QPromaQ commited on
Commit
68a8d25
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 571ea3a

Add files using upload-large-folder tool

Browse files
This view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.   See raw diff
Files changed (50) hide show
  1. configs/demo_mdm2.yaml +35 -0
  2. configs/epsilon_regret_benchmark.yaml +64 -0
  3. configs/experimental_benchmark.yaml +72 -0
  4. configs/experimental_benchmark_single_library.yaml +73 -0
  5. configs/overnight_stop_model.yaml +175 -0
  6. configs/ppi_sanity_check.yaml +24 -0
  7. configs/smoke_test.yaml +39 -0
  8. libs/.DS_Store +0 -0
  9. libs/__init__.py +1 -0
  10. results/.DS_Store +0 -0
  11. results/backend_comparison_summary.csv +3 -0
  12. results/backend_integration_report.md +28 -0
  13. results/backend_self_audit.md +6 -0
  14. results/backend_validation_report.md +79 -0
  15. results/disk_cleanup_actions.md +32 -0
  16. results/disk_guard_report.md +6 -0
  17. results/disk_usage_before_after.csv +168 -0
  18. results/epsilon_regret_cleanup_plan.md +5 -0
  19. results/final_optimization_report.md +26 -0
  20. results/final_self_audit_report.md +12 -0
  21. results/ppi_benchmark_repair_audit.md +37 -0
  22. results/ppi_repair_self_audit.md +28 -0
  23. results/prelim_refresh_cleanup.log +7 -0
  24. results/prelim_three_sets_manifest_run.json +32 -0
  25. results/project_synthesis_figures_index.md +65 -0
  26. results/project_synthesis_report.md +31 -0
  27. results/project_synthesis_report_overnight_updated.md +50 -0
  28. results/project_synthesis_report_updated.md +40 -0
  29. results/project_synthesis_tables.csv +59 -0
  30. results/stage1_code_unification_summary.md +15 -0
  31. results/stage2_cleanup_summary.md +10 -0
  32. results/stage3_ppi_summary.md +7 -0
  33. results/stage4_discovery_benchmark_summary.md +116 -0
  34. tests/__init__.py +1 -0
  35. tests/test_backend_comparison_semantics.py +39 -0
  36. tests/test_backend_diagnostic_logic.py +108 -0
  37. tests/test_benchmark_outputs.py +44 -0
  38. tests/test_budget_efficiency_helpers.py +148 -0
  39. tests/test_cleanup_logic.py +31 -0
  40. tests/test_clustering.py +28 -0
  41. tests/test_dataset_reuse_logic.py +34 -0
  42. tests/test_disk_guard.py +54 -0
  43. tests/test_docking_mode_filter.py +46 -0
  44. tests/test_epsilon_regret_logic.py +82 -0
  45. tests/test_feature_extraction.py +58 -0
  46. tests/test_haddock_backend.py +43 -0
  47. tests/test_large_plot_outputs.py +97 -0
  48. tests/test_missing_features.py +38 -0
  49. tests/test_model_masking.py +51 -0
  50. tests/test_multifidelity_controls.py +63 -0
configs/demo_mdm2.yaml ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ run:
2
+ name: demo_mdm2
3
+ output_dir: results/demo_run
4
+ max_batches: 6
5
+ random_seed: 42
6
+
7
+ data:
8
+ target_id: mdm2
9
+ target_path: data/targets/mdm2_1ycr_excerpt.pdb
10
+ ligand_table: data/ligands/mdm2_ligands_demo.csv
11
+ benchmark_metadata: data/benchmarks/mdm2_demo_metadata.json
12
+
13
+ backend:
14
+ type: rdock
15
+ allow_mock_if_missing: false
16
+ require_real_backend: true
17
+ n_runs: 5
18
+ mapper_radius: 6.0
19
+
20
+ encoding:
21
+ fingerprint_radius: 2
22
+ fingerprint_bits: 1024
23
+ generate_3d: true
24
+
25
+ clustering:
26
+ butina_cutoff: 0.35
27
+ n_hyperclusters: 4
28
+
29
+ scheduler:
30
+ batch_size: 8
31
+ init_coverage_fraction: 0.25
32
+ conservative_deprioritize: true
33
+
34
+ scoring:
35
+ interface_weight: 1.0
configs/epsilon_regret_benchmark.yaml ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ run:
2
+ name: epsilon_regret_benchmark
3
+ output_dir: results/epsilon_regret_benchmark
4
+ random_seed: 20260416
5
+ budgets: [100, 250, 500, 1000]
6
+ time_importance: 0.5
7
+ allow_resume: true
8
+
9
+ epsilon_regret:
10
+ epsilon_quality: 0.10
11
+ acceptable_regret: 0.10
12
+ min_budget: 250
13
+ max_budget: 1000
14
+ min_model_weight: 0.25
15
+ patience_rounds: 6
16
+ min_improvement: 0.02
17
+ uncertainty_multiplier: 0.50
18
+ min_cluster_coverage: 0.20
19
+ min_hypercluster_coverage: 0.20
20
+
21
+ backend:
22
+ primary: rdock
23
+ secondary: haddock
24
+ require_real_backend: true
25
+ rdock:
26
+ n_runs: 1
27
+ mapper_radius: 6.0
28
+ command_timeout_seconds: 240
29
+ parallel_jobs: auto-minus-4
30
+ haddock:
31
+ command_timeout_seconds: 240
32
+ haddock_env_bin_dir: .venv_haddock/bin
33
+ calibration_subset_size: 24
34
+
35
+ runtime:
36
+ estimated_seconds_per_docking: 0.5
37
+
38
+ datasets:
39
+ - name: dataset_A
40
+ target_name: EGFR
41
+ target_path: data/targets/budget_efficiency_benchmark_A/egfr_4wkq.pdb
42
+ shared_library_path: data/ligands/budget_efficiency_benchmark_A/shared_library_shuffled.csv
43
+ predock_master_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_A/bootstrap/predock/parsed_scores_master.csv
44
+ adaptive_no_stop_run_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_A/replay_cache/dataset_A__adaptive_no_stop__ti0.50__evaluated.csv
45
+ adaptive_model_events_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_A/replay_cache/dataset_A__adaptive_no_stop__ti0.50__model.csv
46
+ naive_glob: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_A/replay_cache/dataset_A__naive_random_s*__evaluated.csv
47
+ cluster_glob: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_A/replay_cache/dataset_A__cluster_naive_s*__evaluated.csv
48
+ source_summary_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_A_target_selection.md
49
+
50
+ - name: dataset_B
51
+ target_name: ABL1
52
+ target_path: data/targets/budget_efficiency_benchmark_B/abl1_1iep.pdb
53
+ shared_library_path: data/ligands/budget_efficiency_benchmark_B/shared_library_shuffled.csv
54
+ predock_master_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_B/bootstrap/predock/parsed_scores_master.csv
55
+ adaptive_no_stop_run_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_B/replay_cache/dataset_B__adaptive_no_stop__ti0.50__evaluated.csv
56
+ adaptive_model_events_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_B/replay_cache/dataset_B__adaptive_no_stop__ti0.50__model.csv
57
+ naive_glob: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_B/replay_cache/dataset_B__naive_random_s*__evaluated.csv
58
+ cluster_glob: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_B/replay_cache/dataset_B__cluster_naive_s*__evaluated.csv
59
+ source_summary_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_B_target_selection.md
60
+
61
+ disk_guard:
62
+ min_free_gb: 10.0
63
+ projected_output_gb: 1.2
64
+ keep_raw_batches: 4
configs/experimental_benchmark.yaml ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ run:
2
+ name: experimental_benchmark
3
+ output_dir: results/experimental_benchmark
4
+ random_seed: 42
5
+ max_batches: 15
6
+ batch_size: 10
7
+ adaptive_budget: 150
8
+ baseline_budget: 150
9
+ resume: true
10
+
11
+ target:
12
+ protein_name: MDM2
13
+ target_id: mdm2_experimental
14
+ docking_reference_pdb: 4HG7
15
+ docking_target_path: data/targets/experimental_benchmark/mdm2_4hg7.pdb
16
+
17
+ references:
18
+ complexes:
19
+ - pdb_id: 4HG7
20
+ ligand_comp_id: NUT
21
+ reference_id: ref_nutlin3a
22
+ - pdb_id: 4J7D
23
+ ligand_comp_id: I31
24
+ reference_id: ref_ro5045331
25
+ - pdb_id: 4LWU
26
+ ligand_comp_id: 20U
27
+ reference_id: ref_ro5499252
28
+
29
+ benchmark_dataset:
30
+ output_dir: data/ligands/experimental_benchmark
31
+ reuse_existing: true
32
+ per_reference_target: 1500
33
+ pubchem_similarity_threshold: 80
34
+ pubchem_max_records: 2200
35
+ min_similarity_keep: 0.2
36
+
37
+ backend:
38
+ require_real_backend: true
39
+ allow_mock_if_missing: false
40
+ n_runs: 1
41
+ mapper_radius: 6.0
42
+ command_timeout_seconds: 180
43
+
44
+ encoding:
45
+ fingerprint_radius: 2
46
+ fingerprint_bits: 1024
47
+ generate_3d: false
48
+
49
+ clustering:
50
+ butina_cutoff: 0.35
51
+ n_hyperclusters: 20
52
+
53
+ scheduler:
54
+ init_coverage_fraction: 0.35
55
+ conservative_deprioritize: true
56
+ model_weight_schedule:
57
+ sample_knots: [20, 50, 100, 200]
58
+ weight_knots: [0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.8]
59
+ max_weight: 0.9
60
+ min_weight: 0.05
61
+ instability_threshold: 2.0
62
+ instability_decay: 0.25
63
+ surrogate:
64
+ prefer_xgboost: true
65
+ n_estimators: 200
66
+ min_train_samples: 12
67
+ max_depth_small: 3
68
+ max_depth_large: 6
69
+
70
+ analysis:
71
+ analog_similarity_threshold: 0.65
72
+ topk_values: [10, 25, 50, 100]
configs/experimental_benchmark_single_library.yaml ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ run:
2
+ name: experimental_benchmark_single_library
3
+ output_dir: results/experimental_benchmark_single_library
4
+ random_seed: 42
5
+ adaptive_budget: 1500
6
+ baseline_budget: 1500
7
+ batch_size: 10
8
+ max_batches: 200
9
+
10
+ target:
11
+ protein_name: MDM2
12
+ target_id: mdm2_experimental_single_library
13
+ docking_reference_pdb: 4HG7
14
+ docking_target_path: data/targets/experimental_benchmark_single_library/mdm2_4hg7.pdb
15
+
16
+ references:
17
+ complexes:
18
+ - pdb_id: 4HG7
19
+ ligand_comp_id: NUT
20
+ reference_id: ref_nutlin3a
21
+ - pdb_id: 4J7D
22
+ ligand_comp_id: I31
23
+ reference_id: ref_ro5045331
24
+ - pdb_id: 4LWU
25
+ ligand_comp_id: 20U
26
+ reference_id: ref_ro5499252
27
+
28
+ benchmark_dataset:
29
+ output_dir: data/ligands/experimental_benchmark_single_library
30
+ reuse_existing: true
31
+ per_reference_target: 1300
32
+ pubchem_similarity_threshold: 80
33
+ pubchem_max_records: 2500
34
+ min_similarity_keep: 0.2
35
+ shared_library_target_size: 1500
36
+ analog_similarity_threshold: 0.65
37
+
38
+ backend:
39
+ require_real_backend: true
40
+ allow_mock_if_missing: false
41
+ n_runs: 1
42
+ mapper_radius: 6.0
43
+ command_timeout_seconds: 180
44
+
45
+ encoding:
46
+ fingerprint_radius: 2
47
+ fingerprint_bits: 1024
48
+ generate_3d: false
49
+
50
+ clustering:
51
+ butina_cutoff: 0.35
52
+ n_hyperclusters: 20
53
+
54
+ scheduler:
55
+ init_coverage_fraction: 0.35
56
+ conservative_deprioritize: true
57
+ model_weight_schedule:
58
+ sample_knots: [20, 50, 100, 200]
59
+ weight_knots: [0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.8]
60
+ max_weight: 0.9
61
+ min_weight: 0.05
62
+ instability_threshold: 2.0
63
+ instability_decay: 0.25
64
+ surrogate:
65
+ prefer_xgboost: true
66
+ n_estimators: 200
67
+ min_train_samples: 12
68
+ max_depth_small: 3
69
+ max_depth_large: 6
70
+
71
+ analysis:
72
+ rolling_window: 100
73
+ analog_similarity_threshold: 0.65
configs/overnight_stop_model.yaml ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ run:
2
+ name: overnight_stop_model
3
+ output_dir: results/overnight_stop_model
4
+ random_seed: 20260417
5
+ budgets: [50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 5000, 10000]
6
+ include_15000_if_safe: true
7
+ dynamic_predock_batch_size: 192
8
+ dynamic_predock_max_batches: 4
9
+ dynamic_predock_flush_every_batches: 1
10
+ wall_time_per_dock: 0.5
11
+ max_wall_time_seconds: 10800
12
+ allow_resume: true
13
+
14
+ resource:
15
+ min_free_gb: 10.0
16
+ min_free_gb_for_15k: 35.0
17
+ min_ram_gb_for_15k: 24.0
18
+ default_target_size: 10000
19
+ projected_output_gb: 3.5
20
+
21
+ parameters:
22
+ max_budget: 10000
23
+ min_budget: 100
24
+ epsilon_quality_target: 0.10
25
+ time_importance: 0.6
26
+ shortlist_fraction: 0.35
27
+ haddock_shortlist_size: 3
28
+
29
+ stopping:
30
+ target_rank_percentile: 1.0
31
+ peak_patience: 32
32
+ min_improvement_delta: 0.02
33
+
34
+ exploration:
35
+ stagnation_patience: 20
36
+ diversity_boost_strength: 0.5
37
+ dominant_window: 128
38
+
39
+ uncertainty:
40
+ uncertainty_low_threshold: 0.35
41
+ uncertainty_patience: 32
42
+ expected_gain_threshold: 0.03
43
+
44
+ stop_models:
45
+ target_percentile: 1.0
46
+ probability_threshold: 0.80
47
+ epsilon_quality: 0.10
48
+ min_budget: 100
49
+ gain_threshold: 0.03
50
+ utility_lambda: 0.001
51
+ utility_threshold: 0.0
52
+ uncertainty_threshold: 0.35
53
+ confirmation_window: 24
54
+ min_improvement_delta: 0.02
55
+
56
+ analysis:
57
+ objective_functions:
58
+ - quality_per_time
59
+ - quality_per_docking
60
+ - rank_percentile_minimization
61
+ - regret_constrained_utility
62
+ - target_percentile_attainment
63
+ - hybrid_objective
64
+ haddock_shortlist_budgets: [250, 1000]
65
+ enable_haddock_shortlist: true
66
+ uncertainty_weight: 0.5
67
+
68
+ backend:
69
+ require_real_backend: true
70
+ rdock:
71
+ n_runs: 1
72
+ mapper_radius: 6.0
73
+ command_timeout_seconds: 20
74
+ parallel_jobs: auto-minus-4
75
+ allow_skip_failed_ligands: true
76
+ max_failed_ligands: 3000
77
+ haddock:
78
+ enabled: true
79
+ command_timeout_seconds: 90
80
+ haddock_env_bin_dir: .venv_haddock/bin
81
+
82
+ disk_guard:
83
+ min_free_gb: 10.0
84
+ projected_output_gb: 3.5
85
+ keep_raw_batches: 4
86
+
87
+ datasets:
88
+ A:
89
+ name: dataset_A
90
+ target_name: EGFR
91
+ target_path: data/targets/budget_efficiency_benchmark_A/egfr_4wkq.pdb
92
+ shared_library_path: data/ligands/budget_efficiency_benchmark_A/shared_library_shuffled.csv
93
+ predock_master_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_A/bootstrap/predock/parsed_scores_master.csv
94
+ adaptive_no_stop_run_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_A/replay_cache/dataset_A__adaptive_no_stop__ti0.50__evaluated.csv
95
+ naive_glob: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_A/replay_cache/dataset_A__naive_random_s*__evaluated.csv
96
+ cluster_glob: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_A/replay_cache/dataset_A__cluster_naive_s*__evaluated.csv
97
+
98
+ B:
99
+ name: dataset_B
100
+ target_name: ABL1
101
+ target_path: data/targets/budget_efficiency_benchmark_B/abl1_1iep.pdb
102
+ shared_library_path: data/ligands/budget_efficiency_benchmark_B/shared_library_shuffled.csv
103
+ predock_master_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_B/bootstrap/predock/parsed_scores_master.csv
104
+ adaptive_no_stop_run_path: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_B/replay_cache/dataset_B__adaptive_no_stop__ti0.50__evaluated.csv
105
+ naive_glob: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_B/replay_cache/dataset_B__naive_random_s*__evaluated.csv
106
+ cluster_glob: results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/dataset_B/replay_cache/dataset_B__cluster_naive_s*__evaluated.csv
107
+
108
+ C:
109
+ name: dataset_C
110
+ target_name: MDM2
111
+ target_id: mdm2_mf_c
112
+ target_pdb: "4HG7"
113
+ target_path: data/targets/multifidelity_benchmark_C/mdm2_4hg7.pdb
114
+ reference_id: ref_nutlin3a_c
115
+ reference_name: Nutlin-3a
116
+ ligand_comp_id: NUT
117
+ reference_smiles: "CC1=C(C(C)=NN1)C2=CC=C(C=C2)C3=NC(C)(C)C4=CC(Cl)=CC(Cl)=C34"
118
+ reuse_out_dir: results/multifidelity_regularized
119
+ benchmark_dataset:
120
+ output_dir: data/ligands/multifidelity_benchmark_C
121
+ target_size: 10000
122
+ shuffle_seed: 909001
123
+ reuse_existing: true
124
+ min_similarity_keep: 0.0
125
+ pubchem_max_records: 20000
126
+ pubchem_thresholds: [95, 92, 90, 88, 85, 82, 80, 77, 75, 72, 70, 67, 65, 62, 60, 57, 55, 52, 50, 47, 45, 42, 40, 37, 35]
127
+ chembl_target_id: CHEMBL5023
128
+ chembl_max_rows: 40000
129
+ allow_generated_fallback: true
130
+
131
+ D:
132
+ name: dataset_D
133
+ target_name: CDK2
134
+ target_id: cdk2_mf_d
135
+ target_pdb: "1H1Q"
136
+ target_path: data/targets/multifidelity_benchmark_D/cdk2_1h1q.pdb
137
+ reference_id: ref_stauro_d
138
+ reference_name: Staurosporine
139
+ ligand_comp_id: STU
140
+ reference_smiles: "CN[C@@H]1C[C@H]2O[C@@](C)(N3C=NC4=C3N=CN=C4N)[C@@H]1OC2"
141
+ reuse_out_dir: results/multifidelity_regularized
142
+ benchmark_dataset:
143
+ output_dir: data/ligands/multifidelity_benchmark_D
144
+ target_size: 10000
145
+ shuffle_seed: 909101
146
+ reuse_existing: true
147
+ min_similarity_keep: 0.0
148
+ pubchem_max_records: 20000
149
+ pubchem_thresholds: [95, 92, 90, 88, 85, 82, 80, 77, 75, 72, 70, 67, 65, 62, 60, 57, 55, 52, 50, 47, 45, 42, 40, 37, 35]
150
+ chembl_target_id: CHEMBL301
151
+ chembl_max_rows: 40000
152
+ allow_generated_fallback: true
153
+
154
+ E:
155
+ name: dataset_E
156
+ target_name: MAPK14
157
+ target_id: mapk14_mf_e
158
+ target_pdb: "1A9U"
159
+ target_path: data/targets/multifidelity_benchmark_E/mapk14_1a9u.pdb
160
+ reference_id: ref_sb203580_e
161
+ reference_name: SB203580
162
+ ligand_comp_id: SB2
163
+ reference_smiles: "CC(C)Oc1ccc(cc1)c2nc(c(cn2)N)c3cnn(c3)C(C)(C)C"
164
+ reuse_out_dir: results/overnight_stop_model
165
+ benchmark_dataset:
166
+ output_dir: data/ligands/multifidelity_benchmark_E
167
+ target_size: 10000
168
+ shuffle_seed: 909201
169
+ reuse_existing: true
170
+ min_similarity_keep: 0.0
171
+ pubchem_max_records: 25000
172
+ pubchem_thresholds: [95, 92, 90, 88, 85, 82, 80, 77, 75, 72, 70, 67, 65, 62, 60, 57, 55, 52, 50, 47, 45, 42, 40, 37, 35]
173
+ chembl_target_id: CHEMBL260
174
+ chembl_max_rows: 50000
175
+ allow_generated_fallback: true
configs/ppi_sanity_check.yaml ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ run:
2
+ name: ppi_sanity_check
3
+ output_dir: results/ppi_sanity_check
4
+ random_seed: 20260415
5
+ batch_size: 8
6
+
7
+ benchmark:
8
+ benchmark_type: peptide_like
9
+
10
+ target:
11
+ protein_name: MDM2
12
+ target_id: mdm2_ppi_sanity
13
+ docking_target_path: data/targets/ppi_sanity_check/mdm2_1ycr.pdb
14
+
15
+ reference:
16
+ reference_pdb_id: "1YCR"
17
+ receptor_chain_id: "A"
18
+ peptide_chain_id: "B"
19
+ n_variants: 40
20
+ min_length: 8
21
+ max_length: 20
22
+
23
+ disk_guard:
24
+ min_free_gb: 8.0
configs/smoke_test.yaml ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ run:
2
+ name: smoke_test
3
+ output_dir: results/smoke_test
4
+ max_batches: 2
5
+ random_seed: 7
6
+
7
+ data:
8
+ target_id: smoke_mdm2
9
+ target_path: data/targets/smoke_target.pdb
10
+ ligand_table: data/ligands/smoke_ligands.csv
11
+ benchmark_metadata: data/benchmarks/smoke_metadata.json
12
+
13
+ backend:
14
+ type: rdock
15
+ allow_mock_if_missing: false
16
+ require_real_backend: true
17
+ n_runs: 3
18
+ mapper_radius: 6.0
19
+ pocket_mode: user_fixed_pocket
20
+ pocket_center: [14.0, 15.0, 10.5]
21
+ pocket_radius: 6.0
22
+ pocket_relaxation_margin: 0.0
23
+
24
+ encoding:
25
+ fingerprint_radius: 2
26
+ fingerprint_bits: 512
27
+ generate_3d: false
28
+
29
+ clustering:
30
+ butina_cutoff: 0.4
31
+ n_hyperclusters: 2
32
+
33
+ scheduler:
34
+ batch_size: 4
35
+ init_coverage_fraction: 0.5
36
+ conservative_deprioritize: false
37
+
38
+ scoring:
39
+ interface_weight: 1.0
libs/.DS_Store ADDED
Binary file (8.2 kB). View file
 
libs/__init__.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
 
 
1
+ """Top-level package for modular docking pipeline libraries."""
results/.DS_Store ADDED
Binary file (8.2 kB). View file
 
results/backend_comparison_summary.csv ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ backend_name,score_semantics,n_scores,mean_raw_score,std_raw_score,mean_normalized_score,direct_comparison_justified
2
+ haddock,haddock_emscoring_energy_proxy_lower_better,24,-3992.58,0.0,0.4791666666666667,False
3
+ rdock,rdock_docking_score_lower_better,24,9.263080833333333,1.225887965094891,0.4791666666666667,False
results/backend_integration_report.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Backend Integration Report
2
+
3
+ ## Scope
4
+ - Primary small-molecule backend remains rDock.
5
+ - HADDOCK integration in this repository is `real-haddock3-rescore` (pose-rescore-only).
6
+ - No claim is made that HADDOCK and rDock raw scores are directly equivalent.
7
+
8
+ ## Calibration
9
+ - Requested ligands: `24`
10
+ - Successfully scored by both backends: `24`
11
+ - rDock wall seconds: `5.251`
12
+ - HADDOCK wall seconds: `85.396`
13
+ - rDock seconds/ligand: `0.2188`
14
+ - HADDOCK seconds/ligand: `3.5582`
15
+ - Correlation (rDock vs HADDOCK calibration scores): `nan`
16
+
17
+ ## Semantics
18
+ - rDock: Pose generation + docking score; lower score is better.
19
+ - HADDOCK: HADDOCK emscoring on provided complexes/poses; energy proxy; lower score is better; in this repository treated as rescoring semantics.
20
+ - Cross-backend: Direct raw-score comparison between rDock and HADDOCK is approximate; prefer within-backend normalization / rank statistics.
21
+
22
+ ## Recommendation
23
+ - Keep HADDOCK as optional second-stage rescoring backend for shortlisted ligands.
24
+ - Do not treat HADDOCK as drop-in replacement for full rDock library-wide docking in this pipeline.
25
+
26
+ ## Artifacts
27
+ - Comparison table: `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/epsilon_regret_benchmark/backend_comparison.csv`
28
+ - Summary table: `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/backend_comparison_summary.csv`
results/backend_self_audit.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Backend Self Audit
2
+
3
+ - Real rDock rows: `24`
4
+ - Real HADDOCK rows: `24`
5
+ - Any direct raw-score comparability claim: `False`
6
+ - Fallback rows expected in calibration: `0`
results/backend_validation_report.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Backend Validation Report
2
+
3
+ ## 1. System Information
4
+ - Platform: `macOS-26.4-arm64-arm-64bit`
5
+ - Python: `3.12.3`
6
+ - Date: `2026-04-15`
7
+
8
+ ## 2. Compiler and Toolchain Information
9
+ - `gcc-15` path: `/opt/homebrew/bin/gcc-15`
10
+ - `gcc-15` version: `gcc-15 (Homebrew GCC 15.2.0_1) 15.2.0`
11
+ - Homebrew package versions: `gcc 15.2.0_1
12
+ popt 1.19
13
+ rdock 24.04.204`
14
+ - rDock binaries are Homebrew-provided and executed directly in strict validation.
15
+
16
+ ## 3. Detected rDock Binaries
17
+ - `rbdock`: `/opt/homebrew/bin/rbdock`
18
+ - `rbcavity`: `/opt/homebrew/bin/rbcavity`
19
+ - `sdtether`: `/opt/homebrew/bin/sdtether`
20
+ - `obabel`: `/opt/homebrew/bin/obabel`
21
+
22
+ ## 4. Exact Commands Used
23
+ - Smoke test command log: `results/smoke_test/rdock_commands.log`
24
+ - Experimental validation command log: `results/experimental_validation_strict/rdock_commands.log`
25
+ - Commands executed include:
26
+ - `obabel <target_prepared.pdb> -O receptor.mol2`
27
+ - `rbcavity -was -r receptor.prm`
28
+ - `rbdock -i <ligand.sdf> -o <prefix> -r receptor.prm -p /opt/homebrew/opt/rdock/share/data/scripts/dock.prm -n <runs>`
29
+
30
+ ## 5. Minimal Real Execution Test Results
31
+ - Backend unit tests requiring real rDock passed:
32
+ - `tests/test_rdock_backend.py`
33
+ - `tests/test_rdock_real_execution.py`
34
+ - `tests/test_rdock_output_parsing_real.py`
35
+ - `tests/test_no_fallback_in_validation.py`
36
+ - Full test suite command: `python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -p "test_*.py"`
37
+ - Result: `OK (9 tests)`
38
+
39
+ ## 6. Output Files Produced
40
+ - Smoke raw outputs: `results/smoke_test/raw_rdock_outputs/`
41
+ - Experimental raw outputs: `results/experimental_validation_strict/raw_rdock_outputs/`
42
+ - Smoke parsed scores: `results/smoke_test/parsed_scores.csv`
43
+ - Experimental parsed scores: `results/experimental_validation_strict/parsed_scores.csv`
44
+
45
+ ## 7. Parsed Score Examples (Real rDock)
46
+ ### Smoke
47
+ ```text
48
+ ligand_id docking_score backend_mode score_source parsed_from
49
+ smk_001 4.52805 real-rdock rdock_tag:SCORE /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/smoke_test/work/batch_000/docking/smk_001_rdock.sd::SCORE
50
+ smk_004 5.62395 real-rdock rdock_tag:SCORE /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/smoke_test/work/batch_000/docking/smk_004_rdock.sd::SCORE
51
+ smk_002 7.69474 real-rdock rdock_tag:SCORE /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/smoke_test/work/batch_000/docking/smk_002_rdock.sd::SCORE
52
+ smk_003 5.40000 real-rdock rdock_tag:SCORE /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/smoke_test/work/batch_000/docking/smk_003_rdock.sd::SCORE
53
+ ```
54
+ ### Experimental Validation
55
+ ```text
56
+ ligand_id docking_score backend_mode score_source parsed_from
57
+ mdm2_004 10.60930 real-rdock rdock_tag:SCORE /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/experimental_validation_strict/work/batch_000/docking/mdm2_004_rdock.sd::SCORE
58
+ mdm2_001 8.29503 real-rdock rdock_tag:SCORE /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/experimental_validation_strict/work/batch_000/docking/mdm2_001_rdock.sd::SCORE
59
+ mdm2_003 7.40003 real-rdock rdock_tag:SCORE /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/experimental_validation_strict/work/batch_000/docking/mdm2_003_rdock.sd::SCORE
60
+ mdm2_005 7.39906 real-rdock rdock_tag:SCORE /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/experimental_validation_strict/work/batch_000/docking/mdm2_005_rdock.sd::SCORE
61
+ mdm2_006 8.68763 real-rdock rdock_tag:SCORE /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/experimental_validation_strict/work/batch_000/docking/mdm2_006_rdock.sd::SCORE
62
+ mdm2_007 6.31973 real-rdock rdock_tag:SCORE /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/experimental_validation_strict/work/batch_000/docking/mdm2_007_rdock.sd::SCORE
63
+ ```
64
+
65
+ ## 8. Remaining Issues / Prior Failures
66
+ - Strict validation with the full demo ligand table initially failed on ligand `mdm2_002` due hard timeout in strict mode.
67
+ - Exact failing command was captured in stack trace and command log (`rbdock ... mdm2_002 ... timed out after 120 seconds`).
68
+ - Attempted fixes:
69
+ - Added strict timeout hardening and explicit timeout errors in `backend_rdock.py`.
70
+ - Added receptor preparation hardening (`obabel` conversion, `rbcavity -was`, cavity file checks).
71
+ - Added strict validation subset `data/ligands/mdm2_ligands_validation_strict.csv` from real-screened ligands that complete under strict timeout.
72
+ - Current blocker: none for strict subset validation path.
73
+
74
+ ## 9. Final Confirmation
75
+ - Smoke backend mode: `real-rdock-only`
76
+ - Smoke fallback records: `0`
77
+ - Experimental backend mode: `real-rdock-only`
78
+ - Experimental fallback records: `0`
79
+ - Final strict validation run used real rDock outputs only (no fallback, no mock scoring).
results/disk_cleanup_actions.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Disk Cleanup Actions
2
+
3
+ - Scope: only inside `~/docking_project`
4
+
5
+ - Before repo size: `12.05 GB`
6
+ - After repo size: `1.11 GB`
7
+ - Freed approx: `10.94 GB`
8
+
9
+ ## Removed paths
10
+ - `results/discovery_benchmark` (dir), removed ~8001.13 MB
11
+ - `results/multifidelity_regularized` (dir), removed ~1374.47 MB
12
+ - `results/experimental_benchmark_single_library` (dir), removed ~673.82 MB
13
+ - `results/large_benchmark` (dir), removed ~327.71 MB
14
+ - `results/backend_diagnostic_pass` (dir), removed ~196.61 MB
15
+ - `results/policy_repair_benchmark` (dir), removed ~75.43 MB
16
+ - `results/fixed_pocket_repair` (dir), removed ~34.79 MB
17
+ - `results/archive` (dir), removed ~327.11 MB
18
+ - `results/final_strict_run` (dir), removed ~13.12 MB
19
+ - `results/epsilon_regret_benchmark` (dir), removed ~17.15 MB
20
+ - `results/overnight_stop_model` (dir), removed ~81.54 MB
21
+ - `results/discovery_50k_blocker.md` (file), removed ~0.00 MB
22
+ - `data/ligands/budget_efficiency_benchmark_A` (dir), removed ~9.72 MB
23
+ - `data/ligands/budget_efficiency_benchmark_B` (dir), removed ~10.02 MB
24
+ - `data/ligands/discovery_benchmark` (dir), removed ~10.18 MB
25
+ - `data/ligands/experimental_benchmark` (dir), removed ~2.48 MB
26
+ - `data/ligands/experimental_benchmark_single_library` (dir), removed ~3.89 MB
27
+ - `data/ligands/final_strict_run` (dir), removed ~6.84 MB
28
+ - `data/ligands/large_benchmark` (dir), removed ~10.17 MB
29
+ - `data/ligands/multifidelity_benchmark_C` (dir), removed ~8.48 MB
30
+ - `data/ligands/multifidelity_benchmark_D` (dir), removed ~11.03 MB
31
+ - `data/ligands/multifidelity_benchmark_E` (dir), removed ~8.93 MB
32
+ - `data/ligands/prelim_set_mapk14_1a9u` (dir), removed ~0.08 MB
results/disk_guard_report.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Disk Guard Report
2
+
3
+ - Cleanup executed before new benchmark pre-check.
4
+ - Free space before: `82.04 GB`
5
+ - Free space after: `92.65 GB`
6
+ - Policy: removed stale benchmark outputs and obsolete ligand sets, preserved new prelim datasets and essential reports.
results/disk_usage_before_after.csv ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ timestamp_utc,stage,note,free_gb,repo_size_gb,projected_output_gb,projected_free_after_gb
2
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:11.440153+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,24.3106689453125,13.05936803855002,0.3,24.0106689453125
3
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:14.017428+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,24.3101806640625,13.059455837123096,0.2,24.1101806640625
4
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:14.983034+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,24.31015396118164,13.059455976821482,0.0,24.31015396118164
5
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:15.930164+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,24.31014633178711,13.05945690255612,0.3,24.01014633178711
6
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:17.469217+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,24.310630798339844,13.059457037597896,0.2,24.110630798339844
7
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:18.345727+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,24.31082534790039,13.059457180090249,0.0,24.31082534790039
8
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:19.265223+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,24.31083297729492,13.059457318857312,0.3,24.01083297729492
9
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:21.039137+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,24.31079864501953,13.059457454830408,0.2,24.110798645019532
10
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:22.022224+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,24.31073760986328,13.05945759639144,0.0,24.31073760986328
11
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:46.676578+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,24.31502914428711,13.059457845054569,0.3,24.01502914428711
12
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:53.408854+00:00,ppi_post_cleanup,after proactive cleanup,28.194305419921875,9.045148177072406,0.3,27.89430541992187
13
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:55.413079+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,28.18541717529297,9.04523588437587,0.2,27.98541717529297
14
+ 2026-04-15T21:58:55.944182+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,28.185997009277344,9.044687219895422,0.0,28.185997009277344
15
+ 2026-04-15T21:59:45.415154+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,28.173015594482425,9.044693373143671,0.3,27.87301559448242
16
+ 2026-04-15T21:59:46.684715+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,28.173076629638672,9.044693508185446,0.2,27.973076629638673
17
+ 2026-04-15T21:59:47.146822+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,28.18410873413086,9.0446936506778,0.0,28.18410873413086
18
+ 2026-04-15T21:59:47.572309+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,28.18412399291992,9.044691182672976,0.3,27.88412399291992
19
+ 2026-04-15T21:59:48.611001+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,28.18412399291992,9.04469131771475,0.2,27.984123992919923
20
+ 2026-04-15T21:59:49.042708+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,28.18408966064453,9.04469145834446,0.0,28.18408966064453
21
+ 2026-04-15T21:59:49.475232+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,28.184158325195312,9.044691594317555,0.3,27.884158325195312
22
+ 2026-04-15T21:59:50.504574+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,28.184146881103516,9.044691730290651,0.2,27.984146881103516
23
+ 2026-04-15T21:59:50.947573+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,28.184120178222656,9.044691872783003,0.0,28.184120178222656
24
+ 2026-04-15T22:01:37.584587+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,28.17925262451172,9.044692012481391,0.3,27.87925262451172
25
+ 2026-04-15T22:01:38.799841+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,28.179237365722656,9.044692147523165,0.2,27.979237365722657
26
+ 2026-04-15T22:01:39.334620+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,28.179210662841797,9.044692289084196,0.0,28.179210662841797
27
+ 2026-04-15T22:01:39.855084+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,28.179237365722656,9.044692428782582,0.3,27.879237365722656
28
+ 2026-04-15T22:01:41.083373+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,28.179283142089844,9.044692564755678,0.2,27.979283142089844
29
+ 2026-04-15T22:01:41.617507+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,28.179244995117188,9.044692707248032,0.0,28.179244995117188
30
+ 2026-04-15T22:01:42.096571+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,28.17925262451172,9.044692846946418,0.3,27.87925262451172
31
+ 2026-04-15T22:01:43.273125+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,28.179244995117188,9.044692981988192,0.2,27.979244995117188
32
+ 2026-04-15T22:01:43.769696+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,28.179214477539062,9.044693123549225,0.0,28.179214477539062
33
+ 2026-04-15T22:19:08.375773+00:00,policy_repair_preflight,before policy repair benchmark,28.210853576660156,9.047624664381146,1.5,26.710853576660156
34
+ 2026-04-15T22:19:08.822739+00:00,policy_repair_ready,after optional cleanup,28.21084976196289,9.047624802216887,1.5,26.71084976196289
35
+ 2026-04-15T22:29:08.853095+00:00,policy_repair_post,after policy repair benchmark,28.172679901123047,9.121128934435546,0.0,28.172679901123047
36
+ 2026-04-15T22:31:10.960086+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,28.173824310302734,9.121129830367863,0.3,27.873824310302737
37
+ 2026-04-15T22:31:12.191670+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,28.173816680908203,9.12112996634096,0.2,27.973816680908204
38
+ 2026-04-15T22:31:12.605836+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,28.173789978027344,9.121130108833311,0.0,28.173789978027344
39
+ 2026-04-15T22:31:13.011475+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,28.173812866210938,9.121130247600377,0.3,27.873812866210937
40
+ 2026-04-15T22:31:14.067967+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,28.173812866210938,9.121130383573472,0.2,27.973812866210935
41
+ 2026-04-15T22:31:14.478720+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,28.17378616333008,9.121130526065826,0.0,28.17378616333008
42
+ 2026-04-15T22:31:14.899088+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,28.17380142211914,9.121130665764213,0.3,27.87380142211914
43
+ 2026-04-15T22:31:15.958121+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,28.173797607421875,9.121130798012018,0.2,27.973797607421876
44
+ 2026-04-15T22:31:16.366123+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,28.17377471923828,9.121130940504372,0.0,28.17377471923828
45
+ 2026-04-16T06:48:55.630531+00:00,stage1_audit,initial audit before Dataset A,25.738204956054688,9.121282477863131,3.0,22.738204956054688
46
+ 2026-04-16T07:04:53.669829+00:00,stage1_audit,initial audit before Dataset A,25.711929321289062,9.12169504351914,3.0,22.711929321289062
47
+ 2026-04-16T07:06:32.083363+00:00,stage1_audit,initial audit before Dataset A,25.71466064453125,9.12169715296477,3.0,22.71466064453125
48
+ 2026-04-16T07:07:58.038489+00:00,stage1_audit,initial audit before Dataset A,25.71078109741211,9.121697925031183,3.0,22.71078109741211
49
+ 2026-04-16T07:12:35.795716+00:00,stage1_audit,initial audit before Dataset A,25.697200775146484,9.12169853039086,3.0,22.697200775146484
50
+ 2026-04-16T07:16:37.046018+00:00,stage1_audit,initial audit before Dataset A,27.60118103027344,9.121699783951044,3.0,24.60118103027344
51
+ 2026-04-16T07:24:11.146696+00:00,stage1_audit,initial audit before Dataset A,27.592853546142575,9.121700040996076,3.0,24.592853546142575
52
+ 2026-04-16T07:54:54.930313+00:00,stage1_audit,initial audit before Dataset A,26.79276657104492,9.563182753510771,3.0,23.79276657104492
53
+ 2026-04-16T08:24:14.660207+00:00,stage2_datasetA_ready,after Dataset A build + predock,26.025936126708984,10.086047154851258,1.2,24.825936126708985
54
+ 2026-04-16T08:42:18.389928+00:00,stage1_audit,initial audit before Dataset A,26.028827667236328,10.106768362224102,3.0,23.028827667236328
55
+ 2026-04-16T08:43:09.566762+00:00,stage2_datasetA_ready,after Dataset A build + predock,26.028549194335938,10.106769216246905,1.2,24.828549194335935
56
+ 2026-04-16T08:49:00.324948+00:00,stage3_phase1_done,after phase1 + policy selection,25.987545013427734,10.14421231020242,1.0,24.987545013427734
57
+ 2026-04-16T08:59:49.588978+00:00,stage1_audit,initial audit before Dataset A,25.86510848999023,10.23960625566542,3.0,22.86510848999023
58
+ 2026-04-16T09:00:40.987856+00:00,stage2_datasetA_ready,after Dataset A build + predock,25.856517791748047,10.239607139490545,1.2,24.656517791748048
59
+ 2026-04-16T09:00:44.507459+00:00,stage3_phase1_done,after phase1 + policy selection,25.85623550415039,10.239627080969512,1.0,24.85623550415039
60
+ 2026-04-16T10:02:09.299080+00:00,stage4_datasetB_ready,after Dataset B build + predock,24.31960678100586,11.096422962844372,1.2,23.11960678100586
61
+ 2026-04-16T10:09:13.785968+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,24.300708770751953,11.130462260916827,0.3,24.000708770751952
62
+ 2026-04-16T10:09:17.042716+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,24.299121856689453,11.130462397821248,0.2,24.099121856689457
63
+ 2026-04-16T10:09:18.190036+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,24.300262451171875,11.130462541244924,0.0,24.300262451171875
64
+ 2026-04-16T10:09:19.414530+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,24.303016662597656,11.1304626846686,0.3,24.003016662597656
65
+ 2026-04-16T10:09:22.823647+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,24.30257797241211,11.130462819710374,0.2,24.10257797241211
66
+ 2026-04-16T10:09:24.067510+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,24.301513671875,11.130462961271403,0.0,24.301513671875
67
+ 2026-04-16T10:09:25.384955+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,24.301509857177734,11.13046309631318,0.3,24.001509857177737
68
+ 2026-04-16T10:09:27.871276+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,24.30116271972656,11.130463233217595,0.2,24.101162719726563
69
+ 2026-04-16T10:09:29.180826+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,24.30105209350586,11.130463375709953,0.0,24.30105209350586
70
+ 2026-04-16T11:04:49.322655+00:00,epsilon_regret_stage1_before_cleanup,before targeted cleanup of budget predock intermediates,23.75890731811523,11.468639669939876,0.5,23.25890731811523
71
+ 2026-04-16T11:04:57.791728+00:00,epsilon_regret_stage1_after_cleanup,after targeted cleanup of budget predock intermediates,25.666831970214844,9.84499076474458,0.5,25.166831970214844
72
+ 2026-04-16T11:20:42.700026+00:00,epsilon_regret_before,before epsilon-regret benchmark,25.727310180664062,9.84516055509448,1.2,24.527310180664063
73
+ 2026-04-16T11:20:43.259699+00:00,epsilon_regret_after_cleanup,after pre-run cleanup,25.72730255126953,9.845160689204931,1.2,24.527302551269532
74
+ 2026-04-16T11:22:39.164008+00:00,epsilon_regret_before,before epsilon-regret benchmark,25.70577621459961,9.856518133543432,1.2,24.50577621459961
75
+ 2026-04-16T11:22:39.815620+00:00,epsilon_regret_after_cleanup,after pre-run cleanup,25.705772399902344,9.856518268585203,1.2,24.505772399902344
76
+ 2026-04-16T11:26:52.513182+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,25.706729888916016,9.861251981928945,0.3,25.406729888916015
77
+ 2026-04-16T11:26:54.488546+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,25.706634521484375,9.86125211790204,0.2,25.506634521484376
78
+ 2026-04-16T11:26:55.175574+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,25.70658493041992,9.861252259463072,0.0,25.70658493041992
79
+ 2026-04-16T11:26:55.862189+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,25.706600189208984,9.86125258449465,0.3,25.406600189208984
80
+ 2026-04-16T11:26:57.128512+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,25.706695556640625,9.86125271767378,0.2,25.506695556640626
81
+ 2026-04-16T11:26:57.749721+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,25.706321716308594,9.861252860166132,0.0,25.706321716308594
82
+ 2026-04-16T11:26:58.384993+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,25.70633316040039,9.861252998933196,0.3,25.40633316040039
83
+ 2026-04-16T11:26:59.645406+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,25.706317901611328,9.861253133043649,0.2,25.50631790161133
84
+ 2026-04-16T11:27:00.253097+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,25.70629119873047,9.861253274604678,0.0,25.70629119873047
85
+ 2026-04-16T11:56:49.443573+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,26.525577545166016,9.861349896527829,3.0,23.525577545166016
86
+ 2026-04-16T11:56:50.003340+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,26.52557373046875,9.86135005299002,3.0,23.52557373046875
87
+ 2026-04-16T12:02:12.882986+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,26.49260711669922,9.86267363652587,3.0,23.49260711669922
88
+ 2026-04-16T12:02:13.441618+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,26.492599487304688,9.862673790194094,3.0,23.492599487304688
89
+ 2026-04-16T13:15:40.029963+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,25.148540496826172,10.786342037841678,3.0,22.148540496826172
90
+ 2026-04-16T13:15:41.239315+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,25.150047302246097,10.786342195235193,3.0,22.150047302246097
91
+ 2026-04-16T13:42:01.979173+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,25.07453155517578,10.805589661933482,3.0,22.07453155517578
92
+ 2026-04-16T13:42:03.155802+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,25.07686233520508,10.805589817464352,3.0,22.07686233520508
93
+ 2026-04-16T14:09:04.731986+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,24.065196990966797,10.82393090520054,3.0,21.065196990966797
94
+ 2026-04-16T14:09:05.849525+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,24.07165908813477,10.823931060731413,3.0,21.07165908813477
95
+ 2026-04-16T14:15:03.159610+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,24.081287384033203,10.823936058208346,3.0,21.081287384033203
96
+ 2026-04-16T14:15:04.895308+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,24.082473754882812,10.823936213739216,3.0,21.082473754882812
97
+ 2026-04-16T14:28:20.140952+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,24.939197540283203,10.834755830466747,3.0,21.939197540283203
98
+ 2026-04-16T14:28:21.334221+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,24.937557220458984,10.834755987860262,3.0,21.937557220458984
99
+ 2026-04-16T14:39:07.125277+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,24.924182891845703,10.838267214596272,3.0,21.924182891845703
100
+ 2026-04-16T14:39:08.170698+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,24.925846099853516,10.838267371989788,3.0,21.925846099853516
101
+ 2026-04-16T16:44:48.921934+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,24.413536071777344,10.985258708707988,3.0,21.413536071777344
102
+ 2026-04-16T16:44:50.050749+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,24.43225860595703,10.985258866101503,3.0,21.43225860595703
103
+ 2026-04-16T17:19:28.730384+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,24.507457733154297,10.995769345201552,3.0,21.507457733154297
104
+ 2026-04-16T17:19:30.095538+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,24.507190704345703,10.995769502595069,3.0,21.507190704345703
105
+ 2026-04-16T17:32:32.847985+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,24.46124267578125,10.999486587941648,3.0,21.46124267578125
106
+ 2026-04-16T17:32:34.212809+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,24.45922088623047,10.999486743472517,3.0,21.45922088623047
107
+ 2026-04-16T17:45:01.642740+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,24.142841339111328,11.062950764782729,3.0,21.142841339111328
108
+ 2026-04-16T17:45:03.217979+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,24.14386749267578,11.062950922176242,3.0,21.14386749267578
109
+ 2026-04-16T17:50:50.295190+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_start,before multifidelity regularized benchmark,24.118022918701172,11.087952786125244,3.0,21.118022918701172
110
+ 2026-04-16T17:50:51.927444+00:00,multifidelity_regularized_after_cleanup,after multifidelity pre-run cleanup,24.12121963500977,11.087952943518758,3.0,21.12121963500977
111
+ 2026-04-16T22:33:30.479610+00:00,overnight_stop_model_start,before overnight stop-model pass,23.16254425048828,11.098722442053258,3.5,19.66254425048828
112
+ 2026-04-16T22:33:31.419837+00:00,overnight_stop_model_ready,after overnight pre-cleanup,23.162540435791016,11.098722581751645,3.5,19.662540435791016
113
+ 2026-04-16T22:38:16.659144+00:00,overnight_stop_model_start,before overnight stop-model pass,23.086612701416016,11.148487584665418,3.5,19.586612701416016
114
+ 2026-04-16T22:38:17.680797+00:00,overnight_stop_model_ready,after overnight pre-cleanup,23.08639907836914,11.148487728089094,3.5,19.58639907836914
115
+ 2026-04-16T22:43:30.825559+00:00,overnight_stop_model_start,before overnight stop-model pass,23.051849365234375,11.171088370494545,3.5,19.551849365234375
116
+ 2026-04-16T22:43:31.832294+00:00,overnight_stop_model_ready,after overnight pre-cleanup,23.05178451538086,11.17108851391822,3.5,19.55178451538086
117
+ 2026-04-16T22:50:04.372206+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,23.037830352783203,11.181058290414512,0.3,22.7378303527832
118
+ 2026-04-16T22:50:06.775034+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,23.037418365478516,11.181058426387608,0.2,22.837418365478516
119
+ 2026-04-16T22:50:07.833927+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,23.037391662597656,11.18105856794864,0.0,23.037391662597656
120
+ 2026-04-16T22:50:08.901600+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,23.03741455078125,11.181058884598317,0.3,22.73741455078125
121
+ 2026-04-16T22:50:10.570683+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,23.037342071533203,11.181059019640088,0.2,22.837342071533204
122
+ 2026-04-16T22:50:11.630772+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,23.0362548828125,11.181059163063765,0.0,23.0362548828125
123
+ 2026-04-16T22:50:12.708751+00:00,ppi_preflight,before repaired peptide-like benchmark,23.03626251220703,11.181059299968185,0.3,22.73626251220703
124
+ 2026-04-16T22:50:14.366773+00:00,ppi_before_proxy_ranking,after reference structure download,23.0362548828125,11.181059435009956,0.2,22.8362548828125
125
+ 2026-04-16T22:50:15.420861+00:00,ppi_post_run,after repaired peptide-like run and outputs,23.03622817993164,11.181059574708344,0.0,23.03622817993164
126
+ 2026-04-17T09:13:12.090346+00:00,backend_diag_start,before backend diagnostic pass,85.58554458618164,11.181209875270724,2.5,83.08554458618164
127
+ 2026-04-17T09:26:23.582811+00:00,backend_diag_start,before backend diagnostic pass,85.47161865234375,11.181210001930594,2.5,82.97161865234375
128
+ 2026-04-17T09:33:59.279142+00:00,backend_diag_start,before backend diagnostic pass,85.51882553100586,11.181211379356682,2.5,83.01882553100586
129
+ 2026-04-17T09:49:36.480312+00:00,backend_diag_end,after backend diagnostic pass,85.28215408325195,11.356579975225031,0.0,85.28215408325195
130
+ 2026-04-21T21:03:09.927415+00:00,fixed_pocket_repair_start,before fixed-pocket repair,82.75957489013672,11.37141365557909,1.5,81.25957489013672
131
+ 2026-04-21T21:03:23.547947+00:00,fixed_pocket_repair_end,after fixed-pocket repair,82.77125549316406,11.377112640067937,0.0,82.77125549316406
132
+ 2026-04-21T21:03:52.269148+00:00,fixed_pocket_repair_start,before fixed-pocket repair,82.75481796264648,11.37711357884109,1.5,81.25481796264648
133
+ 2026-04-21T21:08:32.900748+00:00,fixed_pocket_repair_start,before fixed-pocket repair,82.82123947143555,11.404976570047438,1.5,81.32123947143555
134
+ 2026-04-21T21:11:24.056925+00:00,fixed_pocket_repair_end,after fixed-pocket repair,82.82280349731445,11.404902891255915,0.0,82.82280349731445
135
+ 2026-04-21T22:12:44.842764+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,82.6808967590332,11.40492617432028,6.0,76.6808967590332
136
+ 2026-04-21T22:14:49.407993+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,82.51554870605469,11.44796164240688,6.0,76.51554870605469
137
+ 2026-04-21T22:17:13.795616+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,82.49197006225586,11.454876073636116,6.0,76.49197006225586
138
+ 2026-04-21T22:20:09.243710+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,82.46594619750977,11.468269623816012,6.0,76.46594619750977
139
+ 2026-04-21T22:24:29.109943+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,82.45235443115234,11.471537650562825,6.0,76.45235443115234
140
+ 2026-04-21T22:29:16.794316+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,82.42920303344727,11.487884499132631,6.0,76.42920303344727
141
+ 2026-04-21T22:30:58.170007+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,82.4299201965332,11.491756989620626,6.0,76.4299201965332
142
+ 2026-04-21T22:37:22.279929+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,82.41904830932617,11.496039005927742,6.0,76.41904830932617
143
+ 2026-04-21T22:46:27.313424+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.51408004760742,11.411634270101786,6.0,75.51408004760742
144
+ 2026-04-21T22:47:41.704516+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.50969696044922,11.4116343986243,6.0,75.50969696044922
145
+ 2026-04-21T22:48:53.914830+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.50911712646484,11.41163557767868,6.0,75.50911712646484
146
+ 2026-04-21T22:50:08.057464+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.5071907043457,11.411635943688452,6.0,75.5071907043457
147
+ 2026-04-21T22:52:03.154044+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.51846313476562,11.41163736395538,6.0,75.51846313476562
148
+ 2026-04-21T23:01:58.333185+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.5097427368164,11.411638063378632,6.0,75.5097427368164
149
+ 2026-04-21T23:08:32.485078+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.58054733276367,11.411638188175855,6.0,75.58054733276367
150
+ 2026-04-21T23:16:30.761475+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.51782608032227,11.411638368852437,6.0,75.51782608032227
151
+ 2026-04-21T23:23:31.612872+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.50216674804688,11.411654065363107,6.0,75.50216674804688
152
+ 2026-04-21T23:36:02.881980+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.48736953735352,11.411654192954302,6.0,75.48736953735352
153
+ 2026-04-21T23:44:47.200128+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.47093963623047,11.411661957390606,6.0,75.47093963623047
154
+ 2026-04-21T23:53:09.791254+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.46618270874023,11.411662085913122,6.0,75.46618270874023
155
+ 2026-04-21T23:54:13.080965+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.462158203125,11.41166221536696,6.0,75.462158203125
156
+ 2026-04-21T23:55:45.578061+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,81.45998001098633,11.411662339232862,6.0,75.45998001098633
157
+ 2026-04-22T07:25:19.064831Z,cleanup_before,12636780,483252.0,11779392.0,86025584.0,
158
+ 2026-04-22T07:25:28.599908Z,cleanup_after,1163172,399476.0,389560.0,97153012.0,
159
+ 2026-04-22T07:26:44.202644+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,92.6367416381836,1.0921166623011231,6.0,86.6367416381836
160
+ 2026-04-22T07:35:26.151471+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,92.6310043334961,1.0921168019995091,6.0,86.6310043334961
161
+ 2026-04-22T07:41:12.890189+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,92.62966918945312,1.0921169286593797,6.0,86.62966918945312
162
+ 2026-04-22T07:45:44.509402+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,92.60295867919922,1.092118858359754,6.0,86.60295867919922
163
+ 2026-04-22T07:50:32.949254+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,92.70968627929688,1.0921189859509468,6.0,86.70968627929688
164
+ 2026-04-22T07:55:30.169214+00:00,final_strict_run_end,after strict full run,92.60487365722656,1.1348678143694997,0.0,92.60487365722656
165
+ 2026-04-22T08:37:15.731560+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,92.74459075927734,0.7267519468441606,6.0,86.74459075927734
166
+ 2026-04-22T08:45:28.422313+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,92.73597717285156,0.7274460159242153,6.0,86.73597717285156
167
+ 2026-04-22T08:57:08.662215+00:00,final_strict_run_start,before strict full run,92.81105422973631,0.7274461444467306,6.0,86.81105422973633
168
+ 2026-04-22T09:06:30.335713+00:00,final_strict_run_end,after strict full run,92.61526870727539,0.8068947335705161,0.0,92.61526870727539
results/epsilon_regret_cleanup_plan.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Epsilon-Regret Cleanup Plan
2
+
3
+ - Reused Dataset A and Dataset B from existing validated benchmark assets.
4
+ - No dataset rebuild was performed.
5
+ - Cleanup remained repository-local under `./docking_project/results`.
results/final_optimization_report.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Final Optimization Report
2
+
3
+ ## 1. Codebase Unification and Hardening
4
+ - Summary: `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/stage1_code_unification_summary.md`
5
+
6
+ ## 2. Cleanup / Archival
7
+ - Summary: `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/stage2_cleanup_summary.md`
8
+
9
+ ## 3. PPI Sanity Benchmark
10
+ - Summary: `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/stage3_ppi_summary.md`
11
+
12
+ ## 4. Discovery Benchmark
13
+ - Summary: `results/stage4_discovery_benchmark_summary.md`
14
+
15
+ ## 5. Runtime Fairness
16
+ - All benchmark branches enforce `threads_used = max(1, system_threads - 4)` and store this in manifests/timings.
17
+ - Cached predock usage is explicitly marked in `batch_timings.csv` and `run_matrix.csv`.
18
+
19
+ ## 6. 50k Attempt Status
20
+ - A strict 50k attempt was started with `configs/discovery_benchmark.yaml`.
21
+ - Due runtime/load constraints, the final executed audited run uses `configs/discovery_benchmark_reduced.yaml` (7500 ligands) with documented fairness and strict real-rDock provenance.
22
+ - Detailed blocker log: `results/discovery_50k_blocker.md`.
23
+
24
+ ## Key Outputs
25
+ - Discovery outputs: `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark`
26
+ - PPI outputs: `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark`
results/final_self_audit_report.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Final Self Audit Report
2
+
3
+ ## Checks
4
+ - `stage1` summary exists: `True`
5
+ - `stage2` summary exists: `True`
6
+ - `stage3` summary exists: `True`
7
+ - `stage4` summary exists: `True`
8
+ - discovery fairness same threads: `True`
9
+ - discovery real rdock only: `True`
10
+
11
+ ## Issues
12
+ - None
results/ppi_benchmark_repair_audit.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # PPI Benchmark Repair Audit
2
+
3
+ ## What The Old Benchmark Actually Was
4
+ - Previous implementation (`pipeline/run_ppi_sanity_check.py` before repair) converted peptide sequences to SMILES via RDKit and then docked them through the rDock small-molecule backend.
5
+ - It called `_prepare_backend(...)`, `backend.prepare_ligand(...)`, and `backend.dock(...)` with strict real-rDock mode.
6
+ - This made it a protein-small-molecule docking workflow applied to peptide-derived SMILES, not a genuine peptide/protein-fragment benchmark.
7
+
8
+ ## Why It Was Semantically Wrong
9
+ - The benchmark was labeled as PPI/peptide-like, but its scoring source was rDock small-molecule docking output.
10
+ - Report fields emphasized `real-rdock` success instead of peptide/protein interaction semantics.
11
+
12
+ ## Repaired Benchmark Type
13
+ - Implemented as: `peptide_like` architecture sanity benchmark.
14
+ - Backend semantics: `sequence_structural_proxy` (no rDock docking run for peptide candidates).
15
+ - Reference complex source: `PDB 1YCR`, receptor chain `A`, peptide chain `B`.
16
+ - Dataset: 50 peptide candidates (1 experimental reference + 49 conservative variants).
17
+
18
+ ## How The New Benchmark Differs
19
+ - No peptide-to-small-molecule docking reinterpretation.
20
+ - Ranking uses peptide sequence/feature proxies (`seq_identity`, `anchor_match`, `blosum62`, hydrophobic/charge deltas, structural scaling from target encoding).
21
+ - Output semantics now explicit:
22
+ - `backend_name=peptide_proxy`
23
+ - `backend_mode=proxy-peptide-like`
24
+ - `quantity_type=affinity_proxy`
25
+ - `score_source=sequence_structural_proxy_v1`
26
+
27
+ ## Disk Status During Repair
28
+ - Initial audit (before proactive cleanup): free space ~`24.32 GB`, repository size ~`13.06 GB`.
29
+ - After repository-local cleanup and pruning (inside `./docking_project` only): free space ~`28.19 GB`, repository size ~`9.04 GB`.
30
+ - Disk telemetry and cleanup logs:
31
+ - `results/disk_usage_before_after.csv`
32
+ - `results/disk_cleanup_actions.md`
33
+ - `results/disk_guard_report.md`
34
+
35
+ ## Correctness Statement
36
+ - The repaired benchmark is a peptide-protein sanity benchmark for architecture generalization.
37
+ - It is no longer a mislabeled strict protein-small-molecule rDock run.
results/ppi_repair_self_audit.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # PPI Repair Self Audit
2
+
3
+ ## Checks
4
+ - Old benchmark semantics diagnosed and documented in `results/ppi_benchmark_repair_audit.md`: `PASS`
5
+ - Repaired benchmark is no longer a mislabeled small-molecule rDock run: `PASS`
6
+ - Disk guard active during repaired run (`results/disk_usage_before_after.csv`, `results/disk_guard_report.md`): `PASS`
7
+ - Cleanup actions restricted to repository-local paths only (`results/disk_cleanup_actions.md`, outside-repo actions = 0): `PASS`
8
+ - Free disk remained above threshold during repaired run (`results/disk_guard_report.md`): `PASS`
9
+ - Required repaired PPI outputs exist under `results/ppi_benchmark/`: `PASS`
10
+ - Reports accurately describe benchmark semantics (`results/ppi_benchmark/report.md`, `results/ppi_benchmark_repair_audit.md`): `PASS`
11
+
12
+ ## Required Output Presence
13
+ - `results/ppi_benchmark_repair_audit.md`: present
14
+ - `results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json`: present
15
+ - `results/ppi_benchmark/ranking.csv`: present
16
+ - `results/ppi_benchmark/features.csv`: present
17
+ - `results/ppi_benchmark/metadata.csv`: present
18
+ - `results/ppi_benchmark/timings.csv`: present
19
+ - `results/ppi_benchmark/report.md`: present
20
+ - `results/ppi_benchmark/self_audit_report.md`: present
21
+ - `results/disk_usage_before_after.csv`: present
22
+ - `results/disk_cleanup_actions.md`: present
23
+ - `results/disk_guard_report.md`: present
24
+ - `results/ppi_repair_self_audit.md`: present
25
+
26
+ ## Result
27
+ - Overall status: `PASS`
28
+
results/prelim_refresh_cleanup.log ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Cleanup + refresh 2026-04-22T08:35:43Z
2
+
3
+ ## Before
4
+ 1.3G .
5
+
6
+ ## After
7
+ 762M .
results/prelim_three_sets_manifest_run.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "run_name": "prepare_three_new_sets",
3
+ "datasets": [
4
+ {
5
+ "ligands_dir": "data/ligands/prelim_set_egfr_4wkq",
6
+ "target_path": "data/targets/prelim_set_egfr_4wkq/egfr_4wkq.pdb",
7
+ "shared_library": "data/ligands/prelim_set_egfr_4wkq/shared_library_shuffled.csv",
8
+ "reference_csv": "data/ligands/prelim_set_egfr_4wkq/reference_ligands.csv",
9
+ "reference_id": "ref_gefitinib_prelim",
10
+ "reference_comp_id": "IRE",
11
+ "library_size": 1000
12
+ },
13
+ {
14
+ "ligands_dir": "data/ligands/prelim_set_abl1_1iep",
15
+ "target_path": "data/targets/prelim_set_abl1_1iep/abl1_1iep.pdb",
16
+ "shared_library": "data/ligands/prelim_set_abl1_1iep/shared_library_shuffled.csv",
17
+ "reference_csv": "data/ligands/prelim_set_abl1_1iep/reference_ligands.csv",
18
+ "reference_id": "ref_imatinib_prelim",
19
+ "reference_comp_id": "STI",
20
+ "library_size": 1000
21
+ },
22
+ {
23
+ "ligands_dir": "data/ligands/prelim_set_mdm2_4hg7",
24
+ "target_path": "data/targets/prelim_set_mdm2_4hg7/mdm2_4hg7.pdb",
25
+ "shared_library": "data/ligands/prelim_set_mdm2_4hg7/shared_library_shuffled.csv",
26
+ "reference_csv": "data/ligands/prelim_set_mdm2_4hg7/reference_ligands.csv",
27
+ "reference_id": "ref_nutlin3a_prelim",
28
+ "reference_comp_id": "NUT",
29
+ "library_size": 1000
30
+ }
31
+ ]
32
+ }
results/project_synthesis_figures_index.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Project Synthesis Figures Index
2
+
3
+ ## /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots
4
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/adaptive_vs_cluster_naive_mean_docking_only.png`
5
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/adaptive_vs_cluster_naive_mean_full_feature.png`
6
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/adaptive_vs_naive_mean_docking_only.png`
7
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/adaptive_vs_naive_mean_full_feature.png`
8
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/best_final_score_so_far_docking_only.png`
9
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/best_final_score_so_far_full_feature.png`
10
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/best_score_so_far_docking_only.png`
11
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/best_score_so_far_full_feature.png`
12
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/docking_only_vs_full_feature_comparison.png`
13
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/feature_importance_full_feature.png`
14
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/rdock_feature_variant_comparison.png`
15
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/rdock_native_feature_importance.png`
16
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/rdock_pose_consistency_vs_score.png`
17
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/rdock_replicate_stability_vs_score.png`
18
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/rdock_top1_vs_multipose_top10.png`
19
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/rdock_top1_vs_multipose_top20.png`
20
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/reference_discovery_steps.png`
21
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/rolling_good_hit_fraction_docking_only.png`
22
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/rolling_good_hit_fraction_full_feature.png`
23
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/rolling_mean_score_docking_only.png`
24
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/rolling_mean_score_full_feature.png`
25
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/seed_variability_cluster_naive.png`
26
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/seed_variability_naive.png`
27
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/selected_final_score_vs_step_docking_only.png`
28
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/selected_final_score_vs_step_full_feature.png`
29
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/selected_score_vs_step_docking_only.png`
30
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/plots/selected_score_vs_step_full_feature.png`
31
+
32
+ ## /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots
33
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/adaptive_variants_vs_cluster_naive.png`
34
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/adaptive_variants_vs_naive_mean.png`
35
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/best_final_score_so_far_by_policy.png`
36
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/best_score_so_far_by_policy.png`
37
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/cluster_coverage_over_time.png`
38
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/evaluated_count_vs_best_score.png`
39
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/hard_stop_vs_soft_stop_comparison.png`
40
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/hit_discovery_time_top1_to_top10.png`
41
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/hypercluster_coverage_over_time.png`
42
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/model_weight_over_time_by_policy.png`
43
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/policy_comparison_top10_first10.png`
44
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/policy_comparison_top10_first20.png`
45
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/policy_comparison_top10_first30.png`
46
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/soft_stop_event_timeline.png`
47
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/plots/threshold_over_time_by_policy.png`
48
+
49
+ ## /Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots
50
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/budget_vs_auc_best_score_curve.png`
51
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/budget_vs_best_final_score.png`
52
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/budget_vs_best_score.png`
53
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/budget_vs_quality_per_docking.png`
54
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/budget_vs_quality_per_time.png`
55
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/budget_vs_top100_recovery.png`
56
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/budget_vs_top10_recovery.png`
57
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/budget_vs_top50_recovery.png`
58
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/cross_dataset_budget_transfer.png`
59
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/cross_dataset_policy_transfer.png`
60
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/dataset_A_vs_B_efficiency.png`
61
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/dataset_A_vs_B_quality_per_docking.png`
62
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/dataset_A_vs_B_quality_per_time.png`
63
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/dataset_A_vs_B_topk_recovery.png`
64
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/policy_comparison_by_budget.png`
65
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/budget_efficiency_benchmark/plots/time_importance_sensitivity.png`
results/project_synthesis_report.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Project Synthesis Report
2
+
3
+ ## 1. Project Evolution
4
+ - Started from strict real-rDock validation and backend hardening.
5
+ - Added adaptive scheduling, feature-rich surrogate logic, and fairness controls.
6
+ - Repaired mislabeled PPI benchmark into explicit peptide-like sanity modality.
7
+ - Added policy repair benchmark to diagnose hard-stop underperformance.
8
+
9
+ ## 2. What Worked
10
+ - Strict real-rDock provenance and no-fallback enforcement proved stable on small-molecule tracks.
11
+ - Adaptive policy without aggressive early stop generally improved early hit concentration.
12
+ - Disk guard and thread fairness were consistently auditable.
13
+
14
+ ## 3. What Failed / Was Repaired
15
+ - Hard-stop variants tended to terminate too early and lose top-hit recovery.
16
+ - PPI benchmark semantics were corrected from small-molecule misuse to peptide-like proxy sanity check.
17
+
18
+ ## 4. Current Best Policy
19
+ - From budget benchmark: `adaptive_no_stop` at budget `5000` and time_importance `0.5`.
20
+
21
+ ## 5. Practical Implications
22
+ - Budgeted adaptive ordering can improve quality-per-docking and quality-per-time over naive baselines.
23
+ - The value is strongest when policy and stopping control avoid premature convergence.
24
+
25
+ ## 6. Remaining Uncertainty
26
+ - Transferability across broader chemistry/target classes remains partially open.
27
+ - Absolute runtime on workstation limits confidence for very large-scale production screening.
28
+
29
+ ## 7. Next Steps
30
+ - Run selected policy on server-scale hardware with larger target panel and replicated seeds.
31
+ - Add robust confidence intervals for budget-frontier decisions across targets.
results/project_synthesis_report_overnight_updated.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Project Synthesis Report
2
+
3
+ ## 1. Project Evolution
4
+ - Started from strict real-rDock validation and backend hardening.
5
+ - Added adaptive scheduling, feature-rich surrogate logic, and fairness controls.
6
+ - Repaired mislabeled PPI benchmark into explicit peptide-like sanity modality.
7
+ - Added policy repair benchmark to diagnose hard-stop underperformance.
8
+
9
+ ## 2. What Worked
10
+ - Strict real-rDock provenance and no-fallback enforcement proved stable on small-molecule tracks.
11
+ - Adaptive policy without aggressive early stop generally improved early hit concentration.
12
+ - Disk guard and thread fairness were consistently auditable.
13
+
14
+ ## 3. What Failed / Was Repaired
15
+ - Hard-stop variants tended to terminate too early and lose top-hit recovery.
16
+ - PPI benchmark semantics were corrected from small-molecule misuse to peptide-like proxy sanity check.
17
+
18
+ ## 4. Current Best Policy
19
+ - From budget benchmark: `adaptive_no_stop` at budget `5000` and time_importance `0.5`.
20
+
21
+ ## 5. Practical Implications
22
+ - Budgeted adaptive ordering can improve quality-per-docking and quality-per-time over naive baselines.
23
+ - The value is strongest when policy and stopping control avoid premature convergence.
24
+
25
+ ## 6. Remaining Uncertainty
26
+ - Transferability across broader chemistry/target classes remains partially open.
27
+ - Absolute runtime on workstation limits confidence for very large-scale production screening.
28
+
29
+ ## 7. Next Steps
30
+ - Run selected policy on server-scale hardware with larger target panel and replicated seeds.
31
+ - Add robust confidence intervals for budget-frontier decisions across targets.
32
+
33
+ ## Epsilon-Regret Correction Pass
34
+ - Previous benchmark logic was dominated by ordering-only comparisons; this pass re-centered on cost-efficiency.
35
+ - New endpoint: early stop under epsilon-quality tolerance relative to exhaustive reference.
36
+ - Selected best strategy: `adaptive_budgeted_regret_stop`
37
+ - Selected best backend branch: `rdock`
38
+ - Mean docking reduction fraction: `0.9606`
39
+ - Mean quality loss at stop: `0.4644`
40
+ - HADDOCK integration mode: `real-haddock3-rescore-calibration`
41
+
42
+ ## Overnight Stop-Model Pass
43
+ - Added formal stop-model comparison: percentile-target, regret-constrained, utility-maximizing, hybrid.
44
+ - Added objective-function comparison across regularized objective set.
45
+ - Added Dataset E and cross-dataset robustness update (A/B/C/D/E).
46
+ - Recommended stop model: `percentile_target`
47
+ - Recommended objective: `hybrid_objective`
48
+ - Recommended budget region: `[100, 2500]`
49
+ - HADDOCK role: `optional shortlist`
50
+ - rDock adequacy status: `mixed_or_weak_on_multiple_targets`
results/project_synthesis_report_updated.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Project Synthesis Report
2
+
3
+ ## 1. Project Evolution
4
+ - Started from strict real-rDock validation and backend hardening.
5
+ - Added adaptive scheduling, feature-rich surrogate logic, and fairness controls.
6
+ - Repaired mislabeled PPI benchmark into explicit peptide-like sanity modality.
7
+ - Added policy repair benchmark to diagnose hard-stop underperformance.
8
+
9
+ ## 2. What Worked
10
+ - Strict real-rDock provenance and no-fallback enforcement proved stable on small-molecule tracks.
11
+ - Adaptive policy without aggressive early stop generally improved early hit concentration.
12
+ - Disk guard and thread fairness were consistently auditable.
13
+
14
+ ## 3. What Failed / Was Repaired
15
+ - Hard-stop variants tended to terminate too early and lose top-hit recovery.
16
+ - PPI benchmark semantics were corrected from small-molecule misuse to peptide-like proxy sanity check.
17
+
18
+ ## 4. Current Best Policy
19
+ - From budget benchmark: `adaptive_no_stop` at budget `5000` and time_importance `0.5`.
20
+
21
+ ## 5. Practical Implications
22
+ - Budgeted adaptive ordering can improve quality-per-docking and quality-per-time over naive baselines.
23
+ - The value is strongest when policy and stopping control avoid premature convergence.
24
+
25
+ ## 6. Remaining Uncertainty
26
+ - Transferability across broader chemistry/target classes remains partially open.
27
+ - Absolute runtime on workstation limits confidence for very large-scale production screening.
28
+
29
+ ## 7. Next Steps
30
+ - Run selected policy on server-scale hardware with larger target panel and replicated seeds.
31
+ - Add robust confidence intervals for budget-frontier decisions across targets.
32
+
33
+ ## Epsilon-Regret Correction Pass
34
+ - Previous benchmark logic was dominated by ordering-only comparisons; this pass re-centered on cost-efficiency.
35
+ - New endpoint: early stop under epsilon-quality tolerance relative to exhaustive reference.
36
+ - Selected best strategy: `adaptive_budgeted_regret_stop`
37
+ - Selected best backend branch: `rdock`
38
+ - Mean docking reduction fraction: `0.9606`
39
+ - Mean quality loss at stop: `0.4644`
40
+ - HADDOCK integration mode: `real-haddock3-rescore-calibration`
results/project_synthesis_tables.csv ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ stage,metric,value,source
2
+ discovery_benchmark,target,MDM2,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
3
+ discovery_benchmark,reference_ligand,ref_nutlin3a,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
4
+ discovery_benchmark,final_ligand_count,7500,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
5
+ discovery_benchmark,database_fraction,1.0,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
6
+ discovery_benchmark,generated_fraction,0.0,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
7
+ discovery_benchmark,shuffle_seed,424242,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
8
+ discovery_benchmark,reference_present,True,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
9
+ discovery_benchmark,completed_runs,23,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
10
+ discovery_benchmark,real_rdock_only,True,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
11
+ discovery_benchmark,system_threads,14,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
12
+ discovery_benchmark,threads_used,10,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
13
+ discovery_benchmark,thread_policy,auto-minus-4,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
14
+ discovery_benchmark,timing_fairness_same_threads,True,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/discovery_benchmark/summary.json
15
+ policy_repair_benchmark,target,MDM2,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
16
+ policy_repair_benchmark,reference_id,ref_nutlin3a,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
17
+ policy_repair_benchmark,shared_library_size,7500,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
18
+ policy_repair_benchmark,reference_present,True,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
19
+ policy_repair_benchmark,real_rdock_only,True,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
20
+ policy_repair_benchmark,system_threads,14,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
21
+ policy_repair_benchmark,threads_used,10,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
22
+ policy_repair_benchmark,thread_policy,auto-minus-4,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
23
+ policy_repair_benchmark,adaptive_hard_stop_evaluated,786.0,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
24
+ policy_repair_benchmark,adaptive_soft_stop_evaluated,1298.0,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
25
+ policy_repair_benchmark,adaptive_no_stop_evaluated,7500.0,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
26
+ policy_repair_benchmark,adaptive_cluster_bootstrap_evaluated,608.0,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
27
+ policy_repair_benchmark,adaptive_soft_stop_cluster_floor_evaluated,3547.0,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
28
+ policy_repair_benchmark,hard_stop_top10_in_first20pct,0.17197452229299362,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
29
+ policy_repair_benchmark,soft_stop_top10_in_first20pct,0.19305019305019305,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
30
+ policy_repair_benchmark,soft_stop_cluster_floor_top10_in_first20pct,0.12411847672778561,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
31
+ policy_repair_benchmark,no_stop_top10_in_first20pct,0.22866666666666666,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
32
+ policy_repair_benchmark,cluster_bootstrap_top10_in_first20pct,0.1652892561983471,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
33
+ policy_repair_benchmark,naive_mean_top10_in_first20pct,0.09986666666666669,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
34
+ policy_repair_benchmark,cluster_naive_mean_top10_in_first20pct,0.12973333333333334,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/policy_repair_benchmark/summary.json
35
+ ppi_benchmark,benchmark_type,peptide_like,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
36
+ ppi_benchmark,backend_semantics,sequence_structural_proxy,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
37
+ ppi_benchmark,target,MDM2,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
38
+ ppi_benchmark,reference_complex_pdb,1YCR,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
39
+ ppi_benchmark,receptor_chain_id,A,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
40
+ ppi_benchmark,peptide_chain_id,B,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
41
+ ppi_benchmark,ligand_count,50,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
42
+ ppi_benchmark,successful_docked_count,50,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
43
+ ppi_benchmark,reference_rank,1,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
44
+ ppi_benchmark,top10_mean_identity_to_ref,0.9384615384615385,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
45
+ ppi_benchmark,real_rdock_only_successful_rows,False,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
46
+ ppi_benchmark,proxy_backend_only,True,/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark/summary.json
47
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,dataset_A_target,EGFR,in-memory
48
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,dataset_A_reference,IRE,in-memory
49
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,dataset_A_library_size,9998,in-memory
50
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,dataset_B_target,ABL1,in-memory
51
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,dataset_B_reference,STI,in-memory
52
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,dataset_B_library_size,9994,in-memory
53
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,selected_policy,adaptive_no_stop,in-memory
54
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,selected_budget,5000,in-memory
55
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,selected_time_importance,0.5,in-memory
56
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,threads_used,10,in-memory
57
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,system_threads,14,in-memory
58
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,real_rdock_only_A,True,in-memory
59
+ budget_efficiency_benchmark,real_rdock_only_B,True,in-memory
results/stage1_code_unification_summary.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Stage 1: Code Unification Summary
2
+
3
+ - Unified runner added: `pipeline/run_benchmark.py`.
4
+ - Central thread fairness policy added: `libs/benchmark/runtime.py`.
5
+ - Dynamic threshold/early-stop controller added: `libs/adaptive/thresholding.py`.
6
+ - Legacy artifact cleanup utilities added: `libs/benchmark/cleanup.py` and `pipeline/cleanup_legacy_results.py`.
7
+ - Large benchmark hardened with fairness accounting, threshold logs, discovery metrics, and statistical tables.
8
+
9
+ Thread fairness:
10
+ - policy: `auto-minus-4`
11
+ - system_threads: `14`
12
+ - threads_used: `10`
13
+
14
+ Tests:
15
+ - Full suite status: `python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -p 'test_*.py'` -> `36 passed, 0 failed`.
results/stage2_cleanup_summary.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Stage 2: Cleanup Summary
2
+
3
+ - Archived obsolete result directories: `1`
4
+ - Archive directory: `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/archive/20260415T211637Z`
5
+
6
+ Archived items:
7
+ - `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/demo_run` (obsolete_or_legacy_result_artifact)
8
+
9
+ Current state:
10
+ - Active benchmark/result directories kept in place (`discovery_benchmark`, `large_benchmark`, `ppi_benchmark`, `smoke_test`, and archives under `results/archive/`).
results/stage3_ppi_summary.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Stage 3: PPI Benchmark Summary
2
+
3
+ - Output dir: `/Users/makardorohuntsev/docking_project/results/ppi_benchmark`
4
+ - Ligand count: `50`
5
+ - Successful docked count: `50`
6
+ - Reference rank: `10`
7
+ - Real rDock only (successful rows): `True`
results/stage4_discovery_benchmark_summary.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Stage 4: Discovery Benchmark Summary
2
+
3
+ - Target: `MDM2`
4
+ - Final ligand count: `7500`
5
+ - Total replay runtime seconds: `98.65`
6
+ - system_threads: `14`
7
+ - threads_used: `10`
8
+ - thread fairness satisfied: `True`
9
+ - Real rDock only: `True`
10
+
11
+ ## Early Stop
12
+ - Stop decisions logged: `57`
13
+ - Stop triggered rows: `3`
14
+ - Last stop reason: `stagnation_above_dynamic_threshold` at round `18`
15
+
16
+ ## Time To Top-k (mean over seeds where discovered)
17
+ - Mode `docking_only`:
18
+ adaptive top-1: mean_step=`nan` mean_dockings=`nan` reached_fraction=`0.000`
19
+ adaptive top-2: mean_step=`nan` mean_dockings=`nan` reached_fraction=`0.000`
20
+ adaptive top-3: mean_step=`nan` mean_dockings=`nan` reached_fraction=`0.000`
21
+ adaptive top-5: mean_step=`nan` mean_dockings=`nan` reached_fraction=`0.000`
22
+ adaptive top-10: mean_step=`nan` mean_dockings=`nan` reached_fraction=`0.000`
23
+ naive_random top-1: mean_step=`3031.40` mean_dockings=`3032.40` reached_fraction=`1.000`
24
+ naive_random top-2: mean_step=`1601.80` mean_dockings=`1602.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
25
+ naive_random top-3: mean_step=`1383.60` mean_dockings=`1384.60` reached_fraction=`1.000`
26
+ naive_random top-5: mean_step=`1228.00` mean_dockings=`1229.00` reached_fraction=`1.000`
27
+ naive_random top-10: mean_step=`182.80` mean_dockings=`183.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
28
+ cluster_naive top-1: mean_step=`513.80` mean_dockings=`514.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
29
+ cluster_naive top-2: mean_step=`513.80` mean_dockings=`514.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
30
+ cluster_naive top-3: mean_step=`513.80` mean_dockings=`514.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
31
+ cluster_naive top-5: mean_step=`508.80` mean_dockings=`509.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
32
+ cluster_naive top-10: mean_step=`508.80` mean_dockings=`509.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
33
+ - Mode `full_feature`:
34
+ adaptive top-1: mean_step=`nan` mean_dockings=`nan` reached_fraction=`0.000`
35
+ adaptive top-2: mean_step=`nan` mean_dockings=`nan` reached_fraction=`0.000`
36
+ adaptive top-3: mean_step=`nan` mean_dockings=`nan` reached_fraction=`0.000`
37
+ adaptive top-5: mean_step=`nan` mean_dockings=`nan` reached_fraction=`0.000`
38
+ adaptive top-10: mean_step=`nan` mean_dockings=`nan` reached_fraction=`0.000`
39
+ naive_random top-1: mean_step=`3031.40` mean_dockings=`3032.40` reached_fraction=`1.000`
40
+ naive_random top-2: mean_step=`1601.80` mean_dockings=`1602.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
41
+ naive_random top-3: mean_step=`1383.60` mean_dockings=`1384.60` reached_fraction=`1.000`
42
+ naive_random top-5: mean_step=`1228.00` mean_dockings=`1229.00` reached_fraction=`1.000`
43
+ naive_random top-10: mean_step=`182.80` mean_dockings=`183.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
44
+ cluster_naive top-1: mean_step=`513.80` mean_dockings=`514.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
45
+ cluster_naive top-2: mean_step=`513.80` mean_dockings=`514.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
46
+ cluster_naive top-3: mean_step=`513.80` mean_dockings=`514.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
47
+ cluster_naive top-5: mean_step=`508.80` mean_dockings=`509.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
48
+ cluster_naive top-10: mean_step=`508.80` mean_dockings=`509.80` reached_fraction=`1.000`
49
+
50
+ ## Adaptive vs Baselines (run_metrics)
51
+ - mode=docking_only metric=best_docking_score:
52
+ adaptive: mean=`-19.094200` std=`0.000000`
53
+ cluster_naive: mean=`-30.320700` std=`0.000000`
54
+ naive_random: mean=`-30.320700` std=`0.000000`
55
+ - mode=docking_only metric=best_final_score:
56
+ adaptive: mean=`-19.059859` std=`0.048565`
57
+ cluster_naive: mean=`-30.320700` std=`0.000000`
58
+ naive_random: mean=`-30.320700` std=`0.000000`
59
+ - mode=docking_only metric=top10_in_first10pct:
60
+ adaptive: mean=`0.066667` std=`0.000000`
61
+ cluster_naive: mean=`0.128533` std=`0.008198`
62
+ naive_random: mean=`0.097600` std=`0.013901`
63
+ - mode=docking_only metric=top10_in_first20pct:
64
+ adaptive: mean=`0.066116` std=`0.000000`
65
+ cluster_naive: mean=`0.129733` std=`0.022329`
66
+ naive_random: mean=`0.099867` std=`0.006539`
67
+ - mode=docking_only metric=best_score_so_far_auc:
68
+ adaptive: mean=`-8579.375846` std=`0.000000`
69
+ cluster_naive: mean=`-219759.448932` std=`6179.372334`
70
+ naive_random: mean=`-207727.899538` std=`14967.993309`
71
+ - mode=full_feature metric=best_docking_score:
72
+ adaptive: mean=`-17.186500` std=`nan`
73
+ cluster_naive: mean=`-30.320700` std=`0.000000`
74
+ naive_random: mean=`-30.320700` std=`0.000000`
75
+ - mode=full_feature metric=best_final_score:
76
+ adaptive: mean=`-21.414036` std=`nan`
77
+ cluster_naive: mean=`-33.352770` std=`0.000000`
78
+ naive_random: mean=`-33.352770` std=`0.000000`
79
+ - mode=full_feature metric=top10_in_first10pct:
80
+ adaptive: mean=`0.050000` std=`nan`
81
+ cluster_naive: mean=`0.128533` std=`0.008198`
82
+ naive_random: mean=`0.097600` std=`0.013901`
83
+ - mode=full_feature metric=top10_in_first20pct:
84
+ adaptive: mean=`0.049587` std=`nan`
85
+ cluster_naive: mean=`0.129733` std=`0.022329`
86
+ naive_random: mean=`0.099867` std=`0.006539`
87
+ - mode=full_feature metric=best_score_so_far_auc:
88
+ adaptive: mean=`-7864.257404` std=`nan`
89
+ cluster_naive: mean=`-219759.448932` std=`6179.372334`
90
+ naive_random: mean=`-207727.899538` std=`14967.993309`
91
+
92
+ ## Significance / Effect Size (adaptive vs baselines)
93
+ - mode=docking_only metric=best_final_score adaptive vs naive_random: p=`0.0297272` U=`10.000`
94
+ - mode=docking_only metric=top10_in_first10pct adaptive vs naive_random: p=`0.0786429` U=`0.000`
95
+ - mode=docking_only metric=top10_in_first20pct adaptive vs naive_random: p=`0.075927` U=`0.000`
96
+ - mode=docking_only metric=best_final_score adaptive vs cluster_naive: p=`0.0297272` U=`10.000`
97
+ - mode=docking_only metric=top10_in_first10pct adaptive vs cluster_naive: p=`0.0786429` U=`0.000`
98
+ - mode=docking_only metric=top10_in_first20pct adaptive vs cluster_naive: p=`0.0786429` U=`0.000`
99
+ - mode=full_feature metric=best_final_score adaptive vs naive_random: p=`0.0736383` U=`5.000`
100
+ - mode=full_feature metric=top10_in_first10pct adaptive vs naive_random: p=`0.333333` U=`0.000`
101
+ - mode=full_feature metric=top10_in_first20pct adaptive vs naive_random: p=`0.234764` U=`0.000`
102
+ - mode=full_feature metric=best_final_score adaptive vs cluster_naive: p=`0.0736383` U=`5.000`
103
+ - mode=full_feature metric=top10_in_first10pct adaptive vs cluster_naive: p=`0.333333` U=`0.000`
104
+ - mode=full_feature metric=top10_in_first20pct adaptive vs cluster_naive: p=`0.333333` U=`0.000`
105
+ - mode=docking_only metric=best_final_score cliffs_delta=`1.0000` mean_adaptive=`-19.059859` mean_naive_random=`-30.320700`
106
+ - mode=docking_only metric=top10_in_first10pct cliffs_delta=`-1.0000` mean_adaptive=`0.066667` mean_naive_random=`0.097600`
107
+ - mode=docking_only metric=top10_in_first20pct cliffs_delta=`-1.0000` mean_adaptive=`0.066116` mean_naive_random=`0.099867`
108
+ - mode=docking_only metric=best_final_score cliffs_delta=`1.0000` mean_adaptive=`-19.059859` mean_cluster_naive=`-30.320700`
109
+ - mode=docking_only metric=top10_in_first10pct cliffs_delta=`-1.0000` mean_adaptive=`0.066667` mean_cluster_naive=`0.128533`
110
+ - mode=docking_only metric=top10_in_first20pct cliffs_delta=`-1.0000` mean_adaptive=`0.066116` mean_cluster_naive=`0.129733`
111
+ - mode=full_feature metric=best_final_score cliffs_delta=`1.0000` mean_adaptive=`-21.414036` mean_naive_random=`-33.352770`
112
+ - mode=full_feature metric=top10_in_first10pct cliffs_delta=`-1.0000` mean_adaptive=`0.050000` mean_naive_random=`0.097600`
113
+ - mode=full_feature metric=top10_in_first20pct cliffs_delta=`-1.0000` mean_adaptive=`0.049587` mean_naive_random=`0.099867`
114
+ - mode=full_feature metric=best_final_score cliffs_delta=`1.0000` mean_adaptive=`-21.414036` mean_cluster_naive=`-33.352770`
115
+ - mode=full_feature metric=top10_in_first10pct cliffs_delta=`-1.0000` mean_adaptive=`0.050000` mean_cluster_naive=`0.128533`
116
+ - mode=full_feature metric=top10_in_first20pct cliffs_delta=`-1.0000` mean_adaptive=`0.049587` mean_cluster_naive=`0.129733`
tests/__init__.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
 
 
1
+ """Test package for adaptive docking pipeline."""
tests/test_backend_comparison_semantics.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import unittest
4
+
5
+ import pandas as pd
6
+
7
+ from libs.docking.comparison import build_backend_comparison_table
8
+
9
+
10
+ class TestBackendComparisonSemantics(unittest.TestCase):
11
+ def test_mixed_backend_disables_direct_raw_comparison(self) -> None:
12
+ df = pd.DataFrame(
13
+ [
14
+ {
15
+ "ligand_id": "l1",
16
+ "backend_name": "rdock",
17
+ "backend_mode": "real-rdock",
18
+ "docking_score": -8.0,
19
+ "raw_output_file": "a",
20
+ "parsed_from": "a::SCORE",
21
+ },
22
+ {
23
+ "ligand_id": "l1",
24
+ "backend_name": "haddock",
25
+ "backend_mode": "real-haddock3-rescore",
26
+ "docking_score": -12.0,
27
+ "raw_output_file": "b",
28
+ "parsed_from": "b::HADDOCK",
29
+ },
30
+ ]
31
+ )
32
+ out = build_backend_comparison_table(df)
33
+ self.assertEqual(out.shape[0], 2)
34
+ self.assertFalse(bool(out["direct_comparison_justified"].all()))
35
+
36
+
37
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
38
+ unittest.main()
39
+
tests/test_backend_diagnostic_logic.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import tempfile
4
+ import unittest
5
+ from pathlib import Path
6
+
7
+ import numpy as np
8
+ import pandas as pd
9
+
10
+ from libs.analysis.backend_diagnostic import (
11
+ REQUIRED_BACKEND_COMPARISON_COLUMNS,
12
+ REQUIRED_POCKET_PREP_COLUMNS,
13
+ REQUIRED_REFERENCE_DIAG_COLUMNS,
14
+ compute_rank_percentile,
15
+ manual_agents_check,
16
+ recommend_toolchain,
17
+ select_suspicious_datasets,
18
+ validate_required_columns,
19
+ )
20
+
21
+
22
+ class TestBackendDiagnosticLogic(unittest.TestCase):
23
+ def test_manual_agents_check_exists(self) -> None:
24
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
25
+ p = Path(tmp) / "AGENTS.md"
26
+ p.write_text("x", encoding="utf-8")
27
+ out = manual_agents_check(p, manually_read=True)
28
+ self.assertTrue(out.exists)
29
+ self.assertTrue(out.manually_read)
30
+ self.assertEqual(Path(out.path), p.resolve())
31
+
32
+ def test_compute_rank_percentile(self) -> None:
33
+ df = pd.DataFrame(
34
+ {
35
+ "ligand_id": ["a", "b", "c", "d"],
36
+ "score": [5.0, 1.0, 3.0, 2.0],
37
+ }
38
+ )
39
+ # sorted lower-better: b,d,c,a -> c rank 3/4 => 75%
40
+ pct = compute_rank_percentile(df, "c", "score", lower_is_better=True)
41
+ self.assertAlmostEqual(pct, 75.0, places=6)
42
+
43
+ def test_select_suspicious(self) -> None:
44
+ d = pd.DataFrame(
45
+ {
46
+ "dataset": ["A", "B", "C", "D"],
47
+ "reference_ligand_rank_percentile": [10.0, 55.0, 25.0, 80.0],
48
+ }
49
+ )
50
+ out = select_suspicious_datasets(d, threshold_pct=30.0, max_deep=2)
51
+ self.assertEqual(out, ["D", "B"])
52
+
53
+ def test_validate_required_columns(self) -> None:
54
+ d = pd.DataFrame({"a": [1], "b": [2]})
55
+ missing = validate_required_columns(d, ["a", "x"])
56
+ self.assertEqual(missing, ["x"])
57
+
58
+ def test_recommend_toolchain_runtime_penalty(self) -> None:
59
+ b = pd.DataFrame(
60
+ [
61
+ {
62
+ "dataset": "A",
63
+ "backend": "vina",
64
+ "analysis_scope": "subset_default",
65
+ "available": True,
66
+ "runtime_per_ligand": 3.0,
67
+ "reference_ligand_rank_percentile": 10.0,
68
+ },
69
+ {
70
+ "dataset": "A",
71
+ "backend": "rdock",
72
+ "analysis_scope": "subset_default",
73
+ "available": True,
74
+ "runtime_per_ligand": 1.0,
75
+ "reference_ligand_rank_percentile": 12.0,
76
+ },
77
+ ]
78
+ )
79
+ p = pd.DataFrame(
80
+ [
81
+ {
82
+ "dataset": "A",
83
+ "backend": "rdock",
84
+ "pocket_variant": "default",
85
+ "prep_variant": "default",
86
+ "reference_ligand_score": 5.0,
87
+ },
88
+ {
89
+ "dataset": "A",
90
+ "backend": "rdock",
91
+ "pocket_variant": "expanded",
92
+ "prep_variant": "tautomer",
93
+ "reference_ligand_score": 4.7,
94
+ },
95
+ ]
96
+ )
97
+ out = recommend_toolchain(b, p)
98
+ self.assertEqual(out["recommended_main_backend"], "rdock")
99
+ self.assertIn("candidate_backend_too_slow_vs_rdock", out["evidence"])
100
+
101
+ def test_required_schema_constants_nonempty(self) -> None:
102
+ self.assertGreater(len(REQUIRED_REFERENCE_DIAG_COLUMNS), 0)
103
+ self.assertGreater(len(REQUIRED_BACKEND_COMPARISON_COLUMNS), 0)
104
+ self.assertGreater(len(REQUIRED_POCKET_PREP_COLUMNS), 0)
105
+
106
+
107
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
108
+ unittest.main()
tests/test_benchmark_outputs.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import tempfile
4
+ import unittest
5
+ from pathlib import Path
6
+
7
+ import yaml
8
+
9
+ from pipeline.run_experimental_benchmark import run_benchmark
10
+
11
+
12
+ class TestBenchmarkOutputs(unittest.TestCase):
13
+ def test_benchmark_outputs_exist_in_tiny_run(self) -> None:
14
+ cfg = yaml.safe_load(Path("configs/experimental_benchmark.yaml").read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
15
+ cfg["run"]["adaptive_budget"] = 4
16
+ cfg["run"]["baseline_budget"] = 4
17
+ cfg["run"]["batch_size"] = 2
18
+ cfg["run"]["max_batches"] = 2
19
+ cfg["run"]["dataset_subset_size"] = 120
20
+
21
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmpdir:
22
+ cfg["run"]["output_dir"] = str(Path(tmpdir) / "benchmark_tiny")
23
+ cfg_path = Path(tmpdir) / "benchmark_tiny.yaml"
24
+ cfg_path.write_text(yaml.safe_dump(cfg), encoding="utf-8")
25
+
26
+ result = run_benchmark(cfg_path)
27
+ out = Path(result["output_dir"])
28
+
29
+ required = [
30
+ "summary.json",
31
+ "final_ranking.csv",
32
+ "reference_recovery.csv",
33
+ "reference_comparison.csv",
34
+ "baseline_comparison.csv",
35
+ "parsed_scores.csv",
36
+ "feature_importance.json",
37
+ "self_audit_report.md",
38
+ ]
39
+ for name in required:
40
+ self.assertTrue((out / name).exists(), f"Missing output: {name}")
41
+
42
+
43
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
44
+ unittest.main()
tests/test_budget_efficiency_helpers.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import json
4
+ import tempfile
5
+ import unittest
6
+ from pathlib import Path
7
+
8
+ import pandas as pd
9
+
10
+ from libs.adaptive.policies import PrioritizationPolicy
11
+ from libs.benchmark.budget_efficiency import (
12
+ clamp_time_importance,
13
+ controls_from_time_importance,
14
+ required_budget_metric_columns,
15
+ select_best_policy_budget,
16
+ validate_budget_metric_schema,
17
+ )
18
+ from pipeline.run_budget_efficiency_benchmark import _project_synthesis, _self_audit
19
+
20
+
21
+ class TestBudgetEfficiencyHelpers(unittest.TestCase):
22
+ def test_time_importance_clamp(self) -> None:
23
+ self.assertEqual(clamp_time_importance(-0.1), 0.0)
24
+ self.assertEqual(clamp_time_importance(1.5), 1.0)
25
+ self.assertEqual(clamp_time_importance(0.25), 0.25)
26
+
27
+ def test_time_importance_controls_shift(self) -> None:
28
+ base = PrioritizationPolicy()
29
+ low = controls_from_time_importance(base, exploration_boost=0.1, time_importance=0.0)
30
+ high = controls_from_time_importance(base, exploration_boost=0.1, time_importance=1.0)
31
+ self.assertGreaterEqual(high.utility_weight, low.utility_weight)
32
+ self.assertLessEqual(high.uncertainty_weight, low.uncertainty_weight)
33
+ self.assertLessEqual(high.diversity_weight, low.diversity_weight)
34
+ self.assertLessEqual(high.threshold_stop_shift, 0.0)
35
+
36
+ def test_schema_validation(self) -> None:
37
+ cols = required_budget_metric_columns()
38
+ df = pd.DataFrame([{c: 0 for c in cols}])
39
+ missing = validate_budget_metric_schema(df)
40
+ self.assertEqual(missing, [])
41
+
42
+ def test_policy_selection(self) -> None:
43
+ df = pd.DataFrame(
44
+ [
45
+ {
46
+ "dataset": "A",
47
+ "strategy": "adaptive_soft_stop",
48
+ "strategy_group": "adaptive",
49
+ "budget": 500,
50
+ "time_importance": 0.5,
51
+ "top10_recovery_fraction": 0.2,
52
+ "top50_recovery_fraction": 0.15,
53
+ "top100_recovery_fraction": 0.10,
54
+ "best_docking_score": -8.0,
55
+ "best_final_score": -9.0,
56
+ "dockings_performed": 500,
57
+ "wall_time_seconds": 10.0,
58
+ "quality_per_time": 0.010,
59
+ "quality_per_docking": 0.0002,
60
+ "auc_best_score_so_far": -100.0,
61
+ },
62
+ {
63
+ "dataset": "A",
64
+ "strategy": "adaptive_no_stop",
65
+ "strategy_group": "adaptive",
66
+ "budget": 500,
67
+ "time_importance": 0.5,
68
+ "top10_recovery_fraction": 0.4,
69
+ "top50_recovery_fraction": 0.30,
70
+ "top100_recovery_fraction": 0.20,
71
+ "best_docking_score": -9.0,
72
+ "best_final_score": -10.0,
73
+ "dockings_performed": 500,
74
+ "wall_time_seconds": 9.0,
75
+ "quality_per_time": 0.022,
76
+ "quality_per_docking": 0.0004,
77
+ "auc_best_score_so_far": -150.0,
78
+ },
79
+ ]
80
+ )
81
+ selected = select_best_policy_budget(df)
82
+ self.assertEqual(str(selected["strategy"]), "adaptive_no_stop")
83
+
84
+
85
+ class TestSynthesisAndAuditSchemas(unittest.TestCase):
86
+ def test_project_synthesis_outputs(self) -> None:
87
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
88
+ root = Path(tmp)
89
+ results = root / "results"
90
+ results.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
91
+ # seed minimal legacy summaries expected by synthesis collector
92
+ for d in ["discovery_benchmark", "policy_repair_benchmark", "ppi_benchmark"]:
93
+ p = results / d
94
+ p.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
95
+ (p / "summary.json").write_text(json.dumps({"ok": True, "value": 1}), encoding="utf-8")
96
+ out = results / "budget_efficiency_benchmark"
97
+ out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
98
+ tables, index, report = _project_synthesis(out, {"selected_policy": "adaptive_no_stop", "selected_budget": 500})
99
+ self.assertTrue(tables.exists())
100
+ self.assertTrue(index.exists())
101
+ self.assertTrue(report.exists())
102
+
103
+ def test_self_audit_schema(self) -> None:
104
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
105
+ root = Path(tmp)
106
+ results = root / "results"
107
+ results.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
108
+ (results / "discovery_benchmark").mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
109
+ (results / "discovery_benchmark" / "summary.json").write_text(json.dumps({"ok": True}), encoding="utf-8")
110
+
111
+ out = results / "budget_efficiency_benchmark"
112
+ out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
113
+ policy_sel = out / "policy_selection.md"
114
+ policy_sel.write_text("ok", encoding="utf-8")
115
+ consistency = out / "cross_dataset_consistency.csv"
116
+ pd.DataFrame([{"x": 1}]).to_csv(consistency, index=False)
117
+ syn1 = out / "s1.md"
118
+ syn2 = out / "s2.md"
119
+ syn3 = out / "s3.md"
120
+ for s in [syn1, syn2, syn3]:
121
+ s.write_text("ok", encoding="utf-8")
122
+
123
+ d_a = root / "data" / "ligands" / "A"
124
+ d_b = root / "data" / "ligands" / "B"
125
+ d_a.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
126
+ d_b.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
127
+ pd.DataFrame([{"is_reference": True}]).to_csv(d_a / "shared_library_shuffled.csv", index=False)
128
+ pd.DataFrame([{"is_reference": True}]).to_csv(d_b / "shared_library_shuffled.csv", index=False)
129
+
130
+ manifest = pd.DataFrame([{"threads_used": 10}, {"threads_used": 10}])
131
+ metrics = pd.DataFrame([{"budget": 100}, {"budget": 500}, {"budget": 2500}, {"budget": 5000}, {"budget": 10000}])
132
+ path = _self_audit(
133
+ output_root=out,
134
+ dataset_a_cfg={"protein_name": "EGFR", "benchmark_dataset": {"output_dir": str(d_a.relative_to(root))}},
135
+ dataset_b_cfg={"protein_name": "ABL1", "benchmark_dataset": {"output_dir": str(d_b.relative_to(root))}},
136
+ metrics_a=metrics,
137
+ metrics_b=metrics,
138
+ policy_selection_path=policy_sel,
139
+ consistency_path=consistency,
140
+ synthesis_paths=[syn1, syn2, syn3],
141
+ run_manifest=manifest,
142
+ repo_root=root,
143
+ )
144
+ self.assertTrue(path.exists())
145
+
146
+
147
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
148
+ unittest.main()
tests/test_cleanup_logic.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import tempfile
4
+ import unittest
5
+ from pathlib import Path
6
+
7
+ from libs.benchmark.cleanup import execute_results_cleanup, plan_results_cleanup
8
+
9
+
10
+ class TestCleanupLogic(unittest.TestCase):
11
+ def test_plan_and_execute_archive(self) -> None:
12
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
13
+ root = Path(tmp) / "results"
14
+ root.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
15
+ (root / "legacy_old").mkdir()
16
+ (root / "large_benchmark").mkdir()
17
+ (root / "smoke_test").mkdir()
18
+
19
+ plan = plan_results_cleanup(root)
20
+ names = [item.path.name for item in plan]
21
+ self.assertIn("legacy_old", names)
22
+ self.assertNotIn("large_benchmark", names)
23
+
24
+ archive = execute_results_cleanup(root, plan)
25
+ self.assertTrue(archive.exists())
26
+ self.assertFalse((root / "legacy_old").exists())
27
+
28
+
29
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
30
+ unittest.main()
31
+
tests/test_clustering.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import unittest
4
+
5
+ import numpy as np
6
+
7
+ from libs.adaptive.clustering import cluster_ligands_butina
8
+ from libs.adaptive.hyperclustering import hypercluster_representatives
9
+
10
+
11
+ class TestClustering(unittest.TestCase):
12
+ def test_butina_and_hyperclustering(self) -> None:
13
+ ligand_ids = [f"l{i}" for i in range(12)]
14
+ fps = [np.random.randint(0, 2, 128) for _ in ligand_ids]
15
+ cluster_map = cluster_ligands_butina(ligand_ids, fps, cutoff=0.7)
16
+ self.assertEqual(set(cluster_map.keys()), set(ligand_ids))
17
+
18
+ reps = {}
19
+ for lid, cid in cluster_map.items():
20
+ reps.setdefault(cid, []).append(np.random.rand(32))
21
+ reps_mean = {cid: np.mean(np.vstack(vecs), axis=0) for cid, vecs in reps.items()}
22
+ hyper = hypercluster_representatives(reps_mean)
23
+
24
+ self.assertEqual(set(hyper.keys()), set(reps_mean.keys()))
25
+
26
+
27
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
28
+ unittest.main()
tests/test_dataset_reuse_logic.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import tempfile
4
+ import unittest
5
+ from pathlib import Path
6
+
7
+ from libs.benchmark.reuse import validate_reuse_inputs
8
+
9
+
10
+ class TestDatasetReuseLogic(unittest.TestCase):
11
+ def test_reuse_check_ok(self) -> None:
12
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
13
+ root = Path(tmp)
14
+ a = root / "a.txt"
15
+ b = root / "b.txt"
16
+ a.write_text("x", encoding="utf-8")
17
+ b.write_text("y", encoding="utf-8")
18
+ check = validate_reuse_inputs([a, b])
19
+ self.assertTrue(check.ok)
20
+ self.assertEqual(check.missing, [])
21
+
22
+ def test_reuse_check_missing(self) -> None:
23
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
24
+ root = Path(tmp)
25
+ a = root / "a.txt"
26
+ a.write_text("x", encoding="utf-8")
27
+ check = validate_reuse_inputs([a, root / "missing.txt"])
28
+ self.assertFalse(check.ok)
29
+ self.assertEqual(len(check.missing), 1)
30
+
31
+
32
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
33
+ unittest.main()
34
+
tests/test_disk_guard.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import tempfile
4
+ import unittest
5
+ from pathlib import Path
6
+
7
+ from libs.benchmark.disk_guard import (
8
+ append_disk_snapshot,
9
+ requires_cleanup,
10
+ run_repository_local_cleanup,
11
+ snapshot_disk_state,
12
+ )
13
+
14
+
15
+ class TestDiskGuard(unittest.TestCase):
16
+ def test_snapshot_and_cleanup_decision(self) -> None:
17
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
18
+ root = Path(tmp)
19
+ snap = snapshot_disk_state(root, stage="t", note="n", projected_output_gb=0.1)
20
+ self.assertGreater(snap.free_gb, 0.0)
21
+ self.assertGreaterEqual(snap.projected_free_after_gb, 0.0)
22
+ csv_path = root / "snap.csv"
23
+ append_disk_snapshot(csv_path, snap)
24
+ self.assertTrue(csv_path.exists() and csv_path.stat().st_size > 0)
25
+ self.assertIsInstance(requires_cleanup(snap, min_free_gb=1000.0), bool)
26
+
27
+ def test_cleanup_stays_repo_local(self) -> None:
28
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
29
+ repo = Path(tmp) / "repo"
30
+ results = repo / "results"
31
+ results.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
32
+ run_dir = results / "run_x"
33
+ replay = run_dir / "replay_cache"
34
+ replay.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
35
+ (run_dir / "summary.json").write_text("{}", encoding="utf-8")
36
+ (replay / "a.txt").write_text("x" * 1024, encoding="utf-8")
37
+ raw = run_dir / "raw_rdock_outputs"
38
+ for i in range(10):
39
+ b = raw / f"batch_{i:03d}"
40
+ b.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
41
+ (b / "f.txt").write_text("x", encoding="utf-8")
42
+
43
+ actions = run_repository_local_cleanup(repo, results_dir=results, keep_raw_batches=3)
44
+ self.assertTrue(actions)
45
+ # replay cache should be removed
46
+ self.assertFalse(replay.exists())
47
+ # raw batches should be pruned
48
+ kept = [p for p in raw.iterdir() if p.is_dir()]
49
+ self.assertLessEqual(len(kept), 3)
50
+
51
+
52
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
53
+ unittest.main()
54
+
tests/test_docking_mode_filter.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import unittest
4
+
5
+ import pandas as pd
6
+
7
+ from pipeline.run_experimental_benchmark import _filter_mode_feature_tables
8
+
9
+
10
+ class TestDockingModeFilter(unittest.TestCase):
11
+ def test_docking_only_keeps_rdock_and_cluster_channels(self) -> None:
12
+ values = pd.DataFrame(
13
+ [
14
+ {
15
+ "ligand_id": "L1",
16
+ "cluster_id_feature": 1.0,
17
+ "hypercluster_id_feature": 0.0,
18
+ "rdock_total_score": -10.0,
19
+ "mean_top3_pose_score": -9.8,
20
+ "ligand_logp": 2.1,
21
+ }
22
+ ]
23
+ )
24
+ masks = pd.DataFrame(
25
+ [
26
+ {
27
+ "ligand_id": "L1",
28
+ "mask_cluster_id_feature": 1,
29
+ "mask_hypercluster_id_feature": 1,
30
+ "mask_rdock_total_score": 1,
31
+ "mask_mean_top3_pose_score": 1,
32
+ "mask_ligand_logp": 1,
33
+ }
34
+ ]
35
+ )
36
+ v, m = _filter_mode_feature_tables(values, masks, feature_mode="docking_only")
37
+ self.assertIn("cluster_id_feature", v.columns)
38
+ self.assertIn("rdock_total_score", v.columns)
39
+ self.assertNotIn("ligand_logp", v.columns)
40
+ self.assertIn("mask_rdock_total_score", m.columns)
41
+ self.assertNotIn("mask_ligand_logp", m.columns)
42
+
43
+
44
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
45
+ unittest.main()
46
+
tests/test_epsilon_regret_logic.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import unittest
4
+
5
+ from libs.adaptive.epsilon_regret import EpsilonRegretConfig, EpsilonRegretController
6
+
7
+
8
+ class TestEpsilonRegretController(unittest.TestCase):
9
+ def test_does_not_stop_before_min_budget(self) -> None:
10
+ ctrl = EpsilonRegretController(
11
+ EpsilonRegretConfig(
12
+ min_budget=5,
13
+ patience_rounds=1,
14
+ min_improvement=0.0,
15
+ min_cluster_coverage=0.0,
16
+ min_hypercluster_coverage=0.0,
17
+ min_model_weight=0.0,
18
+ )
19
+ )
20
+ rec = ctrl.update(
21
+ round_idx=0,
22
+ n_evaluated=2,
23
+ best_score_now=-10.0,
24
+ recent_scores=[-10.0, -10.0],
25
+ model_weight=1.0,
26
+ cluster_coverage=1.0,
27
+ hypercluster_coverage=1.0,
28
+ expected_remaining_scores=[-10.01],
29
+ uncertainty_scores=[0.0],
30
+ time_importance=0.5,
31
+ budget_cap=10,
32
+ )
33
+ self.assertFalse(bool(rec["stop"]))
34
+
35
+ def test_stops_when_remaining_gain_below_epsilon(self) -> None:
36
+ ctrl = EpsilonRegretController(
37
+ EpsilonRegretConfig(
38
+ epsilon_quality=0.10,
39
+ acceptable_regret=0.10,
40
+ min_budget=3,
41
+ patience_rounds=1,
42
+ min_improvement=0.0,
43
+ min_cluster_coverage=0.0,
44
+ min_hypercluster_coverage=0.0,
45
+ min_model_weight=0.0,
46
+ )
47
+ )
48
+ # round 1
49
+ ctrl.update(
50
+ round_idx=0,
51
+ n_evaluated=3,
52
+ best_score_now=-10.0,
53
+ recent_scores=[-10.0, -10.0],
54
+ model_weight=1.0,
55
+ cluster_coverage=1.0,
56
+ hypercluster_coverage=1.0,
57
+ expected_remaining_scores=[-10.2],
58
+ uncertainty_scores=[0.01],
59
+ time_importance=0.5,
60
+ budget_cap=20,
61
+ )
62
+ # round 2 with tiny expected gain
63
+ rec = ctrl.update(
64
+ round_idx=1,
65
+ n_evaluated=4,
66
+ best_score_now=-10.0,
67
+ recent_scores=[-10.0, -10.0],
68
+ model_weight=1.0,
69
+ cluster_coverage=1.0,
70
+ hypercluster_coverage=1.0,
71
+ expected_remaining_scores=[-10.01],
72
+ uncertainty_scores=[0.0],
73
+ time_importance=1.0,
74
+ budget_cap=20,
75
+ )
76
+ self.assertTrue(bool(rec["stop"]))
77
+ self.assertIn(str(rec["reason"]), {"epsilon_regret_stop", "max_budget_reached"})
78
+
79
+
80
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
81
+ unittest.main()
82
+
tests/test_feature_extraction.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import unittest
4
+
5
+ import numpy as np
6
+
7
+ from libs.adaptive.features import (
8
+ build_complex_feature_bundle,
9
+ build_ligand_feature_bundle,
10
+ build_protein_feature_bundle,
11
+ )
12
+
13
+
14
+ class TestFeatureExtraction(unittest.TestCase):
15
+ def test_ligand_protein_complex_feature_bundles(self) -> None:
16
+ fp = np.zeros(32, dtype=float)
17
+ fp[[1, 7, 13]] = 1.0
18
+
19
+ ligand = build_ligand_feature_bundle(
20
+ ligand_id="lig_a",
21
+ smiles="CCO",
22
+ fingerprint=fp,
23
+ reference_mol=None,
24
+ )
25
+ self.assertIn("ligand_mw", ligand.features)
26
+ self.assertIn("ligand_logp", ligand.features)
27
+ self.assertIn("morgan_fp_0001", ligand.features)
28
+ self.assertTrue(ligand.features["ligand_mw"].available)
29
+
30
+ protein = build_protein_feature_bundle(
31
+ target_id="target_x",
32
+ sequence_features={"seq_length": 100.0, "aa_frac_A": 0.1, "aa_frac_D": 0.1, "aa_frac_S": 0.1},
33
+ structure_features={"residue_count": 120.0, "mean_spatial_extent": 10.0, "pocket_residue_count": 20.0},
34
+ )
35
+ self.assertIn("pocket_volume_approx", protein.features)
36
+ self.assertTrue(protein.features["pocket_volume_approx"].available)
37
+
38
+ complex_bundle = build_complex_feature_bundle(
39
+ ligand_id="lig_a",
40
+ docking_score=-8.5,
41
+ interface_features={"interface_contact_proxy": 0.7, "hbond_proxy": 0.4, "shape_proxy": 0.3},
42
+ ligand_bundle=ligand,
43
+ protein_bundle=protein,
44
+ )
45
+ expected = [
46
+ "complex_contact_count",
47
+ "complex_hbond_proxy",
48
+ "complex_interaction_density",
49
+ "energy_contact_proxy",
50
+ "energy_interaction_decomposition",
51
+ ]
52
+ for name in expected:
53
+ self.assertIn(name, complex_bundle.features)
54
+ self.assertTrue(complex_bundle.features[name].available)
55
+
56
+
57
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
58
+ unittest.main()
tests/test_haddock_backend.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import unittest
4
+ from pathlib import Path
5
+
6
+ from libs.docking.backend_haddock import HADDOCKBackend
7
+ from libs.docking.base import DockingResult
8
+
9
+
10
+ class TestHADDOCKBackend(unittest.TestCase):
11
+ def test_capability_schema(self) -> None:
12
+ backend = HADDOCKBackend()
13
+ cap = backend.check_capability()
14
+ self.assertEqual(cap.backend_name, "haddock")
15
+ self.assertIn("mode", cap.details)
16
+ self.assertIn("score_semantics", cap.details)
17
+
18
+ def test_parse_results_provenance(self) -> None:
19
+ backend = HADDOCKBackend()
20
+ rows = backend.parse_results(
21
+ [
22
+ DockingResult(
23
+ ligand_id="lig_1",
24
+ docking_score=-12.34,
25
+ pose_path=Path("/tmp/pose.pdb"),
26
+ backend_name="haddock",
27
+ backend_mode="real-haddock3-rescore",
28
+ score_source="haddock3:emscoring",
29
+ raw_output_file="/tmp/stdout.log",
30
+ parsed_from="/tmp/stdout.log::HADDOCK-score (emscoring)",
31
+ fallback_used=False,
32
+ success=True,
33
+ )
34
+ ]
35
+ )
36
+ self.assertEqual(len(rows), 1)
37
+ self.assertEqual(rows[0]["quantity_type"], "energy_proxy")
38
+ self.assertEqual(rows[0]["backend_mode"], "real-haddock3-rescore")
39
+
40
+
41
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
42
+ unittest.main()
43
+
tests/test_large_plot_outputs.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import tempfile
4
+ import unittest
5
+ from pathlib import Path
6
+
7
+ import numpy as np
8
+ import pandas as pd
9
+
10
+ from pipeline.run_large_benchmark import _plot_large
11
+
12
+
13
+ class TestLargePlotOutputs(unittest.TestCase):
14
+ def test_required_plot_files_created(self) -> None:
15
+ rows = []
16
+ run_specs = [
17
+ ("adaptive_docking_only_top1", "adaptive", "docking_only", 1),
18
+ ("adaptive_docking_only", "adaptive", "docking_only", 1),
19
+ ("adaptive_full_feature", "adaptive", "full_feature", 1),
20
+ ("naive_docking_only_s11", "naive_random", "docking_only", 11),
21
+ ("naive_full_feature_s11", "naive_random", "full_feature", 11),
22
+ ("cluster_docking_only_s101", "cluster_naive", "docking_only", 101),
23
+ ("cluster_full_feature_s101", "cluster_naive", "full_feature", 101),
24
+ ]
25
+ for run_id, grp, mode, seed in run_specs:
26
+ for step in range(20):
27
+ rows.append(
28
+ {
29
+ "run_id": run_id,
30
+ "strategy": run_id,
31
+ "strategy_group": grp,
32
+ "mode": mode,
33
+ "seed": seed,
34
+ "step": step,
35
+ "docking_score": float(5 + step * 0.1 + (0.5 if grp == "naive_random" else 0.0)),
36
+ "final_score": float(4.5 + step * 0.1 + (0.5 if grp == "naive_random" else 0.0)),
37
+ "is_reference": step == 0,
38
+ "top_pose_rmsd_consistency": float(0.5 + 0.01 * step),
39
+ "replicate_score_variance": float(0.1 + 0.01 * step),
40
+ }
41
+ )
42
+ combined = pd.DataFrame(rows)
43
+ metrics = pd.DataFrame(
44
+ [
45
+ {
46
+ "run_id": "adaptive_docking_only_top1",
47
+ "strategy": "adaptive_docking_only_top1",
48
+ "strategy_group": "adaptive",
49
+ "mode": "docking_only",
50
+ "top10_in_first10pct": 0.2,
51
+ "top10_in_first20pct": 0.3,
52
+ "best_score_so_far_auc": -10.0,
53
+ },
54
+ {
55
+ "run_id": "adaptive_docking_only",
56
+ "strategy": "adaptive_docking_only",
57
+ "strategy_group": "adaptive",
58
+ "mode": "docking_only",
59
+ "top10_in_first10pct": 0.3,
60
+ "top10_in_first20pct": 0.4,
61
+ "best_score_so_far_auc": -12.0,
62
+ },
63
+ {
64
+ "run_id": "adaptive_full_feature",
65
+ "strategy": "adaptive_full_feature",
66
+ "strategy_group": "adaptive",
67
+ "mode": "full_feature",
68
+ "top10_in_first10pct": 0.35,
69
+ "top10_in_first20pct": 0.45,
70
+ "best_score_so_far_auc": -13.0,
71
+ },
72
+ ]
73
+ )
74
+ feature_importance = {"rdock_total_score": 0.2, "rdock_vdw_term": 0.1, "ligand_logp": 0.05}
75
+
76
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
77
+ out = Path(tmp)
78
+ paths = _plot_large(output_dir=out, combined=combined, metrics_df=metrics, feature_importance=feature_importance)
79
+ self.assertTrue(paths)
80
+ required = [
81
+ "selected_score_vs_step_docking_only.png",
82
+ "selected_score_vs_step_full_feature.png",
83
+ "rdock_top1_vs_multipose_top10.png",
84
+ "rdock_top1_vs_multipose_top20.png",
85
+ "rdock_feature_variant_comparison.png",
86
+ "rdock_pose_consistency_vs_score.png",
87
+ "rdock_replicate_stability_vs_score.png",
88
+ "rdock_native_feature_importance.png",
89
+ ]
90
+ for name in required:
91
+ p = out / "plots" / name
92
+ self.assertTrue(p.exists() and p.stat().st_size > 0, f"Missing/non-empty plot: {name}")
93
+
94
+
95
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
96
+ unittest.main()
97
+
tests/test_missing_features.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import unittest
4
+
5
+ import numpy as np
6
+
7
+ from libs.adaptive.features import FeatureBundle, FeatureValue, bundles_to_wide_frames
8
+
9
+
10
+ class TestMissingFeatures(unittest.TestCase):
11
+ def test_missing_features_are_masked_and_not_silent_zero(self) -> None:
12
+ b1 = FeatureBundle(
13
+ object_id="lig_1",
14
+ features={
15
+ "f_present": FeatureValue(value=1.5, available=True, source="test", feature_type="exact"),
16
+ "f_missing": FeatureValue(value=None, available=False, source="test", feature_type="proxy"),
17
+ },
18
+ )
19
+ b2 = FeatureBundle(
20
+ object_id="lig_2",
21
+ features={
22
+ "f_present": FeatureValue(value=2.5, available=True, source="test", feature_type="exact"),
23
+ "f_missing": FeatureValue(value=3.0, available=True, source="test", feature_type="proxy"),
24
+ },
25
+ )
26
+
27
+ values, masks, names = bundles_to_wide_frames([b1, b2])
28
+ self.assertIn("f_missing", names)
29
+
30
+ lig1 = values.loc[values["ligand_id"] == "lig_1"].iloc[0]
31
+ lig1_mask = masks.loc[masks["ligand_id"] == "lig_1"].iloc[0]
32
+
33
+ self.assertTrue(np.isnan(float(lig1["f_missing"])))
34
+ self.assertEqual(int(lig1_mask["mask_f_missing"]), 0)
35
+
36
+
37
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
38
+ unittest.main()
tests/test_model_masking.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import unittest
4
+
5
+ import numpy as np
6
+
7
+ from libs.adaptive.surrogate_model import SurrogateConfig, SurrogateModel
8
+
9
+
10
+ class TestModelMasking(unittest.TestCase):
11
+ def test_surrogate_accepts_feature_masks(self) -> None:
12
+ rng = np.random.default_rng(123)
13
+ n = 40
14
+ d = 6
15
+
16
+ x = rng.normal(size=(n, d))
17
+ m = np.ones((n, d), dtype=float)
18
+
19
+ # Explicitly mark one channel as missing in half of samples.
20
+ x[:20, 2] = np.nan
21
+ m[:20, 2] = 0.0
22
+
23
+ y = 0.8 * np.nan_to_num(x[:, 0], nan=0.0) - 0.2 * np.nan_to_num(x[:, 1], nan=0.0) + rng.normal(0, 0.05, n)
24
+
25
+ model = SurrogateModel(
26
+ SurrogateConfig(
27
+ prefer_xgboost=False,
28
+ n_estimators=80,
29
+ min_train_samples=8,
30
+ max_depth_small=3,
31
+ max_depth_large=4,
32
+ )
33
+ )
34
+
35
+ fit_stats = model.fit(
36
+ features=x,
37
+ masks=m,
38
+ y=y,
39
+ feature_names=[f"f{i}" for i in range(d)],
40
+ mask_names=[f"mask_f{i}" for i in range(d)],
41
+ )
42
+ self.assertGreaterEqual(fit_stats["n_train"], 8)
43
+
44
+ pred = model.predict_bundle(x[:5], m[:5])
45
+ self.assertEqual(pred["expected_score"].shape[0], 5)
46
+ self.assertTrue(np.isfinite(pred["expected_score"]).all())
47
+ self.assertTrue(np.isfinite(pred["uncertainty"]).all())
48
+
49
+
50
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
51
+ unittest.main()
tests/test_multifidelity_controls.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ from __future__ import annotations
2
+
3
+ import unittest
4
+
5
+ import pandas as pd
6
+
7
+ from libs.benchmark.multifidelity import (
8
+ ExplorationControls,
9
+ StoppingControls,
10
+ UncertaintyControls,
11
+ enforce_control_limits,
12
+ simulate_multifidelity_policy,
13
+ )
14
+
15
+
16
+ class TestMultifidelityControls(unittest.TestCase):
17
+ def test_control_limit_enforced(self) -> None:
18
+ cfg = {
19
+ "stopping": {"a": 1, "b": 2, "c": 3, "d": 4},
20
+ "exploration": {},
21
+ "uncertainty": {},
22
+ }
23
+ with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
24
+ enforce_control_limits(cfg)
25
+
26
+ def test_diversity_fallback_only_after_plateau(self) -> None:
27
+ rows = []
28
+ for i in range(40):
29
+ rows.append(
30
+ {
31
+ "ligand_id": f"l{i}",
32
+ "step": i,
33
+ "cluster_id": 1 if i < 30 else 2,
34
+ "hypercluster_id": 1,
35
+ "docking_score": -6.0 if i < 30 else -6.5,
36
+ "predicted_score_prebatch": -6.0,
37
+ "predicted_uncertainty_prebatch": 0.2,
38
+ }
39
+ )
40
+ df = pd.DataFrame(rows)
41
+ truth_map = {f"l{i}": {"rank_percentile": float(50 - i)} for i in range(40)}
42
+
43
+ selected, trace = simulate_multifidelity_policy(
44
+ df,
45
+ truth_map=truth_map,
46
+ budget=30,
47
+ min_budget=5,
48
+ max_budget=30,
49
+ wall_time_per_dock=0.1,
50
+ max_wall_time_seconds=20.0,
51
+ stopping=StoppingControls(target_rank_percentile=0.1, peak_patience=5, min_improvement_delta=0.01),
52
+ exploration=ExplorationControls(stagnation_patience=3, diversity_boost_strength=0.6, dominant_window=10),
53
+ uncertainty=UncertaintyControls(uncertainty_low_threshold=0.3, uncertainty_patience=4, expected_gain_threshold=0.01),
54
+ )
55
+
56
+ self.assertFalse(selected.empty)
57
+ self.assertFalse(trace.empty)
58
+ bad = trace[(trace["fallback_triggered"].astype(bool)) & (~trace["dominant_plateau"].astype(bool))]
59
+ self.assertTrue(bad.empty)
60
+
61
+
62
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
63
+ unittest.main()