PRBench / tasks /task_li_2014 /task.yaml
StarThomas1002's picture
Add 31 PRBench task specifications (instructions, task.yaml, paper markdown; ground truth withheld)
a48f2b1 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
4.54 kB
# PRBench Task Configuration
task_id: task_li_2014
# --- Paper Info ---
paper:
title: "Classical-Quantum Correspondence for Above-Threshold Ionization"
author: "Min Li, Ji-Wei Geng, Hong Liu, Yongkai Deng, Chengyin Wu, Liang-You Peng, Qihuang Gong, Yunquan Liu"
doi: "10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.113002"
year: 2014
paper_file: "qtmc.md"
# --- Files ---
instruction_file: "instruction.md"
metadata_file: "metadata.md"
ground_truth_data_dir: "data"
ground_truth_code_dir: "reproduce"
# --- Expected Outputs ---
expected_outputs:
analysis:
- "reproduction/ANALYSIS.md"
code:
- "reproduction/qtmc_simulation.py"
data:
- "data/fig1d.csv"
# --- Docker Environment ---
docker:
image: "python:3.11-slim"
memory_limit: "4g"
timeout: 7200
pip_install:
- numpy
- scipy
- matplotlib
# --- Grading Rubric ---
grading:
dimensions:
- name: "methodology_understanding"
weight: 0.20
description: >
Does the agent's ANALYSIS.md correctly describe the QTMC methodology:
ADK tunneling theory for initial conditions, Newton's equations with
Coulomb potential for classical propagation, classical action / phase
accumulation for quantum interference, and Kepler transformation for
asymptotic momenta? Compare against metadata.md.
- name: "code_correctness"
weight: 0.15
description: >
Are all required code files present? Does the code correctly implement:
ADK tunneling rate and initial condition sampling, trapezoidal laser
pulse envelope, Newton's equations with Coulomb + laser field,
phase/action integration along trajectories, Kepler transformation
for asymptotic momentum, and complex amplitude accumulation on
momentum grid?
- name: "data_accuracy"
weight: 0.50
description: >
How well does the generated CSV data match the ground truth?
Due to Monte Carlo stochasticity, use statistical comparison:
correlation coefficient, KL divergence, structural feature matching
(ATI rings, Coulomb focusing, interference carpet). Normalize both
distributions before comparison. Allow for statistical fluctuations
inherent to Monte Carlo sampling.
- name: "completeness"
weight: 0.15
description: >
Are the CSV data file, code files, and ANALYSIS.md present?
Are the files non-trivial (not empty/placeholder)?
# --- Code-Only Evaluation Mode ---
code_only:
instruction_suffix: |
## IMPORTANT: Code-Only Mode
In this task you are in **code-only mode**. You must:
1. Read and analyze the paper
2. Write `reproduction/ANALYSIS.md` with your methodology analysis and all formulas
3. Implement ALL code files under `reproduction/`
4. **DO NOT** run the simulation or generate CSV data files
5. Focus on writing correct, complete, and well-structured code
Your deliverables are ONLY the analysis document and code files.
Do NOT produce any CSV data files.
expected_outputs:
analysis:
- "reproduction/ANALYSIS.md"
code:
- "reproduction/qtmc_simulation.py"
grading:
dimensions:
- name: "methodology_understanding"
weight: 0.25
description: >
Does ANALYSIS.md correctly describe the QTMC methodology including
ADK theory, classical trajectory propagation with Coulomb potential,
phase accumulation, and interference? Compare against metadata.md.
- name: "code_correctness"
weight: 0.50
description: >
Read every code file carefully. Check physical and algorithmic correctness:
- ADK tunneling rate formula and initial condition sampling
- Trapezoidal laser pulse envelope and electric field
- Newton's equations of motion with Coulomb + laser field
- Classical action integration (kinetic, Coulomb, Ip terms)
- Kepler transformation for asymptotic momentum
- Complex amplitude accumulation and momentum grid binning
- Correct parameter values (E1=0.0534, w1=0.057, Ip=0.4456, Z=1)
Compare against ground truth formulas in metadata.md.
- name: "code_quality"
weight: 0.10
description: >
Is the code well-structured, readable, and does it follow
reasonable modular organization?
- name: "completeness"
weight: 0.15
description: >
Are all code files and the ANALYSIS.md present and non-trivial?