trust-calibration-benchmark / code /analyze_classwise.py
carlostoxtli's picture
Upload Trust-Calibration Benchmark (TCB) v1.0.0
f8c91b8 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
6.7 kB
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Class-wise metrics and confidence-resolution analysis (camera-ready additions).
Derives, offline from the shipped per-trial data:
1. Per-model confusion matrices (yes = positive class), per-class precision /
recall / F1, macro-F1, and balanced accuracy under the validated protocol,
plus pooled rows for the validated and naive protocols
-> writes ../tables/tcb_classwise.tex (Table: class-wise decomposition).
2. Confidence-resolution statistics: accuracy on trials with stated
confidence below 100 versus exactly 100 (pooled and per model), and the
pooled AUROC of stated confidence for predicting correctness.
3. Spearman rank correlation between panel accuracy and panel ECE.
Stdlib only; no endpoint, no network.
"""
import json
import pathlib
import statistics
HERE = pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parent
DATA = HERE.parent / "data"
TABLES = HERE.parent / "tables"
# Table 1 display order and short names.
ORDER = [
("glm-5.1-fp8", "glm"),
("deepseek-v4-pro", "deepseek"),
("gemma-4-31b", "gemma"),
("gptoss-120b", "gptoss"),
("leanstral-2603", "leanstral"),
("qwen3-omni-30b-a3b", "qwen-omni"),
("qwen3.6-35b-a3b-fp8", "qwen3.6-35b"),
("qwen3.6-27b-fp8", "qwen3.6-27b"),
("qwen3.5-9b", "qwen3.5-9b"),
]
def confusion(trials):
tp = fn = fp = tn = 0
for t in trials:
a = t.get("answer")
if a not in ("Yes", "No"):
continue
if t["truth"] == "Yes":
tp += a == "Yes"
fn += a == "No"
else:
fp += a == "Yes"
tn += a == "No"
return tp, fn, fp, tn
def classwise(tp, fn, fp, tn):
p_yes = tp / (tp + fp) if tp + fp else float("nan")
r_yes = tp / (tp + fn) if tp + fn else float("nan")
f_yes = 2 * p_yes * r_yes / (p_yes + r_yes) if p_yes + r_yes else 0.0
p_no = tn / (tn + fn) if tn + fn else float("nan")
r_no = tn / (tn + fp) if tn + fp else float("nan")
f_no = 2 * p_no * r_no / (p_no + r_no) if p_no + r_no else 0.0
return dict(p_yes=p_yes, r_yes=r_yes, f_yes=f_yes, p_no=p_no, r_no=r_no,
f_no=f_no, macro_f1=(f_yes + f_no) / 2, bal_acc=(r_yes + r_no) / 2)
def spearman(x, y):
def rank(v):
s = sorted(v)
return [(sum(1 for u in s if u < a) + (sum(1 for u in s if u == a) + 1) / 2)
for a in v]
rx, ry = rank(x), rank(y)
mx, my = statistics.mean(rx), statistics.mean(ry)
num = sum((a - mx) * (b - my) for a, b in zip(rx, ry))
den = (sum((a - mx) ** 2 for a in rx) * sum((b - my) ** 2 for b in ry)) ** 0.5
return num / den
def main():
trials = json.load(open(DATA / "tcb_v03_trials.json"))
naive = json.load(open(DATA / "tcb_v03_trials_naive.json"))
lines = [
"\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3.0pt}",
"\\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrrrrrrr}",
"\\toprule",
" & \\multicolumn{4}{c}{Confusion} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{Yes class}"
" & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{No class} & & \\\\",
"\\cmidrule(lr){2-5}\\cmidrule(lr){6-8}\\cmidrule(lr){9-11}",
"Model & TP & FN & FP & TN & Prec & Rec & F1 & Prec & Rec & F1"
" & Macro-F1 & Bal.\\ acc. \\\\",
"\\midrule",
]
pooled_tp = pooled_fn = pooled_fp = pooled_tn = 0
for model, short in ORDER:
tp, fn, fp, tn = confusion([t for t in trials if t["model"] == model])
pooled_tp += tp; pooled_fn += fn; pooled_fp += fp; pooled_tn += tn
m = classwise(tp, fn, fp, tn)
lines.append(
f"{short} & {tp} & {fn} & {fp} & {tn}"
f" & {m['p_yes']:.3f} & {m['r_yes']:.3f} & {m['f_yes']:.3f}"
f" & {m['p_no']:.3f} & {m['r_no']:.3f} & {m['f_no']:.3f}"
f" & {m['macro_f1']:.3f} & {m['bal_acc']:.3f} \\\\")
lines.append("\\midrule")
for label, (tp, fn, fp, tn) in (
("Pooled (validated)", (pooled_tp, pooled_fn, pooled_fp, pooled_tn)),
("Pooled (naive)", confusion(naive))):
m = classwise(tp, fn, fp, tn)
lines.append(
f"{label} & {tp} & {fn} & {fp} & {tn}"
f" & {m['p_yes']:.3f} & {m['r_yes']:.3f} & {m['f_yes']:.3f}"
f" & {m['p_no']:.3f} & {m['r_no']:.3f} & {m['f_no']:.3f}"
f" & {m['macro_f1']:.3f} & {m['bal_acc']:.3f} \\\\")
lines += ["\\bottomrule", "\\end{tabular}"]
out = TABLES / "tcb_classwise.tex"
out.write_text("\n".join(lines) + "\n")
print(f"wrote {out}")
# Confidence resolution: does below-ceiling stated confidence predict error?
stated = [t for t in trials
if t.get("conf_stated") and t.get("answer") in ("Yes", "No")]
at100 = [t for t in stated if t["conf"] == 100]
below = [t for t in stated if t["conf"] < 100]
acc = lambda ts: sum(t["correct"] for t in ts) / len(ts)
print(f"stated-confidence trials: {len(stated)}"
f" (of {sum(1 for t in trials if t.get('answer') in ('Yes','No'))} parseable)")
print(f"conf = 100: n={len(at100)} acc={acc(at100):.3f}")
print(f"conf < 100: n={len(below)} acc={acc(below):.3f}")
for model, short in ORDER:
lo = [t for t in below if t["model"] == model]
hi = [t for t in at100 if t["model"] == model]
if len(lo) >= 10:
print(f" {short}: conf<100 n={len(lo)} acc={acc(lo):.3f}"
f" vs conf=100 acc={acc(hi):.3f}")
correct = [t["conf"] for t in stated if t["correct"]]
wrong = [t["conf"] for t in stated if not t["correct"]]
wins = sum(1 for a in correct for b in wrong if a > b)
ties = sum(1 for a in correct for b in wrong if a == b)
auroc = (wins + 0.5 * ties) / (len(correct) * len(wrong))
print(f"pooled AUROC(stated conf -> correct) = {auroc:.3f}"
f" (n_correct={len(correct)}, n_incorrect={len(wrong)})")
# Accuracy vs ECE rank correlation across the panel (Table 1 values are
# re-derivable via analyze_panel.py; recomputed here from the trials).
accs, eces = [], []
for model, short in ORDER:
ts = [t for t in trials if t["model"] == model
and t.get("answer") in ("Yes", "No")]
accs.append(acc(ts))
confs = [(t["conf"] if t.get("conf_stated") else 50) / 100 for t in ts]
bins = [[] for _ in range(5)]
for c, t in zip(confs, ts):
bins[min(4, int(c * 5))].append((c, t["correct"]))
ece = sum(len(b) / len(ts) *
abs(statistics.mean(c for c, _ in b) -
statistics.mean(k for _, k in b))
for b in bins if b)
eces.append(ece)
print(f"Spearman(accuracy, ECE) across the panel: {spearman(accs, eces):.3f}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()