File size: 4,962 Bytes
3c41fb5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Build a PowerPoint deck from the cable-representation figures.

Slides carry the figures only; the wording that would otherwise clutter the plot
goes into the speaker notes, so the images stay usable as-is in a paper too.
"""
import numpy as np
from pptx import Presentation
from pptx.util import Inches, Pt

FIGDIR = "outputs/pca"
OUT = f"{FIGDIR}/cable_representation.pptx"

SLIDES = [
    dict(
        title="Cable clusters in the learned representation",
        image=f"{FIGDIR}/cable_diameter_clusters.png",
        notes=(
            "Left: unsupervised PCA of the ACT encoder features (512-d), plotted on PC4 vs PC3 "
            "-- the two components that carry cable identity. PC1/PC2 are dominated by arm pose "
            "and grasp phase, so the default projection hides the cable entirely.\n\n"
            "Right: a diameter axis. Ridge regression maps the same encoder features onto physical "
            "cable diameter, fitted on training episodes only. 2.6 mm lands between 1.7 and 4.5 mm "
            "even though the model was never given the ordering -- it only ever saw three task "
            "strings. Held-out R^2 = 0.88.\n\n"
            "  true 1.7 mm -> predicted 1.81 +- 0.33 mm\n"
            "  true 2.6 mm -> predicted 2.66 +- 0.39 mm\n"
            "  true 4.5 mm -> predicted 4.33 +- 0.43 mm\n\n"
            "This means thickness is encoded as a quantity, not as three arbitrary labels: a pure "
            "3-way classifier would place the clusters anywhere, not in metric order.\n\n"
            "Method: 30 episodes per cable, 25 frames per episode (2250 frames). Split is by "
            "EPISODE, not by frame -- frames inside one episode are near-duplicates, so a "
            "frame-level split leaks the answer. Only held-out episodes (675 frames) are plotted. "
            "Model: act-bluev2-cable170-330-270ep-ac60, 300k checkpoint."
        ),
    ),
    dict(
        title="Why PC1/PC2 hides it",
        image=f"{FIGDIR}/pca_cable_informative_300k.png",
        notes=(
            "Same PCA, three views. Left is the default PC1 vs PC2: the three cables are fully "
            "mixed (separability 0.13 and 0.00). Middle is PC4 vs PC3 from the identical "
            "decomposition -- the clusters are there all along. Right shows separability per "
            "component: the cable signal sits almost entirely in PC4 (ratio 1.53).\n\n"
            "PC4 accounts for only 5.0% of variance while PC1 accounts for 11.2%. PCA orders axes "
            "by variance, not by class separation, so a larger but cable-irrelevant factor "
            "outranks it. Labels were used only to choose which existing axis to look along; the "
            "axes themselves are unsupervised."
        ),
    ),
    dict(
        title="The information is really there",
        image=f"{FIGDIR}/cable_repr_analysis_300k.png",
        notes=(
            "A linear probe settles it independently of any visualisation. Logistic regression on "
            "the encoder features predicts cable identity with 97.9% accuracy on held-out episodes "
            "(chance 33.3%). Raw GelSight pixels reach 95.9%.\n\n"
            "Left and middle are LDA projections -- supervised, so they are fitted on training "
            "episodes and drawn on held-out ones. Fitting and plotting the same data would "
            "manufacture clusters that do not generalise.\n\n"
            "Caveat: the model sees four cameras (RealSense x2 + GelSight x2), so this number does "
            "not attribute the signal to touch. Comparing against act-bluev2-gs0-ac60, trained "
            "without GelSight, would separate visual from tactile contribution. Note that across "
            "four datasets, removing GelSight left training loss unchanged."
        ),
    ),
]


def main():
    prs = Presentation()
    prs.slide_width, prs.slide_height = Inches(13.333), Inches(7.5)
    blank = prs.slide_layouts[6]

    for s in SLIDES:
        slide = prs.slides.add_slide(blank)

        tb = slide.shapes.add_textbox(Inches(0.6), Inches(0.35), Inches(12.1), Inches(0.7))
        p = tb.text_frame.paragraphs[0]
        p.text = s["title"]
        p.font.size, p.font.bold = Pt(26), True

        # Fit the image inside the area below the title, preserving aspect ratio.
        from PIL import Image
        w, h = Image.open(s["image"]).size
        avail_w, avail_h = Inches(12.1), Inches(5.9)
        scale = min(avail_w / w, avail_h / h)
        iw, ih = int(w * scale), int(h * scale)
        slide.shapes.add_picture(s["image"],
                                 int((prs.slide_width - iw) / 2), Inches(1.25),
                                 width=iw, height=ih)

        slide.notes_slide.notes_text_frame.text = s["notes"]

    prs.save(OUT)
    print(f"wrote {OUT}")
    print(f"  {len(SLIDES)} slides, figures only; explanations in the speaker notes")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()