File size: 3,559 Bytes
98e8615
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
# Embodied Navigation VLM-Based Evaluation

Evaluates whether a generated image/video correctly performs an embodied-navigation task by asking **Gemini-2.5-Pro** to judge it against the initial scene and the destination reference. This folder provides the exact evaluation prompts; run them through any Gemini access path (Google AI Studio, Gemini API, Vertex AI, or your own client).

There are **four tasks**, each with a separate **video** and **image** evaluation prompt (8 prompts total), organized one subfolder per task:

| Subfolder (task) | Description |
|------------------|-------------|
| `panoramic_view_last-mile_navigation` (task01) | Last-mile navigation in a 360° panoramic FPV scene |
| `top-down_view_real-world_navigation` (task02) | 2D top-down multi-floor navigation |
| `3D_real-world_navigation` (task03) | 3D dollhouse/cutaway real-world navigation |
| `simultaneous_localization_and_generation` (task04) | Split-screen: 3D navigation + synchronized 2D map |

Each subfolder contains:
- `video_evaluation_prompt.txt` — used to evaluate generated **videos**
- `image_evaluation_prompt.txt` — used to evaluate generated **images** (the final navigation state)

## Evaluation Protocol

For each generated output, send one user message to `gemini-2.5-pro` containing:

1. **The matching evaluation prompt** (text) — the `video_` or `image_` prompt from the task's subfolder
2. **The initial scene reference** — the starting panorama / top-down map / scene image
3. For object-goal levels, **the location description** text specifying the destination
4. **The generated video or image** to evaluate

The prompts are self-contained (criteria and output schema are inline) and contain no runtime placeholders — the references above are supplied as separate inputs.

## Evaluation Criteria

The prompts score a set of **binary** metrics (`"0"`/`"1"`), returned as JSON. The exact set varies slightly by task, but generally covers:

| Metric | Meaning |
|--------|---------|
| `SUCCESS_SCORE(_3D)` | Robot reaches and stops on/next to the specified destination by the end |
| `ORACLE_SUCCESS_SCORE(_3D)` | Trajectory ever passes through / pauses inside the correct destination region |
| `OBJECT_SEMANTIC_SCORE` | No collisions or clipping through walls/furniture |
| `AGENT_CONSISTENCY_SCORE` | Motion is temporally continuous (no teleporting, pose pops, size jumps) |
| `SPATIAL_ALIGNMENT_SCORE` | Heading / walking direction / elevation changes stay coherent |
| `DESTINATION_INTEGRITY_SCORE` | Destination in the output matches the reference (position, appearance, semantics) and is unchanged |
| `SCENE_CHANGE_SCORE` | The environment stays static aside from expected viewpoint changes |
| `TRAJECTORY_ALIGNMENT_SCORE` *(task04)* | The 2D-map trajectory matches the 3D navigation path |

Refer to each prompt for the precise metric list and definitions for that task. The prompts instruct Gemini to be fail-safe (assign `0` when ambiguous) and to penalize physical violations even when the goal is reached.

## Response Format

Each prompt instructs Gemini to return **only a JSON object** with a `SCORES` field (string `"0"`/`"1"` per metric) plus a brief reasoning field. Parse the JSON from the response.

## Metrics

`SUCCESS_SCORE(_3D)` is the primary task-success metric. For a set of generations, report:

```
success_rate = (# of outputs with SUCCESS_SCORE = 1) / (total # of outputs)
```

`ORACLE_SUCCESS_SCORE` gives a more lenient upper bound; the remaining metrics are physical-plausibility / fidelity diagnostics.