Datasets:
Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -28,6 +28,31 @@ Code: https://github.com/GainGod-Xu/OccupancyFlow
|
|
| 28 |
| `weights/interactome_weights_0630.xlsx` | 328,378 | the weight file used by the disease-module analyses |
|
| 29 |
| `negatome_check/predictions_negatome_random.csv` | 6,352 | predictions for Negatome human non-interactions, Negatome pairs that are also reported interactions, and random pairs of the same proteins |
|
| 30 |
| `negatome_check/per_protein_comparison.csv` | 283 | per-protein median ΔG for reported partners vs Negatome partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
## Things to know before using these files
|
| 33 |
|
|
|
|
| 28 |
| `weights/interactome_weights_0630.xlsx` | 328,378 | the weight file used by the disease-module analyses |
|
| 29 |
| `negatome_check/predictions_negatome_random.csv` | 6,352 | predictions for Negatome human non-interactions, Negatome pairs that are also reported interactions, and random pairs of the same proteins |
|
| 30 |
| `negatome_check/per_protein_comparison.csv` | 283 | per-protein median ΔG for reported partners vs Negatome partners |
|
| 31 |
+
| `fixed_test_sets/test_s79_fixed.csv` | 111 | S79 with the 1E96 label restored — all 111 chain pairs labelled |
|
| 32 |
+
| `fixed_test_sets/test_s90_fixed.csv` | 90 | S90 with 3H6G added (chains A–B) — all 90 complexes |
|
| 33 |
+
| `official_supplementary/` | — | the upstream sources as published: PPI-Affinity SI files 3 and 4 (labels), the ProAffinity chain list, the PPAP pdbbind90 chain list |
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
## Defects in the benchmark sources, and what was fixed
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
Audited against the published supplementary files; the full write-up is in
|
| 38 |
+
[docs/data_provenance.md](https://github.com/GainGod-Xu/OccupancyFlow/blob/main/docs/data_provenance.md).
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
- **S79 loses one complex in the official file.** PDB code `1E96` is stored as `1.00E+96` — Excel
|
| 41 |
+
read it as scientific notation before publication. Any pipeline joining on the PDB name drops it,
|
| 42 |
+
so published S79 numbers are most likely computed on 78 of 79 complexes. The label survives
|
| 43 |
+
(7.4 kcal/mol) and is confirmed by the ProAffinity pKd for the same entry (5.5686 → 7.60).
|
| 44 |
+
`fixed_test_sets/test_s79_fixed.csv` restores it.
|
| 45 |
+
- **S90 loses one complex to the chain list.** The labels cover 90 complexes; the PPAP chain list
|
| 46 |
+
covers 89. The missing entry, 3H6G, has an unambiguous interface (chains A–B, 355 heavy-atom
|
| 47 |
+
contacts within 4.5 Å, minimum distance 2.75 Å) and is a homodimer, which may be why it was
|
| 48 |
+
excluded. `fixed_test_sets/test_s90_fixed.csv` adds it back.
|
| 49 |
+
- **The two official files use opposite sign conventions**: SI-File-3 stores |ΔG| (positive,
|
| 50 |
+
4.3–18.6), SI-File-4 stores ΔG (negative, −18.1 to −3.3). Files here are all ΔG (negative).
|
| 51 |
+
- **Label quality is good**: cross-checking S79 against the independent ProAffinity pKd values
|
| 52 |
+
gives a median absolute difference of 0.032 kcal/mol over the 78 shared complexes.
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
Keep the original `affinity/test_s79.csv` and `test_s90.csv` when comparing against published
|
| 55 |
+
numbers, which were computed on the uncorrected sets.
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
## Things to know before using these files
|
| 58 |
|