hub, so nothing needs fetching by hand.
|
| 182 |
+
`to_polars()` materialises the tier in memory, and `mz_array` and `intensity_array`
|
| 183 |
+
dominate that, so call `runs.select_columns(["registry_key", "experiment_name",
|
| 184 |
+
"scan"])` first if you only need the split assignment. To work through one accession at
|
| 185 |
+
a time rather than a whole tier, pass `streaming=True` and filter on `experiment_name`,
|
| 186 |
+
or fetch single files directly:
|
| 187 |
+
|
| 188 |
+
```python
|
| 189 |
+
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 |
+
path = hf_hub_download(
|
| 192 |
+
"InstaDeepAI/InstaNovo",
|
| 193 |
+
"by_project/hcfm/PXD000561/Adult_Adrenalgland_Gel_Elite_49_f01.parquet",
|
| 194 |
+
repo_type="dataset",
|
| 195 |
+
)
|
| 196 |
```
|
| 197 |
|
| 198 |
`registry_key` is `unmodified_peptide` with every `I` rewritten to `L`, which is the
|
|
|
|
| 268 |
|
| 269 |
## Versioning
|
| 270 |
|
| 271 |
+
`v0.1` is the first release, and the one the paper's results were produced from. Pin it
|
| 272 |
+
rather than tracking `main`, so a later addition to the corpus cannot change what you
|
| 273 |
+
fetch:
|
| 274 |
|
| 275 |
```python
|
| 276 |
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 277 |
+
ds = load_dataset("InstaDeepAI/InstaNovo", "hcfm_splits", revision="v0.1")
|
| 278 |
```
|
| 279 |
|
| 280 |
+
`main` moves as tiers are extended or corrected; a tag does not.
|
| 281 |
+
|
| 282 |
## Citation
|
| 283 |
|
| 284 |
See the InstaNovo-FM manuscript. Code, including the pipeline that produced these
|