id
stringlengths
16
16
task_family
stringclasses
20 values
task_type
stringclasses
20 values
domain
stringclasses
14 values
difficulty
stringclasses
5 values
difficulty_label
stringclasses
5 values
language
stringclasses
1 value
instruction
stringlengths
54
90
context
stringlengths
0
82
response
stringlengths
1
330
analysis_plan
stringclasses
10 values
verification
stringclasses
10 values
verification_type
stringclasses
7 values
prompt_review
stringclasses
2 values
prompt_alignment
stringclasses
3 values
constraint_check
stringclasses
3 values
consistency_check
stringclasses
2 values
math_check
stringclasses
3 values
logic_check
stringclasses
3 values
counterexample_check
stringclasses
2 values
data_analysis_check
stringclasses
3 values
code_check
stringclasses
3 values
evidence_check
stringclasses
3 values
source_check
stringclasses
3 values
hallucination_control
stringclasses
10 values
error_detection
stringclasses
10 values
error_repair
stringclasses
10 values
answerability
stringclasses
2 values
confidence
float32
0.85
1
uncertainty
float32
0
0.15
reasoning_depth
int16
1
4
minimal_sufficient_reasoning
bool
1 class
unnecessary_reasoning
bool
1 class
stop_condition
stringclasses
10 values
surface_variation
int32
0
16
numeric_variation
int32
0
96
structure_variation
int32
0
30
ood_style
int32
0
12
quality_score
float32
0.9
0.9
synthetic
bool
1 class
license
stringclasses
1 value
generator_version
stringclasses
1 value
mtd-000000006700
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6700. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
7
4
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006701
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6701. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
8
5
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006702
math
arithmetic
mathematics
easy
easy
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 454901 - 83843
371058
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
4
9
6
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006703
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
easy
easy
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 75, 84, 5, 72, 59
Mean = 59.0000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
5
10
7
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006704
math
arithmetic
mathematics
easy
easy
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 156467 + 676843
833310
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
6
11
8
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006705
code
function_generation
programming
easy
easy
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 28599
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
7
12
9
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006706
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
easy
easy
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
6447
12894
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
8
13
10
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006707
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6707. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
14
11
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006708
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6708. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
15
12
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006709
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6709. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
16
13
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006710
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 78, B = 3
A is greater than B by 75.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
12
17
14
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006711
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 59 + 91 Proposed answer: 154
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 150.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
13
18
15
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006712
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6712. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
19
16
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006713
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6713. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
20
17
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006714
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6714. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
21
18
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006715
research
research_methodology
machine learning
medium
medium
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about machine learning.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
0
22
19
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006716
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
4913
9826
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
1
23
20
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006717
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
4116
8232
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
2
24
21
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006718
math
arithmetic
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 63382 ÷ 67
63382
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
3
25
22
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006719
code
function_generation
programming
medium
medium
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 2224
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
4
26
23
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006720
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6720. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
27
24
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006721
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 22, B = 44
B is greater than A by 22.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
6
28
25
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006722
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6722. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
29
26
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006723
math
arithmetic
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 743788 + 832736
1576524
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
8
30
27
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006724
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6724. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
31
28
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006725
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6725. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
32
29
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006726
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
3198
6396
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
11
33
30
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006727
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6727. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
34
0
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006728
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6728. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
35
1
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006729
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6729. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
36
2
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006730
research
research_methodology
economics
medium
medium
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about economics.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
15
37
3
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006731
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
6519
13038
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
16
38
4
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006732
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6732. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
39
5
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006733
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6733. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
40
6
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006734
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6734. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
41
7
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006735
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 36 + 59 Proposed answer: 98
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 95.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
3
42
8
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006736
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 56, B = 36
A is greater than B by 20.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
4
43
9
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006737
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
5279
10558
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
5
44
10
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006738
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6738. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
45
11
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006739
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
medium
medium
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 25, 15, 96, 6, 19
Mean = 32.2000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
7
46
12
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006740
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6740. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
47
13
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006741
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6741. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
48
14
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006742
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6742. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
49
15
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006743
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6743. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
50
16
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006744
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 39 + 40 Proposed answer: 86
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 79.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
12
51
17
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006745
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 44 + 67 Proposed answer: 117
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 111.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
13
52
18
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006746
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6746. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
53
19
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006747
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6747. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
54
20
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006748
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6748. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
55
21
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006749
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6749. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
56
22
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006750
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6750. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
57
23
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006751
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
hard
hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 82, 85, 55, 83, 48
Mean = 70.6000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
2
58
24
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006752
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 488145 - 487073
1072
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
3
59
25
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006753
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
hard
hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 5, 62, 72, 81, 51
Mean = 54.2000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
4
60
26
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006754
research
research_methodology
statistics
hard
hard
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about statistics.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
5
61
27
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006755
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
hard
hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
The Earth has one natural satellite.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
6
62
28
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006756
code
function_generation
programming
hard
hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 83229
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
7
63
29
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006757
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6757. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
64
30
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006758
research
research_methodology
materials science
hard
hard
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about materials science.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
9
65
0
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006759
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
hard
hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 49, 34, 28, 97, 5
Mean = 42.6000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
10
66
1
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006760
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6760. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
67
2
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006761
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6761. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
68
3
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006762
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6762. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
69
4
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006763
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6763. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
70
5
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006764
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6764. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
71
6
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006765
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6765. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
72
7
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006766
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
hard
hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
3209
6418
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
0
73
8
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006767
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6767. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
74
9
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006768
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6768. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
75
10
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006769
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6769. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
76
11
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006770
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6770. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
77
12
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006771
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6771. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
78
13
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006772
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 55, B = 7
A is greater than B by 48.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
6
79
14
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006773
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6773. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
80
15
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006774
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
hard
hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
8590
17180
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
8
81
16
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006775
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6775. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
82
17
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006776
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
very_hard
very_hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
Water freezes at 0°C under standard atmospheric pressure.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
10
83
18
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006777
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
very_hard
very_hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 16, then x is positive. x = 16. y = 98.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
11
84
19
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006778
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6778. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
85
20
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006779
research
research_methodology
climate science
very_hard
very_hard
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
13
86
21
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006780
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6780. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
87
22
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006781
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6781. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
88
23
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006782
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
very_hard
very_hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 55, then x is positive. x = 55. y = 51.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
16
89
24
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006783
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6783. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
90
25
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006784
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 47, 27, 85, 70, 23
Mean = 50.4000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
1
91
26
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006785
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6785. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
92
27
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006786
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
very_hard
very_hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 37, then x is positive. x = 37. y = 94.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
3
93
28
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006787
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 26 + 24 Proposed answer: 59
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 50.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
4
94
29
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006788
research
research_methodology
biology
very_hard
very_hard
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about biology.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
5
95
30
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006789
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 80, 84, 83, 24, 34
Mean = 61.0000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
6
96
0
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006790
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6790. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
0
1
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006791
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6791. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
1
2
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006792
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6792. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
2
3
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006793
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6793. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
3
4
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006794
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6794. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
4
5
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006795
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6795. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
5
6
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006796
research
research_methodology
computer security
extreme
extreme
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about computer security.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
13
6
7
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006797
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6797. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
7
8
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006798
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6798. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
8
9
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000006799
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 6799. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
9
10
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1