context_before
stringlengths
0
199
equation
stringlengths
5
80
context_after
stringlengths
0
249
spoken_English
stringlengths
0
119
for all
$ \sigma \in \cC $
. Since
Sigma belongs to the set C.
for all
$ x $
.
x
By choosing
$ T $
small enough , we can control
T
as a continuous-time Markov chain
$ ( \eta_t ) _ { t\geq 0 } $
on
Open parenthesis, eta sub t, close parenthesis, sub t greater than or equal to zero.
Introducing
$ u=u_ { h } x $
,
u equals u sub h times x.
exactly equals to
$ M_K $
. The label
M sub K.
are finite and contribute to the normalized crossed conductance for
$ E > \Delta_ { 0 } $
. For
E greater than Delta sub zero
&
$ \delta $
max &
delta.
Let
$ m\geq 0 $
and
m greater than or equal to zero.
while
$ \delta $
is determined by the relative phase among 2 orthogonal oscillations as electromagnetic fields . These 2 parameters must not be affected during the amplification process for which we used a
delta.
which is at a distance
$ x $
from the initial position , differ by unity depending on whether it is located on the right-side or the left-side of the initial position . For
x
&
$ A $
A
and
$ \epsilon $
, we start the simulation from rest , adding an infinitesimal perturbation to the otherwise linear temperature background . After a short transient , the kinetic energy grows exponentially in
epsilon.
for
$ v \in A $
and
v belongs to A
and we append two indexes to indicate the values of the parameter
$ a $
and of the potential
a
4 10
$ ^ { -4 } $
& 9.3
Negative four.
&
$ - $
& 41.0 & 5.0 & 3.2 & 15.3 &
minus
is the centralizer of
$ \pi \in S_n $
. Note that all elements
Pi belongs to the set of permutations of n.
$ p $
? x ? o ) } is contradicted by a positive effect ( resp . precondition ) , then
p
At any time
$ t $
, one can observe the market price , i.e.~the time-
t
05
$ , $
h=0.5
comma
a vector meson
$ V\fn { Q\ol Q } $
decays into two light pseudo-scalar mesons
V f n Q ol Q
0
$ & $
1.00
and
1
$ \pm { 0.02 } $
, 0.3
Plus or minus zero point zero two.
~Zhang
$ ^ { 80 } $
, J.~J.~Zhang
to the power of 80
and the seller 's outside option value
$ x $
and market participation costs
x
the differential equation has the typical form with a non-homogeneous term
$ g ( x ) $
g of x.
2
$ & $
876
and
by
$ Y '' $
. Now on each
Y double prime.
The proof for general
$ x\in [ 0,1 ] $
follows from shifting every interval by
x belongs to the interval from 0 to 1.
He bound state under each of the
$ \eta N $
potential sets shown in Fig.~
Eta N.
and taking the expectation over
$ S , S ' $
, the second inequality follows from Jensen 's inequality , and the third inequality follows from the fact that
S comma S prime.
and
$ G_2 = ( V_2 , E_2 ) $
and suppose that
G sub 2 equals open parenthesis, V sub 2 comma E sub 2, close parenthesis.
28
$ \pm $
26.73 & 48.83
Plus or minus.
is
$ C $
-convex if and only if it is the intersection of some translates of
C
8
$ \pm $
4.9 & 96.2
Plus or minus.
In the area with
$ -1 $
pc
Minus one.
$ We have $
We have: None
by choice of
$ A^ * $
. For every
A star.
have
$ R $
-charges 1 ,
R
After checking all the
$ n $
individual arms , it can be easily seen that by the algorithm 's construction , both sets
n
these slots have indices in the set
$ D $
, so also refer to pivot columns )
D
corresponding to a different band index
$ \nu $
. Elements of each column are ordered as
nu.
The function
$ \zeta $
plays almost no role in our analysis , as we are focused on the bulk of the system . For simplicity we keep “ the same
zeta.
independently of
$ \delta $
near which we can fix areas . %
delta.
and keep track of
$ w ( i ) $
, and plot it in Figure
w of i
26
$ \pm $
0.45
Plus or minus.
All models were highly successful in learning the distribution of the novel tokens in the fine-tuning datasets : average accuracy was
$ 99.6\ % $
for DistilBERT ,
99.6 percent.
in terms of performance on the CTW
$ 1500 $
benchmark . Fig .
One thousand five hundred.
where
$ i \in [ 2 ] $
. Let
i belongs to the set containing 2.
is unmeasured or that the effect of
$ X $
on
X
as the regularity properties of
$ \mathcal { N } $
do not suffice to control
capital N
&
$ \log\mbh/\msun $
&
log m b h divided by m s u
with respect to the basis
$ v_ { \lambda 1 } , \ldots , v_ { \lambda |\lambda| } $
. Let
v sub lambda 1, ellipsis, v sub lambda absolute value of lambda
letting
$ \dfrac { \partderiv { \mathcal { Q } } } { \partderiv { \wght { } } } = 0 $
and rearranging , %
The derivative of the Q with respect to the derivative of delta wgtht equals zero.
-valued simple functions in
$ L^ { p ' } ( \Omega , \omega^ { \frac { 1 } { p-1 } } ; Y ) $
is also norming for
L prime, open parenthesis, Omega, comma, omega, to the power of one over p minus one, semicolon, Y, close parenthesis.
and any value of
$ \bar { p } $
, whereas the second group satisfies the following formulas :
p bar.
there exists a constant
$ \mathfrak { C } > 0 $
does n't depending neither on
C is greater than zero.
because it is not consistent with the median 's optimal choice of
$ r^ * $
. In this example , both potential local optima are global optima . Moreover , there is also a null equilibrium , because at
r star.
and the label
$ y $
is in
y
and
$ X $
. % , which is similar to Algorithm
X
$ b $
} { edges } & 30 & 35 & 40 & 45 & 50
b
which approximately coincides with the duration of the ultra-slow-roll phase
$ \Delta N_\text { USR } =\Or ( 1 ) $
. Using Eqs.~
Delta N sub U R equals big O r of 1.
and
$ \psi $
can be removed by use of their EOMs . After this manipulation , we have
Psi.
let
$ P ( x ) $
be the proposition that
P of x
$ b=b\sigma^\dagger\sigma+b\sigma\sigma^\dagger $
, which gives two dynamical equations corresponding to the operator
b equals b sigma dagger sigma plus b sigma sigma dagger.
Since we assume
$ \hat\Gamma $
to be Lipschitz , there exists a decomposition
gamma-hat.
for all
$ u\in U $
such that the mapping
u belongs to U.
The ‘
$ \alpha $
’ and
Alpha.
where the matrix elements of
$ V_ { n } $
are
V sub n.
and
$ \\ { \tilde\ { Z $
.
curly brace, tilde, Z
where
$ |\cdot| $
is the absolute value norm . Consequently ,
Absolute value of center dot.
is the polynomial in
$ q $
defined by
q
is the reduction threshold used in the definition of a reduced in
$ G_\al $
word . Informally , a reduced in
G sub alpha.
Taking into account the previous constraint in
$ \beta ' $
, and that thus
Beta prime.
if
$ i \in V_1 $
and
i belongs to V sub 1.
contains all
$ 2 $
-faces of
two
we compare the values of
$ N_ * $
for NFD and NSPS schemes by simulating PEPQCs possessing noisy CNOT gates with the channel action in~
N star.
as well as to obtain a general equation relating the quantities
$ E $
,
E
for some finite
$ S'\supseteq S $
. Then one can imitate the proof of
S prime is a superset of S.
002 &
$ - $
2.551 & & & &
minus
In the case
$ d $
even , the vertices are even , but the internal edges are odd so that an ordering of this set is chosen ( up to permutation ) . This rule
d
the cross section
$ \sigma ( E ) $
is substantially larger for the
sigma of E.
in thermoelectric materials with ultralow
$ \kappa $
at 300 K. The comparison clearly illustrates that the oscillation of Ag atoms in AgTlI
kappa.
we conclude that
$ \beta $
swaps colors
Beta.
060
$ \pm $
0.002
Plus or minus.
the masses of the chimney and edge clouds are 3800 and 2300
$ M_ { \odot } $
, respectively . Also , the masses of these clouds are 1100 and 700
M sub-sun.
is satisfied in case
$ \sigma $
is as in Example
Sigma.
is an
$ n $
-sequence of disjoint clopens on a Stone-space
n
and the action of
$ H $
on
H
for any convex body
$ C $
. See also
C
of dimension
$ 0 $
and consider the two arrows , say
zero
where
$ \alpha $
and
Alpha.
$ M $
, is presented in Figure
M
that are exactly at distance
$ \eps $
from some point in
epsilon.
our choice of the symmetric
$ T^ { \mu\nu } $
is more preferable . % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
T raised to the mu nu.
for
$ Q_1 > 0 $
:
Q one is greater than zero.
-dimension subspace of
$ \mathcal { K } ^ * _b $
.
K star sub b.
we have
$ x > y $
in
x is greater than y.
let
$ ( i , i ' ) $
be a minimal element of
open parenthesis i, comma, i prime, close parenthesis.