File size: 3,519 Bytes
e643ceb | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 | {
"prompt": [
"The video shows a close-up of a bundt cake with a citrus glaze and lemon slices on top, placed on a white plate. The cake is the main focus of the video, with the camera zooming in on it. The background features a kitchen counter with various baking ingredients and utensils, suggesting that the cake was freshly baked. The lighting is bright and natural, highlighting the cake's texture and the glaze's sheen. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the cake and its presentation without any additional embellishments or distractions."
],
"video_ids": [
"h0pQNoPldzk_7_0to145"
],
"question": [
"You are a careful video forensics assistant. You are given two videos: a test video (the first 2 frames) which is ai-generated and a real video (the last 10 frames). The test video is generated by the caption of the real video. The caption is \"The video shows a close-up of a bundt cake with a citrus glaze and lemon slices on top, placed on a white plate. The cake is the main focus of the video, with the camera zooming in on it. The background features a kitchen counter with various baking ingredients and utensils, suggesting that the cake was freshly baked. The lighting is bright and natural, highlighting the cake's texture and the glaze's sheen. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the cake and its presentation without any additional embellishments or distractions.\"\nYour task is evaluating whether the test video shows physics-related defects. You should compared both videos and use the provided caption as high-level intent. Focus on physical plausibility, not style or aesthetics.\nYou need to analyze it in these aspects:\n- Liquid flow irregularity \u2013 e.g., non-inertial or discontinuous flow, volume popping, gravity-inconsistent motion, impossible splashes.\n- Abnormal object deformation \u2013 e.g., rigid objects bending/stretching without cause, topology changes (parts merging/splitting).\n- Abnormal texture/material change \u2013 e.g., surface turns matte\u2192glossy without cause, texture swimming/flicker detached from geometry.\n- Abnormal motion \u2013 e.g., inertia/acceleration violations, teleporting, time reversals, jitter not explained by camera motion.\n- Unnatural interpenetration \u2013 e.g., objects passing through each other or ground, missing collisions/contacts.\nIf the prompt doesn't have related physical aspects, you should answer 'No'.\nOutput strictly as JSON with this schema (no extra text):\n{\n \"liquid_flow_irregularity\": \"Yes/No\",\n \"abnormal_deformation\": \"Yes/No\",\n \"abnormal_texture_change\": \"Yes/No\", \n \"abnormal_motion\": \"Yes/No\", \n \"unnatural_interpenetration\": \"Yes/No\",\n}\n"
],
"gt_answer": [
"```json\n{\n \"liquid_flow_irregularity\": \"No\",\n \"abnormal_deformation\": \"No\",\n \"abnormal_texture_change\": \"No\",\n \"abnormal_motion\": \"No\",\n \"unnatural_interpenetration\": \"No\"\n}\n```"
],
"pred_answer": [
"json\n{\n \"liquid_flow_irregularity\": \"No\",\n \"abnormal_deformation\": \"No\",\n \"abnormal_texture_change\": \"No\",\n \"abnormal_motion\": \"No\",\n \"unnatural_interpenetration\": \"No\"\n}\n```<|im_end|>\n<|im_start|>",
" \"has_obvious_defect\"\": No,\n \"\"dominant_issue\"\": \"\"none\"\",\n detail_loss_vs_reference\"\": NoNo\"\",\n evidence\"\": [}<|im_end|>\n<|im_start|>"
]
} |