Consolidate hacking SFT into one Parquet per configuration without changing rows

README.md

@@ -16,23 +16,23 @@ configs:
   default: true
   data_files:
   - split: train
-    path: data/pool/*.parquet
+    path: data/pool.parquet
 - config_name: paper_nt10.5k_t0.5k
   data_files:
   - split: train
-    path: data/paper_nt10.5k_t0.5k/*.parquet
+    path: data/paper_nt10.5k_t0.5k.parquet
 - config_name: paper_nt10k_t1k
   data_files:
   - split: train
-    path: data/paper_nt10k_t1k/*.parquet
+    path: data/paper_nt10k_t1k.parquet
 - config_name: paper_nt9k_t2k
   data_files:
   - split: train
-    path: data/paper_nt9k_t2k/*.parquet
+    path: data/paper_nt9k_t2k.parquet
 - config_name: paper_nt8k_t3k
   data_files:
   - split: train
-    path: data/paper_nt8k_t3k/*.parquet
+    path: data/paper_nt8k_t3k.parquet
 ---
 
 # CATCH Hacking SFT
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ The SFT algorithmic questions originate from the **`code` split of [Skywork/Skyw
 
 ## Configurations
 
-Each configuration exposes one split, **`train`**. `pool` is the default. The `paper_*` configurations are exact class-filtered projections of the four existing local SFT mixture artifacts, rather than newly sampled subsets. Their names identify the original combined experimental setting; each repository stores only its own hacking/non-hacking component.
+Each configuration exposes one split, **`train`**. Each configuration is stored in exactly one Parquet file under `data/`. `pool` is the default. The `paper_*` configurations are exact class-filtered projections of the four existing local SFT mixture artifacts, rather than newly sampled subsets. Their names identify the original combined experimental setting; each repository stores only its own hacking/non-hacking component.
 
 | Configuration | Rows in this repository | Non-hacking | Explicit hacking | Implicit hacking |
 |---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
@@ -127,8 +127,8 @@ Use `name="pool"` for the candidate pool, or one of the other listed configurati
 
 ## Validation performed for this export
 
-- Checked the exact ten-column schema and absence of the removed column in every Parquet shard.
-- Read every shard back and verified the ordered content fingerprint against the export input.
+- Checked the exact ten-column schema and absence of the removed column in every Parquet file.
+- Read every Parquet file back and verified the ordered content fingerprint against the export input.
 - Checked paper configuration counts and the explicit/implicit composition against the local paper appendix.
 - Preserved original null values and source labels; did not infer missing upstream row IDs.
 - Screened the retained fields for common high-confidence credential patterns; this is not a comprehensive privacy, security, or licensing audit.

data/paper_nt10.5k_t0.5k.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:31d4dd86ccc412e2d95ffd4c6b13db3494aa468fd7517af361f2f3c5a804302f
+size 4397099

data/paper_nt10k_t1k.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0260833a5a4ad1426d234b1992468a9044f16c3cdc3106d0b4f667f56965f52b
+size 8561165

data/paper_nt8k_t3k.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8a0766c5677bc154ec7eafb89df578eee953a51f59efead54da8df7570ed101f
+size 71459550

data/paper_nt9k_t2k.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:98cac142e2e9df6dd4d860475482589099766188044fd301db0640df0577f3c6
+size 46683638

data/pool.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fba130f39cff90735377c9b87953ce9df55c53feb0d4b328e080fd0c9ec30fac
+size 449930072