File size: 4,993 Bytes
10979b5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
schema_version: 1
protocol_id: imagenet-e4-alignment-single-seed-20260716
title: Matched ImageNet gate-feature alignment retraining
registered_at_utc: "2026-07-16T19:00:00Z"
relationship_to_prior_work: >-
  Post-hoc, single-seed exploratory mechanism follow-up. These tasks do not
  enter the ImageNet-v2 Holm family and do not provide seed-level inference.
known_before_registration:
  paper_recipe_relu6_top1: 78.746
  relu6_only_top1: 78.122
  no_gate_top1: 14.376
  learned_smooth_top1: 78.670
  fixed_c6_top1: 78.798
  release_recipe_paper_bn_top1: 79.158
  frozen_interventions_are_distribution_shifted: true
claim_restrictions:
  - Report fixed final checkpoints even when the direction is unfavorable.
  - The historical baseline has retrospective-unverified source provenance.
  - Effects at or below 0.3 percentage points are descriptive near-baseline results.
  - Effects above 1.0 percentage point are material single-seed signals, not significance claims.
  - High post-training channel coherence indicates adaptation, not maintained misalignment.

data:
  runtime_root: /tmp/gmnet_data/imagenet-1k
  source_archive_uri: s3://snap-research-cv-code/ywang29/datasets/imagenet-1k/imagenet-1k.tar
  expected_archive_bytes: 161381969920
  canonical_manifest_sha256: bb70bc9f530db6bb24f70e648624b35281bfbc76a57775d589a2e0209dd98661
  train_sample_index_sha256: e74104e28ef79fff114e729e81d050a7b4f0c294c4d82345bad13c320d7255b2
  val_sample_index_sha256: 5ed16b5cd3ebd64e90cd7a8380b4e19d4c0d82eedcca3489dfa29313ce88d6f6
  train_sampled_content_sha256: dea27b5dbcb5f110ed47c075d473ebd0f6aefc446b45ab1e62d8246f2a153798
  val_sampled_content_sha256: d80a57419bc9396df7c01e29a2b17698c02c3a9a68dc4006a1fe87ef129ed166
  expected_train_samples: 1281167
  expected_val_samples: 50000

run_root: /nfs/ywang29/GmNet/runs/e4_alignment
deploy_root: /nfs/ywang29/GmNet/depoly/e4_alignment_20260716
code_manifest_path: configs/code_manifests/e4_alignment_20260716.json
smoke_evidence_path: /nfs/ywang29/GmNet/depoly/e4_alignment_20260716/smoke_evidence.json
policy:
  seed: 0
  seed_replication_in_scope: false
  model_variant: s3
  baseline_recipe: paper-supplementary-table8-v1
  baseline_top1: 78.746
  intervention_seed: 41041
  block_seed_stride: 10007
  gpus_per_job: 8
  epochs: 300
  eta_class: greater_than_12h
  checkpoint_policy: fixed_last
  resume: auto
  post_eval: strict_official
  approval_marker_required_for_every_task: true
  approval_requires_8gpu_strict_resume_smoke: true
  output_lock: nonblocking_flock
  launchjob_submitted_by_generator: false

historical_baseline:
  evidence_id: legacy_relu6_s3_seed0
  acceptance: accepted_historical_seed0_alias
  code_provenance: retrospective_unverified
  run_dir: /nfs/ywang29/GmNet/runs/e0_s3_seed0
  target_config: configs/e0_baseline/imagenet_gmnet_s3.yaml
  semantic_projection_sha256: 63c040674fd48ef97272392a4fb52e46534f291a43a979c1077a1ac0904deddd
  expected:
    checkpoint_last.pt: e03401ab71852656b7e62d82376eb628efdcc158d310088afd39e0e6b98d1930
    config_source.yaml: 0460961aa6de4c1127d03abafbe30b24178d90e6ca5d8b84d4201d1ccbab6a64
    config_resolved.yaml: d669c6c6f57815b9e3ead42a99c160ba399ef15df40fdd845f899c3b97d396d5
    data_manifest.json: e130879b003a8b4f6630afc9e2cf606789cb722802df742e046ac538e183ce40
    official_eval/checks.json: 7b1010999d913ab5e4ae267279cfab2d6172b60b9d4b29402a2b374a40145f84
    official_eval/results.json: 614bf87d7fd9f63ef2512c121e8a452ab85ea6b06f4a9237e7258db7dbd6129c
    official_eval/per_sample.npz: 3f719366080c2d510efff6bf318201dc5ebd20fa37f5bc16947efabff26e0f31
  official:
    run_name: e0_s3_seed0
    gate_type: relu6_self
    top1: 78.746
    checkpoint_config_sha256: a914c8e570ffb0cc953afff81c49dd76bd5b606beca95fdbd2c9445119c647c5
    artifacts_sha256: 33a79b915eedbbf45c2e31ccf69595a23685b757fcb66ab080281132e729e6be
    parameter_count: 7791544
    state_tensor_count: 365
    model_state_schema_sha256: 352cb771eaf4123fb9364dfd25d0151f9c2e6fa5493b989759091819f8981c99

tasks:
  - task_id: e4a_s3_stop_gradient_seed0
    experiment: E4
    model: s3
    gate: relu6_self
    gate_intervention: stop_gradient
    gate_intervention_seed: 41041
    seed: 0
    config_path: configs/e4_alignment/imagenet_gmnet_s3_stop_gradient.yaml
    role: matched_alignment_retraining
    status: ready_after_smoke
    contrast: stop-gradient minus historical aligned ReLU6 self-gate
    question: Does the derivative through the gate branch materially aid optimization?

  - task_id: e4a_s3_channel_derangement_seed0
    experiment: E4
    model: s3
    gate: relu6_self
    gate_intervention: channel_derangement
    gate_intervention_seed: 41041
    seed: 0
    config_path: configs/e4_alignment/imagenet_gmnet_s3_channel_derangement.yaml
    role: matched_alignment_retraining
    status: ready_after_smoke
    contrast: channel-deranged minus historical aligned ReLU6 self-gate
    question: Can the network retain accuracy when feature and gate channels are persistently mismatched?