Add README with dataset name and description
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
title: Doc Protocol Data
|
| 3 |
+
description: >-
|
| 4 |
+
The 4 cross-domain test sets (T-SROIE, OSTF, TPIC-13, RTM). All samples in
|
| 5 |
+
the cross-domain test sets are cropped to 512 × 512 patches without
|
| 6 |
+
additional compression. The training set and the three in-domain test sets
|
| 7 |
+
share the same three forgery synthesis types: copy-move, splicing, and
|
| 8 |
+
print-based edits. The cross-domain test sets have more diverse forgery
|
| 9 |
+
sources, including AIGC-based text editing models and manual manipulation.
|
| 10 |
+
license: other
|
| 11 |
+
---
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
# Doc Protocol Data
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
The 4 cross-domain test sets (T-SROIE, OSTF, TPIC-13, RTM). All samples in the cross-domain test sets are cropped to 512 × 512 patches without additional compression. The training set and the three in-domain test sets share the same three forgery synthesis types: **copy-move**, **splicing**, and **print-based edits**. The cross-domain test sets have more diverse forgery sources, including **AIGC-based text editing models** and **manual manipulation**.
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
## Cross-domain test sets
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
| Dataset | Split | Domain | #Samples | Description |
|
| 20 |
+
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 21 |
+
| T-SROIE [Wang et al., 2022b] | Test | Cross-domain | 1,579 | Scanned receipts tampered using the AIGC text editing model SR-Net. |
|
| 22 |
+
| OSTF [Qu et al., 2025] | Test | Cross-domain | 3,046 | Natural scene text images tampered using eight different AIGC-based text editing models. |
|
| 23 |
+
| TPIC-13 [Wang et al., 2022a] | Test | Cross-domain | 589 | Naturally captured scene-text images tampered using the AIGC text editing model SR-Net. |
|
| 24 |
+
| RTM [Luo et al., 2025] | Test | Cross-domain | 3,444 | Document images with both synthetic and manual manipulations, covering copy-move, splicing, print, and erasure edits across diverse document types such as scanned forms. |
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
## File structure
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
```
|
| 29 |
+
cutted_datasets_fakes.zip
|
| 30 |
+
└── cutted_datasets_fakes/
|
| 31 |
+
├── T-SROIE/ # 1,579 cropped 512×512 patches
|
| 32 |
+
├── OSTF/ # 3,046 cropped 512×512 patches
|
| 33 |
+
├── TPIC-13/ # 589 cropped 512×512 patches
|
| 34 |
+
└── RTM/ # 3,444 cropped 512×512 patches
|
| 35 |
+
```
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
## Citation
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
If you use this dataset, please cite:
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 42 |
+
@article{du2025forensichub,
|
| 43 |
+
title={ForensicHub: A unified benchmark \& codebase for all-domain fake image detection and localization},
|
| 44 |
+
author={Bo Du and Xuekang Zhu and Xiaochen Ma and Chenfan Qu and Kaiwen Feng and Zhe Yang and Chi-Man Pun and Jian Liu and Ji-Zhe Zhou},
|
| 45 |
+
journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
|
| 46 |
+
year={2025}
|
| 47 |
+
}
|
| 48 |
+
```
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
## References
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
- Wang et al., 2022a: TPIC-13
|
| 53 |
+
- Wang et al., 2022b: T-SROIE
|
| 54 |
+
- Qu et al., 2025: OSTF
|
| 55 |
+
- Luo et al., 2025: RTM
|