Xu-AI4Science commited on
Commit
cb9e278
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f109e21

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +25 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -28,6 +28,31 @@ Code: https://github.com/GainGod-Xu/OccupancyFlow
28
  | `weights/interactome_weights_0630.xlsx` | 328,378 | the weight file used by the disease-module analyses |
29
  | `negatome_check/predictions_negatome_random.csv` | 6,352 | predictions for Negatome human non-interactions, Negatome pairs that are also reported interactions, and random pairs of the same proteins |
30
  | `negatome_check/per_protein_comparison.csv` | 283 | per-protein median ΔG for reported partners vs Negatome partners |
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31
 
32
  ## Things to know before using these files
33
 
 
28
  | `weights/interactome_weights_0630.xlsx` | 328,378 | the weight file used by the disease-module analyses |
29
  | `negatome_check/predictions_negatome_random.csv` | 6,352 | predictions for Negatome human non-interactions, Negatome pairs that are also reported interactions, and random pairs of the same proteins |
30
  | `negatome_check/per_protein_comparison.csv` | 283 | per-protein median ΔG for reported partners vs Negatome partners |
31
+ | `fixed_test_sets/test_s79_fixed.csv` | 111 | S79 with the 1E96 label restored — all 111 chain pairs labelled |
32
+ | `fixed_test_sets/test_s90_fixed.csv` | 90 | S90 with 3H6G added (chains A–B) — all 90 complexes |
33
+ | `official_supplementary/` | — | the upstream sources as published: PPI-Affinity SI files 3 and 4 (labels), the ProAffinity chain list, the PPAP pdbbind90 chain list |
34
+
35
+ ## Defects in the benchmark sources, and what was fixed
36
+
37
+ Audited against the published supplementary files; the full write-up is in
38
+ [docs/data_provenance.md](https://github.com/GainGod-Xu/OccupancyFlow/blob/main/docs/data_provenance.md).
39
+
40
+ - **S79 loses one complex in the official file.** PDB code `1E96` is stored as `1.00E+96` — Excel
41
+ read it as scientific notation before publication. Any pipeline joining on the PDB name drops it,
42
+ so published S79 numbers are most likely computed on 78 of 79 complexes. The label survives
43
+ (7.4 kcal/mol) and is confirmed by the ProAffinity pKd for the same entry (5.5686 → 7.60).
44
+ `fixed_test_sets/test_s79_fixed.csv` restores it.
45
+ - **S90 loses one complex to the chain list.** The labels cover 90 complexes; the PPAP chain list
46
+ covers 89. The missing entry, 3H6G, has an unambiguous interface (chains A–B, 355 heavy-atom
47
+ contacts within 4.5 Å, minimum distance 2.75 Å) and is a homodimer, which may be why it was
48
+ excluded. `fixed_test_sets/test_s90_fixed.csv` adds it back.
49
+ - **The two official files use opposite sign conventions**: SI-File-3 stores |ΔG| (positive,
50
+ 4.3–18.6), SI-File-4 stores ΔG (negative, −18.1 to −3.3). Files here are all ΔG (negative).
51
+ - **Label quality is good**: cross-checking S79 against the independent ProAffinity pKd values
52
+ gives a median absolute difference of 0.032 kcal/mol over the 78 shared complexes.
53
+
54
+ Keep the original `affinity/test_s79.csv` and `test_s90.csv` when comparing against published
55
+ numbers, which were computed on the uncorrected sets.
56
 
57
  ## Things to know before using these files
58