File size: 7,762 Bytes
9755170 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 | \section{The fixed-period, fixed-resource sharp theorem}\label{sec:resource}
Let $R>1$, $S>0$, $1<m<R^2$, and put
\begin{equation}\label{eq:duty}
p=\frac{m-1}{R^2-1}\in(0,1).
\end{equation}
For a proposed one-turn duration $\tau$, define
\begin{align}
h=p\tau,\qquad \ell=(1-p)\tau,\qquad
D_m(\tau)&=\cos(Rp\tau)\cos((1-p)\tau)\nonumber\\
&\quad-\frac{R+R^{-1}}2\sin(Rp\tau)\sin((1-p)\tau).
\label{eq:resourceD}
\end{align}
On $0<\tau<\tau_{\rm cap}:=\min\{\pi/(Rp),\pi/(1-p)\}$ set
\[
t(\tau)=\tan(Rp\tau/2)\tan((1-p)\tau/2).
\]
This function is continuous and strictly increasing from zero to infinity.
Define the unique two roots
\begin{equation}\label{eq:resourceedges}
t(\tau_-)=R^{-1},\qquad t(\tau_+)=R,
\end{equation}
and, for $\tau\in(\tau_-,\tau_+)$, define
\begin{equation}\label{eq:resourceG}
G_m(\tau)=\arcosh[-D_m(\tau)]>0.
\end{equation}
These definitions require only monotone scalar root finding and elementary
functions. The finite winding set is
\begin{equation}\label{eq:resourceN}
\mathcal N_m(R,S)=\{n\in\N: S/\tau_+<n<S/\tau_-\}.
\end{equation}
\begin{theorem}[Global resource-constrained extremality and equality]\label{thm:resource}
Over every measurable $S$-periodic profile with $1\le u\le R^2$ and
$S^{-1}\int_0^S u=m$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:resourceF}
\boxed{\sup_u L(u)=F(R,S,m):=
\max\bigl(\{0\}\cup\{nG_m(S/n):n\in\mathcal N_m(R,S)\}\bigr).}
\end{equation}
If $\mathcal N_m$ is nonempty, let $\mathcal W_m$ be the set of all maximizing
integers. Every equality profile, and only those profiles, is up to a temporal
translation and null-set changes $n$ repetitions of
\begin{equation}\label{eq:resourcecell}
u^*_{m,n}(s)=
\begin{cases}
R^2,&0\le s<pS/n,\\
1,&pS/n\le s<S/n,
\end{cases}\qquad n\in\mathcal W_m.
\end{equation}
If $\mathcal N_m$ is empty, every admissible profile has $L(u)=0$ and no
binary-purity implication is asserted. The endpoint means $m=1,R^2$ force
constant profiles and have zero growth. Collapsed contrast $R=1$ is the
same constant-oscillator case.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
First consider any growing profile and its expanding eigenline, with winding
$n$. Average the exact variables $z$ over its $n$ turns, identifying each
turn with the projective circle. The average is in $[0,1]$ and has
\[
\int za=\pi-S/n,\qquad \int zb=mS/n-\pi,
\qquad \int zc_0=L(u)/n>0.
\]
By Lemma~\ref{lem:boundary}, this moment is interior. Lemma~\ref{lem:normal}
therefore gives a unique binary phase selector with a high-state arc and a
low-state arc, each connected and shorter than one full projective turn.
Its time profile is one high segment of duration $h$ followed by one low
segment of duration $\ell$, up to translation. Time and resource impose
$h+\ell=S/n$ and $R^2h+\ell=mS/n$, hence precisely
$h=pS/n$ and $\ell=(1-p)S/n$. The associated phase gain is at least
$L(u)/n>0$. Its transfer matrix is $E(1,\ell)E(R,h)$, whose half trace is
\eqref{eq:resourceD}; its expanding multiplier is negative, because the
phase advances by $\pi$. Thus $D_m(S/n)<-1$, and its gain equals $G_m(S/n)$.
To identify the admissible duration interval explicitly, set
$x=\tan(Rp\tau/2)$ and $y=\tan((1-p)\tau/2)$. Substitution of the
half-angle identities gives
\begin{equation}\label{eq:factoredD}
D_m(\tau)+1=\frac{2(xy-R)(xy-R^{-1})}{(1+x^2)(1+y^2)}.
\end{equation}
For the binary selector above, $Rh<\pi$ and $\ell<\pi$, since each angular
arc is shorter than $\pi$. Equation~\eqref{eq:factoredD} now proves
$\tau_-<S/n<\tau_+$, so $n\in\mathcal N_m$ and
$L(u)\le nG_m(S/n)\le F$.
Conversely, for any $n\in\mathcal N_m$, the binary cell
\eqref{eq:resourcecell} has $D_m<-1$ and positive gain $G_m$. Each segment
advances any lifted angle by less than $\pi$, because its duration is less
than its own full projective-turn time. The expanding eigenline of the
negative eigenvalue has a positive odd multiple of $\pi$ as its angle
advance, and the total advance is less than $2\pi$. It is therefore exactly
$\pi$. This actual expanding trajectory has the interior moment above.
The linear-program maximizer at that moment is also a binary cell with
these same durations, so the given cell is the canonical maximizer up to
translation. Repetition attains $nG_m$. This proves the maximum and its
attainment without assuming a layered admissible class.
To classify equality among arbitrary profiles, integrate
\eqref{eq:twoPointDefect} for the dual of this one-turn moment. Both the time
and resource multipliers cancel, giving Theorem~\ref{thm:resourceDefect}
below. Equality forces the selected endpoint at every angle except its two
zeros. The phase-to-time clock then fixes every residence time and every
turn; no independently variable timing remains. This gives precisely
\eqref{eq:resourcecell}, with every tied winning integer retained.
If no candidate exists, the first part rules out every growing profile.
The endpoint-mean statements follow by integrating $u-1\ge0$ or $R^2-u\ge0$.
\end{proof}
\begin{theorem}[Resource defect and unique dual parameters]\label{thm:resourceDefect}
For any admissible growing profile with winding $n$, the one-turn moment
$(\pi-S/n,mS/n-\pi)$ has a unique finite pair $(\eta_n,\xi_n)$.
Writing $b=b_{\eta_n,\xi_n}$ and $\Delta_n=1+4\eta_n\xi_n>0$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:resourceDefect}
\boxed{nG_m(S/n)-L(u)=
\int_{\theta_0}^{\theta_0+n\pi}
\frac{|K_{\eta_n,\xi_n}(\theta)|\,|\widehat u(\theta)-b(\theta)|}
{v_{\widehat u}(\theta)v_b(\theta)}\dd\theta.}
\end{equation}
The same dual is the one associated with the expanding eigenline of the
binary cell of durations $pS/n$ and $(1-p)S/n$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Existence and uniqueness follow from Lemma~\ref{lem:normal}. The integral
of the maximum of $H_{\eta_n,\xi_n}$ over one turn is
$G_m(S/n)-\eta_n S/n-\xi_n mS/n$. The actual integral over $n$ turns is
$L(u)-\eta_nS-\xi_nmS$. Their difference gives
\eqref{eq:resourceDefect} exactly.
\end{proof}
\subsection{Constructive phase and dual recovery}
Let $\tau=S/n$ and $x_0$ be an expanding eigenvector of
$P=E(1,(1-p)\tau)E(R,p\tau)$. Set
$x_1=E(R,p\tau)x_0$ and choose lifted angles $\theta_0,\theta_1$ in the
positive high-state arc. Solve the two linear equations
\begin{equation}\label{eq:dualrecover}
\begin{pmatrix}
\cos^2\theta_0&-\sin^2\theta_0\\
\cos^2\theta_1&-\sin^2\theta_1
\end{pmatrix}
\binom{\eta_n}{\xi_n}
=-\binom{\sin\theta_0\cos\theta_0}{\sin\theta_1\cos\theta_1}.
\end{equation}
This system is nonsingular. Indeed the low state has zero radial gain,
whereas on the high arc
\[
G_m(\tau)=\tfrac12\log\frac{v_B(\theta_0)}{v_B(\theta_1)}>0.
\]
Thus $\cos^2\theta_0\ne\cos^2\theta_1$, which is exactly the determinant
condition in \eqref{eq:dualrecover}. This supplies the dual, the switch
phases, and the defect weight without nonlinear multiplier fitting.
\subsection{Symmetries and physical interpretation}
Temporal translation conjugates the monodromy and preserves its spectral
radius. Reversal also preserves the scalar discriminant: if
$J_0=\diag(1,-1)$, the reversed monodromy is $J_0M^{-1}J_0$ and
$\tr M^{-1}=\tr M$ for determinant one. Reversal of the canonical two-block
period lies in its translation orbit. With fixed, unequal labeled material
bounds and fixed $m$, exchange of the material values is not an additional
symmetry. There is no unspecified gauge freedom in the fixed state convention.
In physical time, the optimizer uses $\varepsilon_-$ for $pT/n$ and
$\varepsilon_+$ for $(1-p)T/n$, repeated $n$ times. Therefore its high-$u$
(low-permittivity) duty cycle is forced by the resource, not fitted from a
spectral observation. The optimal physical amplitude rate is $F(R,S,m)/T$.
The weak-$*$ argument proving the angular maximum also excludes a need for
chattering or singular intermediate states at positive equality.
|