File size: 73,563 Bytes
9755170 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 | {
"schema_version": "1.0",
"release": "2.0.0",
"date": "2026-09-25",
"title": "Eve Floquet Defect Rigidity: Resource-Constrained Extremality, Exact Inverse Theory, and Classical–Quantum Temporal Photonics",
"status_definition": "All numbered statements have supplied internal proofs or explicit reductions under their literal hypotheses. This is not a confidence percentage, formal certification, independent review, or established novelty.",
"numbered_statement_count": 44,
"claims": [
{
"id": "lem:linearize",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "3.1",
"page": 7,
"title_latex": "An exact, unrelaxed linearization",
"statement_latex": "Write $c=\\cos\\theta$, $s_\\theta=\\sin\\theta$, and define\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:z}\nz=\\frac{(u-1)v_B}{(B-1)v_u},\\qquad\n a=\\frac{(B-1)c^2}{v_B},\\quad b=\\frac{(B-1)s_\\theta^2}{v_B},\\quad\n c_0=\\frac{(B-1)s_\\theta c}{v_B}.\n\\end{equation}\nFor each angle, $u\\mapsto z$ is a continuous strictly increasing bijection\n$[1,B]\\to[0,1]$, and\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:linearized}\n\\frac1{v_u}=1-za,\\qquad \\frac{u}{v_u}=1+zb,\n\\qquad \\frac{w_u}{v_u}=zc_0.\n\\end{equation}\nThus a complete projective turn has time, resource, and gain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:turnmoments}\n\\tau=\\pi-\\int_0^\\pi za,\\qquad U=\\pi+\\int_0^\\pi zb,\n\\qquad J=\\int_0^\\pi zc_0.\n\\end{equation}\nEvery measurable $z\\in[0,1]$ gives an actual control via its inverse map and\nthe clock $\\dd s=\\dd\\theta/v_u$; no randomized-control relaxation is used.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:linearize",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 7
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:projective",
"foundation:fractional"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "lem:boundary",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "3.2",
"page": 7,
"title_latex": "Boundary moments cannot carry positive gain",
"statement_latex": "Every boundary point of $\\mathcal K$ has exactly one representing $z$\nup to null sets. That representative is invariant under\n$\\theta\\mapsto\\pi-\\theta$, and its gain $J$ is zero. In particular\n$\\mathcal K$ is strictly convex, and any moment represented with $J>0$\nlies in its interior.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:boundary",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 7
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:linearize",
"foundation:convex"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "lem:normal",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "3.3",
"page": 7,
"title_latex": "Finite normal duals at every interior moment",
"statement_latex": "Let $q\\in\\operatorname{int}\\mathcal K$. The largest gain above $q$ is\nattained and has finite real multipliers $\\eta,\\xi$. Its unique maximizing\nrepresentative is\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:resourceselector}\nz_*(\\theta)=\\boldsymbol1_{\\{K_{\\eta,\\xi}(\\theta)>0\\}},\\qquad\nK_{\\eta,\\xi}=\\sin\\theta\\cos\\theta+\\eta\\cos^2\\theta-\\xi\\sin^2\\theta.\n\\end{equation}\nThe quadratic is indefinite, $\\Delta:=1+4\\eta\\xi>0$, and has two simple\nzeros on the projective circle. The pair $(\\eta,\\xi)$ is unique.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:normal",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 7
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:linearize",
"lem:boundary",
"foundation:convex"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:resource",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "4.1",
"page": 9,
"title_latex": "Global resource-constrained extremality and equality",
"statement_latex": "Over every measurable $S$-periodic profile with $1\\le u\\le R^2$ and\n$S^{-1}\\int_0^S u=m$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:resourceF}\n\\boxed{\\sup_u L(u)=F(R,S,m):=\n\\max\\bigl(\\{0\\}\\cup\\{nG_m(S/n):n\\in\\mathcal N_m(R,S)\\}\\bigr).}\n\\end{equation}\nIf $\\mathcal N_m$ is nonempty, let $\\mathcal W_m$ be the set of all maximizing\nintegers. Every equality profile, and only those profiles, is up to a temporal\ntranslation and null-set changes $n$ repetitions of\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:resourcecell}\nu^*_{m,n}(s)=\n\\begin{cases}\nR^2,&0\\le s<pS/n,\\\\\n1,&pS/n\\le s<S/n,\n\\end{cases}\\qquad n\\in\\mathcal W_m.\n\\end{equation}\nIf $\\mathcal N_m$ is empty, every admissible profile has $L(u)=0$ and no\nbinary-purity implication is asserted. The endpoint means $m=1,R^2$ force\nconstant profiles and have zero growth. Collapsed contrast $R=1$ is the\nsame constant-oscillator case.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:resource",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 9
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:normal",
"foundation:fractional",
"foundation:segments"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:resourceDefect",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "4.2",
"page": 10,
"title_latex": "Resource defect and unique dual parameters",
"statement_latex": "For any admissible growing profile with winding $n$, the one-turn moment\n$(\\pi-S/n,mS/n-\\pi)$ has a unique finite pair $(\\eta_n,\\xi_n)$.\nWriting $b=b_{\\eta_n,\\xi_n}$ and $\\Delta_n=1+4\\eta_n\\xi_n>0$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:resourceDefect}\n\\boxed{nG_m(S/n)-L(u)=\n\\int_{\\theta_0}^{\\theta_0+n\\pi}\n\\frac{|K_{\\eta_n,\\xi_n}(\\theta)|\\,|\\widehat u(\\theta)-b(\\theta)|}\n{v_{\\widehat u}(\\theta)v_b(\\theta)}\\dd\\theta.}\n\\end{equation}\nThe same dual is the one associated with the expanding eigenline of the\nbinary cell of durations $pS/n$ and $(1-p)S/n$.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:resourceDefect",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 10
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:resource",
"lem:normal",
"foundation:fractional"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:concavity",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "5.1",
"page": 10,
"title_latex": "Strict concavity and at most two adjacent winning windings",
"statement_latex": "For $R>1$ and $1<m<R^2$, $G_m$ is analytic and strictly concave on\n$(\\tau_-,\\tau_+)$, positive there, and extends continuously by zero to its\ntwo endpoints. The ratio $G_m(\\tau)/\\tau$ has a unique maximum at\n$\\tau^\\circ\\in(\\tau_-,\\tau_+)$. It is strictly increasing before this point\nand strictly decreasing after it. Consequently all fixed-$S$ winning\nintegers belong to\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:twoneighbors}\n\\left\\{\\left\\lfloor S/\\tau^\\circ\\right\\rfloor,\n\\left\\lceil S/\\tau^\\circ\\right\\rceil\\right\\}\\cap\\mathcal N_m(R,S).\n\\end{equation}\nIn particular there are at most two winning windings, and any tie is between\nadjacent integers. If $S/\\tau^\\circ$ is an admissible integer, it is the\nunique winner.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:concavity",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 10
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:normal",
"thm:resource",
"foundation:convex"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:resourceFree",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "5.2",
"page": 11,
"title_latex": "Free-period optimum with a fixed long-run resource",
"statement_latex": "Put\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:resourcegamma}\n\\gamma(R,m)=G_m(\\tau^\\circ)/\\tau^\\circ.\n\\end{equation}\nEvery periodic profile of any period with mean $m$ obeys\n$L(u)/S\\le\\gamma(R,m)$. Equality holds exactly for translated repetitions\nof the binary cell of period $\\tau^\\circ$ and duty $p$.\nThere are unique finite multipliers $\\eta,\\xi$ for that cell, with\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:gammamultipliers}\n\\eta+\\xi m=\\gamma(R,m).\n\\end{equation}\nA bounded $\\pi$-periodic absolutely continuous function $V$ satisfies,\nfor every measurable, not necessarily periodic control $1\\le u\\le B$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:resourcegauge}\n\\log\\frac{\\|x(s)\\|}{\\|x(0)\\|}\n\\le\\gamma(R,m)s+\\xi\\int_0^s(u(v)-m)\\dd v+\\operatorname{osc}V.\n\\end{equation}\nConsequently every such control with time average tending to $m$ has\nupper asymptotic amplitude exponent at most $\\gamma(R,m)$, and the bound\nis attained by the periodic canonical cell.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:resourceFree",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 11
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:concavity",
"thm:resourceDefect"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "lem:margin",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "6.1",
"page": 12,
"title_latex": "A two-multiplier switching margin",
"statement_latex": "Suppose $K=\\sin\\theta\\cos\\theta+\\eta\\cos^2\\theta-\\xi\\sin^2\\theta$\nhas $\\Delta=1+4\\eta\\xi>0$. Let $Z$ be its two zeros on\n$\\R/\\pi\\mathbb Z$, and let $d_Z$ be distance to this set. Then\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:margin}\n|K(\\theta)|\\ge\\frac{2\\sqrt\\Delta}{\\pi^2}d_Z(\\theta).\n\\end{equation}\nFor the bounds-only calibration $\\xi=0$, this is exactly the uniform v1.0\nconstant $2/\\pi^2$, independent of $\\eta$.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:margin",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 12
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:fractional"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:phasestability",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "6.2",
"page": 13,
"title_latex": "Phase and clock stability from the exact defect",
"statement_latex": "For a growing fixed-resource profile with winding $n$, put\n$d=B-1$, $E=nG_m(S/n)-L(u)$, and $\\Delta_n=1+4\\eta_n\\xi_n$.\nWith the canonical selector $b=b_{\\eta_n,\\xi_n}$,\n\\begin{align}\nQ:=\\int_{\\theta_0}^{\\theta_0+n\\pi}|\\widehat u-b|\\dd\\theta\n&\\le2\\pi B\\sqrt{ndE}\\,\\Delta_n^{-1/4},\\label{eq:phaseL1}\\\\\n\\inf_{t_0}\\int_0^S|u(s)-u^*_{m,n}(s-t_0)|\\dd s\n&\\le(1+2nd)\\,2\\pi B\\sqrt{ndE}\\,\\Delta_n^{-1/4}.\n\\label{eq:timeL1}\n\\end{align}\nHere $u^*_{m,n}$ denotes all $n$ repeated cells. The same assertions hold\nfor a bounds-only calibrated cell with $\\xi=0$, its branch defect, and\n$\\Delta_n=1$.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:phasestability",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 13
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:margin",
"thm:resourceDefect",
"foundation:projective"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:globalstability",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "6.3",
"page": 13,
"title_latex": "Global resource-constrained square-root rigidity",
"statement_latex": "Suppose $F=F(R,S,m)>0$. Let $F_n=nG_m(S/n)$ and let $\\mathcal O_*$ be\nthe union of all translates of every winning architecture. Define\n\\begin{align}\n\\delta_b&=\\min\\bigl(\\{F\\}\\cup\\{F-F_n:n\\in\\mathcal N_m\\setminus\\mathcal W_m\\}\\bigr)>0,\\nonumber\\\\\nC_0&=\\max_{n\\in\\mathcal W_m}\n\\frac{2\\pi B(1+2nd)\\sqrt{nd}}{S\\Delta_n^{1/4}},\\qquad\nC=\\max\\{C_0,d/\\sqrt{\\delta_b}\\}.\\label{eq:resourceC}\n\\end{align}\nEvery admissible measurable profile satisfies\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:globalstability}\n\\boxed{\\dist_1(u,\\mathcal O_*):=\n\\inf_{v\\in\\mathcal O_*}\\frac1S\\int_0^S|u-v|\\dd s\n\\le C\\sqrt{F-L(u)}.}\n\\end{equation}\nReplacing the distance by mean absolute permittivity error is valid after\nmultiplying $C$ by $\\varepsilon_+$.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:globalstability",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 13
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:phasestability",
"thm:resource"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "prop:resourceSharp",
"kind": "proposition",
"number": "6.4",
"page": 14,
"title_latex": "Sharpness while preserving the resource exactly",
"statement_latex": "The exponent $1/2$ in \\eqref{eq:globalstability} cannot generally be improved,\neven when period, contrast, and mean are all fixed.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "prop:resourceSharp",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 14
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:segments",
"thm:resource"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:main",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "7.1",
"page": 15,
"title_latex": "Preserved exact bounds-only optimum",
"statement_latex": "For all measurable $S$-periodic controls $1\\le u\\le R^2$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:F}\n\\sup_u L(u)=F(R,S):=\\max\\bigl(\\{0\\}\\cup\\{F_n:n\\in\\mathcal N(R,S)\\}\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\nIf $\\mathcal N$ is empty, every profile has zero growth. Otherwise every\nmaximizer is exactly, up to translation and null sets, $n$ repetitions of\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:binary}\nu_n^*(s)=\\begin{cases}R^2,&0\\le s<h_R(\\eta_n),\\\\\n1,&h_R(\\eta_n)\\le s<\\tau_R(\\eta_n),\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $n$ belongs to the full winner set $\\mathcal W=\\{n:F_n=F\\}$.\nAll winding ties and the reversal-as-translation symmetry are retained.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:main",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 15
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:projective",
"foundation:fractional",
"foundation:segments"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:defect",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "7.2",
"page": 15,
"title_latex": "Preserved bounds-only exact defect",
"statement_latex": "For a growing profile with expanding winding $n$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:globaldefect}\nF_n-L(u)=\\int_{\\theta_0}^{\\theta_0+n\\pi}\n\\frac{|K_{\\eta_n}(\\theta)|\\,|\\widehat u(\\theta)-b_{\\eta_n}(\\theta)|}\n{v_{\\widehat u}(\\theta)v_{b_{\\eta_n}}(\\theta)}\\dd\\theta.\n\\end{equation}",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:defect",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 15
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:main",
"foundation:fractional"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "cor:boundstability",
"kind": "corollary",
"number": "7.3",
"page": 15,
"title_latex": "Preserved bounds-only global stability",
"statement_latex": "If $F(R,S)>0$, the union $\\mathcal O_*$ of all winning translation orbits\nobeys\n\\[\n\\dist_1(u,\\mathcal O_*)\\le C\\sqrt{F(R,S)-L(u)},\n\\]\nwhere\n\\[\n\\begin{gathered}\n\\delta_b=\\min\\bigl(\\{F\\}\\cup\\{F-F_n:n\\in\\mathcal N\\setminus\\mathcal W\\}\\bigr),\\\\\nC=\\max\\left\\{\\max_{n\\in\\mathcal W}\n\\frac{2\\pi B(1+2n(B-1))\\sqrt{n(B-1)}}S,\n\\frac{B-1}{\\sqrt{\\delta_b}}\\right\\}.\n\\end{gathered}\n\\]",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "cor:boundstability",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 15
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:main",
"thm:defect",
"thm:phasestability"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "prop:sharp",
"kind": "proposition",
"number": "7.4",
"page": 15,
"title_latex": "The exponent $1/2$ cannot generally be improved",
"statement_latex": "There exist fixed $R,S$ for which no estimate replacing\n$\\sqrt{F-L}$ in Corollary~\\ref{cor:boundstability} by $(F-L)^\\alpha$ can hold\nwith a finite constant when $\\alpha>1/2$.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "prop:sharp",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 15
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:segments",
"thm:main"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:free",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "8.1",
"page": 16,
"title_latex": "Sharp growth per unit time",
"statement_latex": "There is a unique $\\gamma_R>0$ satisfying\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:gamma}\nG_R(\\gamma_R)=\\gamma_R\\tau_R(\\gamma_R).\n\\end{equation}\nEvery admissible periodic profile, of any period, obeys\n$L(u)/S\\leq\\gamma_R$. Equality holds precisely for translated repetitions\nof the canonical cell with $\\eta=\\gamma_R$. In particular equality at a\nspecified $S$ requires $S$ to be an integer multiple of\n$\\tau_R(\\gamma_R)$. The physical upper rate is $\\omega_-\\gamma_R$.\nMoreover, the same rate is the maximal asymptotic growth rate over\nnonperiodic measurable controls in $[1,R^2]$.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:free",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 16
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:main",
"thm:defect"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:quantum",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "9.1",
"page": 18,
"title_latex": "Exact finite-cycle and asymptotic quantum laws",
"statement_latex": "Let $M\\in SL(2,\\R)$ be the one-period monodromy of any admissible program,\nwith the fixed reference above. Denote its $N$-period Bogoliubov coefficient\nby $\\beta_N$, its mean pair count by $\\nu_N=|\\beta_N|^2$, and its\nsqueezing parameter by $r_N=\\operatorname{arsinh}\\sqrt{\\nu_N}$.\nThen, with $U_j$ the Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:quantumCheb}\n\\beta_N=U_{N-1}(D)\\beta,\\qquad\nr_N=\\log\\|W_\\Omega M^N W_\\Omega^{-1}\\|_2.\n\\end{equation}\nIf $|D|>1$ and $L=\\arcosh|D|$, then\n\\begin{align}\n\\nu_N&=\\chi\\sinh^2(NL),\\qquad\n\\chi=\\frac{|\\beta|^2}{\\sinh^2L}\n=1+\\frac{(\\Im\\alpha)^2}{\\sinh^2L}\\ge1,\\label{eq:quantumhyper}\\\\\nr_N&=NL+\\tfrac12\\log\\chi+o(1).\\label{eq:quantumr}\n\\end{align}\nIf $|D|<1$, put $\\phi=\\arccos D$; then\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:quantumstable}\n\\nu_N=|\\beta|^2\\frac{\\sin^2(N\\phi)}{\\sin^2\\phi},\n\\end{equation}\nwhich is bounded for the fixed monodromy. If $|D|=1$, then\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:quantumparabolic}\n\\nu_N=N^2|\\beta|^2.\n\\end{equation}\nAt $M=\\pm I$ this is identically zero; otherwise this is polynomial photon\ngrowth, with $r_N=\\log N+O(1)$, not a positive Floquet exponent.\nIn every case,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:quantumlimits}\n\\lim_{N\\to\\infty}\\frac{r_N}{N}=L,\\qquad\n\\lim_{N\\to\\infty}\\frac{\\log(1+\\nu_N)}N=2L.\n\\end{equation}",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:quantum",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 18
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:maxwell",
"foundation:linear_algebra"
],
"novelty_status": "ESTABLISHED_CLASSICAL_QUANTUM_IDENTITIES; independently derived here, not claimed new",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement.",
"Fixed canonical reference vacuum; ideal prescribed material drive; no loss, dispersion, saturation, depletion or continuum ultraviolet claim."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "cor:quantumargmax",
"kind": "corollary",
"number": "9.2",
"page": 19,
"title_latex": "Resource-constrained classical--quantum extremality",
"statement_latex": "For the fixed $(R,S,m)$ admissible class,\n\\[\n\\operatorname*{arg\\,max}_u L(u)\n=\\operatorname*{arg\\,max}_u\\lim_{N\\to\\infty}r_N(u)/N\n=\\operatorname*{arg\\,max}_u\\lim_{N\\to\\infty}\\log(1+\\nu_N(u))/N.\n\\]\nWhen $F(R,S,m)>0$, this is exactly the union of the canonical binary\ntranslation orbits in Theorem~\\ref{thm:resource}. A deficit $\\delta$ in the\nasymptotic squeezing rate per cycle gives\n$\\dist_1(u,\\mathcal O_*)\\le C\\sqrt\\delta$; a deficit $\\delta$ in the\nlogarithmic pair-count rate gives $C\\sqrt{\\delta/2}$.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "cor:quantumargmax",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 19
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:quantum",
"thm:resource",
"thm:globalstability"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement.",
"Fixed canonical reference vacuum; ideal prescribed material drive; no loss, dispersion, saturation, depletion or continuum ultraviolet claim."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "prop:quantumfinite",
"kind": "proposition",
"number": "9.3",
"page": 19,
"title_latex": "Finite-cycle photon optimization is a different problem",
"statement_latex": "Even within a single classical maximizing translation orbit, one-period\nsqueezing and photon production need not agree. Thus the finite-$N$ quantum\nargmax is not universally the full classical argmax.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "prop:quantumfinite",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 19
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:segments",
"thm:quantum",
"thm:resource"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:quantumstability",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "9.4",
"page": 19,
"title_latex": "Finite-observation quantum rigidity",
"statement_latex": "For a class with $\\|W_\\Omega M W_\\Omega^{-1}\\|_2\\le K_0$ uniformly,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:finitequantumerror}\n0\\le r_N-NL\\le\\log\\{N(K_0+1)\\}.\n\\end{equation}\nFor the scalar bounds, one may take\n$K_0=\\max(\\Omega,\\Omega^{-1})e^{BS}$.\nLet $e_N=\\log\\{N(K_0+1)\\}/N$. For the fixed-resource class with $F>0$,\neither certificate\n\\[\nr_N(u)/N\\ge F-\\delta\n\\quad\\text{or}\\quad\n\\sup_v r_N(v)/N-r_N(u)/N\\le\\delta\n\\]\nimplies\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:finitequantumrigidity}\n\\boxed{\\dist_1(u,\\mathcal O_*)\\le C\\sqrt{\\delta+e_N}.}\n\\end{equation}",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:quantumstability",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 19
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:quantum",
"thm:globalstability",
"foundation:ode"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement.",
"Fixed canonical reference vacuum; ideal prescribed material drive; no loss, dispersion, saturation, depletion or continuum ultraviolet claim."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "lem:boxselector",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "10.1",
"page": 20,
"title_latex": "The exact corner selector",
"statement_latex": "For every finite $\\eta$, the maximizer of $H_\\eta$ on the rectangle is a\nunique corner away from the following finite set of switching angles.\nFor $\\eta>0$, let\n$\\theta_1=\\arctan(b_+/\\eta)$ and\n$\\theta_2=\\pi-\\arctan(\\eta/a_+)$. In increasing angle order the arcs and\nstates are\n\\[\n\\begin{array}{c|c}\n(0,\\theta_1)&(a_-,b_+)\\\\\n(\\theta_1,\\pi/2)&(a_+,b_+)\\\\\n(\\pi/2,\\theta_2)&(a_+,b_-)\\\\\n(\\theta_2,\\pi)&(a_+,b_+).\n\\end{array}\n\\]\nFor $\\eta<0$, put $e=-\\eta$,\n$\\theta_1=\\arctan(e/a_-)$, and\n$\\theta_2=\\pi-\\arctan(b_-/e)$. The selector is\n\\[\n\\begin{array}{c|c}\n(0,\\theta_1)&(a_-,b_-)\\\\\n(\\theta_1,\\pi/2)&(a_-,b_+)\\\\\n(\\pi/2,\\theta_2)&(a_-,b_-)\\\\\n(\\theta_2,\\pi)&(a_+,b_-).\n\\end{array}\n\\]\nFor $\\eta=0$, only the two opposite corners are used:\n$(a_-,b_+)$ on $(0,\\pi/2)$ and $(a_+,b_-)$ on $(\\pi/2,\\pi)$.\nFor nonzero $\\eta$ there are exactly three distinct states and four switches\nper projective turn, counting the switch at the periodic cut.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:boxselector",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 20
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:maxwell",
"foundation:fractional"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "lem:boxclock",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "10.2",
"page": 21,
"title_latex": "A strictly monotone clock",
"statement_latex": "The function $\\tau_\\Box$ is continuous and strictly decreasing, with\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:boxlimits}\n\\tau_\\Box(-\\infty)=\\frac\\pi{\\sqrt{a_-b_-}},\\qquad\n\\tau_\\Box(+\\infty)=\\frac\\pi{\\sqrt{a_+b_+}}.\n\\end{equation}\nFor every finite $\\eta$, $G_\\Box(\\eta)>0$. At zero,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:boxzero}\nG_\\Box(0)=\\tfrac12\\log\\frac{a_+b_+}{a_-b_-},\\qquad\n\\tau_\\Box(0)=\\frac\\pi2\\left(\\frac1{\\sqrt{a_-b_+}}+\n\\frac1{\\sqrt{a_+b_-}}\\right).\n\\end{equation}",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:boxclock",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 21
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:boxselector"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:boxfixed",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "10.3",
"page": 22,
"title_latex": "Complete fixed-period Maxwell corner-purity theorem",
"statement_latex": "Let $S>0$ and both positive coefficient intervals be strict. Define\n\\[\n\\mathcal N_\\Box=\n\\left\\{n\\in\\N:\\frac{n\\pi}{\\sqrt{a_+b_+}}<S<\n\\frac{n\\pi}{\\sqrt{a_-b_-}}\\right\\}.\n\\]\nFor each $n\\in\\mathcal N_\\Box$, there is a unique $\\eta_n$ with\n$\\tau_\\Box(\\eta_n)=S/n$. Then\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:boxoptimum}\n\\boxed{\\sup_{a(\\cdot),b(\\cdot)}\\log\\rho(M)\n=F_\\Box(S):=\\max\\bigl(\\{0\\}\\cup\n\\{nG_\\Box(\\eta_n):n\\in\\mathcal N_\\Box\\}\\bigr).}\n\\end{equation}\nEvery positive-growth optimizer is, up to translation and null sets, $n$\nrepetitions of the corner program in Lemma~\\ref{lem:boxselector}, with its\narc times from \\eqref{eq:boxarcs}, for a winning $n$. There are no additional\npositive equality cases. In physical parameters it takes values only at\ncorners of $\\{\\varepsilon_-,\\varepsilon_+\\}\\times\\{\\mu_-,\\mu_+\\}$.\nAt $\\eta_n=0$, two opposite material corners suffice; at $\\eta_n\\ne0$,\nthree are necessary for that canonical branch. All four are never needed\nfor this bounds-only rectangular problem.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:boxfixed",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 22
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:boxclock",
"lem:boxselector",
"foundation:projective"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "cor:boxfree",
"kind": "corollary",
"number": "10.4",
"page": 22,
"title_latex": "Free-period rectangle rate and quantum optimum",
"statement_latex": "There is a unique $\\gamma_\\Box>0$ with\n$G_\\Box(\\gamma_\\Box)=\\gamma_\\Box\\tau_\\Box(\\gamma_\\Box)$.\nIt is the largest amplitude growth per unit time over all periodic and\nnonperiodic measurable rectangle controls. Its periodic equality profiles\nare precisely repetitions of the canonical $\\eta=\\gamma_\\Box$ cell.\nFor strict intervals this free-rate optimizer uses three material corners\nand four switches per turn. Its asymptotic squeezing and logarithmic\npair-count optimizers coincide with the classical ones, with rates\n$\\gamma_\\Box$ and $2\\gamma_\\Box$ per unit time.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "cor:boxfree",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 22
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:boxfixed",
"thm:quantum"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "prop:boxstability",
"kind": "proposition",
"number": "10.5",
"page": 23,
"title_latex": "Rectangle structural stability",
"statement_latex": "For strict intervals and fixed $S$ with $F_\\Box(S)>0$, the distance in\nmean $|a-a_*|+|b-b_*|$ to the union of winning corner-program translates\nis bounded by $C_\\Box\\sqrt{F_\\Box-\\log\\rho(M)}$, with a finite constant\ncomputable from the arc formulas, the margins \\eqref{eq:boxmargin}, and\nthe finite winning-branch gaps. The finite-cycle quantum certificate of\nTheorem~\\ref{thm:quantumstability} holds with this distance and constant.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "prop:boxstability",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 23
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:boxfixed",
"thm:phasestability",
"thm:quantumstability"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "lem:polylinear",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "11.1",
"page": 23,
"title_latex": "Fractional barycentric linearization",
"statement_latex": "For any convex representation $A=\\sum_jp_jA_j$, put\n$q_j=p_jv_j/v_A$. Then $q_j\\ge0$, $\\sum q_j=1$, and\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:polylinear}\n\\frac1{v_A}=\\sum_j\\frac{q_j}{v_j},\\quad\n\\frac{\\mathbf r(A)}{v_A}=\\sum_j\\frac{q_j\\mathbf r_j}{v_j},\\quad\n\\frac{f_A}{v_A}=\\sum_j\\frac{q_j f_j}{v_j}.\n\\end{equation}\nConversely any angular simplex weights $q_j$ give actual convex weights\n$p_j=(q_j/v_j)/(\\sum_iq_i/v_i)$. Thus fixing angularly integrated time and\naffine resources is a finite-moment linear problem without a relaxation gap.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:polylinear",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 23
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:projective",
"foundation:fractional"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:polyresource",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "11.2",
"page": 24,
"title_latex": "Affine-resource calibration, purity, and finite switching",
"statement_latex": "Suppose the maximizing vertex $j_*(\\theta)$ is unique almost everywhere,\nno pair $H_i,H_j$ is identically equal, and its one-turn time, resource,\nand gain are $(\\tau,\\mathbf U,G)$ with $G>0$.\nFor every periodic measurable control having an expanding eigenline of\nwinding $n$, period $S=n\\tau$, and resource integral $n\\mathbf U$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:polyglobaldefect}\n\\boxed{nG-\\log\\rho(M)=\n\\int_{\\theta_0}^{\\theta_0+n\\pi}E_A(\\theta)\\dd\\theta\\ge0.}\n\\end{equation}\nEquality holds exactly for translated repetitions of the selected\none-turn corner program. It has at most $q(q-1)$ switches per turn.\n\nFor any feasible time/resource moment in the relative interior of its\nmoment body, a finite supporting pair $(\\eta,\\boldsymbol\\xi)$ exists for\nmaximal gain. If this pair additionally has the stated no-persistent-tie\nproperty and positive gain, it supplies the certificate above.\nUniqueness of general resource multipliers is not asserted.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:polyresource",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 24
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:polylinear",
"foundation:convex"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement.",
"Interior/normality and persistent-tie exclusions are explicit; arbitrary polytope boundary strata are not classified."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:abstract",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "11.3",
"page": 25,
"title_latex": "Preserved calibrated rotating-polytope extremality",
"statement_latex": "Every periodic measurable $A(s)\\in\\mathcal A$ obeys\n$S^{-1}\\log\\rho(M)\\le\\lambda_*$. Equality holds exactly for translated\nrepetitions of the unique angular maximizing-vertex program; its one-turn\nperiod must divide $S$. There are at most $q(q-1)$ switches per turn.\nThe same sharp asymptotic rate holds for nonperiodic controls.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:abstract",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 25
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:polyresource"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:boxresource",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "12.1",
"page": 26,
"title_latex": "Explicit two-resource Maxwell extremality",
"statement_latex": "With the strict rectangle and interior means above, form the finite set\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:boxresourceN}\n\\mathcal N_{\\rm res}^{\\Box}=\n\\left\\{n\\in\\N:\\begin{array}{l}\nn\\pi/\\sqrt{a_+b_+}<S<n\\pi/\\sqrt{a_-b_-},\\\\\nM_*(S/n)\\text{ hyperbolic with expanding winding one}\n\\end{array}\\right\\}.\n\\end{equation}\nFor each retained $n$, set $G_*(S/n)=\\log\\rho(M_*(S/n))>0$.\nThen over all measurable periodic rectangle controls satisfying\n\\eqref{eq:boxmeans},\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:boxresourceF}\n\\boxed{\\sup L=F_{\\rm res}^{\\Box}\n=\\max\\left(\\{0\\}\\cup\\{nG_*(S/n):n\\in\\mathcal N_{\\rm res}^{\\Box}\\}\\right).}\n\\end{equation}\nEvery positive-growth equality case is exactly a translation of repeated\ncopies of \\eqref{eq:boxresourceprogram}, with a winning winding number.\nThere are at most two winning numbers, and any tie is between adjacent\nintegers. There are no additional positive-growth optimizers.\nIf the set is empty, every admissible control has zero exponential growth.\n\nThus two opposite material corners are necessary and sufficient precisely\nwhen $P+Q=1$. Otherwise exactly three corners are used, with four switches\nper projective turn and two equal visits to the selected diagonal corner.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:boxresource",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 26
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:boxnormal",
"lem:boxpalindrome",
"prop:boxresourceconcavity",
"foundation:projective"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_maxwell_resource.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "lem:boxnormal",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "12.2",
"page": 26,
"title_latex": "Boundary moments and normal duals for two Maxwell resources",
"statement_latex": "A boundary moment of $\\mathcal K_{\\Box}$ whose two physical means are\ninterior can carry only zero gain. Every positive-gain moment with interior\nmeans therefore has a finite normal triple $(\\eta,\\xi,\\zeta)$ for\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:boxresourceH}\nH(\\theta,a,b)=\n\\frac{(b-a)\\sin\\theta\\cos\\theta-\\eta-\\xi a-\\zeta b}\n{b\\cos^2\\theta+a\\sin^2\\theta}.\n\\end{equation}\nIts maximizing corner is unique almost everywhere, and the normal triple\nis unique.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:boxnormal",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 26
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:polylinear",
"foundation:convex",
"lem:boxselector"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_maxwell_resource.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "lem:boxpalindrome",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "12.3",
"page": 28,
"title_latex": "Time reversal locks the two diagonal visits",
"statement_latex": "The unique positive-gain one-turn maximizing program at an interior-mean\nmoment has equal durations for its two visits to the diagonal corner.\nConsequently it is exactly \\eqref{eq:boxresourceprogram}, up to translation.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:boxpalindrome",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 28
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:boxnormal",
"foundation:segments",
"foundation:projective"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_maxwell_resource.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "prop:boxresourceconcavity",
"kind": "proposition",
"number": "12.4",
"page": 29,
"title_latex": "Resource-ray concavity and rate calibration",
"statement_latex": "The feasible one-turn moments on the ray\n$\\tau(1,\\bar a,\\bar b)$ form a nondegenerate compact interval\n$[\\tau_-^{\\Box},\\tau_+^{\\Box}]$. Its endpoints carry zero gain. On its\ninterior the maximal gain $G_*(\\tau)$ is positive, analytic, and strictly\nconcave, and is the gain of \\eqref{eq:boxresourceprogram}. There is a unique\nmaximum of $G_*(\\tau)/\\tau$, at $\\tau_\\Box^\\circ$ in that interior.\nFixed-period winners lie among\n$\\lfloor S/\\tau_\\Box^\\circ\\rfloor,\\lceil S/\\tau_\\Box^\\circ\\rceil$,\nafter feasibility filtering.\n\nWriting $\\gamma_\\Box=G_*(\\tau_\\Box^\\circ)/\\tau_\\Box^\\circ$, its normal dual\nsatisfies $\\eta+\\xi\\bar a+\\zeta\\bar b=\\gamma_\\Box$ and gives a bounded\nperiodic projective gauge $V$ such that every trajectory obeys\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:boxresourcegauge}\n\\log\\frac{\\|x(s)\\|_2}{\\|x(0)\\|_2}\n\\le\\gamma_\\Box s+\\xi\\int_0^s(a-\\bar a)\\dd v\n+\\zeta\\int_0^s(b-\\bar b)\\dd v+\n V(\\theta(s))-V(\\theta(0)).\n\\end{equation}\nThus the same sharp rate holds even for nonperiodic controls whose two\nlong-run means converge to the declared resources.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "prop:boxresourceconcavity",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 29
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:boxnormal",
"lem:boxpalindrome",
"foundation:convex"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_maxwell_resource.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "cor:boxresourceStability",
"kind": "corollary",
"number": "12.5",
"page": 30,
"title_latex": "Two-resource Maxwell stability and quantum extremality",
"statement_latex": "For every fixed strict rectangle, period, and pair of interior means with\n$F_{\\rm res}^{\\Box}>0$, there is an explicit finite $C_{\\Box,\\rm res}$ such\nthat\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:boxresourceStability}\n\\inf_{(a_*,b_*)\\in\\mathcal O_*}\\frac1S\\int_0^S\n\\bigl(|a-a_*|+|b-b_*|\\bigr)\\dd s\n\\le C_{\\Box,\\rm res}\\sqrt{F_{\\rm res}^{\\Box}-L}.\n\\end{equation}\nHere $\\mathcal O_*$ retains all translations of every winning explicit\nprogram. The optimal asymptotic squeezing rate is $F_{\\rm res}^{\\Box}$ per\nperiod; the optimal logarithmic pair-number rate is $2F_{\\rm res}^{\\Box}$.\nTheir maximizing controls are exactly the same programs. Near-maximal\nfinite-period squeezing yields \\eqref{eq:boxresourceStability} with the\nadditional $O(\\log N/N)$ spectral-deficit term of\nTheorem~\\ref{thm:quantumstability}.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "cor:boxresourceStability",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 30
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:boxresource",
"prop:boxstability",
"thm:quantum",
"thm:quantumstability"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_maxwell_resource.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "prop:inversefailure",
"kind": "proposition",
"number": "13.1",
"page": 31,
"title_latex": "Exact two-layer isodiscriminant counterexample",
"statement_latex": "Even when $T$ and common positive material bounds are known, the entire\nfunction $D(k)=\\frac12\\tr M(k)$ need not determine a two-layer medium up\nto translation or reversal.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "prop:inversefailure",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 31
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:segments"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_inverse_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:inverse",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "14.1",
"page": 31,
"title_latex": "Finite derivatives determine every reduced layer",
"statement_latex": "Fix $T>0$, $\\mu>0$, and an integer layer bound $r\\geq1$. Let a marked medium\nhave at most $r$ positive-duration layers with positive constant speeds,\nand write $N=2^r$. The real dataset\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:jetdata}\n\\mathcal J_r=\n\\left\\{M_{11}^{(2j)}(0),M_{12}^{(2j)}(0):1\\leq j\\leq N-1\\right\\}\n\\end{equation}\nuniquely determines its reduced ordered layer sequence. The number of\nlisted real data is $2N-2=2^{r+1}-2$; $T$ and $M_{11}(0)=1$ are already\nknown. There is a constructive reconstruction by finite\nexponential-polynomial recovery followed by layer peeling.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:inverse",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 31
},
"dependencies": [
"lem:prony",
"lem:peel",
"foundation:analytic_jets"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_inverse_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "lem:prony",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "14.2",
"page": 32,
"title_latex": "Finite exponential determination",
"statement_latex": "An exponential polynomial with at most $N$ distinct real exponents is\nuniquely determined by its first $2N$ derivatives at zero, counting the\nzeroth derivative. Its exponents and coefficients can be constructed from\nthose derivatives by a finite Prony procedure.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:prony",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 32
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:linear_algebra"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_inverse_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "lem:peel",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "14.3",
"page": 33,
"title_latex": "Recovering the leading temporal layer",
"statement_latex": "For a nonempty positive reduced medium, its first-row functions $f,g$\nuniquely determine its first speed and optical duration by\n\\begin{align}\nc_1&=\\lim_{z\\to+\\infty}\\frac{f(z)}{g(z)},\\label{eq:cpeel}\\\\\na_1&=-\\frac12\\lim_{z\\to+\\infty}\\frac1z\n\\log\\left|\\frac{f(z)-c_1g(z)}{f(z)+c_1g(z)}\\right|.\\label{eq:apeel}\n\\end{align}\nThe next first row is $(f,g)(E_1^{\\mathrm h})^{-1}$ and\n$\\tau_1=a_1/c_1$.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:peel",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 33
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:analytic_jets",
"foundation:segments"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_inverse_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "prop:datacount",
"kind": "proposition",
"number": "15.1",
"page": 33,
"title_latex": "Preserved regular-data lower bound",
"statement_latex": "Any $C^1$ real measurement map that is injective on the open exactly-$r$-layer\nclass with known $T$ requires at least $2r-1$ scalar outputs. In particular\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:counts}\n2r-1\\le m_{\\min}^{\\rm jet}(r)\\le 2^{r+1}-2.\n\\end{equation}\nFor $r=1$, one jet value suffices: $c_1=\\sqrt{-M_{11}''(0)}/T$.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "prop:datacount",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 33
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:inverse",
"foundation:inverse_function"
],
"novelty_status": "V1_PRESERVED_OR_GENERALIZED; external priority unestablished",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v1_rerun.json",
"results/verification_inverse_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "lem:projection",
"kind": "lemma",
"number": "15.2",
"page": 34,
"title_latex": "A direct generic projection bound",
"statement_latex": "Let $F$ be a $C^1$ injective map on a finite or countable union of smooth\nparameter strata, each of dimension at most $d$, into $\\R^K$.\nFor any integer $m>2d$, almost every matrix $P\\in\\R^{m\\times K}$ makes\n$PF$ injective on the whole union.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "lem:projection",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 34
},
"dependencies": [
"foundation:inverse_function"
],
"novelty_status": "ESTABLISHED_METHOD_OR_DIRECT_APPLICATION; not claimed as invention of the general method",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_inverse_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement.",
"Generic projection improves output count, not derivative order; no uniform noise bound.",
"Global CAD projection search was not executed; its termination is a mathematical algorithm claim."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:jetCompression",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "15.3",
"page": 34,
"title_latex": "Linear-count compression of exact transfer data",
"statement_latex": "For the marked positive finite-layer problem with known $T$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:linearcount}\n\\boxed{2r-1\\le m_{\\min}^{\\rm jet}(r)\n\\le\\min\\{2^{r+1}-2,\\,4r-1\\}.}\n\\end{equation}\nWhen the time-average of $c(t)^2$ is also fixed and positive, define the\nanalogous minimum on that resource-constrained class. For $r\\ge2$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:resourcecount}\n\\boxed{2r-2\\le m_{\\min}^{\\rm jet,res}(r)\n\\le\\min\\{2^{r+1}-2,\\,4r-3\\}.}\n\\end{equation}\nThe lower bound requires a nonempty open reduced exactly-$r$-layer resource\nstratum. For one layer the known average fixes the material completely,\nso no additional spectral datum is needed. Since\n$c^2=(\\mu\\varepsilon)^{-1}$, this is precisely the inverse-permittivity\nresource when $\\mu$ is known and constant.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:jetCompression",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 34
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:inverse",
"lem:projection",
"prop:datacount"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_inverse_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement.",
"Generic projection improves output count, not derivative order; no uniform noise bound.",
"Global CAD projection search was not executed; its termination is a mathematical algorithm claim."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "prop:CAD",
"kind": "proposition",
"number": "15.4",
"page": 35,
"title_latex": "Certified projection search for algebraic inputs",
"statement_latex": "When $T$ and any imposed resource $Q$ are positive real algebraic numbers,\na finite algorithm can find a rational matrix $P$ attaining either improved\nupper count in Theorem~\\ref{thm:jetCompression}. For exact real algebraic\ncompressed observations, the unique reduced medium can then be recovered\nby a finite real-algebraic decision and root-isolation procedure.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "prop:CAD",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 35
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:jetCompression",
"foundation:analytic_jets",
"external:real_QE"
],
"novelty_status": "ESTABLISHED_METHOD_OR_DIRECT_APPLICATION; not claimed as invention of the general method",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_inverse_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement.",
"Generic projection improves output count, not derivative order; no uniform noise bound.",
"Global CAD projection search was not executed; its termination is a mathematical algorithm claim."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "prop:localInverse",
"kind": "proposition",
"number": "15.5",
"page": 36,
"title_latex": "Local inverse conditioning at regular points",
"statement_latex": "For the full jet map, or any injective projected map above, the full-rank\npoints are open and dense within every smooth parameter stratum. At such\na point $x_0$, let $\\sigma>0$ be the smallest singular value of its Jacobian\nin the declared parameter/data norms. On a sufficiently small neighborhood,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:localInverse}\n\\|x-y\\|\\le\\frac2\\sigma\\|F(x)-F(y)\\|.\n\\end{equation}\nA locally constrained fit whose data residual is at most the true noise\nbound $\\epsilon$ consequently has parameter error at most $4\\epsilon/\\sigma$,\nprovided the fit and true point remain in that neighborhood.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "prop:localInverse",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 36
},
"dependencies": [
"prop:datacount",
"thm:inverse",
"thm:jetCompression",
"foundation:inverse_function"
],
"novelty_status": "ESTABLISHED_METHOD_OR_DIRECT_APPLICATION; not claimed as invention of the general method",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_inverse_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "thm:rigidityCompression",
"kind": "theorem",
"number": "15.6",
"page": 36,
"title_latex": "Saturation is an inverse certificate",
"statement_latex": "Suppose $R,S,m$ are known, $F(R,S,m)>0$, and exact classical or asymptotic\nquantum extremality is certified. If the winning winding is unique, the\nentire temporal program modulo translation is determined with no further\nreal spectral measurements. If two windings tie, specifying one of those\ntwo integers determines the program. More generally, a known winding $n$\nand the branch saturation equality $L=nG_m(S/n)>0$ determine its canonical\nprogram even if that branch is not the global winner.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "thm:rigidityCompression",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 36
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:resource",
"thm:concavity",
"thm:quantum",
"thm:boxresource"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
},
{
"id": "prop:nearNoGo",
"kind": "proposition",
"number": "15.7",
"page": 37,
"title_latex": "No finite exact inverse for the entire near-extremal class",
"statement_latex": "Fix a positive resource optimum $F$ and any $\\delta>0$. No fixed finite\nnumber of real observations that are $C^1$ on finite-dimensional control\nfamilies can uniquely reconstruct every measurable fixed-resource profile\nwith $L>F-\\delta$. This remains true if the growth itself is included among\nthe observations. Thus near-extremality gives approximate structural\ncompression, not exact finite-data reconstruction of arbitrary residual\nvariations.",
"status": "PROVED_UNDER_STATED_ASSUMPTIONS",
"proof_location": {
"source": "MANUSCRIPT.tex",
"label": "prop:nearNoGo",
"pdf": "MANUSCRIPT.pdf",
"page": 37
},
"dependencies": [
"thm:resource",
"prop:datacount",
"foundation:ode"
],
"novelty_status": "NEW_TO_THIS_RELEASE; first-in-literature priority not established",
"corroborating_test_reports": [
"results/verification_v2.json"
],
"limits": [
"Hypotheses are the literal statement below and its referenced definitions. No independent or proof-assistant certification.",
"Listed tests verify only finite consequences and are not proofs of the full statement."
],
"independent_review": false,
"formal_verification": false
}
]
}
|