context_before
stringlengths
0
199
equation
stringlengths
5
80
context_after
stringlengths
0
249
spoken_English
stringlengths
0
119
approaches the critical value
$ b_ { c } $
, which represents the impact parameter for photon trajectories on the photon sphere at
b sub c
$ \omega_2 $
as purely imaginary . If
Omega sub 2.
Alice generates a syndrome
$ \mathbf { s } _A $
and sends it to Bob . The syndrome size varies depending on the code rate , i.e . , low code rates require longer syndrome . This gives better chances
s sub A
introduced by the HP transformation whose
$ z $
-component reads
z
where
$ \mathcal { P } $
and
P in calligraphic font.
where
$ \mathbf { v } _2 $
,
v sub 2.
with respect to
$ g $
} and we denote the number by
g
one can also immediately write down bounds limiting the allowed anomalous dimensions of the renormalised fields
$ \phi $
and
phi.
&
$ -0.202 $
&
negative zero point two zero two.
When
$ r $
is even , similarly , we can prove
r
The reason why we take this Gaussian operator is that it is normalizable and thus well-defined :
$ ( { \cal O } _0| { \cal O } _0 ) = 1 $
where the inner-product is the standard trace in the quantum mechanics Hilbert space , with
Open curly brace, calligraphic O, subscript 0, vertical bar, calligraphic O, subscript 0, equals 1.
and for
$ i \geq 1 $
,
i is greater than or equal to 1.
32
$ \pm $
2.0 & 68.46
Plus or minus.
the generalized
$ L_p $
-discrepancy suffers from the curse of dimensionality .
L sub p
if
$ B\subseteq N_G [ X ] $
. Thus ,
B is a subset of N sub G of X.
and a stability condition
$ \alpha $
on
Alpha.
\\ & IRS &
$ 0 $
&
zero
then
$ \beta $
is contained in
Beta.
rather than solving for
$ P ( r ) $
and
P of r
$ \frac { d\Phi } { dE } $
,
dee phi over dee e
omitting the indices
$ n $
and
n
&
$ \text { SA } ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) $
& 47.00 & 61.50 & 0.059 & 5.540
S A one, two, three.
-softness is still maintained with
$ \kappa=0.2 $
, where the quasi-degenerate
kappa equals zero point two.
by
$ -1 $
-homogeneity we have
Minus one.
em For any
$ R > 0 $
consider a set
R is greater than zero.
in
$ W^ { 1 , \infty } ( \Omega ) $
, and smooth convergence of ,
W raised to the power of one comma infinity, open parenthesis Omega, close parenthesis.
as
$ r \to \infty $
where
r goes to infinity.
-independent constant
$ C > 0 $
such that
C is greater than zero.
are denoted
$ \rodProfSf { n } $
and
rodProfSf n
and dropping the monomial corresponding to the exponent vector
$ ( 0,0 ) $
from the result . The similarity of two objects is rather superficial and this leads to the problem of finding the explicit form of a polynomial given its amoeba .
zero comma zero.
24 &
$ \pm $
& 0.39 & 0.46 &
Plus or minus.
and
$ D_ { eff } $
of the ensemble of the particles along the
D sub effective.
and
$ Q $
is an arbitrarily chosen symmetric positive definite matrix . Given strictly stable
Q
increases from 159 to 917 and
$ \chi $
decreases from 0.354 to 0.147 , the stretching speed of the early liquid film becomes faster , the average time to complete the swing backup becomes shorter , and the
chi.
Is it necessary to speak about the third rectangle
$ R $
, or is it equivalent to require that
R
1
$ \pm $
1.1 & 63.7
Plus or minus.
if for any scheme
$ S $
and morphism
S
-th channel paths for the
$ k $
-th user , respectively , and follow the probability density function
k
of unknown length
$ n $
over an alphabet
n
is the space of all
$ 1 $
-dimensional vector subspaces of
one
$ C < \infty $
so that for every
C is less than infinity.
for
$ i\in [ n-2 ] $
and
i belongs to the set of integers from n minus 2.
so there is usually no loss of generality in assuming that
$ X $
is some specific space such as
X
form with its
$ T $
(
T
th tensor component unchanged and being either Pauli
$ X $
or Pauli
X
implies that
$ \Aut ( X ) $
is second countable and locally compact . Furthermore , since every element of
Automorphism of X.
trained on training data
$ X_ { trn } = U\Sigma_ { trn } V_ { trn } ^T $
with
X sub t r n equals U Sigma sub t r n V sub t r n transpose.
tuples reduced to a single~
$ 1 $
before the last cut ( hence
one
and the value of
$ \lambda $
is between 0.01 to 1 in all four datasets . Model performance degenerates significantly when
Lambda.
using special factoring properties of
$ \ { n\ } $
. Recently , Garret and Killpatrick~
n
of
$ N_S $
configurations
N sub S.
holds for all
$ i $
, but we prefer to write it in the above shape in order to highlight the similarities with the argument in the previous section . As in Section~
i
$ \PPhi_ { 13 } $
, and
P i sub 13
satisfying
$ a_j > 0 $
for all
a sub j is greater than zero.
and hence intersect
$ \del M $
in at most one component . As the triangulation of
delta M
\EndIf \EndWhile \Return
$ N $
,
N
we are going to present and discuss the quotients that appear in the spectral sequence construction for each
$ p=0 , \ldots,4 $
. In order to make the computations more understandable , we are also going to summarise the overall information at each page in a more pictorial way with the use
p equals zero, dot dot dot, four.
Each
$ BD_ { n } $
proposes
D B sub n
that shows a typical value of
$ 1.5 $
for
1.5: One point five.
in
$ T $
. Moreover , we study matches between substrings of
T
We denote the encoder and its trainable parameters as
$ E_ { \text { 3D } } $
, and its output feature as
E sub 3D
&
$ 0.927 $
&
zero point nine two seven.
em if
$ x\xtransto { ~a~ } x ' $
in
x transits to a prime, where x is mapped to a by a function or transformation.
$ \delta=0 $
, the resulting statistical field theory obeys a fluctuation -- dissipation relation~
delta equals zero.
Now we choose
$ s_0 $
so that
s sub zero.
with polynomial growing number of parameters
$ P ( a ) $
, parameter magnitude
P of a.
while the scattering length
$ a $
can have an effect on the velocity-dependence of the cross section at low energy . The self-interacting cross section can be written as
a
from the best fit of the stacked spectrum inside
$ 1 R_ { \rm e } $
of UDG11 we obtained a velocity dispersion of
one R sub r m e
and
$ i = 1 $
. After computing a period matrix
i equals one.
is the first positive root of the Bessel function
$ J_0 ( z ) $
. %
J zero of z.
where both inputs
$ x_n $
's and outputs
x sub n.
As
$ \psi $
is an even function with unit integral we get from
Psi.
&
$ 10 $
&
Ten.
has the form
$ \oc B $
, and
oh-k B
A factorization
$ \mathcal { D } $
-module is
D
that ensure consistency of the associated sequence of CGVI % densities
$ \ { \bar { p } _N\ } $
. %
the bar p sub N.
$ for all $
[ t : u ]
For all.
denote the mapping of an input dataset
$ \bm { X } $
to a lower dimensional representation via algorithm
capital X.
$ L_1 $
is positive definite . As a result ,
L sub 1.
the pairformer has features for all
$ \binom { n } { 2 } $
pairs of nodes , whether they correspond to existing edges or not . We believe that considering non-existing edges is crucial for the pairformer to inform the policy to decide
n choose 2.
and
$ c_i $
and
c sub i
with
$ \gamma $
the gyromagnetic ratio ,
Gamma.
Then
$ T $
has at least a fixed point
T
% The phase difference between
$ \lambda_ { AU } $
and
Lambda sub AU.
for every
$ t \in I $
, then maximal parabolic regularity of
t belongs to I.
of dimension
$ n $
) that takes the form :
n
parameterized reduction from
$ L $
to
L
$ U \subseteq \mathcal { U } $
and
U is a subset of U.
we first compute an estimate
$ \hat { \mathcal { S } } $
for the support
S hat.
can be represented by a harmonic form
$ ( u_ { 1 } , u_ { 2 } ) $
. % Here we used %
u sub 1, u sub 2
are concentrated in homological degrees
$ 0 $
,
zero
We observe that SAL and SAFL improve AUC ROC and yield up to
$ 48.9\ % $
relative improvement in mean latency . %
48.9 percent.
&
$ -1 $
&
Minus one.
% and the fact that the unitary
$ U_ { \rho \sigma } $
in the polar decomposition % of
U sub rho sigma
and~
$ r ( \tree , i ) $
respectively denote the numbers of leaves in the left and right subtrees of the
r of tree i
$ ] $
respectively yield that
closing bracket
Suppose first that
$ t $
is non-locally-modular . Then both
t
is the number of odd zeros of
$ q $
. Even for the top stratum
q
stands for the measured cross-section in the
$ s $
- ( or
s
to cancel the divergent
$ 1/\delta $
. For the
One divided by delta.