Unxei-XII-Resolution-Actuation-Law / src /verify_resolution.py
PureOne's picture
Upload research package with Eve Uploader
a5568e0 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
6.83 kB
"""High-precision checks of interval response, minimax degree and collision cost."""
import json
from pathlib import Path
import mpmath as mp
from spectral_control import (two_mode, MomentProblem, polyval, flat_polynomial_coeffs,
flat_error, interval_error, polynomial_jets)
ROOT=Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
def s(x):
return mp.nstr(x,45)
def main():
mp.mp.dps=110
checks=[]
def check(name,condition,detail=None):
if not condition:
raise AssertionError(name+': '+str(detail))
checks.append({'name':name,'passed':True,'detail':detail})
# Exact polynomial profiles, including high-order extrapolation.
rc=(mp.sqrt(2)-1)/2
profile=[]
for radius in [mp.mpf('.1'),rc,mp.mpf('.25'),mp.mpf('.4')]:
for m in [0,1,2,4,8,16,32,64]:
A=flat_error(m,radius)
B=interval_error(m,radius)
profile.append({'m':m,'radius':s(radius),'flat_error':s(A),'interval_error':s(B)})
for radius in [mp.mpf('.1'),rc,mp.mpf('.25'),mp.mpf('.4')]:
m=512
g=radius*(1+radius)
asymp=4*g/(mp.sqrt(mp.pi)*(1+2*radius)*mp.sqrt(m))*(4*g)**m
ratio=flat_error(m,radius)/asymp
check('Laplace_asymptotic_r'+s(radius),abs(ratio-1)<mp.mpf('.006'),s(ratio))
# Fixed-m response tends to the Hermite polynomial; remainder is a bound
# at every sampled point (the proof, not sampling, gives the continuum bound).
convergence=[]
points=[mp.mpf(k)/8 for k in range(-2,11)] # y=-.25,...,1.25
for m in [0,1,2]:
H=flat_polynomial_coeffs(m)
previous=None
for gap in ['.08','.04','.02','.01']:
problem=two_mode(m,gap,dps=110)
delta=mp.mpf(gap)
errors=[]; bound_ratios=[]
for y in points:
F=problem.response(2+delta*(y-mp.mpf('.5')))
err=abs(F-polyval(H,y))
bound=problem.hermite_remainder_bound(y,[0,1],delta)
if bound:
check(f'Hermite_bound_m{m}_gap{gap}_y{s(y)}',err<=bound*(1+mp.mpf('1e-65')),s(err/bound))
bound_ratios.append(err/bound)
else:
check(f'nodal_value_m{m}_gap{gap}_y{s(y)}',err<mp.mpf('1e-65'),s(err))
errors.append(err)
maxerr=max(errors)
if previous is not None:
check(f'profile_convergence_m{m}_gap{gap}',maxerr<previous,s(maxerr/previous))
previous=maxerr
check(f'linear_residual_m{m}_gap{gap}',problem.solve_residual<mp.mpf('1e-65'),s(problem.solve_residual))
convergence.append({'m':m,'gap':gap,'energy':s(problem.energy),
'scaled_energy':s(problem.energy*delta**(4*m+2)),
'profile_max_error':s(maxerr),'max_bound_fraction':s(max(bound_ratios))})
# Analytically optimal cubic at radius1/4. It is not the flat cubic.
P=[0,-mp.mpf(26)/9,0,mp.mpf(32)/9]
cubic=[]
for gap in ['.08','.04','.02','.01','.001','.0001']:
delta=mp.mpf(gap)
jets=polynomial_jets(P,[-mp.mpf('.5'),mp.mpf('.5')],delta,1)
p=MomentProblem([2-delta/2,2+delta/2],1,jets=jets)
f=two_mode(1,gap,dps=110)
# Uniform bound: |(x+.5)^2(x-.5)^2| is maximal at the outer edge.
maxprod=(mp.mpf('.75')**2-mp.mpf('.5')**2)**2
bound=delta**4*maxprod*p.moment_norm(4)*mp.sqrt(p.energy)/mp.factorial(4)
certified=mp.mpf(1)/3+bound
samples=[-mp.mpf('.75')+mp.mpf(k)/200 for k in range(101)]
samples+= [mp.mpf('.25')+mp.mpf(k)/200 for k in range(101)]
worst=max(abs(p.response(2+delta*x)-(1 if x<0 else -1)) for x in samples)
check('cubic_finite_gap_bound_'+gap,worst<=certified,s(certified))
cubic.append({'gap':gap,'energy':s(p.energy),'flat_energy':s(f.energy),
'energy_ratio':s(p.energy/f.energy),'sampled_worst_error':s(worst),
'uniform_error_upper_bound':s(certified),'uniform_remainder_bound':s(bound),
'tolerance_0_4_certified':bool(certified<mp.mpf('.4'))})
check('cubic_asymptotic_energy_ratio',abs(mp.mpf(cubic[-1]['energy_ratio'])-mp.mpf(64)/81)<mp.mpf('1e-5'))
check('cubic_continuum_tolerance_certificate',any(x['tolerance_0_4_certified'] for x in cubic))
# Leading coefficient constants, independent of extrapolation tests.
constants=[]
for m in [0,1,2]:
n=2*m+1
# Leading coefficient in centered x is unchanged by the shift y=x+.5.
hn=(-1)**(m+1)*2*mp.binomial(2*m,m)
jets=[[0]*(n+1)]
jets[0][n]=mp.factorial(n)*hn
limit=MomentProblem([2],n,jets=jets).energy
final=[v for v in convergence if v['m']==m][-1]
ratio=mp.mpf(final['scaled_energy'])/limit
check(f'leading_constant_m{m}',abs(ratio-1)<mp.mpf('.003'),s(ratio))
constants.append({'m':m,'limit_constant':s(limit),'finite_gap_ratio':s(ratio)})
# Unequal collision speeds: orders4 and6 instead of one universal order4.
multiscale=[]
for target,exponent in [([0,0,1],6),([1,0,0],4),([1,1,1],0)]:
vals=[]
for gap in ['.08','.04','.02','.01']:
eps=mp.mpf(gap)
p=MomentProblem([2,2+eps,2+eps+eps**2],0,jets=[[v] for v in target])
vals.append({'epsilon':gap,'energy':s(p.energy),'scaled_energy':s(p.energy*eps**exponent)})
slope=mp.log(mp.mpf(vals[-1]['energy'])/mp.mpf(vals[-2]['energy']))/mp.log(mp.mpf('.5'))
check('multiscale_slope_'+str(target),abs(slope+exponent)<mp.mpf('.12'),s(slope))
multiscale.append({'target':target,'expected_exponent':exponent,'slope':s(slope),'data':vals})
# One independently integrated difficult case and a precision replication.
p=two_mode(1,'.04',dps=90)
quadrature=p.direct_residual()
check('independent_adaptive_quadrature',quadrature<mp.mpf('1e-55'),s(quadrature))
E90=p.energy
p=two_mode(1,'.04',dps=140)
difference=abs(E90/p.energy-1)
check('precision_90_vs_140',difference<mp.mpf('1e-60'),s(difference))
report={'status':'PASS','precision_digits':110,'assertions':len(checks),'checks':checks,
'critical_radius':s(rc),'polynomial_profiles':profile,'response_convergence':convergence,
'cubic_comparison':cubic,'leading_constants':constants,'multiscale':multiscale,
'independent_quadrature_residual':s(quadrature),'precision_relative_difference':s(difference),
'limitations':'High precision is not directed-rounding interval arithmetic. Continuum bounds follow from proved formulas; response grids are illustrations.'}
path=ROOT/'results/resolution_report.json'
path.write_text(json.dumps(report,indent=2),encoding='utf-8')
print(f'PASS: {len(checks)} numerical assertions; {path.name}')
if __name__=='__main__':
main()