id stringlengths 16 16 | task_family stringclasses 20
values | task_type stringclasses 20
values | domain stringclasses 14
values | difficulty stringclasses 5
values | difficulty_label stringclasses 5
values | language stringclasses 1
value | instruction stringlengths 54 90 | context stringlengths 0 82 | response stringlengths 1 330 | analysis_plan stringclasses 10
values | verification stringclasses 10
values | verification_type stringclasses 7
values | prompt_review stringclasses 2
values | prompt_alignment stringclasses 3
values | constraint_check stringclasses 3
values | consistency_check stringclasses 2
values | math_check stringclasses 3
values | logic_check stringclasses 3
values | counterexample_check stringclasses 2
values | data_analysis_check stringclasses 3
values | code_check stringclasses 3
values | evidence_check stringclasses 3
values | source_check stringclasses 3
values | hallucination_control stringclasses 10
values | error_detection stringclasses 10
values | error_repair stringclasses 10
values | answerability stringclasses 2
values | confidence float32 0.85 1 | uncertainty float32 0 0.15 | reasoning_depth int16 1 4 | minimal_sufficient_reasoning bool 1
class | unnecessary_reasoning bool 1
class | stop_condition stringclasses 10
values | surface_variation int32 0 16 | numeric_variation int32 0 96 | structure_variation int32 0 30 | ood_style int32 0 12 | quality_score float32 0.9 0.9 | synthetic bool 1
class | license stringclasses 1
value | generator_version stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mtd-000000013200 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13200. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 8 | 25 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013201 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | easy | easy | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 79, then x is positive.
x = 79.
y = 87. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 9 | 9 | 26 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013202 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13202. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 10 | 27 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013203 | code | function_generation | programming | easy | easy | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 25367 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 11 | 11 | 28 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013204 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13204. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 12 | 29 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013205 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13205. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 13 | 30 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013206 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13206. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 14 | 0 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013207 | research | research_methodology | statistics | easy | easy | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about statistics. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 15 | 15 | 1 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013208 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | easy | easy | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 74, 21, 72, 3, 86 | Mean = 51.2000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 16 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013209 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13209. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013210 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 39 + 79
Proposed answer: 124 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 118. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 1 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000013211 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13211. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 19 | 5 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013212 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | medium | medium | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 23, then x is positive.
x = 23.
y = 27. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 3 | 20 | 6 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013213 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13213. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 21 | 7 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013214 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | medium | medium | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 92, 44, 81, 22, 67 | Mean = 61.2000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 5 | 22 | 8 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013215 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13215. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 23 | 9 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013216 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13216. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 24 | 10 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013217 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13217. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 25 | 11 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013218 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13218. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 26 | 12 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013219 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13219. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 27 | 13 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013220 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | medium | medium | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | All metals are liquid at room temperature. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 11 | 28 | 14 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000013221 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13221. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 29 | 15 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013222 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13222. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 30 | 16 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013223 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13223. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 31 | 17 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013224 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | medium | medium | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 96, then x is positive.
x = 96.
y = 79. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 15 | 32 | 18 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013225 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | medium | medium | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 5460 | 10920 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 16 | 33 | 19 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000013226 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13226. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 34 | 20 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013227 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13227. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 35 | 21 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013228 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13228. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 36 | 22 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013229 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 1855 × 366 | 678930 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 3 | 37 | 23 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013230 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 229215 ÷ 259 | 229215 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 4 | 38 | 24 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013231 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 2181276 ÷ 228 | 2181276 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 5 | 39 | 25 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013232 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 1765 × 113 | 199445 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 6 | 40 | 26 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013233 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13233. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 41 | 27 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013234 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | medium | medium | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 77, 99, 17, 78, 60 | Mean = 66.2000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 8 | 42 | 28 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013235 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13235. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 43 | 29 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013236 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13236. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 44 | 30 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013237 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13237. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 45 | 0 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013238 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | medium | medium | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | A triangle has four sides. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 12 | 46 | 1 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000013239 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13239. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 47 | 2 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013240 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 690185 - 538278 | 151907 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 14 | 48 | 3 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013241 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13241. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 49 | 4 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013242 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 14, B = 41 | B is greater than A by 27. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 16 | 50 | 5 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000013243 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 1332 × 405 | 539460 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 0 | 51 | 6 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013244 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13244. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 52 | 7 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013245 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13245. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 53 | 8 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013246 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 37 + 30
Proposed answer: 72 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 67. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 3 | 54 | 9 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000013247 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13247. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 55 | 10 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013248 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 99 + 48
Proposed answer: 151 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 147. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 5 | 56 | 11 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000013249 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13249. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 57 | 12 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013250 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13250. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 58 | 13 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013251 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13251. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 59 | 14 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013252 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13252. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 60 | 15 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013253 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13253. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 61 | 16 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013254 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 11 + 80
Proposed answer: 98 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 91. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 11 | 62 | 17 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000013255 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13255. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 63 | 18 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013256 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 77, B = 66 | A is greater than B by 11. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 13 | 64 | 19 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000013257 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13257. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 65 | 20 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013258 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13258. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 66 | 21 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013259 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13259. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 67 | 22 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013260 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13260. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 68 | 23 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013261 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | hard | hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 5143 | 10286 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 1 | 69 | 24 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000013262 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13262. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 70 | 25 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013263 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 7539 × 439 | 3309621 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 3 | 71 | 26 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013264 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13264. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 72 | 27 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013265 | code | function_generation | programming | hard | hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 62661 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 5 | 73 | 28 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013266 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13266. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 74 | 29 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013267 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13267. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 75 | 30 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013268 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13268. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 76 | 0 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013269 | research | research_methodology | computer security | hard | hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about computer security. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 9 | 77 | 1 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013270 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13270. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 78 | 2 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013271 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13271. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 79 | 3 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013272 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 32 + 69
Proposed answer: 105 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 101. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 12 | 80 | 4 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000013273 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13273. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 81 | 5 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013274 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13274. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 82 | 6 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013275 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | very_hard | very_hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 40, then x is positive.
x = 40.
y = 53. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 15 | 83 | 7 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013276 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13276. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 84 | 8 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013277 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | very_hard | very_hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | The Earth has one natural satellite. | Assessment: Correct.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 0 | 85 | 9 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000013278 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13278. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 86 | 10 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013279 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | very_hard | very_hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 1480 | 2960 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 2 | 87 | 11 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000013280 | research | research_methodology | climate science | very_hard | very_hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 3 | 88 | 12 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013281 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13281. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 89 | 13 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013282 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13282. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 90 | 14 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013283 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13283. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 91 | 15 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013284 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13284. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 92 | 16 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013285 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13285. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 93 | 17 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013286 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13286. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 94 | 18 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013287 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13287. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 95 | 19 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013288 | research | research_methodology | computer security | very_hard | very_hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about computer security. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 11 | 96 | 20 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013289 | research | research_methodology | economics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about economics. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 12 | 0 | 21 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000013290 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 73, B = 24 | A is greater than B by 49. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 13 | 1 | 22 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000013291 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 35, B = 12 | A is greater than B by 23. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 14 | 2 | 23 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000013292 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13292. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 3 | 24 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013293 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13293. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 4 | 25 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013294 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | very_hard | very_hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | All metals are liquid at room temperature. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 0 | 5 | 26 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000013295 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13295. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 6 | 27 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013296 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13296. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 7 | 28 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013297 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 13297. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 8 | 29 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000013298 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | extreme | extreme | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | A triangle has four sides. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 4 | 9 | 30 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000013299 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | extreme | extreme | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 80, then x is positive.
x = 80.
y = 63. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.