Add 31 PRBench task specifications (instructions, task.yaml, paper markdown; ground truth withheld)
a48f2b1 verified | # PRBench Task Configuration | |
| task_id: task_shvetsov_2016 | |
| paper: | |
| title: "Semiclassical two-step model for strong-field ionization" | |
| author: "N. I. Shvetsov-Shilovski et al." | |
| doi: "10.1103/PhysRevA.94.013415" | |
| year: 2016 | |
| paper_file: "shvetsov2016.md" | |
| instruction_file: "instruction.md" | |
| metadata_file: "metadata.md" | |
| ground_truth_data_dir: "data" | |
| ground_truth_code_dir: "reproduction" | |
| expected_outputs: | |
| analysis: | |
| - "reproduction/ANALYSIS.md" | |
| code: | |
| - "reproduction/scts_core.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig1_momentum_distribution.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig2_lowenergy_momentum.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig4_energy_spectrum.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig4_angular_distribution.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig6_sfa_momentum.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig7_sfa_energy_spectrum.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig7_sfa_angular_distribution.py" | |
| data: | |
| - "data/fig1_momentum_distribution.csv" | |
| - "data/fig2_lowenergy_momentum.csv" | |
| - "data/fig4_energy_spectrum.csv" | |
| - "data/fig4_angular_distribution.csv" | |
| - "data/fig6_sfa_momentum.csv" | |
| - "data/fig7_sfa_energy_spectrum.csv" | |
| - "data/fig7_sfa_angular_distribution.csv" | |
| docker: | |
| image: "python:3.11-slim" | |
| memory_limit: "4g" | |
| timeout: 10800 | |
| pip_install: | |
| - numpy | |
| - matplotlib | |
| grading: | |
| dimensions: | |
| - name: "methodology_understanding" | |
| weight: 0.20 | |
| description: > | |
| Does ANALYSIS.md correctly describe the SCTS two-step model, | |
| tunneling ionization (EQ-9), Newton's equations (EQ-14), | |
| semiclassical phase with factor-2 Coulomb correction (EQ-22), | |
| Coulomb mapping (EQ-26-29), and coherent sum (EQ-41)? | |
| - name: "code_correctness" | |
| weight: 0.15 | |
| description: > | |
| Are all required code files present? Does the code correctly implement | |
| the SCTS model including adaptive RK4 integration, importance sampling, | |
| tunnel exit computation, and SFA parallel velocity? | |
| - name: "data_accuracy" | |
| weight: 0.50 | |
| description: > | |
| How well do the generated CSV data files match the ground truth? | |
| This is a Monte Carlo simulation so tolerances are larger (~10-20%). | |
| Check momentum distributions, energy spectra, angular distributions. | |
| Verify ATI peak spacing, fanlike interference patterns, ionization fractions. | |
| - name: "completeness" | |
| weight: 0.15 | |
| description: > | |
| Are all 7 CSV files, all 8 code files, and ANALYSIS.md present and non-trivial? | |
| code_only: | |
| instruction_suffix: | | |
| ## IMPORTANT: Code-Only Mode | |
| In this task you are in **code-only mode**. You must: | |
| 1. Read and analyze the paper | |
| 2. Write `reproduction/ANALYSIS.md` with your methodology analysis | |
| 3. Implement ALL code files under `reproduction/` | |
| 4. **DO NOT** run the scripts or generate CSV data files | |
| 5. Focus on writing correct, complete, and well-structured code | |
| Your deliverables are ONLY the analysis document and code files. | |
| Do NOT produce any CSV data files. | |
| expected_outputs: | |
| analysis: | |
| - "reproduction/ANALYSIS.md" | |
| code: | |
| - "reproduction/scts_core.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig1_momentum_distribution.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig2_lowenergy_momentum.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig4_energy_spectrum.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig4_angular_distribution.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig6_sfa_momentum.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig7_sfa_energy_spectrum.py" | |
| - "reproduction/fig7_sfa_angular_distribution.py" | |
| grading: | |
| dimensions: | |
| - name: "methodology_understanding" | |
| weight: 0.25 | |
| description: > | |
| Does ANALYSIS.md correctly describe the SCTS model, tunneling ionization, | |
| semiclassical phase with factor-2 Coulomb term, and Coulomb mapping? | |
| - name: "code_correctness" | |
| weight: 0.50 | |
| description: > | |
| Read every code file carefully. Check whether the implementation is | |
| physically and algorithmically correct: | |
| - Tunneling rate: ADK formula (EQ-9) with importance sampling | |
| - Tunnel exit: parabolic coordinate equation (EQ-11-13) | |
| - Propagation: adaptive RK4 for Newton's equations (EQ-14) | |
| - Phase: SCTS formula with 2Z/r Coulomb term (EQ-22) | |
| - Coulomb mapping: asymptotic momentum (EQ-26-29) | |
| - Post-pulse phase: Coulomb correction (EQ-40) | |
| - Observable: coherent sum (EQ-41) | |
| - SFA parallel velocity (EQ-47-48) | |
| - name: "code_quality" | |
| weight: 0.10 | |
| description: > | |
| Is the code well-structured and readable? | |
| - name: "completeness" | |
| weight: 0.15 | |
| description: > | |
| Are all 8 code files and ANALYSIS.md present and non-trivial? | |