Datasets:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ To solve the task, models must recover the hidden text by relying on the remaini
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
MMTR-Bench evaluates a model's ability to maintain a continuous, structured reading flow across complex multimodal layouts. The dataset is rigorously balanced across various dimensions to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs).
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-
:** The dataset is categorized into four distinct difficulty levels (L1 to L4), scaling from word-level completion to complex paragraph-level reconstruction. It incorporates both Single Context (single-page) and Multi Context (multi-page) scenarios, demanding robust cross-page reasoning.
|
|
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ The distributions in the dataset highlight our multi-faceted evaluation strategy
|
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
The benchmark assesses models using a specialized level-aware scoring mechanism to account for the varying complexities of L1 through L4 tasks. The inclusion of explicit reasoning ("Thinking") models reveals a significant paradigm shift in how MLLMs approach visual text reconstruction.
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-
.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
+

|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
The distributions in the dataset highlight our multi-faceted evaluation strategy:
|
| 29 |
* **Difficulty Level & Context Mode (a):** The dataset is categorized into four distinct difficulty levels (L1 to L4), scaling from word-level completion to complex paragraph-level reconstruction. It incorporates both Single Context (single-page) and Multi Context (multi-page) scenarios, demanding robust cross-page reasoning.
|
|
|
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
The benchmark assesses models using a specialized level-aware scoring mechanism to account for the varying complexities of L1 through L4 tasks. The inclusion of explicit reasoning ("Thinking") models reveals a significant paradigm shift in how MLLMs approach visual text reconstruction.
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
+

|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
### Main Results
|
| 42 |
|