File size: 4,736 Bytes
f79f2ee
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31f4ae4
f79f2ee
 
cb8680f
f79f2ee
d569bc9
 
 
 
bf59868
f79f2ee
 
 
bf59868
f79f2ee
bf59868
f79f2ee
bf59868
f79f2ee
bf59868
 
f79f2ee
bf59868
 
f79f2ee
bf59868
f79f2ee
bf59868
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f79f2ee
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
bd36b5c
 
f79f2ee
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
d569bc9
f79f2ee
 
 
31f4ae4
bf59868
f79f2ee
bf59868
f79f2ee
bf59868
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
---
pretty_name: OccludeBench
language:
- en
task_categories:
- visual-question-answering
- image-to-text
size_categories:
- n<1K
tags:
- occlusion
- visual-reasoning
- shadows
- reflections
- vision-language-models
configs:
- config_name: default
  data_files:
  - split: test
    path: images/sec3_occludebench/occluded/*
---

# OccludeBench: Can VLMs Find What's Missing?

<p align="center">
  <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/afs07fda89sdfas90/data/resolve/main/assets/teaser.png" alt="OccludeBench teaser. Top: a direct example (answer: balance ball) and an inferential example (answer: chimney), next to each model's accuracy on direct versus inferential images; every model's gap is larger than the humans' 5.1 points. Bottom: the four OccludeTrace stages (detect cue, recognize cue, map to source, recover in context); only the last stage separates solved from failed images, 91% vs. 50%." width="100%">
</p>

OccludeBench tests whether vision-language models can recover an object hidden from view. Each of the 378 photographs has one object fully covered by a mask, and the model is asked:

> What is the primary object that is completely occluded in this image? Be as specific as you can.

In **direct** images (197) the object can only be recovered from its shadow or reflection; in **inferential** images (181) it can be inferred from the rest of the scene. Direct images are specular reflections (94), diffuse reflections (56) or shadows (47); inferential images cover technology (45), household (44), culture (37), activities (31) and nature (24).

Answers are open-ended. A response counts as correct if either of two LLM judges (GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.6) accepts it, which agrees with author labels on 98% of items.

## Loading

```python
from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("afs07fda89sdfas90/data", split="test")  # occluded images + id, type, category, answer
```

Or read `annotations.json` directly and open the image paths it lists.

## Structure

```
annotations.json                                    # One record per image
images/
  sec3_occludebench/occluded/                       # 378  Benchmark input: object behind a black, yellow-bordered mask
  sec3_occludebench/original/                       # 378  Unedited photographs
  sec4_2_why_vlms_fail/seeing_failure/              # 136  Direct images with the cue region outlined
  sec4_2_why_vlms_fail/stage2_zoomed_recognition/   # 153  Cue regions cropped from direct images
  sec4_2_why_vlms_fail/stage3_source_mapping/       # 107  Four candidate regions masked and labeled A–D
  appendix/box_sensitivity/                         # 378  Blue-filled mask, for the mask-style check
code/                                               # Evaluation, grading and analysis code
```

Images are named by item `id` (e.g. `pic0001.png`); crops add a suffix (`pic0002-1.png`).

## Annotations

| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| `id` | Image id, `pic0001`–`pic0378` |
| `type` | `direct` or `inferential` |
| `category` | Direct: `specular reflection`, `diffuse reflection`, `shadow`. Inferential: `technology`, `household`, `culture`, `activities`, `nature` |
| `fine_category` | Finer annotation label the category was merged from |
| `answer` | Reference answer |
| `occluders` | Mask geometry in original-image pixels: `bbox` (`x1`, `y1`, `x2`, `y2`) or `polygon` (`points`) |
| `images` | Paths to this item's image in each folder (`null` where a variant does not exist) |
| `cue_crops` | Crops of the shadow/reflection region: `image` path and crop `box` (`x`, `y`, `w`, `h`) in original-image pixels. Empty for items without a crop |
| `reverse_mapping` | Source-mapping `image` and the `answer` letter of the region hiding the object, or `null` |
| `source_url` | Where the photograph was found |
| `annotator_note` | Annotator's rationale for the answer |

## Reproducing the experiments

```bash
cd code
pip install -r requirements.txt
cp .env.example .env      # API keys
python prepare_data.py    # lays out the images the way the scripts expect
```

See `code/README.md` for the main commands and the code layout.

## Notes

- `pic0360`: its occluded image was made from a differently cropped copy of the photograph, so its `occluders` coordinates match its original and box-sensitivity images but not its occluded image.
- Images come from the web, Visual Genome, and the authors' own photographs. Web images remain under their original owners' terms; see `source_url`.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{cekinmez2026occludebench,
  title={OccludeBench: Can VLMs Find What's Missing?},
  author={Cekinmez, Jasin and Wu, Addison J. and Mitsuhashi, Ryo and Cai, Linrong and Fu, Xingyu and Liu, Zhuang},
  year={2026}
}
```