MMTR-Bench commited on
Commit
b58be3c
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 1cbc0b9

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +2 -2
README.md CHANGED
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ To solve the task, models must recover the hidden text by relying on the remaini
23
 
24
  MMTR-Bench evaluates a model's ability to maintain a continuous, structured reading flow across complex multimodal layouts. The dataset is rigorously balanced across various dimensions to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs).
25
 
26
- ![Dataset Overview](./png/overview.jpg)
27
 
28
  The distributions in the dataset highlight our multi-faceted evaluation strategy:
29
  * **Difficulty Level & Context Mode (a):** The dataset is categorized into four distinct difficulty levels (L1 to L4), scaling from word-level completion to complex paragraph-level reconstruction. It incorporates both Single Context (single-page) and Multi Context (multi-page) scenarios, demanding robust cross-page reasoning.
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ The distributions in the dataset highlight our multi-faceted evaluation strategy
36
 
37
  The benchmark assesses models using a specialized level-aware scoring mechanism to account for the varying complexities of L1 through L4 tasks. The inclusion of explicit reasoning ("Thinking") models reveals a significant paradigm shift in how MLLMs approach visual text reconstruction.
38
 
39
- ![Model Benchmark Comparison](./png/model_bench.jpg)
40
 
41
  ### Main Results
42
 
 
23
 
24
  MMTR-Bench evaluates a model's ability to maintain a continuous, structured reading flow across complex multimodal layouts. The dataset is rigorously balanced across various dimensions to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs).
25
 
26
+ ![Dataset Overview](./png/overview.png)
27
 
28
  The distributions in the dataset highlight our multi-faceted evaluation strategy:
29
  * **Difficulty Level & Context Mode (a):** The dataset is categorized into four distinct difficulty levels (L1 to L4), scaling from word-level completion to complex paragraph-level reconstruction. It incorporates both Single Context (single-page) and Multi Context (multi-page) scenarios, demanding robust cross-page reasoning.
 
36
 
37
  The benchmark assesses models using a specialized level-aware scoring mechanism to account for the varying complexities of L1 through L4 tasks. The inclusion of explicit reasoning ("Thinking") models reveals a significant paradigm shift in how MLLMs approach visual text reconstruction.
38
 
39
+ ![Model Benchmark Comparison](./png/model_bench.png)
40
 
41
  ### Main Results
42