id stringlengths 33 75 | group_id stringlengths 24 53 | split stringclasses 1
value | source stringclasses 12
values | kind stringclasses 3
values | question stringlengths 38 926 | options listlengths 2 16 | target listlengths 2 16 | state_json stringlengths 187 1.26k | metadata_json stringlengths 462 975 | record_json stringlengths 999 3.03k | original_line_number int64 1 80.8k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2491:ordinal | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2491 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | score | Count eligible records at the highest eligible revision, after applying the entity and authority filters. | [
"No eligible record",
"One latest eligible record",
"Two latest eligible records",
"At least three latest eligible records"
] | [
0,
1,
0,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_02dc42", "query_property": "sta... | {"domain": "evidence_integration", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2491, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2491", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2491:ordinal", "kind": "score", "metadata": {"domain": "evidence_integration", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_versio... | 80,801 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492:decision | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | choice | Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment. | [
"true: The expression evaluates to true",
"false: The expression evaluates to false"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"assignments": {"p_ff82e7_0": true, "p_ff82e7_1": true, "p_ff82e7_2": true, "p_ff82e7_3": false}, "expression": "NOT ((p_ff82e7_1 AND p_ff82e7_2))", "record_id": "ff82e7973e23d0e1", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only when A is true and B ... | {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "routing", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2492, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-j... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492:decision", "kind": "choice", "metadata": {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "routing", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "... | 80,802 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492:verification | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | noul | Task: Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment.
Proposed answer: The expression evaluates to false
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | [
"no",
"yes"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"assignments": {"p_ff82e7_0": true, "p_ff82e7_1": true, "p_ff82e7_2": true, "p_ff82e7_3": false}, "expression": "NOT ((p_ff82e7_1 AND p_ff82e7_2))", "record_id": "ff82e7973e23d0e1", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only when A is true and B ... | {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "evidence", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2492, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492:verification", "kind": "noul", "metadata": {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "evidence", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version"... | 80,803 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492:ordinal | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | score | Count true values in assignments, independent of the expression result. | [
"Exactly 0 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 1 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 2 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 3 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 4 items satisfy the stated count condition"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1,
0
] | {"assignments": {"p_ff82e7_0": true, "p_ff82e7_1": true, "p_ff82e7_2": true, "p_ff82e7_3": false}, "expression": "NOT ((p_ff82e7_1 AND p_ff82e7_2))", "record_id": "ff82e7973e23d0e1", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only when A is true and B ... | {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2492, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-ja... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2492:ordinal", "kind": "score", "metadata": {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "rea... | 80,804 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495:decision | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | choice | Which event occurs earliest in absolute time? | [
"event_6ecbe2_1: Event event_6ecbe2_1",
"event_6ecbe2_3: Event event_6ecbe2_3",
"event_6ecbe2_0: Event event_6ecbe2_0",
"event_6ecbe2_2: Event event_6ecbe2_2"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T12:48:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_6ecbe2_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T14:29:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_6ecbe2_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T10:34:00+00:00"}, {"id": "event_6ecbe2_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T06:21:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_6ecbe2_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:00:00+02:00"... | {"domain": "temporal", "family": "routing", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2495, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-jagge... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495:decision", "kind": "choice", "metadata": {"domain": "temporal", "family": "routing", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reas... | 80,805 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495:verification | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | noul | Task: Which event occurs earliest in absolute time?
Proposed answer: Event event_6ecbe2_0
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | [
"no",
"yes"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T12:48:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_6ecbe2_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T14:29:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_6ecbe2_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T10:34:00+00:00"}, {"id": "event_6ecbe2_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T06:21:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_6ecbe2_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:00:00+02:00"... | {"domain": "temporal", "family": "evidence", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2495, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-jagg... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495:verification", "kind": "noul", "metadata": {"domain": "temporal", "family": "evidence", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "r... | 80,806 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495:ordinal | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | score | Count events strictly before the cutoff instant. | [
"Exactly 0 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 1 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 2 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 3 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 4 items satisfy the stated count condition"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"cutoff": "2026-02-14T12:48:00+00:00", "events": [{"id": "event_6ecbe2_1", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T14:29:00+02:00"}, {"id": "event_6ecbe2_3", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T10:34:00+00:00"}, {"id": "event_6ecbe2_0", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T06:21:00-03:00"}, {"id": "event_6ecbe2_2", "timestamp": "2026-02-14T11:00:00+02:00"... | {"domain": "temporal", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2495, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-jagged... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2495:ordinal", "kind": "score", "metadata": {"domain": "temporal", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoni... | 80,807 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497:decision | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | choice | Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly. | [
"-5: The exact integer result is -5",
"-10: The exact integer result is -10",
"-9: The exact integer result is -9",
"not_present: The requested result does not exist",
"1: The exact integer result is 1"
] | [
0,
1,
0,
0,
0
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "4fae2c5bb2e0ab7a", "values": [-6, 11, 28, 5, -10, -8], "zero_based_index": 0} | {"domain": "algorithms", "family": "routing", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2497, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-jag... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497:decision", "kind": "choice", "metadata": {"domain": "algorithms", "family": "routing", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "re... | 80,808 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497:verification | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | noul | Task: Apply the stated filter/sort/index algorithm exactly.
Proposed answer: The exact integer result is -10
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | [
"no",
"yes"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "4fae2c5bb2e0ab7a", "values": [-6, 11, 28, 5, -10, -8], "zero_based_index": 0} | {"domain": "algorithms", "family": "evidence", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2497, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-ja... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497:verification", "kind": "noul", "metadata": {"domain": "algorithms", "family": "evidence", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": ... | 80,809 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497:ordinal | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | score | How many original values survive the divisibility filter? | [
"Zero surviving values",
"Exactly one surviving value",
"Exactly two surviving values",
"At least three surviving values"
] | [
0,
0,
0,
1
] | {"algorithm": "Keep values divisible by divisor, sort them in the stated order, then return the value at zero_based_index. If the index does not exist, return not_present.", "divisor": 2, "order": "ascending", "record_id": "4fae2c5bb2e0ab7a", "values": [-6, 11, 28, 5, -10, -8], "zero_based_index": 0} | {"domain": "algorithms", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2497, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-jagg... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2497:ordinal", "kind": "score", "metadata": {"domain": "algorithms", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reaso... | 80,810 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498:decision | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | choice | Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy. | [
"active: Current status is active",
"queued: Current status is queued",
"conflict: Highest eligible revision contains conflicting values",
"not_stated: No eligible status record remains",
"paused: Current status is paused",
"closed: Current status is closed"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_a86dbe", "query_property": "sta... | {"domain": "evidence_integration", "family": "routing", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2498, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498:decision", "kind": "choice", "metadata": {"domain": "evidence_integration", "family": "routing", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_ver... | 80,811 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498:verification | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | noul | Task: Resolve the requested current status by the supplied evidence policy.
Proposed answer: Current status is active
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | [
"no",
"yes"
] | [
0,
1
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_a86dbe", "query_property": "sta... | {"domain": "evidence_integration", "family": "evidence", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2498, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.a... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498:verification", "kind": "noul", "metadata": {"domain": "evidence_integration", "family": "evidence", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_... | 80,812 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498:ordinal | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | score | Count eligible records at the highest eligible revision, after applying the entity and authority filters. | [
"No eligible record",
"One latest eligible record",
"Two latest eligible records",
"At least three latest eligible records"
] | [
0,
1,
0,
0
] | {"aliases": {}, "policy": "Normalize entity aliases transitively. Ignore other entities/properties, non-authoritative and retracted records. Consider only the highest remaining revision. If their values disagree return conflict; if none remain return not_stated.", "query_entity": "device_a86dbe", "query_property": "sta... | {"domain": "evidence_integration", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2498, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2498:ordinal", "kind": "score", "metadata": {"domain": "evidence_integration", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_versio... | 80,813 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499:decision | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | choice | Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment. | [
"true: The expression evaluates to true",
"false: The expression evaluates to false"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"assignments": {"p_7c6da2_0": true, "p_7c6da2_1": true, "p_7c6da2_2": false, "p_7c6da2_3": false}, "expression": "((p_7c6da2_1 AND p_7c6da2_0) OR NOT (p_7c6da2_3))", "record_id": "7c6da2c0a09e56e8", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only when... | {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "routing", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2499, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-j... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499:decision", "kind": "choice", "metadata": {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "routing", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "... | 80,814 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499:verification | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | noul | Task: Evaluate the Boolean expression using exactly the supplied assignment.
Proposed answer: The expression evaluates to false
Is this proposed answer correct under the supplied rules? | [
"no",
"yes"
] | [
1,
0
] | {"assignments": {"p_7c6da2_0": true, "p_7c6da2_1": true, "p_7c6da2_2": false, "p_7c6da2_3": false}, "expression": "((p_7c6da2_1 AND p_7c6da2_0) OR NOT (p_7c6da2_3))", "record_id": "7c6da2c0a09e56e8", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only when... | {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "evidence", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2499, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499:verification", "kind": "noul", "metadata": {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "evidence", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version"... | 80,815 |
reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499:ordinal | reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499 | train | reasoning-control-v1 | score | Count true values in assignments, independent of the expression result. | [
"Exactly 0 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 1 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 2 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 3 items satisfy the stated count condition",
"Exactly 4 items satisfy the stated count condition"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0
] | {"assignments": {"p_7c6da2_0": true, "p_7c6da2_1": true, "p_7c6da2_2": false, "p_7c6da2_3": false}, "expression": "((p_7c6da2_1 AND p_7c6da2_0) OR NOT (p_7c6da2_3))", "record_id": "7c6da2c0a09e56e8", "semantics": "AND/OR/NOT have Boolean meanings. XOR is true exactly when operands differ. A IMPLIES B is false only when... | {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "reasoning-control-v1", "group_index": 2499, "license": "CC0-1.0", "seed": 76109, "source_url": "https://docs.typesafe.ai/model-ja... | {"group_id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499", "id": "reasoning-control-v1:76109:2499:ordinal", "kind": "score", "metadata": {"domain": "formal_logic", "family": "rubric", "provenance": {"benchmark_separation": "Independent generator; no JF100 items/answers or benchmark transformations used", "generator_version": "rea... | 80,816 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.