codelion commited on
Commit
811ea6c
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): e9e70d4

Leaderboard: Decider 1 beats Jev on accuracy, latency and price

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +24 -30
README.md CHANGED
@@ -64,21 +64,21 @@ their Jev model.
64
  Scored on the `test` split: 400 cases, 2,000 decisions. General models are
65
  scored zero-shot: they have never seen these workflows or their question schemas.
66
 
67
- | # | Model | Kind | Accuracy ↑ | KL from gold ↓ | Brier ↓ |
68
- |---|---|---|---|---|---|
69
- | 1 | **[meraGPT Decider 1](https://meragpt.com/models/state-decider-1)** (`sd-1`) | general, zero-shot | **0.768** | **0.096** | **0.052** |
70
- | 2 | TypeSafe Jev 1.13.0 | general, zero-shot | 0.727 | 1.442 | 0.148 |
71
- | 3 | ModernBERT-base (149M) | specialist, fitted per workflow | 0.646 | 0.223 | 0.119 |
72
- | 4 | MiniLM-L6 (22M) | specialist, fitted per workflow | 0.587 | 0.262 | 0.143 |
73
- | – | Prior (ignores the input) | reference | 0.470 | 0.347 | 0.189 |
74
-
75
- **[Decider 1](https://meragpt.com/models/state-decider-1) is state of the art on
76
- this benchmark** as of 2026-09-22: the highest accuracy and the closest
77
- distributions to gold of any model scored here, on every question type. It
78
- answers `POST /v1/systemone` at [meragpt.com](https://meragpt.com/docs/systemone).
79
- For scale: perfect scenario understanding scores 0.704 and teacher
80
- self-agreement 0.735 (see [What a score here means](#what-a-score-here-means)).
81
- Full metrics are under [Baseline results](#baseline-results).
82
 
83
  To add a model, score it on `test` with the full distributions and open a
84
  discussion with the numbers and the mode (specialist or generalist) it used.
@@ -237,10 +237,9 @@ of number it is, because they are not all the same kind.
237
  | Perfect scenario understanding | ceiling | 0.704 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
238
  | TypeSafe Jev 1.13.0 | general | 0.727 | 0.580 | 0.613 | 1.442 | 0.251 | 0.148 | 0.144 | 0.391 | 0.952 | 710 |
239
  | Teacher self-agreement | ceiling | 0.735 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
240
- | **[meraGPT Decider 1](https://meragpt.com/models/state-decider-1)** | **general** | **0.768** | **0.608** | **0.641** | **0.096** | **0.149** | **0.052** | 0.180 | **0.219** | **0.984** | 48* |
241
 
242
- \* Model time on one GPU. Jev's 710 is end to end through its API, so the two
243
- latency figures are not comparable.
244
 
245
  ### What each row is
246
 
@@ -290,18 +289,13 @@ that this gold is a three-sample teacher spread and Jev does not reproduce that
290
  spread. Which number matters depends on whether you consume the argmax or the
291
  distribution.
292
 
293
- **meraGPT Decider 1** (`state-decider-1`, alias `sd-1`) is a general System One
294
- model, scored zero-shot: it had never seen these four workflows or any of the
295
- twenty question schemas. It leads every question type — `noul` 0.840 against
296
- Jev's 0.775, `choice` 0.733 against 0.720, `score` 0.739 against 0.696 — and
297
- its distributions sit far closer to gold, with KL 0.096 against Jev's 1.442 and a
298
- Brier score of 0.052 against 0.148. It scores above teacher self-agreement, which
299
- is possible because gold is the mean of three teacher samples: a model that
300
- predicts that mean can agree with it better than any single sample does. Its ECE
301
- of 0.180 is measured against the gold argmax, which penalises hedging exactly
302
- where the teacher itself hedged. Served at `POST /v1/systemone` on
303
- [meragpt.com](https://meragpt.com/models/state-decider-1), at $0.03 per million
304
- input tokens; the typesafe-sdk works against it by setting `TYPESAFE_BASE_URL`.
305
 
306
  ### Specialist and generalist are not comparable
307
 
 
64
  Scored on the `test` split: 400 cases, 2,000 decisions. General models are
65
  scored zero-shot: they have never seen these workflows or their question schemas.
66
 
67
+ | # | Model | Kind | Accuracy ↑ | KL from gold ↓ | Brier ↓ | Latency, p50 end to end ↓ | Price per 1M input tokens ↓ |
68
+ |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
69
+ | 1 | **[meraGPT Decider 1](https://meragpt.com/models/state-decider-1)** (`sd-1`) | general, zero-shot | **0.768** | **0.096** | **0.052** | **526 ms** | **$0.03** |
70
+ | 2 | TypeSafe Jev 1.13.0 | general, zero-shot | 0.727 | 1.442 | 0.148 | 710 ms | $0.042 |
71
+ | 3 | ModernBERT-base (149M) | specialist, fitted per workflow | 0.646 | 0.223 | 0.119 | – | – |
72
+ | 4 | MiniLM-L6 (22M) | specialist, fitted per workflow | 0.587 | 0.262 | 0.143 | – | – |
73
+ | – | Prior (ignores the input) | reference | 0.470 | 0.347 | 0.189 | – | – |
74
+
75
+ **meraGPT's proprietary model, [Decider 1](https://meragpt.com/models/state-decider-1),
76
+ is state of the art on this benchmark** as of 2026-09-22. It beats TypeSafe's Jev
77
+ on accuracy and on every question type, it is faster end to end, and it costs
78
+ less per token. It answers `POST /v1/systemone` at
79
+ [meragpt.com](https://meragpt.com/docs/systemone), so the typesafe-sdk works
80
+ against it by setting `TYPESAFE_BASE_URL`. Full metrics are under
81
+ [Baseline results](#baseline-results).
82
 
83
  To add a model, score it on `test` with the full distributions and open a
84
  discussion with the numbers and the mode (specialist or generalist) it used.
 
237
  | Perfect scenario understanding | ceiling | 0.704 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
238
  | TypeSafe Jev 1.13.0 | general | 0.727 | 0.580 | 0.613 | 1.442 | 0.251 | 0.148 | 0.144 | 0.391 | 0.952 | 710 |
239
  | Teacher self-agreement | ceiling | 0.735 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
240
+ | **[meraGPT Decider 1](https://meragpt.com/models/state-decider-1)** | **general** | **0.768** | **0.608** | **0.641** | **0.096** | **0.149** | **0.052** | 0.180 | **0.219** | **0.984** | 526* |
241
 
242
+ \* p50 end to end through the meraGPT API, like Jev's 710.
 
243
 
244
  ### What each row is
245
 
 
289
  spread. Which number matters depends on whether you consume the argmax or the
290
  distribution.
291
 
292
+ **meraGPT Decider 1** (`state-decider-1`, alias `sd-1`) is meraGPT's proprietary
293
+ System One model, scored zero-shot: it had never seen these four workflows or
294
+ any of the twenty question schemas. It leads every question type — `noul` 0.840
295
+ against Jev's 0.775, `choice` 0.733 against 0.720, `score` 0.739 against 0.696 —
296
+ with KL 0.096 against Jev's 1.442. End to end it answers in about half a second
297
+ at the median, against Jev's 710 ms, at $0.03 per million input tokens against
298
+ Jev's $0.042. [meragpt.com/models/state-decider-1](https://meragpt.com/models/state-decider-1).
 
 
 
 
 
299
 
300
  ### Specialist and generalist are not comparable
301