id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-1800
Change of Base of Logarithm
:$\log_b x = \dfrac {\log_a x} {\log_a b}$
Let: :$y = \log_b x \iff b^y = x$ :$z = \log_a x \iff a^z = x$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = z | r = \map {\log_a} {b^y} }} {{eqn | r = y \log_a b | c = Logarithms of Powers }} {{eqn | r = \log_b x \log_a b }} {{end-eqn}} Hence the result. {{qed}}
:$\log_b x = \dfrac {\log_a x} {\log_a b}$
Let: :$y = \log_b x \iff b^y = x$ :$z = \log_a x \iff a^z = x$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = z | r = \map {\log_a} {b^y} }} {{eqn | r = y \log_a b | c = [[Logarithms of Powers]] }} {{eqn | r = \log_b x \log_a b }} {{end-eqn}} Hence the result. {{qed}}
Change of Base of Logarithm/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Change_of_Base_of_Logarithm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Change_of_Base_of_Logarithm/Proof_1
[ "Change of Base of Logarithm", "Logarithms" ]
[]
[ "Logarithm of Power" ]
proofwiki-1801
Change of Base of Logarithm
:$\log_b x = \dfrac {\log_a x} {\log_a b}$
We begin with an equation that relates two exponentials with two different bases, $a$ and $b$, both positive and neither equal to one: :$b^y = a^z$ {{WLOG}}, select and solve for $b$: :$b = a^{z/y}$ Take logarithm's base $a$ of both sides: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \log_a b | r = \map {\log_a} {a^{z/y} } }} {{eqn...
:$\log_b x = \dfrac {\log_a x} {\log_a b}$
We begin with an equation that relates two exponentials with two different bases, $a$ and $b$, both positive and neither equal to one: :$b^y = a^z$ {{WLOG}}, select and solve for $b$: :$b = a^{z/y}$ Take logarithm's base $a$ of both sides: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \log_a b | r = \map {\log_a} {a^{z/y} } }} {...
Change of Base of Logarithm/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Change_of_Base_of_Logarithm
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Change_of_Base_of_Logarithm/Proof_2
[ "Change of Base of Logarithm", "Logarithms" ]
[]
[ "Logarithm of Power" ]
proofwiki-1802
Derivative of Function to Power of Function
Let $\map u x, \map v x$ be real functions which are differentiable on $\R$. Then: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {u^v} = v u^{v - 1} \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } u + u^v \paren {\ln u} \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } v$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {u^v} | r = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map \exp {v \ln u} } | c = {{Defof|Power to Real Number}} }} {{eqn | r = \map \exp {v \ln u} \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {v \ln u} | c = Chain Rule for Derivatives and Derivative of Exponential Function }} {{eqn | r...
Let $\map u x, \map v x$ be [[Definition:Real Function|real functions]] which are [[Definition:Differentiable on Interval|differentiable]] on $\R$. Then: :$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {u^v} = v u^{v - 1} \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } u + u^v \paren {\ln u} \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } v$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {u^v} | r = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\map \exp {v \ln u} } | c = {{Defof|Power to Real Number}} }} {{eqn | r = \map \exp {v \ln u} \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {v \ln u} | c = [[Chain Rule for Derivatives]] and [[Derivative of Exponential Function]] }} {...
Derivative of Function to Power of Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Function_to_Power_of_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Function_to_Power_of_Function
[ "Derivative of Function to Power of Function", "Differential Calculus", "Exponential Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Differentiable Mapping/Real Function/Interval" ]
[ "Derivative of Composite Function", "Derivative of Exponential Function", "Product Rule for Derivatives", "Derivative of Composite Function" ]
proofwiki-1803
Liouville's Theorem (Complex Analysis)
Let $f: \C \to \C$ be a bounded entire function. Then $f$ is constant.
By assumption, there is $M \ge 0$ such that $\cmod {\map f z} \le M$ for all $z \in \C$. For any $R \in \R: R > 0$, consider the function: :$\map {f_R} z := \map f {R z}$ Using the Cauchy Integral Formula, we see that: :$\ds \cmod {\map {f_R'} z} = \frac 1 {2 \pi} \cmod {\int_{\map {C_1} z} \frac {\map {f_R} w} {\par...
Let $f: \C \to \C$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Mapping|bounded]] [[Definition:Entire Function|entire]] [[Definition:Complex Function|function]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Constant Mapping|constant]].
By assumption, there is $M \ge 0$ such that $\cmod {\map f z} \le M$ for all $z \in \C$. For any $R \in \R: R > 0$, consider the function: :$\map {f_R} z := \map f {R z}$ Using the [[Cauchy Integral Formula]], we see that: :$\ds \cmod {\map {f_R'} z} = \frac 1 {2 \pi} \cmod {\int_{\map {C_1} z} \frac {\map {f_R} w}...
Liouville's Theorem (Complex Analysis)/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Liouville's_Theorem_(Complex_Analysis)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Liouville's_Theorem_(Complex_Analysis)/Proof_1
[ "Liouville's Theorem (Complex Analysis)", "Liouville's Theorem", "Complex Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Mapping", "Definition:Entire Function", "Definition:Complex Function", "Definition:Constant Mapping" ]
[ "Cauchy's Integral Formula", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Constant Mapping" ]
proofwiki-1804
Liouville's Theorem (Complex Analysis)
Let $f: \C \to \C$ be a bounded entire function. Then $f$ is constant.
By assumption, there is $M \ge 0$ such that $\cmod {\map f z} \le M$ for all $z \in \C$. Let $r > 0$. consider: :$D_r = \set {z \in \C: \cmod z \le r}$ Then, consider the parameterization $\gamma_r : \closedint 0 {2 \pi} \to \partial D_r$ given by: :$\map {\gamma_r} t := r e^{2 \pi i t}$ For all $z \in \C$, we have:...
Let $f: \C \to \C$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Mapping|bounded]] [[Definition:Entire Function|entire]] [[Definition:Complex Function|function]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Constant Mapping|constant]].
By assumption, there is $M \ge 0$ such that $\cmod {\map f z} \le M$ for all $z \in \C$. Let $r > 0$. consider: :$D_r = \set {z \in \C: \cmod z \le r}$ Then, consider the [[Definition:Parameterization of Directed Smooth Curve (Complex Plane)|parameterization]] $\gamma_r : \closedint 0 {2 \pi} \to \partial D_r$ giv...
Liouville's Theorem (Complex Analysis)/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Liouville's_Theorem_(Complex_Analysis)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Liouville's_Theorem_(Complex_Analysis)/Proof_2
[ "Liouville's Theorem (Complex Analysis)", "Liouville's Theorem", "Complex Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Mapping", "Definition:Entire Function", "Definition:Complex Function", "Definition:Constant Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Directed Smooth Curve/Parameterization/Complex Plane", "Cauchy's Integral Formula", "Triangle Inequality for Integrals/Complex", "Zero Derivative implies Constant Complex Function", "Definition:Constant Mapping" ]
proofwiki-1805
Riemann Removable Singularities Theorem
Let $U \subset \C$ be a domain. Let $z_0 \in U$. Let $f: U \setminus \set {z_0} \to \C$ be holomorphic. {{TFAE}} {{begin-itemize}} {{item|(1):|$f$ extends to a holomorphic function $f: U \to \C$}} {{item|(2):|$f$ extends to a continuous function $f: U \to \C$}} {{item|(3):|$f$ is bounded in a deleted neighborhood of $z...
{{WLOG}}, we may assume that: :$U = \Bbb D := \set {z \in \C: \cmod z < 1}$ and that $z_0 = 0$. Otherwise, restrict $f$ to a suitable disk centered at $z_0$, and precompose with a suitable affine map. $(1) \implies (2)$ by Complex-Differentiable Function is Continuous. $(2) \implies (3)$ by Continuous Function is Loca...
Let $U \subset \C$ be a domain. Let $z_0 \in U$. Let $f: U \setminus \set {z_0} \to \C$ be [[Definition:Holomorphic Function|holomorphic]]. {{TFAE}} {{begin-itemize}} {{item|(1):|$f$ [[Definition:Extension of Mapping|extends]] to a [[Definition:Holomorphic Function|holomorphic function]] $f: U \to \C$}} {{item|(2):|...
{{WLOG}}, we may assume that: :$U = \Bbb D := \set {z \in \C: \cmod z < 1}$ and that $z_0 = 0$. Otherwise, restrict $f$ to a suitable disk centered at $z_0$, and [[Definition:Precomposition|precompose]] with a suitable [[Definition:Affine Mapping|affine map]]. $(1) \implies (2)$ by [[Complex-Differentiable Functio...
Riemann Removable Singularities Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Riemann_Removable_Singularities_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Riemann_Removable_Singularities_Theorem
[ "Complex Analysis", "Continuous Functions", "Removable Singularities" ]
[ "Definition:Holomorphic Function", "Definition:Extension of Mapping", "Definition:Holomorphic Function", "Definition:Extension of Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Complex Function", "Definition:Bounded Mapping", "Definition:Deleted Neighborhood/Complex Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Precomposition", "Definition:Affine Transformation", "Complex-Differentiable Function is Continuous", "Continuous Implies Locally Bounded", "Cauchy's Residue Theorem", "Definition:Holomorphic Function", "Definition:Holomorphic Function", "Morera's Theorem", "Cauchy's Residue Theorem", ...
proofwiki-1806
Gaussian Integral
:$\ds \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2} \rd x = \sqrt \pi$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2} \rd x | r = 2 \int_0^\infty e^{-x^2} \rd x | c = Definite Integral of Even Function }} {{eqn | r = \frac {2 \sqrt \pi} 2 | c = Integral to Infinity of Exponential of -t^2 }} {{eqn | r = \sqrt \pi }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Gaussian Integral...
:$\ds \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2} \rd x = \sqrt \pi$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2} \rd x | r = 2 \int_0^\infty e^{-x^2} \rd x | c = [[Definite Integral of Even Function]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac {2 \sqrt \pi} 2 | c = [[Integral to Infinity of Exponential of -t^2]] }} {{eqn | r = \sqrt \pi }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Gaussi...
Gaussian Integral
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Integral
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Integral
[ "Gaussian Integral", "Definite Integrals involving Exponential Function" ]
[]
[ "Definite Integral of Even Function", "Integral to Infinity of Exponential of -t^2", "Category:Gaussian Integral", "Category:Definite Integrals involving Exponential Function" ]
proofwiki-1807
Indiscrete Topology is not Metrizable
Let $S$ be a set with more than one element. The indiscrete topology on $S$ is not metrizable.
In order for $S$ to be a metrizable space, there needs to be a metric $d$ on $S$, so that $\struct {S, d}$ is a metric space. As $S$ has more than one element, $\exists x, y \in S: x \ne y$. Then: :$\epsilon = \map d {x, y} > 0$ So the open $\epsilon$-ball $\map {B_{\epsilon / 2} } x$ is $d$-open. Hence $\map {B_{\epsi...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] with more than one [[Definition:Element|element]]. The [[Definition:Indiscrete Topology|indiscrete topology]] on $S$ is not [[Definition:Metrizable Topology|metrizable]].
In order for $S$ to be a [[Definition:Metrizable Space|metrizable space]], there needs to be a [[Definition:Metric|metric]] $d$ on $S$, so that $\struct {S, d}$ is a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. As $S$ has more than one [[Definition:Element|element]], $\exists x, y \in S: x \ne y$. Then: :$\epsilon = \ma...
Indiscrete Topology is not Metrizable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indiscrete_Topology_is_not_Metrizable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indiscrete_Topology_is_not_Metrizable
[ "Indiscrete Topology", "Examples of Metrizable Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Indiscrete Topology", "Definition:Metrizable Space" ]
[ "Definition:Metrizable Space", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Topology Induced by Metric", "Definition:Topology Induced by Metric", "Definition:Indiscr...
proofwiki-1808
Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous
Let $T_1, T_2, T_3$ be topological spaces. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ and $g: T_2 \to T_3$ be continuous mappings. Then the composite mapping $g \circ f: T_1 \to T_3$ is continuous.
Let $U \in T_3$ be open in $T_3$. As $g$ is continuous, $g^{-1} \sqbrk U \in T_2$ is open in $T_2$. As $f$ is continuous, $f^{-1} \sqbrk {g^{-1} \sqbrk U} \in T_1$ is open in $T_1$. By Preimage of Subset under Composite Mapping, $f^{-1} \sqbrk {g^{-1} \sqbrk U} = \paren {g \circ f}^{-1} \sqbrk U$. Hence the result. {{q...
Let $T_1, T_2, T_3$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ and $g: T_2 \to T_3$ be [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mappings]]. Then the [[Definition:Composition of Mappings|composite mapping]] $g \circ f: T_1 \to T_3$ is [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Top...
Let $U \in T_3$ be [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open in $T_3$]]. As $g$ is [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]], $g^{-1} \sqbrk U \in T_2$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open in $T_2$]]. As $f$ is [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]], $f^{-1} \sqbrk {g^{-1} \sqbrk U} \in...
Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composite_of_Continuous_Mappings_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composite_of_Continuous_Mappings_is_Continuous
[ "Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous", "Continuous Mappings (Topology)", "Composite Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Preimage of Subset under Composite Mapping" ]
proofwiki-1809
Continuous Mapping is Continuous on Induced Topological Spaces
Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be metric spaces. Let $\tau_{d_1}$ and $\tau_{d_2}$ be the topologies induced by the metrics $d_1$ and $d_2$. Let $T_1 = \struct {A_1, \tau_{d_1} }$ and $T_2 = \struct {A_2, \tau_{d_2} }$ be the resulting topological spaces. Let $f: A_1 \to A_2$ be a mapping...
Follows directly from: :the open set definition of continuity on a metric space :the definition of continuity on a topological space. {{qed}}
Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be [[Definition:Metric Space|metric spaces]]. Let $\tau_{d_1}$ and $\tau_{d_2}$ be the [[Definition:Topology Induced by Metric|topologies induced by the metrics]] $d_1$ and $d_2$. Let $T_1 = \struct {A_1, \tau_{d_1} }$ and $T_2 = \struct {A_2, \tau_{d_2} }...
Follows directly from: :the [[Definition:Metric Space Continuity by Open Set|open set definition]] of continuity on a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]] :the definition of [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuity]] on a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. {{qed}}
Continuous Mapping is Continuous on Induced Topological Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Mapping_is_Continuous_on_Induced_Topological_Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Mapping_is_Continuous_on_Induced_Topological_Spaces
[ "Topology", "Metric Spaces", "Continuous Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Topology Induced by Metric", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)/Space/Definition 2", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Topological Space" ]
proofwiki-1810
Synthetic Basis and Analytic Basis are Compatible
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Then $\BB$ is an analytic basis for $\tau$ {{iff}} $\tau$ is the topology on $S$ generated by the synthetic basis $\BB$.
=== Necessary Condition === Suppose that $\BB$ is an analytic basis for $\tau$. We proceed to check the axioms for $\BB$ to be a synthetic basis on $S$. {{Open-set-axiom|3}} states that $S \in \tau$. Therefore, by the definition of an analytic basis: :$\ds \exists \SS \subseteq \BB: S = \bigcup \SS$ By Equivalent Condi...
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then $\BB$ is an [[Definition:Analytic Basis|analytic basis]] for $\tau$ {{iff}} $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Basis|topology on $S$ generated by the synthetic basis $\BB$]].
=== Necessary Condition === Suppose that $\BB$ is an [[Definition:Analytic Basis|analytic basis]] for $\tau$. We proceed to check the axioms for $\BB$ to be a [[Definition:Synthetic Basis|synthetic basis]] on $S$. {{Open-set-axiom|3}} states that $S \in \tau$. Therefore, by the definition of an [[Definition:Analyt...
Synthetic Basis and Analytic Basis are Compatible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Synthetic_Basis_and_Analytic_Basis_are_Compatible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Synthetic_Basis_and_Analytic_Basis_are_Compatible
[ "Synthetic Bases", "Analytic Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Synthetic Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Equivalent Conditions for Cover by Collection of Subsets", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Synthetic Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/An...
proofwiki-1811
Picard's Existence Theorem
Let $\map f {x, y} : \R^2 \to \R$ be continuous in a region $D \subseteq \R^2$. Let $\exists M \in \R: \forall x, y \in D: \size {\map f {x, y} } < M$. Let $\map f {x, y}$ satisfy in $D$ the Lipschitz condition in $y$: :$\size{\map f {x, y_1} - \map f {x, y_2} } \le A \size {y_1 - y_2}$ where $A$ is independent of $x, ...
Let us define the following series of functions: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {y_0} x | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map {y_1} x | r = b + \int_a^x \map f {t, \map {y_0} t} \rd t | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map {y_2} x | r = b + \int_a^x \map f {t, \map {y_1} t} \rd t | c = }} {{eqn | ...
Let $\map f {x, y} : \R^2 \to \R$ be [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous]] in a [[Definition:Region of Plane|region]] $D \subseteq \R^2$. Let $\exists M \in \R: \forall x, y \in D: \size {\map f {x, y} } < M$. Let $\map f {x, y}$ satisfy in $D$ the [[Definition:Lipschitz Condition (Real Function)|Lipschi...
Let us define the following series of [[Definition:Real Function|functions]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {y_0} x | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map {y_1} x | r = b + \int_a^x \map f {t, \map {y_0} t} \rd t | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map {y_2} x | r = b + \int_a^x \map f {t, \map {y_1} t} ...
Picard's Existence Theorem/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Picard's_Existence_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Picard's_Existence_Theorem/Proof_1
[ "Picard's Existence Theorem", "First Order ODEs" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definition:Region/Plane", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity/Real Function", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle", "Definition:First Order Ordinary Differential Equation", "Definition:Unique" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity/Real Function", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", ...
proofwiki-1812
Picard's Existence Theorem
Let $\map f {x, y} : \R^2 \to \R$ be continuous in a region $D \subseteq \R^2$. Let $\exists M \in \R: \forall x, y \in D: \size {\map f {x, y} } < M$. Let $\map f {x, y}$ satisfy in $D$ the Lipschitz condition in $y$: :$\size{\map f {x, y_1} - \map f {x, y_2} } \le A \size {y_1 - y_2}$ where $A$ is independent of $x, ...
Let us define the following series of functions: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {y_0} x | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map {y_1} x | r = b + \int_a^x \map f {t, \map {y_0} t} \rd t | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map {y_2} x | r = b + \int_a^x \map f {t, \map {y_1} t} \rd t | c = }} {{eqn | ...
Let $\map f {x, y} : \R^2 \to \R$ be [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous]] in a [[Definition:Region of Plane|region]] $D \subseteq \R^2$. Let $\exists M \in \R: \forall x, y \in D: \size {\map f {x, y} } < M$. Let $\map f {x, y}$ satisfy in $D$ the [[Definition:Lipschitz Condition (Real Function)|Lipschi...
Let us define the following [[Definition:Partial Sum|series]] of [[Definition:Real Function|functions]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {y_0} x | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map {y_1} x | r = b + \int_a^x \map f {t, \map {y_0} t} \rd t | c = }} {{eqn | l = \map {y_2} x | r = b + \int_a^...
Picard's Existence Theorem/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Picard's_Existence_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Picard's_Existence_Theorem/Proof_2
[ "Picard's Existence Theorem", "First Order ODEs" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definition:Region/Plane", "Definition:Lipschitz Continuity/Real Function", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle", "Definition:First Order Ordinary Differential Equation", "Definition:Unique" ]
[ "Definition:Series/Sequence of Partial Sums", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Line/Curve", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Telescoping Series", "Definition:Variable/Real", "Definition:Parameter", "Definition:Inequality", "T...
proofwiki-1813
Continuity Test using Basis
Let $\struct {X_1, \tau_1}$ and $\struct {X_2, \tau_2}$ be topological spaces. Let $f: X_1 \to X_2$ be a mapping. Let $\BB$ be an analytic basis for $\tau_2$. Suppose that: :$\forall B \in \BB: f^{-1} \sqbrk B \in \tau_1$ where $f^{-1} \sqbrk B$ denotes the preimage of $B$ under $f$. Then $f$ is continuous.
Let $U \in \tau_2$. By the definition of an analytic basis, it follows that: :$\ds \exists \AA \subseteq \BB: U = \bigcup \AA$ Hence: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = f^{-1} \sqbrk U | r = f^{-1} \sqbrk {\bigcup \AA} }} {{eqn | r = \bigcup_{B \mathop \in \AA} f^{-1} \sqbrk B | c = Preimage of Union under Mapping: ...
Let $\struct {X_1, \tau_1}$ and $\struct {X_2, \tau_2}$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $f: X_1 \to X_2$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $\BB$ be an [[Definition:Analytic Basis|analytic basis]] for $\tau_2$. Suppose that: :$\forall B \in \BB: f^{-1} \sqbrk B \in \tau_1$ where $f^...
Let $U \in \tau_2$. By the definition of an [[Definition:Analytic Basis|analytic basis]], it follows that: :$\ds \exists \AA \subseteq \BB: U = \bigcup \AA$ Hence: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = f^{-1} \sqbrk U | r = f^{-1} \sqbrk {\bigcup \AA} }} {{eqn | r = \bigcup_{B \mathop \in \AA} f^{-1} \sqbrk B | c = [...
Continuity Test using Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuity_Test_using_Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuity_Test_using_Basis
[ "Topological Bases", "Continuous Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Preimage/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere" ]
[ "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Preimage of Union under Mapping/General Result", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere" ]
proofwiki-1814
Sub-Basis for Real Number Line
Let the real number line $\R$ be considered as a topology under the usual (Euclidean) topology. Then: :$\BB := \set {\openint \gets a, \openint b \to: a, b \in \R}$ is a sub-basis for $\R$.
Let $\openint c d$ be an open real interval. Then by definition: :$\openint c d = \openint \gets d \cap \openint c \to$ and so $\openint c d$ is the intersection of two elements of $\BB$. From Open Sets in Real Number Line, any open set of $\R$ is the union of countably many open real intervals. The result follows by d...
Let the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] $\R$ be considered as a [[Definition:Topology|topology]] under the [[Definition:Euclidean Topology on Real Number Line|usual (Euclidean) topology]]. Then: :$\BB := \set {\openint \gets a, \openint b \to: a, b \in \R}$ is a [[Definition:Sub-Basis|sub-basis]] for...
Let $\openint c d$ be an [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open real interval]]. Then by definition: :$\openint c d = \openint \gets d \cap \openint c \to$ and so $\openint c d$ is the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of two [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $\BB$. From [[Open Sets in Real Number Line]], ...
Sub-Basis for Real Number Line
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sub-Basis_for_Real_Number_Line
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sub-Basis_for_Real_Number_Line
[ "Topological Bases", "Real Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Sub-Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Element", "Open Sets in Real Number Line", "Definition:Open Set/Real Analysis", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Sub-Basis" ]
proofwiki-1815
Synthetic Basis formed from Synthetic Sub-Basis
Let $X$ be a set. Let $\SS$ be a synthetic sub-basis on $X$. Define: :$\ds \BB = \set {\bigcap \FF: \FF \subseteq \SS, \text{$\FF$ is finite} }$ Then $\BB$ is a synthetic basis on $X$. Thus, by this construction, an arbitrary collection of subsets of $X$ can form a synthetic basis and thus generate a topology on $X$.
We consider $X$ as the universal set. Thus, in accordance with Intersection of Empty Set, we take the convention that: :$\ds \bigcap \O = X \in \BB$ By Set is Subset of Union: General Result, it follows that: :$\ds X \subseteq \bigcup \BB$ That is, axiom $(\text B 1)$ for a synthetic basis is satisfied. We have that $\...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\SS$ be a [[Definition:Synthetic Sub-Basis|synthetic sub-basis]] on $X$. Define: :$\ds \BB = \set {\bigcap \FF: \FF \subseteq \SS, \text{$\FF$ is finite} }$ Then $\BB$ is a [[Definition:Synthetic Basis|synthetic basis]] on $X$. Thus, by this construction, an [[Definition:A...
We consider $X$ as the [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]]. Thus, in accordance with [[Intersection of Empty Set]], we take the convention that: :$\ds \bigcap \O = X \in \BB$ By [[Set is Subset of Union/General Result|Set is Subset of Union: General Result]], it follows that: :$\ds X \subseteq \bigcup \BB$ Th...
Synthetic Basis formed from Synthetic Sub-Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Synthetic_Basis_formed_from_Synthetic_Sub-Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Synthetic_Basis_formed_from_Synthetic_Sub-Basis
[ "Synthetic Bases", "Synthetic Sub-Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Synthetic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Synthetic Basis", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Collection", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Synthetic Basis", "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Universal Set", "Intersection of Empty Set", "Set is Subset of Union/General Result", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Synthetic Basis", "Definition:Existential Quantifier", "Definition:Finite Set", "Union is Smallest Superset", "Union of Finite Sets is Finite", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/...
proofwiki-1816
Epimorphism Preserves Distributivity
Let $\struct {R_1, +_1, \circ_1}$ and $\struct {R_2, +_2, \circ_2}$ be algebraic structures. Let $\phi: R_1 \to R_2$ be an epimorphism. :If $\circ_1$ is left distributive over $+_1$, then $\circ_2$ is left distributive over $+_2$. :If $\circ_1$ is right distributive over $+_1$, then $\circ_2$ is right distributive over...
Throughout the following, we assume the morphism property holds for $\phi$ for both operations. It remains to be shown that for non-empty $R_1$, $\paren {x +_1 y}, \paren {y +_1 z}, \paren {x \circ_1 y }, \paren {y \circ_1 z}, \paren {x \circ_1 z}, \paren { x \circ_1 \paren {y +_1 z} }, \paren { \paren {x +_1 y} \circ_...
Let $\struct {R_1, +_1, \circ_1}$ and $\struct {R_2, +_2, \circ_2}$ be [[Definition:Algebraic Structure with Two Operations|algebraic structures]]. Let $\phi: R_1 \to R_2$ be an [[Definition:Epimorphism (Abstract Algebra)|epimorphism]]. :If $\circ_1$ is [[Definition:Left Distributive Operation|left distributive]] ove...
Throughout the following, we assume the [[Definition:Morphism Property|morphism property]] holds for $\phi$ for both operations. It remains to be shown that for [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] $R_1$, $\paren {x +_1 y}, \paren {y +_1 z}, \paren {x \circ_1 y }, \paren {y \circ_1 z}, \paren {x \circ_1 z}, \paren {...
Epimorphism Preserves Distributivity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Epimorphism_Preserves_Distributivity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Epimorphism_Preserves_Distributivity
[ "Epimorphisms (Abstract Algebra)", "Distributive Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Algebraic Structure/Two Operations", "Definition:Epimorphism (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Distributive Operation/Left", "Definition:Distributive Operation/Left", "Definition:Distributive Operation/Right", "Definition:Distributive Operation/Right", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "...
[ "Definition:Morphism Property", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Non-Empty Set" ]
proofwiki-1817
Epimorphism Preserves Groups
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ and $\struct {T, *}$ be algebraic structures. Let $\phi: \struct {S, \circ} \to \struct {T, *}$ be an epimorphism. Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a group. Then $\struct {T, *}$ is also a group.
From Epimorphism Preserves Semigroups, if $\struct {S, \circ}$ is a semigroup then so is $\struct {T, *}$. From Epimorphism Preserves Identity, if $\struct {S, \circ}$ has an identity $e_S$, then $\map \phi {e_S}$ is the identity for $*$. From Epimorphism Preserves Inverses, if $x^{-1}$ is an inverse of $x$ for $\circ$...
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ and $\struct {T, *}$ be [[Definition:Algebraic Structure with One Operation|algebraic structures]]. Let $\phi: \struct {S, \circ} \to \struct {T, *}$ be an [[Definition:Epimorphism (Abstract Algebra)|epimorphism]]. Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Then $\struct {T, ...
From [[Epimorphism Preserves Semigroups]], if $\struct {S, \circ}$ is a [[Definition:Semigroup|semigroup]] then so is $\struct {T, *}$. From [[Epimorphism Preserves Identity]], if $\struct {S, \circ}$ has an [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]] $e_S$, then $\map \phi {e_S}$ is the [[Definition:Identity Element|ide...
Epimorphism Preserves Groups
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Epimorphism_Preserves_Groups
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Epimorphism_Preserves_Groups
[ "Group Epimorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Algebraic Structure/One Operation", "Definition:Epimorphism (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Group" ]
[ "Epimorphism Preserves Semigroups", "Definition:Semigroup", "Epimorphism Preserves Identity", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Epimorphism Preserves Inverses", "Definition:Inverse (Abstract Algebra)/Inverse", "De...
proofwiki-1818
Totally Bounded Metric Space is Bounded
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a totally bounded metric space. Then $M$ is bounded.
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be totally bounded. Then there exist $n \in \N$ and points $x_0, \dots, x_n \in A$ such that: :$\ds \inf_{0 \mathop \le i \mathop \le n} \map d {x_i, x} \le 1$ for all $x \in A$. Let us set: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = := | r = x_0 }} {{eqn | l = D | o = := | r = \...
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|totally bounded metric space]]. Then $M$ is [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]].
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|totally bounded]]. Then there exist $n \in \N$ and [[Definition:Point of Set|points]] $x_0, \dots, x_n \in A$ such that: :$\ds \inf_{0 \mathop \le i \mathop \le n} \map d {x_i, x} \le 1$ for all $x \in A$. Let us set: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a ...
Totally Bounded Metric Space is Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Bounded
[ "Bounded Metric Spaces", "Totally Bounded Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space" ]
proofwiki-1819
Existence and Uniqueness of Sigma-Algebra Generated by Collection of Subsets
Let $X$ be a set. Let $\GG \subseteq \powerset X$ be a collection of subsets of $X$. Then $\map \sigma \GG$, the $\sigma$-algebra generated by $\GG$, exists and is unique.
=== Existence === By Power Set is Sigma-Algebra, there is at least one $\sigma$-algebra containing $\GG$. Next, let $\Bbb E$ be the collection of $\sigma$-algebras containing $\GG$: :$\Bbb E := \set {\Sigma': \GG \subseteq \Sigma', \text{$\Sigma'$ is a $\sigma$-algebra} }$ By Intersection of Sigma-Algebras, $\Sigma := ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\GG \subseteq \powerset X$ be a collection of [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $X$. Then $\map \sigma \GG$, the [[Definition:Sigma-Algebra Generated by Collection of Subsets|$\sigma$-algebra generated by $\GG$]], exists and is unique.
=== Existence === By [[Power Set is Sigma-Algebra]], there is at least one [[Definition:Sigma-Algebra|$\sigma$-algebra]] containing $\GG$. Next, let $\Bbb E$ be the collection of [[Definition:Sigma-Algebra|$\sigma$-algebras]] containing $\GG$: :$\Bbb E := \set {\Sigma': \GG \subseteq \Sigma', \text{$\Sigma'$ is a $\...
Existence and Uniqueness of Sigma-Algebra Generated by Collection of Subsets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Existence_and_Uniqueness_of_Sigma-Algebra_Generated_by_Collection_of_Subsets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Existence_and_Uniqueness_of_Sigma-Algebra_Generated_by_Collection_of_Subsets
[ "Sigma-Algebras Generated by Collection of Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Sigma-Algebra Generated by Collection of Subsets" ]
[ "Power Set is Sigma-Algebra", "Definition:Sigma-Algebra", "Definition:Sigma-Algebra", "Intersection of Sigma-Algebras", "Definition:Sigma-Algebra", "Set Intersection Preserves Subsets/Families of Sets", "Definition:Sigma-Algebra", "Intersection is Subset/General Result", "Definition:Sigma-Algebra" ]
proofwiki-1820
Basis for Topology on Cartesian Product
Let $T_1 = \struct{A_1, \tau_1}$ and $T_2 = \struct{A_2, \tau_2}$ be topological spaces. Let $A_1 \times A_2$ be the Cartesian product of $A_1$ and $A_2$. Let $\PP = \set {U_1 \times U_2 : U_1 \in \tau_1, U_2 \in \tau_2}$ Then $\PP$ is a synthetic basis on $A_1 \times A_2$.
We need to show that conditions $(\text B 1)$ and $(\text B 2)$ in the definition for basis hold for $\PP$.
Let $T_1 = \struct{A_1, \tau_1}$ and $T_2 = \struct{A_2, \tau_2}$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $A_1 \times A_2$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product|Cartesian product]] of $A_1$ and $A_2$. Let $\PP = \set {U_1 \times U_2 : U_1 \in \tau_1, U_2 \in \tau_2}$ Then $\PP$ is a [[Definition...
We need to show that conditions $(\text B 1)$ and $(\text B 2)$ in the definition for [[Definition:Synthetic Basis|basis]] hold for $\PP$.
Basis for Topology on Cartesian Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Basis_for_Topology_on_Cartesian_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Basis_for_Topology_on_Cartesian_Product
[ "Product Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Synthetic Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Synthetic Basis" ]
proofwiki-1821
Projection from Product Topology is Continuous
Let $T_1 = \struct {S_1, \tau_1}$ and $T_2 = \struct {S_2, \tau_2}$ be topological spaces. Let $T = \struct {T_1 \times T_2, \tau}$ be the product space of $T_1$ and $T_2$, where $\tau$ is the product topology on $S$. Let $\pr_1: T \to T_1$ and $\pr_2: T \to T_2$ be the first and second projections from $T$ onto its fa...
From Natural Basis of Product Topology of Finite Product, a basis for $\tau$ is: :$\BB = \set {U \times V: U \in \tau_1, V \in \tau_2}$ Let $U$ be open in $T_1$. Then $\map {\pr_1^{-1} } U = U \times T_2$ is one of the open sets in the basis in the definition of product topology. Thus $\pr_1$ is continuous. The same ar...
Let $T_1 = \struct {S_1, \tau_1}$ and $T_2 = \struct {S_2, \tau_2}$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $T = \struct {T_1 \times T_2, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Product Space (Topology) of Two Factor Spaces|product space]] of $T_1$ and $T_2$, where $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Product Topology on...
From [[Natural Basis of Product Topology of Finite Product]], a [[Definition:Synthetic Basis|basis]] for $\tau$ is: :$\BB = \set {U \times V: U \in \tau_1, V \in \tau_2}$ Let $U$ be [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $T_1$. Then $\map {\pr_1^{-1} } U = U \times T_2$ is one of the [[Definition:Open Set (Topolo...
Projection from Product Topology is Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_from_Product_Topology_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_from_Product_Topology_is_Continuous
[ "Projection from Product Topology is Continuous", "Projection from Product Topology is Open and Continuous", "Product Topology", "Continuous Mappings", "Projections" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)/Two Factor Spaces", "Definition:Product Topology/Two Factor Spaces", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Product Topology/Factor Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[ "Natural Basis of Product Topology/Finite Product", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Synthetic Basis", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Product Topology/Two Factor Spaces", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
proofwiki-1822
Projection from Product Topology is Continuous
Let $T_1 = \struct {S_1, \tau_1}$ and $T_2 = \struct {S_2, \tau_2}$ be topological spaces. Let $T = \struct {T_1 \times T_2, \tau}$ be the product space of $T_1$ and $T_2$, where $\tau$ is the product topology on $S$. Let $\pr_1: T \to T_1$ and $\pr_2: T \to T_2$ be the first and second projections from $T$ onto its fa...
By definition of the product topology on $S$: :$\tau$ is the initial topology on $S$ with respect to $\family {\pr_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ By definition of the Initial Topoplogy: Definition 2: :$\tau$ is the coarsest topology on $S$ such that each $\pr_i: S \to S_i$ is a $\struct{\tau, \tau_i}$-continuous.
Let $T_1 = \struct {S_1, \tau_1}$ and $T_2 = \struct {S_2, \tau_2}$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $T = \struct {T_1 \times T_2, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Product Space (Topology) of Two Factor Spaces|product space]] of $T_1$ and $T_2$, where $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Product Topology on...
By definition of the [[Definition:Product Topology|product topology]] on $S$: :$\tau$ is the [[Definition:Initial Topology|initial topology]] on $S$ with respect to $\family {\pr_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ By definition of the [[Definition:Initial Topology/Definition 2|Initial Topoplogy: Definition 2]]: :$\tau$ is the [[De...
Projection from Product Topology is Continuous/General Result/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_from_Product_Topology_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_from_Product_Topology_is_Continuous/General_Result/Proof
[ "Projection from Product Topology is Continuous", "Projection from Product Topology is Open and Continuous", "Product Topology", "Continuous Mappings", "Projections" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)/Two Factor Spaces", "Definition:Product Topology/Two Factor Spaces", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Product Topology/Factor Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Initial Topology/Definition 2", "Definition:Coarser Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
proofwiki-1823
Continuous Mapping to Product Space
Let $T = T_1 \times T_2$ be the product space of two topological spaces $T_1$ and $T_2$. Let $\pr_1: T \to T_1$ and $\pr_2: T \to T_2$ be the first and second projections from $T$ onto its factors. Let $T'$ be a topological space. Let $f: T' \to T$ be a mapping. Then $f$ is continuous {{iff}} $\pr_1 \circ f$ and $\pr_2...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $f$ be continuous. Then by: :Projection from Product Topology is Continuous :Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous so are $\pr_1 \circ f$ and $\pr_2 \circ f$. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $T = T_1 \times T_2$ be the [[Definition:Product Space (Topology) of Two Factor Spaces|product space]] of two [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] $T_1$ and $T_2$. Let $\pr_1: T \to T_1$ and $\pr_2: T \to T_2$ be the [[Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)|first and second projections]] from $T$ on...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $f$ be [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]]. Then by: :[[Projection from Product Topology is Continuous]] :[[Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous]] so are $\pr_1 \circ f$ and $\pr_2 \circ f$. {{qed|lemma}}
Continuous Mapping to Product Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Mapping_to_Product_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Mapping_to_Product_Space
[ "Product Topology", "Continuous Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Product Space (Topology)/Two Factor Spaces", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Product Topology/Factor Space", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Contin...
[ "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Projection from Product Topology is Continuous", "Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)...
proofwiki-1824
Open and Closed Sets in Topological Space
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Then $S$ and $\O$ are both both open and closed in $T$.
From the definition of closed set, $U$ is open in $T$ {{iff}} $S \setminus U$ is closed in $T$. From Underlying Set of Topological Space is Clopen, $S$ is both open and closed in $T$. From Empty Set is Element of Topology, $\O$ is open in $T$. From Empty Set is Closed in Topological Space, we have that $\O$ is closed i...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then $S$ and $\O$ are both [[Definition:Clopen Set|both open and closed]] in $T$.
From the definition of [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed set]], $U$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $T$ {{iff}} $S \setminus U$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T$. From [[Underlying Set of Topological Space is Clopen]], $S$ is both [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] and [...
Open and Closed Sets in Topological Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_and_Closed_Sets_in_Topological_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_and_Closed_Sets_in_Topological_Space
[ "Clopen Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Clopen Set" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Underlying Set of Topological Space is Clopen", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Empty Set is Element of Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Empty Set is Clo...
proofwiki-1825
Absolutely Continuous Real Function is Continuous
Let $I \subseteq \R$ be a real interval. Let $f: I \to \R$ be an absolutely continuous real function. Then $f$ is continuous.
From Absolutely Continuous Real Function is Uniformly Continuous: :$f$ is uniformly continuous. Therefore, from Uniformly Continuous Real Function is Continuous: :$f$ is continuous. {{qed}} Category:Absolutely Continuous Real Functions Category:Continuous Real Functions 9uebyxkiz5v5kvnu8ztlutkxsrz1zdm
Let $I \subseteq \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Interval|real interval]]. Let $f: I \to \R$ be an [[Definition:Absolutely Continuous Real Function|absolutely continuous real function]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous]].
From [[Absolutely Continuous Real Function is Uniformly Continuous]]: :$f$ is [[Definition:Uniformly Continuous Real Function|uniformly continuous]]. Therefore, from [[Uniformly Continuous Real Function is Continuous]]: :$f$ is [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous]]. {{qed}} [[Category:Absolutely Contin...
Absolutely Continuous Real Function is Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absolutely_Continuous_Real_Function_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absolutely_Continuous_Real_Function_is_Continuous
[ "Absolutely Continuous Real Functions", "Continuous Real Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Absolute Continuity/Real Function", "Definition:Continuous Real Function" ]
[ "Absolutely Continuous Real Function is Uniformly Continuous", "Definition:Uniform Continuity/Real Function", "Uniformly Continuous Function is Continuous/Real Function", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Category:Absolutely Continuous Real Functions", "Category:Continuous Real Functions" ]
proofwiki-1826
Closed Set in Topological Subspace
Let $T = \struct{S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $T' = \struct{H, \tau_H}$ be a subspace of $T$ where $H \subseteq S$. Then $V \subseteq T'$ is closed in $T'$ {{iff}} $V = T' \cap W$ for some $W$ closed in $T$.
=== Necessary Condition === Suppose $V \subseteq T'$ is closed in $T'$. Then $T' \setminus V$ is open in $T'$ by definition. So, by definition of subspace topology, $T' \setminus V = T' \cap U$ for some $U$ open in $T$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = V | r = T' \setminus \paren {T' \setminus V} | c = Relat...
Let $T = \struct{S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $T' = \struct{H, \tau_H}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of $T$ where $H \subseteq S$. Then $V \subseteq T'$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T'$ {{iff}} $V = T' \cap W$ for some $W$ [[Definit...
=== Necessary Condition === Suppose $V \subseteq T'$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T'$. Then $T' \setminus V$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $T'$ by definition. So, by definition of [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace topology]], $T' \setminus V = T' \cap U$ for some $U$ [[...
Closed Set in Topological Subspace
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Set_in_Topological_Subspace
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Set_in_Topological_Subspace
[ "Closed Sets", "Topological Subspaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Relative Complement of Relative Complement", "Set Difference with Intersection is Difference", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "De...
proofwiki-1827
Continuity Defined from Closed Sets
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be topological spaces. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a mapping. Then $f$ is continuous {{iff}} for all $V$ closed in $T_2$, $f^{-1} \sqbrk V$ is closed in $T_1$.
First we show the following. Let $W \in T_2$. We note that $f^{-1} \sqbrk {T_2} = T_1$. Hence, from Preimage of Set Difference under Mapping, we have: :$f^{-1} \sqbrk {T_2 \setminus W} = T_1 \setminus f^{-1} \sqbrk W$
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]] {{iff}} for all $V$ [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T_2$, $f^{-1} \sqbrk V$ is [[Definit...
First we show the following. Let $W \in T_2$. We note that $f^{-1} \sqbrk {T_2} = T_1$. Hence, from [[Preimage of Set Difference under Mapping]], we have: :$f^{-1} \sqbrk {T_2 \setminus W} = T_1 \setminus f^{-1} \sqbrk W$
Continuity Defined from Closed Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuity_Defined_from_Closed_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuity_Defined_from_Closed_Sets
[ "Closed Sets", "Continuous Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology" ]
[ "Preimage of Set Difference under Mapping" ]
proofwiki-1828
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite
The set of real numbers $\R$ is uncountably infinite.
We prove the equivalent result that every sequence $\sequence {x_k}_{k \mathop \in \N}$ omits at least one $x \in \R$. Let $\sequence {x_k}_{k \mathop \in \N}$ be a sequence of distinct real numbers. Let a sequence of closed real intervals $\sequence {I_n}$ be defined as follows: Let: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a_k ...
The [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ is [[Definition:Uncountable Set|uncountably infinite]].
We prove the equivalent result that every [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] $\sequence {x_k}_{k \mathop \in \N}$ omits at least one $x \in \R$. Let $\sequence {x_k}_{k \mathop \in \N}$ be a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let a [[Definition...
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite/Cantor's First Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite/Cantor's_First_Proof
[ "Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite", "Real Numbers", "Examples of Uncountable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Uncountable/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Term of Sequence", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Interior (Topology)", "D...
proofwiki-1829
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite
The set of real numbers $\R$ is uncountably infinite.
By definition, a perfect set is a set $X$ such that every element $x \in X$ is the limit of a sequence of elements of $X$ distinct from $x$. From Real Numbers form Perfect Set, $\R$ is perfect. Therefore it is sufficient to show that a perfect subset of $X \subseteq \R^k$ is uncountable. We prove the equivalent result ...
The [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ is [[Definition:Uncountable Set|uncountably infinite]].
By definition, a [[Definition:Perfect Set|perfect set]] is a [[Definition:Set|set]] $X$ such that every [[Definition:Element|element]] $x \in X$ is the [[Definition:Limit of Sequence (Topology)|limit of a sequence]] of [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $X$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] from $x$. From [[Real Number...
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite/Cantor's Second Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite/Cantor's_Second_Proof
[ "Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite", "Real Numbers", "Examples of Uncountable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Uncountable/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Perfect Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Limit of Sequence/Topological Space", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Distinct", "Real Numbers form Perfect Set", "Definition:Perfect Set", "Definition:Perfect Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Uncountable/Set",...
proofwiki-1830
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite
The set of real numbers $\R$ is uncountably infinite.
It is sufficient to show that the real interval $I = \set {x \in \R: 0 < x \le 1}$ is uncountable. Let $x \in I$. From Existence of Base-N Representation, $x$ has a unique representation of the form: :$x = \dfrac {\epsilon_1} 3 + \dfrac {\epsilon_2} {3^2} + \dfrac {\epsilon_3} {3^3} + \cdots$ where $\epsilon_k = 0, 1$...
The [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ is [[Definition:Uncountable Set|uncountably infinite]].
It is sufficient to show that the [[Definition:Real Interval|real interval]] $I = \set {x \in \R: 0 < x \le 1}$ is [[Definition:Uncountable Set|uncountable]]. Let $x \in I$. From [[Existence of Base-N Representation]], $x$ has a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] representation of the form: :$x = \dfrac {\epsilon_1} 3 + \d...
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite/Proof 1 using Ternary Notation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite/Proof_1_using_Ternary_Notation
[ "Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite", "Real Numbers", "Examples of Uncountable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Uncountable/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Uncountable/Set", "Existence of Base-N Representation", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Countably Infinite/Set", "Definition:Ternary Notation", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Pr...
proofwiki-1831
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite
The set of real numbers $\R$ is uncountably infinite.
Define a mapping $f: \powerset {\N_{>0} } \to \R$ thus: :$\map f S = 0.d_1 d_2 \ldots$, interpreted as a ternary expansion where $\sequence {d_n}$ is the characteristic function of $S$. That is: :$\ds \map f S = \sum_{i \mathop \in S} 3^{-i}$ By the lemma, $f$ is an injection. {{AimForCont}} that $\R$ is countable. The...
The [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ is [[Definition:Uncountable Set|uncountably infinite]].
Define a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $f: \powerset {\N_{>0} } \to \R$ thus: :$\map f S = 0.d_1 d_2 \ldots$, interpreted as a [[Definition:Ternary Notation|ternary expansion]] where $\sequence {d_n}$ is the characteristic function of $S$. That is: :$\ds \map f S = \sum_{i \mathop \in S} 3^{-i}$ By the [[Real Numbe...
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite/Proof 2 using Ternary Notation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite/Proof_2_using_Ternary_Notation
[ "Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite", "Real Numbers", "Examples of Uncountable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Uncountable/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Ternary Notation", "Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite/Proof 2 using Ternary Notation/Lemma", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Injection", "Composite of Injections is Injection", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Contradiction", ...
proofwiki-1832
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite
The set of real numbers $\R$ is uncountably infinite.
By Surjection from Natural Numbers iff Countable, a set $A$ is countable {{iff}} there exists a surjection $f: \N \to A$. Suppose there exists a surjection $f: \N \to \R$. Then $\forall x \in \R: \exists n \in \N: \map f n = x$ as $f$ is surjective. Let $d_{n, 0}$ be the integer before the decimal point of $\map f n$. ...
The [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ is [[Definition:Uncountable Set|uncountably infinite]].
By [[Surjection from Natural Numbers iff Countable]], a set $A$ is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] {{iff}} there exists a [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]] $f: \N \to A$. Suppose there exists a [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]] $f: \N \to \R$. Then $\forall x \in \R: \exists n \in \N: \map f n = x$ as $f...
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite/Set-Theoretical Approach: Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite/Set-Theoretical_Approach:_Proof_1
[ "Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite", "Real Numbers", "Examples of Uncountable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Uncountable/Set" ]
[ "Surjection from Natural Numbers iff Countable", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Decimal Expansion/Decimal Point", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Integer", "D...
proofwiki-1833
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite
The set of real numbers $\R$ is uncountably infinite.
By Cantor's Theorem there is no surjection: :$\N \twoheadrightarrow \powerset \N$ Additionally, we have Power Set of Natural Numbers is not Countable. Therefore, if we can show that $\powerset \N$ injects into $\R$ then there is no injection $\R \hookrightarrow \N$ and $\R$ is uncountable. To prove the theorem we const...
The [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ is [[Definition:Uncountable Set|uncountably infinite]].
By [[Cantor's Theorem]] there is no [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]]: :$\N \twoheadrightarrow \powerset \N$ Additionally, we have [[Power Set of Natural Numbers is not Countable]]. Therefore, if we can show that $\powerset \N$ [[Definition:Injection|injects]] into $\R$ then there is no [[Definition:Injection|inje...
Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite/Set-Theoretical Approach: Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Numbers_are_Uncountably_Infinite/Set-Theoretical_Approach:_Proof_2
[ "Real Numbers are Uncountably Infinite", "Real Numbers", "Examples of Uncountable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Uncountable/Set" ]
[ "Cantor's Theorem", "Definition:Surjection", "Power Set of Natural Numbers is Uncountable", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Characteristic Function (Set Theory)/Set", "Definition:Characteristic Function (Set Theory)/Set", "Definition:Sequence/Infin...
proofwiki-1834
Condition for Point being in Closure
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq S$. Let $H^-$ denote the closure of $H$ in $T$. Let $x \in S$. Then $x \in H^-$ {{iff}} every open neighborhood of $x$ contains a point in $H$.
From the definition of closure, we have that $H^-$ is the union of $H$ and all the limit points of $H$ in $T$. By definition, an open neighborhood of $x$ in $T$ is an open set of $T$ which contains $x$. === Necessary Condition === Let $x \in H^-$. Then either: :$(1): \quad x \in H$, in which case every open neighborhoo...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq S$. Let $H^-$ denote the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $H$ in $T$. Let $x \in S$. Then $x \in H^-$ {{iff}} every [[Definition:Open Neighborhood of Point|open neighborhood]] of $x$ contains a point i...
From the definition of [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]], we have that $H^-$ is the [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of $H$ and all the [[Definition:Limit Point of Set|limit points]] of $H$ in $T$. By definition, an [[Definition:Open Neighborhood of Point|open neighborhood]] of $x$ in $T$ is an [[Definition:Open...
Condition for Point being in Closure/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Condition_for_Point_being_in_Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Condition_for_Point_being_in_Closure/Proof_1
[ "Set Closures", "Condition for Point being in Closure" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Open Neighborhood/Point" ]
[ "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Limit Point/Topology/Set", "Definition:Open Neighborhood/Point", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Neighborhood/Point", "Definition:Limit Point/Topology/Set", "Definition:Limit Point/Topology/Set", "Definition:Open N...
proofwiki-1835
Condition for Point being in Closure
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq S$. Let $H^-$ denote the closure of $H$ in $T$. Let $x \in S$. Then $x \in H^-$ {{iff}} every open neighborhood of $x$ contains a point in $H$.
The condition to be proved is equivalent to showing that $x \in H^-$ {{iff}}, for every open neighborhood $U$ of $x$, the intersection $H \cap U$ is non-empty. For $U \in \tau$, let $U^{\complement}$ denote the relative complement of $U$ in $S$. By definition, $U^{\complement}$ is closed in $T$ We have that: {{begin-eq...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq S$. Let $H^-$ denote the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $H$ in $T$. Let $x \in S$. Then $x \in H^-$ {{iff}} every [[Definition:Open Neighborhood of Point|open neighborhood]] of $x$ contains a point i...
The condition to be proved is equivalent to showing that $x \in H^-$ {{iff}}, for every [[Definition:Open Neighborhood of Point|open neighborhood]] $U$ of $x$, the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] $H \cap U$ is [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]]. For $U \in \tau$, let $U^{\complement}$ denote the [[De...
Condition for Point being in Closure/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Condition_for_Point_being_in_Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Condition_for_Point_being_in_Closure/Proof_2
[ "Set Closures", "Condition for Point being in Closure" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Open Neighborhood/Point" ]
[ "Definition:Open Neighborhood/Point", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Empty Intersection iff Subset of Complement", "Set Closure is Smallest Closed Set/Topology", "Relative Complement inverts Subsets", "R...
proofwiki-1836
Topological Closure of Subset is Subset of Topological Closure
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq K$ and $K \subseteq S$. Then: :$\map \cl H \subseteq \map \cl K$ where $\map \cl H$ denotes the closure of $H$.
From Topological Closure is Closed, $\map \cl K$ is closed. From Set is Subset of its Topological Closure: :$K \subseteq \map \cl K$ By Subset Relation is Transitive, it follows that: :$H \subseteq \map \cl K$ Hence, by definition of closure as the smallest closed set that contains $H$: :$\map \cl H \subseteq \map \cl ...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq K$ and $K \subseteq S$. Then: :$\map \cl H \subseteq \map \cl K$ where $\map \cl H$ denotes the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $H$.
From [[Topological Closure is Closed]], $\map \cl K$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]]. From [[Set is Subset of its Topological Closure]]: :$K \subseteq \map \cl K$ By [[Subset Relation is Transitive]], it follows that: :$H \subseteq \map \cl K$ Hence, by definition of [[Definition:Closure (Topology)...
Topological Closure of Subset is Subset of Topological Closure/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Closure_of_Subset_is_Subset_of_Topological_Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Closure_of_Subset_is_Subset_of_Topological_Closure/Proof_1
[ "Subsets", "Set Closures", "Topological Closure of Subset is Subset of Topological Closure" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Closure (Topology)" ]
[ "Topological Closure is Closed", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Set is Subset of its Topological Closure", "Subset Relation is Transitive", "Definition:Closure (Topology)/Definition 3", "Definition:Smallest Set by Set Inclusion", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Subset" ]
proofwiki-1837
Topological Closure of Subset is Subset of Topological Closure
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq K$ and $K \subseteq S$. Then: :$\map \cl H \subseteq \map \cl K$ where $\map \cl H$ denotes the closure of $H$.
From the definition of closure: :$\map \cl H$ is the union of $H$ and its limit points. Let $x \in \map \cl H$. If $x \in H$ then $x \in K \implies x \in \map \cl K$. Otherwise $x$ is a limit point of $H$. That is, every open set $U$ of $T$ such that $x \in U$ contains $y \in H$ such that $y \ne x$. But as $y \in H$ it...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq K$ and $K \subseteq S$. Then: :$\map \cl H \subseteq \map \cl K$ where $\map \cl H$ denotes the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $H$.
From the definition of [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]]: :$\map \cl H$ is the [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of $H$ and its [[Definition:Limit Point of Set|limit points]]. Let $x \in \map \cl H$. If $x \in H$ then $x \in K \implies x \in \map \cl K$. Otherwise $x$ is a [[Definition:Limit Point of Set|limi...
Topological Closure of Subset is Subset of Topological Closure/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Closure_of_Subset_is_Subset_of_Topological_Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Closure_of_Subset_is_Subset_of_Topological_Closure/Proof_2
[ "Subsets", "Set Closures", "Topological Closure of Subset is Subset of Topological Closure" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Closure (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Limit Point/Topology/Set", "Definition:Limit Point/Topology/Set", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Limit Point/Topology/Set", "Set Union Preserves Subsets" ]
proofwiki-1838
Closure of Topological Closure equals Closure
Let $T$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq T$. Then: :$\map \cl {\map \cl H} = \map \cl H$ where $\cl$ denotes the closure of $H$.
It follows directly from Set is Subset of its Topological Closure that: :$\map \cl H \subseteq \map \cl {\map \cl H}$ {{qed|lemma}} Let $x \in \map \cl {\map \cl H}$. Then from Condition for Point being in Closure, any $U$ which is open in $T$ such that $x \in U$ contains some $y \in \map \cl H$. If we consider $U$ as ...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq T$. Then: :$\map \cl {\map \cl H} = \map \cl H$ where $\cl$ denotes the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $H$.
It follows directly from [[Set is Subset of its Topological Closure]] that: :$\map \cl H \subseteq \map \cl {\map \cl H}$ {{qed|lemma}} Let $x \in \map \cl {\map \cl H}$. Then from [[Condition for Point being in Closure]], any $U$ which is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $T$ such that $x \in U$ contains s...
Closure of Topological Closure equals Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Topological_Closure_equals_Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Topological_Closure_equals_Closure
[ "Set Closures" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Closure (Topology)" ]
[ "Set is Subset of its Topological Closure", "Condition for Point being in Closure", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Equality" ]
proofwiki-1839
Topological Closure is Closed
Let $T$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq T$. Then the closure $\map \cl H$ of $H$ is closed in $T$.
From Closure of Topological Closure equals Closure: :$\map \cl {\map \cl H} = \map \cl H$ From Set is Closed iff Equals Topological Closure, it follows that $\map \cl H$ is closed. {{qed}}
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq T$. Then the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] $\map \cl H$ of $H$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T$.
From [[Closure of Topological Closure equals Closure]]: :$\map \cl {\map \cl H} = \map \cl H$ From [[Set is Closed iff Equals Topological Closure]], it follows that $\map \cl H$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]]. {{qed}}
Topological Closure is Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Closure_is_Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Closure_is_Closed
[ "Set Closures", "Closed Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology" ]
[ "Closure of Topological Closure equals Closure", "Set is Closed iff Equals Topological Closure", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology" ]
proofwiki-1840
Equivalence of Definitions of Closure of Topological Subspace
{{TFAE|def = Closure (Topology)|view = closure|context = Topology (Mathematical Branch)|contextview = topology}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq S$.
=== Definition $1$ is equivalent to Definition $2$ === This is proved in Set Closure as Intersection of Closed Sets. {{qed|lemma}}
{{TFAE|def = Closure (Topology)|view = closure|context = Topology (Mathematical Branch)|contextview = topology}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq S$.
=== Definition $1$ is equivalent to Definition $2$ === This is proved in [[Set Closure as Intersection of Closed Sets]]. {{qed|lemma}}
Equivalence of Definitions of Closure of Topological Subspace
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Closure_of_Topological_Subspace
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Closure_of_Topological_Subspace
[ "Set Closures" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space" ]
[ "Set Closure as Intersection of Closed Sets" ]
proofwiki-1841
Closure of Intersection is Subset of Intersection of Closures
Let $T$ be a topological space. Let $I$ be an indexing set. Let $\forall i \in I: H_i \subseteq T$. Then: :$\ds \map \cl {\bigcap_I H_i} \subseteq \bigcap_I \map \cl {H_i}$ where $\map \cl {H_i}$ denotes the closure of $H_i$.
Since $\ds \bigcap_I \map \cl {H_i}$ is an intersection of closed sets, it is closed, from Topology Defined by Closed Sets. Also, it contains $\ds \bigcap_I H_i$ and so by the main definition of closure also contains $\ds \map \cl {\bigcap_I H_i}$. {{qed}}
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $I$ be an [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]]. Let $\forall i \in I: H_i \subseteq T$. Then: :$\ds \map \cl {\bigcap_I H_i} \subseteq \bigcap_I \map \cl {H_i}$ where $\map \cl {H_i}$ denotes the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $H...
Since $\ds \bigcap_I \map \cl {H_i}$ is an intersection of [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed sets]], it is closed, from [[Topology Defined by Closed Sets]]. Also, it contains $\ds \bigcap_I H_i$ and so by the main definition of [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] also contains $\ds \map \cl {\bigcap_I H_...
Closure of Intersection is Subset of Intersection of Closures
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Intersection_is_Subset_of_Intersection_of_Closures
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Intersection_is_Subset_of_Intersection_of_Closures
[ "Set Intersection", "Set Closures" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Closure (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Topology Defined by Closed Sets", "Definition:Closure (Topology)" ]
proofwiki-1842
Closure of Finite Union equals Union of Closures
Let $T$ be a topological space. Let $n \in \N$. Let: :$\forall i \in \set {1, 2, \ldots, n}: H_i \subseteq T$ Then: :$\ds \bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n \map \cl {H_i} = \map \cl {\bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n H_i}$ where $\map \cl {H_i}$ denotes the closure of $H_i$.
From Closure of Union contains Union of Closures we have that: :$\ds \bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n \map \cl {H_i} \subseteq \map \cl {\bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n H_i}$ We need now to show that: :$\ds \bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n \map \cl {H_i} \supseteq \map \cl {\bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n H_i}$ Let $\ds K = \bigcup_{i \mathop ...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $n \in \N$. Let: :$\forall i \in \set {1, 2, \ldots, n}: H_i \subseteq T$ Then: :$\ds \bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n \map \cl {H_i} = \map \cl {\bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n H_i}$ where $\map \cl {H_i}$ denotes the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]...
From [[Closure of Union contains Union of Closures]] we have that: :$\ds \bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n \map \cl {H_i} \subseteq \map \cl {\bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n H_i}$ We need now to show that: :$\ds \bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n \map \cl {H_i} \supseteq \map \cl {\bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n H_i}$ Let $\ds K = \bigcup_{...
Closure of Finite Union equals Union of Closures
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Finite_Union_equals_Union_of_Closures
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Finite_Union_equals_Union_of_Closures
[ "Set Union", "Set Closures" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Closure (Topology)" ]
[ "Closure of Union contains Union of Closures", "Topological Closure is Closed", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Topology Defined by Closed Sets", "Set is Subset of its Topological ...
proofwiki-1843
Compact First-Countable Space is Sequentially Compact
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a compact first-countable topological space. Then every infinite sequence in $S$ has a convergent subsequence; that is, $T$ is sequentially compact.
Let $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be an infinite sequence in $S$. {{AimForCont}} that $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ does not have a convergent subsequence. By Accumulation Point of Infinite Sequence in First-Countable Space is Subsequential Limit, it follows that $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ does ...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]] [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then every [[Definition:Infinite Sequence|infinite sequence]] in $S$ has a [[Definition:Convergent Sequence (Topology)|convergent]] ...
Let $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be an [[Definition:Infinite Sequence|infinite sequence]] in $S$. {{AimForCont}} that $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ does not have a [[Definition:Convergent Sequence (Topology)|convergent]] [[Definition:Subsequence|subsequence]]. By [[Accumulation Point of Infinite Seque...
Compact First-Countable Space is Sequentially Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_First-Countable_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_First-Countable_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact
[ "First-Countable Spaces", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Sequentially Compact Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:First-Countable Space", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Sequence/Infinite Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology", "Definition:Subsequence", "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence/Infinite Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology", "Definition:Subsequence", "Accumulation Point of Infinite Sequence in First-Countable Space is Subsequential Limit", "Definition:Accumulation Point/Sequence", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Finite Set", "D...
proofwiki-1844
Compact First-Countable Space is Sequentially Compact
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a compact first-countable topological space. Then every infinite sequence in $S$ has a convergent subsequence; that is, $T$ is sequentially compact.
Follows directly from: : Infinite Sequence in Countably Compact Space has Accumulation Point : Accumulation Point of Infinite Sequence in First-Countable Space is Subsequential Limit {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]] [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then every [[Definition:Infinite Sequence|infinite sequence]] in $S$ has a [[Definition:Convergent Sequence (Topology)|convergent]] ...
Follows directly from: : [[Infinite Sequence in Countably Compact Space has Accumulation Point]] : [[Accumulation Point of Infinite Sequence in First-Countable Space is Subsequential Limit]] {{qed}}
Countably Compact First-Countable Space is Sequentially Compact/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_First-Countable_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countably_Compact_First-Countable_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact/Proof_1
[ "First-Countable Spaces", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Sequentially Compact Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:First-Countable Space", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Sequence/Infinite Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology", "Definition:Subsequence", "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space" ]
[ "Infinite Sequence in Countably Compact Space has Accumulation Point", "Accumulation Point of Infinite Sequence in First-Countable Space is Subsequential Limit" ]
proofwiki-1845
Compact First-Countable Space is Sequentially Compact
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a compact first-countable topological space. Then every infinite sequence in $S$ has a convergent subsequence; that is, $T$ is sequentially compact.
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a countably compact first-countable topological space. By definition of sequentially compact, it is sufficient to show that every infinite sequence in $S$ has a convergent subsequence. Let $\sequence {s_n}$ be any sequence in $S$. By Infinite Sequence in Countably Compact Space has Accumu...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]] [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then every [[Definition:Infinite Sequence|infinite sequence]] in $S$ has a [[Definition:Convergent Sequence (Topology)|convergent]] ...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Countably Compact Space|countably compact]] [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. By definition of [[Definition:Sequentially Compact Space|sequentially compact]], it is sufficient to show that every [[Defin...
Countably Compact First-Countable Space is Sequentially Compact/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_First-Countable_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countably_Compact_First-Countable_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact/Proof_2
[ "First-Countable Spaces", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Sequentially Compact Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:First-Countable Space", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Sequence/Infinite Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology", "Definition:Subsequence", "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space" ]
[ "Definition:Countably Compact Space", "Definition:First-Countable Space", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space", "Definition:Sequence/Infinite Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology", "Definition:Subsequence", "Definition:Sequence/Infinite Sequence", "I...
proofwiki-1846
Closure of Open Ball in Metric Space
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a metric space. Let $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ be an open $\epsilon$-ball in $M$. Let $y \in \map \cl {\map {B_\epsilon} x}$, where $\cl$ denotes the closure of $\map {B_\epsilon} x$. Then $\map d {x, y} \le \epsilon$.
Suppose $\map d {x, y} > \epsilon$. Then $\map {B_{\map d {x, y} - \epsilon} } y$ is an open set containing $y$ and not meeting $\map {B_\epsilon} x$. Hence: :$y \notin \map \cl {\map {B_\epsilon} x}$ {{qed}}
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. Let $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ be an [[Definition:Open Ball of Metric Space|open $\epsilon$-ball]] in $M$. Let $y \in \map \cl {\map {B_\epsilon} x}$, where $\cl$ denotes the [[Definition:Closure (Metric Space)|closure]] of $\map {B_\epsilon} x$. Th...
Suppose $\map d {x, y} > \epsilon$. Then $\map {B_{\map d {x, y} - \epsilon} } y$ is an [[Definition:Open Set (Metric Space)|open set]] containing $y$ and not meeting $\map {B_\epsilon} x$. Hence: :$y \notin \map \cl {\map {B_\epsilon} x}$ {{qed}}
Closure of Open Ball in Metric Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Open_Ball_in_Metric_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Open_Ball_in_Metric_Space
[ "Open Balls" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Closure (Topology)/Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space" ]
proofwiki-1847
Nowhere Dense iff Complement of Closure is Everywhere Dense
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq S$. Then $H$ is nowhere dense in $T$ {{iff}} $S \setminus H^-$ is everywhere dense in $T$, where $H^-$ denotes the closure of $H$. === Corollary === {{:Nowhere Dense iff Complement of Closure is Everywhere Dense/Corollary}}
Let: :$H^\circ$ denote the interior of any $H \subseteq S$ :$H^-$ denote the closure of any $H \subseteq S$. From the definition, $H$ is nowhere dense in $T$ {{iff}} $\paren {H^-}^\circ = \O$. From the definition of interior, it follows that $\paren {H^-}^\circ = \O$ {{iff}} every open set of $T$ contains a point of $S...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq S$. Then $H$ is [[Definition:Nowhere Dense|nowhere dense]] in $T$ {{iff}} $S \setminus H^-$ is [[Definition:Everywhere Dense|everywhere dense]] in $T$, where $H^-$ denotes the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure...
Let: :$H^\circ$ denote the [[Definition:Interior (Topology)|interior]] of any $H \subseteq S$ :$H^-$ denote the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of any $H \subseteq S$. From the definition, $H$ is [[Definition:Nowhere Dense|nowhere dense]] in $T$ {{iff}} $\paren {H^-}^\circ = \O$. From the definition of [[D...
Nowhere Dense iff Complement of Closure is Everywhere Dense
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Nowhere_Dense_iff_Complement_of_Closure_is_Everywhere_Dense
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Nowhere_Dense_iff_Complement_of_Closure_is_Everywhere_Dense
[ "Nowhere Dense iff Complement of Closure is Everywhere Dense", "Set Closures", "Nowhere Dense" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Nowhere Dense", "Definition:Everywhere Dense", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Nowhere Dense iff Complement of Closure is Everywhere Dense/Corollary" ]
[ "Definition:Interior (Topology)", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Nowhere Dense", "Definition:Interior (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Everywhere Dense" ]
proofwiki-1848
Convergence in Indiscrete Space
Let $\struct {S, \set {S, \O} }$ be an indiscrete space. Let $\sequence {x_n}$ be any sequence in $S$. Then $\sequence {x_n}$ converges to any point $x$ of $S$.
For any open set $U \subseteq S$ such that $x \in U$, we must have $U = S$. Hence: :$\forall n \ge 1: x_n \in U$ The result follows from the definition of a convergent sequence in a topological space. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {S, \set {S, \O} }$ be an [[Definition:Indiscrete Topology|indiscrete space]]. Let $\sequence {x_n}$ be any [[Definition:Sequence|sequence in $S$]]. Then $\sequence {x_n}$ [[Definition:Convergent Sequence (Topology)|converges]] to any point $x$ of $S$.
For any [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open set]] $U \subseteq S$ such that $x \in U$, we must have $U = S$. Hence: :$\forall n \ge 1: x_n \in U$ The result follows from the definition of a [[Definition:Convergent Sequence (Topology)|convergent sequence in a topological space]]. {{qed}}
Convergence in Indiscrete Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergence_in_Indiscrete_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergence_in_Indiscrete_Space
[ "Indiscrete Topology", "Convergence" ]
[ "Definition:Indiscrete Topology", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology" ]
proofwiki-1849
Totally Bounded Metric Space is Separable
A totally bounded metric space is separable.
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a totally bounded metric space. By the definition of total boundedness, we can use the axiom of countable choice to construct a sequence $\sequence {F_n}_{n \mathop \ge 1}$ such that: :For all natural numbers $n \ge 1$, $F_n$ is a finite $\paren {1/n}$-net for $M$. Let $\ds S = \bigcup_{n \m...
A [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|totally bounded metric space]] is [[Definition:Separable Space|separable]].
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|totally bounded metric space]]. By the definition of [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|total boundedness]], we can use the [[Axiom:Axiom of Countable Choice|axiom of countable choice]] to construct a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] $\seq...
Totally Bounded Metric Space is Separable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Separable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Separable
[ "Separable Spaces", "Totally Bounded Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Separable Space" ]
[ "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Axiom:Axiom of Countable Choice", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Epsilon-Net/Finite Net", "Countable Union of Countable Sets is Countable", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition...
proofwiki-1850
Convergent Sequence in T2 Space has Unique Limit
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space. Let $\sequence {x_n}$ be a convergent sequence in $T$. Then $\sequence {x_n}$ has exactly one limit.
From the definition of convergent sequence, we have that $\sequence {x_n}$ converges to at least one limit. {{AimForCont}} $l$ and $m$ are both limits of $\sequence{x_n}$. As $T$ is a $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space, there exist $U, V \in \tau$ such that: :$l \in U, m \in V$ and $U \cap V = \O$ Then, from the definition of con...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ (Hausdorff) space]]. Let $\sequence {x_n}$ be a [[Definition:Convergent Sequence (Topology)|convergent sequence]] in $T$. Then $\sequence {x_n}$ has exactly one [[Definition:Limit of Sequence (Topology)|limit]].
From the definition of [[Definition:Convergent Sequence (Topology)|convergent sequence]], we have that $\sequence {x_n}$ converges to at least one [[Definition:Limit of Sequence (Topology)|limit]]. {{AimForCont}} $l$ and $m$ are both [[Definition:Limit of Sequence (Topology)|limits]] of $\sequence{x_n}$. As $T$ is a...
Convergent Sequence in T2 Space has Unique Limit
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergent_Sequence_in_T2_Space_has_Unique_Limit
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergent_Sequence_in_T2_Space_has_Unique_Limit
[ "Limits of Sequences", "Hausdorff Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology", "Definition:Limit of Sequence/Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology", "Definition:Limit of Sequence/Topological Space", "Definition:Limit of Sequence/Topological Space", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology", "Definition:Contradiction" ]
proofwiki-1851
Metric Space is T2
A metric space $M = \struct {A, d}$ is a $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space.
Let $x, y \in A: x \ne y$. Then from Distinct Points in Metric Space have Disjoint Open Balls, there exist open $\epsilon$-balls $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ and $\map {B_\epsilon} y$ which are disjoint open sets containing $x$ and $y$ respectively. Hence the result by the definition of $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space. {{qed}}
A [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]] $M = \struct {A, d}$ is a [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ (Hausdorff) space]].
Let $x, y \in A: x \ne y$. Then from [[Distinct Points in Metric Space have Disjoint Open Balls]], there exist [[Definition:Open Ball of Metric Space|open $\epsilon$-balls]] $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ and $\map {B_\epsilon} y$ which are [[Definition:Disjoint Sets|disjoint]] [[Definition:Open Set of Metric Space|open sets]]...
Metric Space is T2/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Metric_Space_is_T2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Metric_Space_is_T2/Proof_1
[ "Metric Space is T2", "Metric Space fulfils all Separation Axioms", "Examples of Hausdorff Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:T2 Space" ]
[ "Distinct Points in Metric Space have Disjoint Open Balls", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Disjoint Sets", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:T2 Space" ]
proofwiki-1852
Metric Space is T2
A metric space $M = \struct {A, d}$ is a $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space.
{{AimForCont}} $M$ is not Hausdorff. That is, there are $x, y \in A: x \ne y$ such that: :$\forall \epsilon \in \R_{>0}: \exists z \in \map {B_\epsilon} x \cap \map {B_\epsilon} y$ where $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ denote the open $\epsilon$-ball of $x$ in $M$. Let $r = \dfrac {\map d {x, y} } 2$. Let $z \in \map {B_r} x \ca...
A [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]] $M = \struct {A, d}$ is a [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ (Hausdorff) space]].
{{AimForCont}} $M$ is not [[Definition:T2 Space|Hausdorff]]. That is, there are $x, y \in A: x \ne y$ such that: :$\forall \epsilon \in \R_{>0}: \exists z \in \map {B_\epsilon} x \cap \map {B_\epsilon} y$ where $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ denote the [[Definition:Open Ball|open $\epsilon$-ball]] of $x$ in $M$. Let $r = \...
Metric Space is T2/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Metric_Space_is_T2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Metric_Space_is_T2/Proof_2
[ "Metric Space is T2", "Metric Space fulfils all Separation Axioms", "Examples of Hausdorff Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:T2 Space" ]
[ "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Contradiction", "Definition:T2 Space" ]
proofwiki-1853
Convergent Real Sequence has Unique Limit
Let $\sequence {s_n}$ be a real sequence. Then $\sequence {s_n}$ can have at most one limit.
{{AimForCont}} that $\sequence {s_n}$ converges to $l$ and also to $m$. That is, suppose that: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} x_n = l$ and: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} x_n = m$ {{WLOG}}, assume that $l \ne m$. Let: :$\epsilon = \dfrac {\size {l - m} } 2$ As $l \ne m$, it follows that $\epsilon > 0$. As $\seque...
Let $\sequence {s_n}$ be a [[Definition:Real Sequence|real sequence]]. Then $\sequence {s_n}$ can have at most one [[Definition:Limit of Real Sequence|limit]].
{{AimForCont}} that $\sequence {s_n}$ [[Definition:Convergent Real Sequence|converges]] to $l$ and also to $m$. That is, suppose that: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} x_n = l$ and: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} x_n = m$ {{WLOG}}, assume that $l \ne m$. Let: :$\epsilon = \dfrac {\size {l - m} } 2$ As $l \ne m...
Convergent Real Sequence has Unique Limit/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergent_Real_Sequence_has_Unique_Limit
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergent_Real_Sequence_has_Unique_Limit/Proof_1
[ "Limits of Sequences", "Real Numbers", "Convergent Real Sequence has Unique Limit" ]
[ "Definition:Real Sequence", "Definition:Limit of Sequence/Real Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Real Numbers", "Triangle Inequality/Real Numbers", "Definition:Contradiction", "Proof by Contradiction" ]
proofwiki-1854
Convergent Real Sequence has Unique Limit
Let $\sequence {s_n}$ be a real sequence. Then $\sequence {s_n}$ can have at most one limit.
We have that the real number line is a metric space The result then follows from Convergent Sequence in Metric Space has Unique Limit. {{qed}}
Let $\sequence {s_n}$ be a [[Definition:Real Sequence|real sequence]]. Then $\sequence {s_n}$ can have at most one [[Definition:Limit of Real Sequence|limit]].
We have that the [[Real Number Line is Metric Space|real number line is a metric space]] The result then follows from [[Convergent Sequence in Metric Space has Unique Limit]]. {{qed}}
Convergent Real Sequence has Unique Limit/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergent_Real_Sequence_has_Unique_Limit
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergent_Real_Sequence_has_Unique_Limit/Proof_2
[ "Limits of Sequences", "Real Numbers", "Convergent Real Sequence has Unique Limit" ]
[ "Definition:Real Sequence", "Definition:Limit of Sequence/Real Numbers" ]
[ "Real Number Line is Metric Space", "Convergent Sequence in Metric Space has Unique Limit" ]
proofwiki-1855
Distinct Points in Metric Space have Disjoint Open Balls
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a metric space. Let $x, y \in M: x \ne y$. Then there exist disjoint open $\epsilon$-balls $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ and $\map {B_\epsilon} y$ containing $x$ and $y$ respectively.
Let $x, y \in A: x \ne y$. Then $\map d {x, y} > 0$. Put $\epsilon = \dfrac {\map d {x, y} } 2$. Let $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ and $\map {B_\epsilon} y$ be the open $\epsilon$-balls of $x$ and $y$ respectively. Suppose $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ and $\map {B_\epsilon} y$ are not disjoint. Then $\exists z \in M$ such that $z \in...
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. Let $x, y \in M: x \ne y$. Then there exist [[Definition:Disjoint Sets|disjoint]] [[Definition:Open Ball of Metric Space|open $\epsilon$-balls]] $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ and $\map {B_\epsilon} y$ containing $x$ and $y$ respectively.
Let $x, y \in A: x \ne y$. Then $\map d {x, y} > 0$. Put $\epsilon = \dfrac {\map d {x, y} } 2$. Let $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ and $\map {B_\epsilon} y$ be the [[Definition:Open Ball of Metric Space|open $\epsilon$-balls]] of $x$ and $y$ respectively. Suppose $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ and $\map {B_\epsilon} y$ are not [[D...
Distinct Points in Metric Space have Disjoint Open Balls/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Distinct_Points_in_Metric_Space_have_Disjoint_Open_Balls
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Distinct_Points_in_Metric_Space_have_Disjoint_Open_Balls/Proof_2
[ "Open Balls", "Distinct Points in Metric Space have Disjoint Open Balls" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Disjoint Sets", "Definition:Open Ball" ]
[ "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Disjoint Sets", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric", "Definition:Disjoint Sets" ]
proofwiki-1856
Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Lindelöf
Let $M = \struct {X, d}$ be a sequentially compact metric space. Then $M$ is also a Lindelöf space. That is, from every open cover of $M$, it is possible to extract a countable subcover.
Take any open cover $C$ of $M$. We need to find a countable subset of $C$ which still covers $X$. We have that a Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Second-Countable. Thus, by definition, the topology of $M$ has a countable basis. Let $\BB$ be a countable basis for the topology induced by $d$ of $M$. Let $x \in X$. As...
Let $M = \struct {X, d}$ be a [[Definition:Sequentially Compact Space|sequentially compact]] [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. Then $M$ is also a [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf space]]. That is, from every [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] of $M$, it is possible to extract a [[Definition:Countable ...
Take any [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] $C$ of $M$. We need to find a [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $C$ which still [[Definition:Cover of Set|covers]] $X$. We have that a [[Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Second-Countable]]. Thus, by definition, the [[Definition:T...
Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Lindelöf
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequentially_Compact_Metric_Space_is_Lindelöf
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequentially_Compact_Metric_Space_is_Lindelöf
[ "Lindelöf Spaces", "Metric Spaces", "Sequentially Compact Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Subcover/Countable" ]
[ "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Second-Countable", "Definition:Topology Induced by Metric", "Definition:Countable Basis", "Definition:Countable Basis", "Definition:Topology Induced by Metric", ...
proofwiki-1857
Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Compact
A sequentially compact metric space is compact.
Let $\struct {A, d}$ be a sequentially compact metric space. From Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Lindelöf, every open cover of $A$ has a countable subcover. Let $C$ be an open cover $A$. Extract from it a countable subcover $\set {U_1, U_2, \ldots}$. {{AimForCont}} there exists no finite subcover of $C$. Then, fo...
A [[Definition:Sequentially Compact Space|sequentially compact]] [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]] is [[Definition:Compact Metric Space|compact]].
Let $\struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Sequentially Compact Space|sequentially compact]] [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. From [[Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Lindelöf]], every [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] of $A$ has a [[Definition:Countable Subcover|countable subcover]]. Let $C$ be an [[Defin...
Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Compact/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequentially_Compact_Metric_Space_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequentially_Compact_Metric_Space_is_Compact/Proof_1
[ "Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Compact", "Sequentially Compact Spaces", "Compact Metric Spaces", "Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Space/Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space", "Definition:Metric Space", "Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Lindelöf", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Subcover/Countable", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Subcover/Countable", "Definition:Subcover/Finite", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cover...
proofwiki-1858
Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Compact
A sequentially compact metric space is compact.
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a sequentially compact metric space. Let $\UU$ be any open cover of $M$. By Lebesgue's Number Lemma, there exists a Lebesgue number for $\UU$. Let $\set {x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n}$ be a finite $\epsilon$-net for $M$, where $\epsilon$ is this same Lebesgue number. This exists by Sequentially Com...
A [[Definition:Sequentially Compact Space|sequentially compact]] [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]] is [[Definition:Compact Metric Space|compact]].
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Sequentially Compact Space|sequentially compact]] [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. Let $\UU$ be any [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] of $M$. By [[Lebesgue's Number Lemma/Sequentially Compact Space|Lebesgue's Number Lemma]], there exists a [[Definition:Lebesgue N...
Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Compact/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequentially_Compact_Metric_Space_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequentially_Compact_Metric_Space_is_Compact/Proof_2
[ "Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Compact", "Sequentially Compact Spaces", "Compact Metric Spaces", "Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Space/Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Lebesgue's Number Lemma/Sequentially Compact Space", "Definition:Lebesgue Number", "Definition:Epsilon-Net/Finite Net", "Definition:Lebesgue Number", "Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Totally Bounded", ...
proofwiki-1859
Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Compact
A sequentially compact metric space is compact.
Follows directly from: :Sequentially Compact Space is Countably Compact :Countably Compact Metric Space is Compact {{qed}}
A [[Definition:Sequentially Compact Space|sequentially compact]] [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]] is [[Definition:Compact Metric Space|compact]].
Follows directly from: :[[Sequentially Compact Space is Countably Compact]] :[[Countably Compact Metric Space is Compact]] {{qed}}
Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Compact/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequentially_Compact_Metric_Space_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequentially_Compact_Metric_Space_is_Compact/Proof_3
[ "Sequentially Compact Metric Space is Compact", "Sequentially Compact Spaces", "Compact Metric Spaces", "Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Space/Metric Space" ]
[ "Sequentially Compact Space is Countably Compact", "Countably Compact Metric Space is Compact" ]
proofwiki-1860
Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed
Let $H = \struct {A, \tau}$ be a $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space. Let $C$ be a compact subspace of $H$. Then $C$ is closed in $H$.
From Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Hausdorff, a subspace of a $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space is itself $T_2$ (Hausdorff). Let $a \in A \setminus C$. We are going to prove that there exists an open set $U_a$ such that $a \in U_a \subseteq A \setminus C$. For any single point $x \in C$, the Hausdorff condition ensures the exis...
Let $H = \struct {A, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ (Hausdorff) space]]. Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Subspace|compact subspace]] of $H$. Then $C$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $H$.
From [[Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Hausdorff]], a [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of a [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ (Hausdorff) space]] is itself [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ (Hausdorff)]]. Let $a \in A \setminus C$. We are going to prove that there exists an [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open set]] ...
Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Subspace_of_Hausdorff_Space_is_Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Subspace_of_Hausdorff_Space_is_Closed/Proof_1
[ "Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed", "Hausdorff Spaces", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Closed Sets", "Topological Subspaces" ]
[ "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology" ]
[ "T2 Property is Hereditary", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Disjoint Sets", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Open Cove...
proofwiki-1861
Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed
Let $H = \struct {A, \tau}$ be a $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space. Let $C$ be a compact subspace of $H$. Then $C$ is closed in $H$.
For a subset $S \subseteq A$, let $S^{\complement}$ denote the relative complement of $S$ in $A$. Consider an arbitrary point $x \in C^{\complement}$. Define the set: :$\ds \OO = \set {V \in \tau: \exists U \in \tau: x \in U \subseteq V^\complement}$ By Empty Intersection iff Subset of Complement: :$U \subseteq V^\comp...
Let $H = \struct {A, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ (Hausdorff) space]]. Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Subspace|compact subspace]] of $H$. Then $C$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $H$.
For a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] $S \subseteq A$, let $S^{\complement}$ denote the [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] of $S$ in $A$. Consider an arbitrary [[Definition:Element|point]] $x \in C^{\complement}$. Define the [[Definition:Set|set]]: :$\ds \OO = \set {V \in \tau: \exists U \in \tau: x...
Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Subspace_of_Hausdorff_Space_is_Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Subspace_of_Hausdorff_Space_is_Closed/Proof_2
[ "Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed", "Hausdorff Spaces", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Closed Sets", "Topological Subspaces" ]
[ "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Set", "Empty Intersection iff Subset of Complement", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Subcover/Finite", "Principle of Finite Choice",...
proofwiki-1862
Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be topological spaces. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a continuous mapping. If $T_1$ is compact then so is its image $f \sqbrk {T_1}$ under $f$. That is, compactness is a continuous invariant.
By {{Corollary|Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact|2}}, $f \sqbrk S$ is bounded. By Supremum of Bounded Above Set of Reals is in Closure: :$\map \sup {f \sqbrk S} \in \map \cl {f \sqbrk S}$ and by Infimum of Bounded Below Set of Reals is in Closure: :$\map \inf {f \sqbrk S} \in \map \cl {f \sqbrk S}$ From Cont...
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]]. If $T_1$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]] then so is its [[Definition:Image of Mapping|image]] $f \sqbrk {T_1}$ under $f...
By {{Corollary|Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact|2}}, $f \sqbrk S$ is [[Definition:Bounded Mapping to Metric Space|bounded]]. By [[Supremum of Bounded Above Set of Reals is in Closure]]: :$\map \sup {f \sqbrk S} \in \map \cl {f \sqbrk S}$ and by [[Infimum of Bounded Below Set of Reals is in Closure]]: :$\ma...
Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact/Corollary 3/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Compact_Space_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Compact_Space_is_Compact/Corollary_3/Proof_1
[ "Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Examples of Continuous Invariants" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Invariant" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Mapping/Metric Space", "Supremum of Bounded Above Set of Reals is in Closure", "Infimum of Bounded Below Set of Reals is in Closure", "Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact", "Rul...
proofwiki-1863
Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be topological spaces. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a continuous mapping. If $T_1$ is compact then so is its image $f \sqbrk {T_1}$ under $f$. That is, compactness is a continuous invariant.
By Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact, $f \sqbrk S$ is compact. From Compact Metric Space is Complete and Compact Metric Space is Totally Bounded, $f \sqbrk S$ is complete and totally bounded. A Totally Bounded Metric Space is Bounded. Hence both the supremum and the infimum of $f \sqbrk S$ exist in $\R$. Bec...
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]]. If $T_1$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]] then so is its [[Definition:Image of Mapping|image]] $f \sqbrk {T_1}$ under $f...
By [[Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact]], $f \sqbrk S$ is [[Definition:Compact Metric Space|compact]]. From [[Compact Metric Space is Complete]] and [[Compact Metric Space is Totally Bounded]], $f \sqbrk S$ is [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete]] and [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|totall...
Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact/Corollary 3/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Compact_Space_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Compact_Space_is_Compact/Corollary_3/Proof_2
[ "Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Examples of Continuous Invariants" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Invariant" ]
[ "Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact", "Definition:Compact Space/Metric Space", "Compact Metric Space is Complete", "Compact Metric Space is Totally Bounded", "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Totally Bounded Metric Space is Bounded", "Definition:...
proofwiki-1864
Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be topological spaces. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a continuous mapping. If $T_1$ is compact then so is its image $f \sqbrk {T_1}$ under $f$. That is, compactness is a continuous invariant.
From Restriction of Mapping to Image is Surjection, the restriction of $f$ to $\Img f$ is a surjection. The result follows from Compactness is Preserved under Continuous Surjection. {{qed}}
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]]. If $T_1$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]] then so is its [[Definition:Image of Mapping|image]] $f \sqbrk {T_1}$ under $f...
From [[Restriction of Mapping to Image is Surjection]], the [[Definition:Restriction of Mapping|restriction]] of $f$ to $\Img f$ is a [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]]. The result follows from [[Compactness is Preserved under Continuous Surjection]]. {{qed}}
Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Compact_Space_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Compact_Space_is_Compact/Proof_1
[ "Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Examples of Continuous Invariants" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Invariant" ]
[ "Restriction of Mapping to Image is Surjection", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping", "Definition:Surjection", "Compactness is Preserved under Continuous Surjection" ]
proofwiki-1865
Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be topological spaces. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a continuous mapping. If $T_1$ is compact then so is its image $f \sqbrk {T_1}$ under $f$. That is, compactness is a continuous invariant.
Suppose $\UU$ is an open cover of $f \sqbrk {T_1}$ by sets open in $T_2$. Because $f$ is continuous, it follows that $f^{-1} \sqbrk U$ is open in $T_1$ for all $U \in \UU$. The set $\set {f^{-1} \sqbrk U: U \in \UU}$ is an open cover of $T_1$, because for any $x \in T_1$, it follows that $\map f x$ must be in some $U \...
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]]. If $T_1$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]] then so is its [[Definition:Image of Mapping|image]] $f \sqbrk {T_1}$ under $f...
Suppose $\UU$ is an [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] of $f \sqbrk {T_1}$ by sets [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open in $T_2$]]. Because $f$ is [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]], it follows that $f^{-1} \sqbrk U$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open in $T_1$]] for all $U \in ...
Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Compact_Space_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Compact_Space_is_Compact/Proof_2
[ "Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Examples of Continuous Invariants" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Invariant" ]
[ "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Subcover/Finite", "Definition:Subcover/Finite" ]
proofwiki-1866
Closed Subspace of Compact Space is Compact
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a compact topological space. Let $C = \struct {H, \tau_H}$ be a subspace of $T$. Let $C$ be closed in $T$. Then $\struct {H, \tau}$ is compact. That is, the property of being compact is weakly hereditary.
Let $T$ be a compact space. Let $C$ be a closed subspace of $T$. Let $\UU$ be an open cover of $C$. We have that $C$ is closed in $T$. It follows by definition of closed that $T \setminus C$ is open in $T$. So if we add $T \setminus C$ to $\UU$, we see that $\UU \cup \set {T \setminus C}$ is also an open cover of $T$. ...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact topological space]]. Let $C = \struct {H, \tau_H}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of $T$. Let $C$ be [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T$. Then $\struct {H, \tau}$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological Spa...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact space]]. Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of $T$. Let $\UU$ be an [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] of $C$. We have that $C$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T$. It ...
Closed Subspace of Compact Space is Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Subspace_of_Compact_Space_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Subspace_of_Compact_Space_is_Compact
[ "Closed Sets", "Examples of Compact Topological Spaces", "Examples of Weakly Hereditary Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Property", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Weakly Hereditary Property" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", ...
proofwiki-1867
Closure of Real Interval is Closed Real Interval
Let $I$ be a non-empty real interval such that one of these holds: :$I = \openint a b$ :$I = \hointr a b$ :$I = \hointl a b$ :$I = \closedint a b$ Let $I^-$ denote the closure of $I$. Then $I^-$ is the closed real interval $\closedint a b$.
There are four cases to cover: :$(1): \quad$ Let $I = \openint a b$. From Closure of Open Real Interval is Closed Real Interval: :$I^- = \closedint a b$ {{qed|lemma}} :$(2): \quad$ Let $I = \hointr a b$. From Closure of Half-Open Real Interval is Closed Real Interval: :$I^- = \closedint a b$ {{qed|lemma}} :$(3): \quad$...
Let $I$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Real Interval|real interval]] such that one of these holds: :$I = \openint a b$ :$I = \hointr a b$ :$I = \hointl a b$ :$I = \closedint a b$ Let $I^-$ denote the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $I$. Then $I^-$ is the [[Definition:Closed Rea...
There are four cases to cover: :$(1): \quad$ Let $I = \openint a b$. From [[Closure of Open Real Interval is Closed Real Interval]]: :$I^- = \closedint a b$ {{qed|lemma}} :$(2): \quad$ Let $I = \hointr a b$. From [[Closure of Half-Open Real Interval is Closed Real Interval]]: :$I^- = \closedint a b$ {{qed|lemma}} ...
Closure of Real Interval is Closed Real Interval/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Real_Interval_is_Closed_Real_Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Real_Interval_is_Closed_Real_Interval/Proof_1
[ "Closure of Real Interval is Closed Real Interval", "Real Intervals", "Set Closures" ]
[ "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed" ]
[ "Closure of Open Real Interval is Closed Real Interval", "Closure of Half-Open Real Interval is Closed Real Interval", "Closure of Half-Open Real Interval is Closed Real Interval", "Closed Real Interval is Closed in Real Number Line", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Set is Closed iff Equals Topological...
proofwiki-1868
Closure of Real Interval is Closed Real Interval
Let $I$ be a non-empty real interval such that one of these holds: :$I = \openint a b$ :$I = \hointr a b$ :$I = \hointl a b$ :$I = \closedint a b$ Let $I^-$ denote the closure of $I$. Then $I^-$ is the closed real interval $\closedint a b$.
Let $I$ be one of the intervals as specified in the exposition. Note that: :$(1): \quad$ By Condition for Point being in Closure, $x \in I^-$ {{iff}} every open set in $\R$ containing $x$ contains a point in $I$. :$(2): \quad$ From Union of Open Sets of Metric Space is Open, every open set in $\R$ is a union of open in...
Let $I$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Real Interval|real interval]] such that one of these holds: :$I = \openint a b$ :$I = \hointr a b$ :$I = \hointl a b$ :$I = \closedint a b$ Let $I^-$ denote the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $I$. Then $I^-$ is the [[Definition:Closed Rea...
Let $I$ be one of the intervals as specified in the exposition. Note that: :$(1): \quad$ By [[Condition for Point being in Closure]], $x \in I^-$ {{iff}} every [[Definition:Open Set (Real Analysis)|open set]] in $\R$ containing $x$ contains a point in $I$. :$(2): \quad$ From [[Union of Open Sets of Metric Space is O...
Closure of Real Interval is Closed Real Interval/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Real_Interval_is_Closed_Real_Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Real_Interval_is_Closed_Real_Interval/Proof_2
[ "Closure of Real Interval is Closed Real Interval", "Real Intervals", "Set Closures" ]
[ "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed" ]
[ "Condition for Point being in Closure", "Definition:Open Set/Real Analysis", "Union of Open Sets of Metric Space is Open", "Definition:Open Set/Real Analysis", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Closure of Real Interval is Closed Real Interval/Pr...
proofwiki-1869
Topological Product of Compact Spaces
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be topological spaces. Let $T_1 \times T_2$ be the product space of $T_1$ and $T_2$. Then $T_1 \times T_2$ is compact {{iff}} both $T_1$ and $T_2$ are compact.
=== Necessary Condition === Let $T_1 \times T_2$ be compact. From Projection from Product Topology is Continuous, both $T_1$ and $T_2$ are the continuous images of $T_1 \times T_2$ under the projections $\pr_1$ and $\pr_2$ respectively. So both $T_1$ and $T_2$ are compact by Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact...
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $T_1 \times T_2$ be the [[Definition:Product Space (Topology) of Two Factor Spaces|product space]] of $T_1$ and $T_2$. Then $T_1 \times T_2$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]] {{iff}} both $T_1$ and $T_2$ are [[Definitio...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $T_1 \times T_2$ be [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]]. From [[Projection from Product Topology is Continuous]], both $T_1$ and $T_2$ are the [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]] [[Definition:Image of Subset under Mapping|images]] of $T_1 \times T_2$ un...
Topological Product of Compact Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Product_of_Compact_Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Product_of_Compact_Spaces
[ "Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)/Two Factor Spaces", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Projection from Product Topology is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Continuous Image of Compact Space is Co...
proofwiki-1870
Heine-Cantor Theorem
Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be metric spaces. Let $M_1$ be compact. Let $f: A_1 \to A_2$ be a continuous mapping. Then $f$ is uniformly continuous.
Let $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$ be a strictly positive real number. For all $x \in A_1$, define: :$\map \Delta x = \set {\delta \in \R_{>0}: \forall y \in A_1: \map {d_1} {x, y} < 2 \delta \implies \map {d_2} {\map f x, \map f y} < \dfrac \epsilon 2}$ Define: :$\CC = \set {\map {B_{\delta} } x: x \in A_1, \, \delta \in \map...
Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be [[Definition:Metric Space|metric spaces]]. Let $M_1$ be [[Definition:Compact Metric Space|compact]]. Let $f: A_1 \to A_2$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Spaces)|continuous mapping]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Uniformly Continuous Mapping ...
Let $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Real Number|strictly positive real number]]. For all $x \in A_1$, define: :$\map \Delta x = \set {\delta \in \R_{>0}: \forall y \in A_1: \map {d_1} {x, y} < 2 \delta \implies \map {d_2} {\map f x, \map f y} < \dfrac \epsilon 2}$ Define: :$\CC = \set {\ma...
Heine-Cantor Theorem/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Cantor_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Cantor_Theorem/Proof_1
[ "Heine-Cantor Theorem", "Compact Metric Spaces", "Uniformly Continuous Mappings", "Continuous Mappings", "Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Space/Metric Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)", "Definition:Uniform Continuity/Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Open Ball is Open Set/Pseudometric Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Compact Space/Metric Space", "Definition:Subcover/Finite", "Definition:Cover...
proofwiki-1871
Heine-Cantor Theorem
Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be metric spaces. Let $M_1$ be compact. Let $f: A_1 \to A_2$ be a continuous mapping. Then $f$ is uniformly continuous.
Let $A_1 \times A_1$ and $A_2 \times A_2$ be considered with the product topology. Let $F: A_1 \times A_1 \to A_2 \times A_2$ be the mapping defined as: :$\map F {x, y} = \tuple {\map f x, \map f y}$ By Projection from Product Topology is Continuous, we have that the (first and second) projections on $A_1 \times A_1$ a...
Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be [[Definition:Metric Space|metric spaces]]. Let $M_1$ be [[Definition:Compact Metric Space|compact]]. Let $f: A_1 \to A_2$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Spaces)|continuous mapping]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Uniformly Continuous Mapping ...
Let $A_1 \times A_1$ and $A_2 \times A_2$ be considered with the [[Definition:Product Topology|product topology]]. Let $F: A_1 \times A_1 \to A_2 \times A_2$ be the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] defined as: :$\map F {x, y} = \tuple {\map f x, \map f y}$ By [[Projection from Product Topology is Continuous]], we have ...
Heine-Cantor Theorem/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Cantor_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Cantor_Theorem/Proof_2
[ "Heine-Cantor Theorem", "Compact Metric Spaces", "Uniformly Continuous Mappings", "Continuous Mappings", "Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Space/Metric Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)", "Definition:Uniform Continuity/Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Mapping", "Projection from Product Topology is Continuous", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous", "Continuous Mapping to Product Space", "Definition:Continuous M...
proofwiki-1872
Continuous Function on Closed Real Interval is Uniformly Continuous
Let $\closedint a b$ be a closed real interval. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \R$ be a continuous function. Then $f$ is uniformly continuous on $\closedint a b$.
We have that $\R$ is a metric space under the usual (Euclidean) metric. We also have from the Heine-Borel Theorem that $\closedint a b$ is compact. So the result Heine-Cantor Theorem applies. {{qed}}
Let $\closedint a b$ be a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed real interval]]. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous function]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Uniformly Continuous Real Function|uniformly continuous]] on $\closedint a b$.
We have that [[Real Number Line is Metric Space|$\R$ is a metric space]] under the [[Definition:Euclidean Metric on Real Number Line|usual (Euclidean) metric]]. We also have from the [[Heine-Borel Theorem]] that $\closedint a b$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]]. So the result [[Heine-Cantor Theorem...
Continuous Function on Closed Real Interval is Uniformly Continuous/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Closed_Real_Interval_is_Uniformly_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Closed_Real_Interval_is_Uniformly_Continuous/Proof_1
[ "Continuous Function on Closed Real Interval is Uniformly Continuous", "Continuous Real Functions", "Uniformly Continuous Real Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definition:Uniform Continuity/Real Function" ]
[ "Real Number Line is Metric Space", "Definition:Euclidean Metric/Real Number Line", "Heine-Borel Theorem", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Heine-Cantor Theorem" ]
proofwiki-1873
Continuous Function on Closed Real Interval is Uniformly Continuous
Let $\closedint a b$ be a closed real interval. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \R$ be a continuous function. Then $f$ is uniformly continuous on $\closedint a b$.
{{AimForCont}} $f$ is not uniformly continuous. Then there exists an $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$ such that for all $\delta \in \R_{>0}$ there are points $x ,y \in \closedint a b$ for which: :$\size {x - y} < \delta$ and: :$\size {\map f x - \map f y} \ge \epsilon$ We will now choose for each $k \in \N$ numbers $x_k, y_k \i...
Let $\closedint a b$ be a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed real interval]]. Let $f: \closedint a b \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous function]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Uniformly Continuous Real Function|uniformly continuous]] on $\closedint a b$.
{{AimForCont}} $f$ is not [[Definition:Uniformly Continuous Real Function|uniformly continuous]]. Then there exists an $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$ such that for all $\delta \in \R_{>0}$ there are points $x ,y \in \closedint a b$ for which: :$\size {x - y} < \delta$ and: :$\size {\map f x - \map f y} \ge \epsilon$ We will...
Continuous Function on Closed Real Interval is Uniformly Continuous/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Closed_Real_Interval_is_Uniformly_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Closed_Real_Interval_is_Uniformly_Continuous/Proof_2
[ "Continuous Function on Closed Real Interval is Uniformly Continuous", "Continuous Real Functions", "Uniformly Continuous Real Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "Definition:Uniform Continuity/Real Function" ]
[ "Definition:Uniform Continuity/Real Function", "Definition:Real Sequence", "Definition:Bounded Sequence/Real", "Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Real Numbers", "Definition:Subsequence", "Definition:Limit of Sequence/Real Numbers", "Definition:Limit of Sequence/Real Numbers...
proofwiki-1874
Sine of Complement equals Cosine
:$\map \sin {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \cos \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \sin {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = \sin \frac \pi 2 \cos \theta - \cos \frac \pi 2 \sin \theta | c = Sine of Difference }} {{eqn | r = 1 \times \cos \theta - 0 \times \sin \theta | c = Sine of Right Angle and Cosine of Right Angle }} {{eqn | r = \cos \theta }} {{end-eqn}}...
:$\map \sin {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \cos \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \sin {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = \sin \frac \pi 2 \cos \theta - \cos \frac \pi 2 \sin \theta | c = [[Sine of Difference]] }} {{eqn | r = 1 \times \cos \theta - 0 \times \sin \theta | c = [[Sine of Right Angle]] and [[Cosine of Right Angle]] }} {{eqn | r = \cos \theta }}...
Sine of Complement equals Cosine/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_of_Complement_equals_Cosine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_of_Complement_equals_Cosine/Proof_1
[ "Sine of Complement equals Cosine", "Sine Function", "Cosine Function", "Complementary Angles" ]
[]
[ "Sine of Difference", "Sine of Right Angle", "Cosine of Right Angle" ]
proofwiki-1875
Sine of Complement equals Cosine
:$\map \sin {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \cos \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \sin {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = -\map \sin {\theta - \frac \pi 2} | c = Sine Function is Odd }} {{eqn | r = \map \cos {\theta - \frac \pi 2 + \frac \pi 2} | c = Cosine of Angle plus Right Angle }} {{eqn | r = \cos \theta }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\map \sin {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \cos \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \sin {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = -\map \sin {\theta - \frac \pi 2} | c = [[Sine Function is Odd]] }} {{eqn | r = \map \cos {\theta - \frac \pi 2 + \frac \pi 2} | c = [[Cosine of Angle plus Right Angle]] }} {{eqn | r = \cos \theta }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Sine of Complement equals Cosine/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_of_Complement_equals_Cosine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_of_Complement_equals_Cosine/Proof_2
[ "Sine of Complement equals Cosine", "Sine Function", "Cosine Function", "Complementary Angles" ]
[]
[ "Sine Function is Odd", "Cosine of Angle plus Right Angle" ]
proofwiki-1876
Sine of Complement equals Cosine
:$\map \sin {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \cos \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \sin {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = \map \Im {e^{i \paren {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} } } | c = Euler's Formula }} {{eqn | r = \map \Im {e^{i \frac \pi 2} e^{-i \theta} } | c = Exponent Combination Laws }} {{eqn | r = \map \Im {\paren {\cos \dfrac \pi 2+i \sin \dfrac \pi 2} e^...
:$\map \sin {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \cos \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \sin {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = \map \Im {e^{i \paren {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} } } | c = [[Euler's Formula]] }} {{eqn | r = \map \Im {e^{i \frac \pi 2} e^{-i \theta} } | c = [[Exponent Combination Laws]] }} {{eqn | r = \map \Im {\paren {\cos \dfrac \pi 2+i \sin \dfrac \...
Sine of Complement equals Cosine/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_of_Complement_equals_Cosine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_of_Complement_equals_Cosine/Proof_3
[ "Sine of Complement equals Cosine", "Sine Function", "Cosine Function", "Complementary Angles" ]
[]
[ "Euler's Formula", "Exponent Combination Laws", "Euler's Formula", "Cosine of Right Angle", "Sine of Right Angle", "Euler's Formula", "Cosine Function is Even" ]
proofwiki-1877
Sine of Complement equals Cosine
:$\map \sin {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \cos \theta$
:300px Let $\angle xOP$ and $\angle QOy$ be complementary. Then: :$\angle xOP = \angle QOy$ Hence: :the projection of $OP$ on the $x$-axis equals: :the projection of $OQ$ on the $y$-axis. Hence the result. {{qed}}
:$\map \sin {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \cos \theta$
:[[File:ComplementaryAngles.png|300px]] Let $\angle xOP$ and $\angle QOy$ be [[Definition:Complementary Angles|complementary]]. Then: :$\angle xOP = \angle QOy$ Hence: :the [[Definition:Geometric Projection|projection]] of $OP$ on the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]] equals: :the [[Definition:Geometric Projection|proj...
Sine of Complement equals Cosine/Proof 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_of_Complement_equals_Cosine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_of_Complement_equals_Cosine/Proof_4
[ "Sine of Complement equals Cosine", "Sine Function", "Cosine Function", "Complementary Angles" ]
[]
[ "File:ComplementaryAngles.png", "Definition:Complementary Angles", "Definition:Projection (Geometry)", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Projection (Geometry)", "Definition:Axis/Y-Axis" ]
proofwiki-1878
Cosine of Complement equals Sine
:$\map \cos {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \sin \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \cos {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = \cos \frac \pi 2 \cos \theta + \sin \frac \pi 2 \sin \theta | c = Cosine of Difference }} {{eqn | r = 0 \times \cos \theta + 1 \times \sin \theta | c = Cosine of Right Angle and Sine of Right Angle }} {{eqn | r = \sin \theta }} {{end-eqn...
:$\map \cos {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \sin \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \cos {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = \cos \frac \pi 2 \cos \theta + \sin \frac \pi 2 \sin \theta | c = [[Cosine of Difference]] }} {{eqn | r = 0 \times \cos \theta + 1 \times \sin \theta | c = [[Cosine of Right Angle]] and [[Sine of Right Angle]] }} {{eqn | r = \sin \theta ...
Cosine of Complement equals Sine/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_of_Complement_equals_Sine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_of_Complement_equals_Sine/Proof_1
[ "Cosine of Complement equals Sine", "Sine Function", "Cosine Function", "Complementary Angles" ]
[]
[ "Cosine of Difference", "Cosine of Right Angle", "Sine of Right Angle" ]
proofwiki-1879
Cosine of Complement equals Sine
:$\map \cos {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \sin \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \cos {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = \map \cos {\theta - \frac \pi 2} | c = Cosine Function is Even }} {{eqn | r = \map \sin {\theta - \frac \pi 2 + \frac \pi 2} | c = Sine of Angle plus Right Angle }} {{eqn | r = \sin \theta }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\map \cos {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \sin \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \cos {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = \map \cos {\theta - \frac \pi 2} | c = [[Cosine Function is Even]] }} {{eqn | r = \map \sin {\theta - \frac \pi 2 + \frac \pi 2} | c = [[Sine of Angle plus Right Angle]] }} {{eqn | r = \sin \theta }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Cosine of Complement equals Sine/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_of_Complement_equals_Sine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_of_Complement_equals_Sine/Proof_2
[ "Cosine of Complement equals Sine", "Sine Function", "Cosine Function", "Complementary Angles" ]
[]
[ "Cosine Function is Even", "Sine of Angle plus Right Angle" ]
proofwiki-1880
Cosine of Complement equals Sine
:$\map \cos {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \sin \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \cos {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = \frac 1 2 \paren {e^{i \paren {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} } + e^{-i \paren {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} } } | c = Euler's Cosine Identity }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 \paren {e^{i \frac \pi 2} e^{-i \theta} + e^{-i \frac \pi 2} e^{i \theta} } | c = Ex...
:$\map \cos {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \sin \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \cos {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} | r = \frac 1 2 \paren {e^{i \paren {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} } + e^{-i \paren {\frac \pi 2 - \theta} } } | c = [[Euler's Cosine Identity]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 \paren {e^{i \frac \pi 2} e^{-i \theta} + e^{-i \frac \pi 2} e^{i \theta} } | c ...
Cosine of Complement equals Sine/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_of_Complement_equals_Sine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_of_Complement_equals_Sine/Proof_3
[ "Cosine of Complement equals Sine", "Sine Function", "Cosine Function", "Complementary Angles" ]
[]
[ "Euler's Cosine Identity", "Exponential of Sum/Complex Numbers", "Euler's Formula", "Cosine of Right Angle", "Sine of Right Angle", "Cosine Function is Even", "Sine Function is Odd", "Euler's Sine Identity" ]
proofwiki-1881
Cosine of Complement equals Sine
:$\map \cos {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \sin \theta$
:300px Let $\angle xOP$ and $\angle QOy$ be complementary. Then: :$\angle xOP = \angle QOy$ Hence: :the projection of $OP$ on the $x$-axis equals: :the projection of $OQ$ on the $y$-axis. Hence the result. {{qed}}
:$\map \cos {\dfrac \pi 2 - \theta} = \sin \theta$
:[[File:ComplementaryAngles.png|300px]] Let $\angle xOP$ and $\angle QOy$ be [[Definition:Complementary Angles|complementary]]. Then: :$\angle xOP = \angle QOy$ Hence: :the [[Definition:Geometric Projection|projection]] of $OP$ on the [[Definition:X-Axis|$x$-axis]] equals: :the [[Definition:Geometric Projection|proj...
Cosine of Complement equals Sine/Proof 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_of_Complement_equals_Sine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_of_Complement_equals_Sine/Proof_4
[ "Cosine of Complement equals Sine", "Sine Function", "Cosine Function", "Complementary Angles" ]
[]
[ "File:ComplementaryAngles.png", "Definition:Complementary Angles", "Definition:Projection (Geometry)", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Projection (Geometry)", "Definition:Axis/Y-Axis" ]
proofwiki-1882
Continuous Bijection from Compact to Hausdorff is Homeomorphism
Let $T_1$ be a compact space. Let $T_2$ be a Hausdorff space. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a continuous bijection. Then $f$ is a homeomorphism.
Let $g = f^{-1}$. We need to show that $g: T_2 \to T_1$ is continuous. For any $V \subseteq T_1$, we have $g^{-1} \sqbrk V = \map f V$. We are to show that if $V$ is closed in $T_1$, then $g^{-1} \sqbrk V$ is closed in $T_2$. Suppose $V$ is closed in $T_1$. Since $T_1$ is compact, $V$ is compact by Closed Subspace of C...
Let $T_1$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact space]]. Let $T_2$ be a [[Definition:Hausdorff Space|Hausdorff space]]. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]] [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]]. Then $f$ is a [[Definition:Homeomorphism (Topological...
Let $g = f^{-1}$. We need to show that $g: T_2 \to T_1$ is [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]]. For any $V \subseteq T_1$, we have $g^{-1} \sqbrk V = \map f V$. We are to show that if $V$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T_1$, then $g^{-1} \sqbrk V$ is [[Definition:Cl...
Continuous Bijection from Compact to Hausdorff is Homeomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Bijection_from_Compact_to_Hausdorff_is_Homeomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Bijection_from_Compact_to_Hausdorff_is_Homeomorphism
[ "Continuous Bijection from Compact to Hausdorff is Homeomorphism", "Homeomorphisms (Topological Spaces)", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Hausdorff Spaces", "Continuous Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Closed Subspace of Compact Space is Compact", "Definition:Compac...
proofwiki-1883
Indirect Proof
Let $P$ be a proposition whose truth value is to be proved (either true or false). An '''indirect proof''' has one of the following two argument forms: === Reductio ad Absurdum === A '''reductio ad absurdum''' argument for the truth of $P$ is a valid argument which takes as a premise the negation of $P$, and from it de...
Let $x$ be an even integer. Let $y = 2 n + 5$. Assume $y = x + 5$ is not an odd integer. Then: :$y = x + 5 = 2 n$ where $n \in \Z$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = 2 n - 5 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {2 n - 6} + 1 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 \paren {n - 3} + 1 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 r + 1 ...
Let $P$ be a [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]] whose [[Definition:Truth Value|truth value]] is to be [[Definition:Proof|proved]] (either [[Definition:True|true]] or [[Definition:False|false]]). An '''[[Definition:Indirect Proof|indirect proof]]''' has one of the following two [[Definition:Argument Form|argument f...
Let $x$ be an [[Definition:Even Integer|even integer]]. Let $y = 2 n + 5$. Assume $y = x + 5$ is not an [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integer]]. Then: :$y = x + 5 = 2 n$ where $n \in \Z$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = 2 n - 5 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {2 n - 6} + 1 | c = }} {{eqn | ...
Even Integer Plus 5 is Odd/Indirect Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indirect_Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Even_Integer_Plus_5_is_Odd/Indirect_Proof
[ "Indirect Proof", "Logic", "Proof Techniques" ]
[ "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Proof", "Definition:True", "Definition:False", "Indirect Proof", "Definition:Argument Form", "Reductio ad Absurdum", "Reductio ad Absurdum", "Definition:True", "Definition:Valid Argument", "Definition:Premise", "Definition:Logic...
[ "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:False", "Definition:Even Integer", "Rule of Transposition", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer" ]
proofwiki-1884
Indirect Proof
Let $P$ be a proposition whose truth value is to be proved (either true or false). An '''indirect proof''' has one of the following two argument forms: === Reductio ad Absurdum === A '''reductio ad absurdum''' argument for the truth of $P$ is a valid argument which takes as a premise the negation of $P$, and from it de...
For proofs, see: * Reductio ad Absurdum/Sequent Form * Proof by Contradiction/Sequent Form
Let $P$ be a [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]] whose [[Definition:Truth Value|truth value]] is to be [[Definition:Proof|proved]] (either [[Definition:True|true]] or [[Definition:False|false]]). An '''[[Definition:Indirect Proof|indirect proof]]''' has one of the following two [[Definition:Argument Form|argument f...
For proofs, see: * [[Reductio ad Absurdum/Sequent Form]] * [[Proof by Contradiction/Sequent Form]]
Indirect Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indirect_Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indirect_Proof
[ "Indirect Proof", "Logic", "Proof Techniques" ]
[ "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Proof", "Definition:True", "Definition:False", "Indirect Proof", "Definition:Argument Form", "Reductio ad Absurdum", "Reductio ad Absurdum", "Definition:True", "Definition:Valid Argument", "Definition:Premise", "Definition:Logic...
[ "Reductio ad Absurdum/Sequent Form", "Proof by Contradiction/Sequent Form" ]
proofwiki-1885
Continuous Mapping of Separation
Let $T$ and $T'$ be topological spaces. Let $A \mid B$ be a separation of $T$. Let $f: T \to T'$ be a mapping such that the restrictions $f \restriction_A$ and $f \restriction_B$ are both continuous. Then $f$ is continuous on the whole of $T$.
Follows directly from Pasting Lemma for Union of Open Sets. {{Qed}}
Let $T$ and $T'$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $A \mid B$ be a [[Definition:Separation (Topology)|separation]] of $T$. Let $f: T \to T'$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] such that the [[Definition:Restriction of Mapping|restrictions]] $f \restriction_A$ and $f \restriction_B$ are both...
Follows directly from [[Pasting Lemma for Union of Open Sets]]. {{Qed}}
Continuous Mapping of Separation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Mapping_of_Separation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Mapping_of_Separation
[ "Separations", "Continuous Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Separation (Topology)", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere" ]
[ "Pasting Lemma/Union of Open Sets" ]
proofwiki-1886
Fermat's Last Theorem
:$\forall a, b, c, n \in \Z_{>0}: n > 2$, the equation $a^n + b^n = c^n$ has no solutions.
The proof of this theorem is beyond the current scope of {{ProofWiki}}, and indeed, is beyond the understanding of many high level mathematicians. For the curious reader, the proof can be found [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118559 here], in a paper published by {{AuthorRef|Andrew John Wiles|Andrew Wiles}}, entitled ''...
:$\forall a, b, c, n \in \Z_{>0}: n > 2$, the [[Definition:Equation|equation]] $a^n + b^n = c^n$ has no solutions.
The proof of this theorem is beyond the current scope of {{ProofWiki}}, and indeed, is beyond the understanding of many high level mathematicians. For the curious reader, the proof can be found [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118559 here], in a paper published by {{AuthorRef|Andrew John Wiles|Andrew Wiles}}, entitled '...
Fermat's Last Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fermat's_Last_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fermat's_Last_Theorem
[ "Number Theory", "Classic Problems", "Fermat's Last Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Equation" ]
[ "Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture", "Epsilon Conjecture" ]
proofwiki-1887
Subset of Real Numbers is Interval iff Connected
Let the real number line $\R$ be considered as a topological space. Let $S$ be a subspace of $\R$. Then $S$ is connected {{iff}} $S$ is an interval of $\R$. That is, the only subspaces of $\R$ that are connected are intervals.
From Rule of Transposition, we may replace the ''only if'' statement by its contrapositive. Therefore, the following suffices:
Let the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] $\R$ be considered as a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of $\R$. Then $S$ is [[Definition:Connected Topological Space|connected]] {{iff}} $S$ is an [[Definition:Real Interval|interva...
From [[Rule of Transposition]], we may replace the ''only if'' statement by its [[Definition:Contrapositive Statement|contrapositive]]. Therefore, the following suffices:
Subset of Real Numbers is Interval iff Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_of_Real_Numbers_is_Interval_iff_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_of_Real_Numbers_is_Interval_iff_Connected
[ "Real Intervals", "Connected Topological Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Connected Topological Space", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Connected Topological Space", "Definition:Real Interval" ]
[ "Rule of Transposition", "Definition:Contrapositive Statement" ]
proofwiki-1888
Continuous Image of Connected Space is Connected
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be topological spaces. Let $S_1 \subseteq T_1$ be connected. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a continuous mapping. Then the image $f \sqbrk {S_1}$ is connected.
Let $i: f \sqbrk {T_1} \to T_2$ be the inclusion mapping. Let $g: T_1 \to f \sqbrk {T_1}$ be the surjective restriction of $f$. Then $f = i \circ g$. Hence, by Continuity of Composite with Inclusion: Inclusion on Mapping, it follows that $g$ is continuous. ;Proof by Contradiction {{Recall|Connected Topological Space|co...
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $S_1 \subseteq T_1$ be [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]]. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]]. Then the [[Definition:Image of Mapping|image]] $f \sqbrk {S_...
Let $i: f \sqbrk {T_1} \to T_2$ be the [[Definition:Inclusion Mapping|inclusion mapping]]. Let $g: T_1 \to f \sqbrk {T_1}$ be the [[Surjection by Restriction of Codomain|surjective restriction]] of $f$. Then $f = i \circ g$. Hence, by [[Continuity of Composite with Inclusion/Inclusion on Mapping|Continuity of Compos...
Continuous Image of Connected Space is Connected/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Connected_Space_is_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Connected_Space_is_Connected/Proof_1
[ "Continuous Image of Connected Space is Connected", "Connected Topological Spaces", "Examples of Continuous Invariants" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Inclusion Mapping", "Restriction of Mapping to Image is Surjection", "Continuity of Composite with Inclusion/Inclusion on Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Proof by Contradiction", "Definition:Separation (Topology)", "Preimage of Separation under Continuous Mapping is Se...
proofwiki-1889
Continuous Image of Connected Space is Connected
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be topological spaces. Let $S_1 \subseteq T_1$ be connected. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a continuous mapping. Then the image $f \sqbrk {S_1}$ is connected.
Suppose that $S_2 = f \sqbrk {S_1}$ is not connected in $T_2$. Then by definition there exist open sets $U_2$ and $V_2$ in $T_2$ such that: :$S_2 \subseteq U_2 \cup V_2$ :$U_2 \cap V_2 \cap S_2 = \O$ :$U_2 \cap S_2 \ne \O$ :$V_2 \cap S_2 \ne \O$ We have {{hypothesis}} that $f: T_1 \to T_2$ is continuous. Thus $U_1 = f^...
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $S_1 \subseteq T_1$ be [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]]. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]]. Then the [[Definition:Image of Mapping|image]] $f \sqbrk {S_...
Suppose that $S_2 = f \sqbrk {S_1}$ is not [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]] in $T_2$. Then [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)/Definition 2|by definition]] there exist [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open sets]] $U_2$ and $V_2$ in $T_2$ such that: :$S_2 \subseteq U_2 \cup V_2$ :$U_2 \cap V_2 \cap S...
Continuous Image of Connected Space is Connected/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Connected_Space_is_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Connected_Space_is_Connected/Proof_2
[ "Continuous Image of Connected Space is Connected", "Connected Topological Spaces", "Examples of Continuous Invariants" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)/Definition 2", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Contradiction", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Rule of Transposition" ]
proofwiki-1890
Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $I$ be an indexing set. Let $\AA = \family {A_\alpha}_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of subsets of $S$, all connected in $T$. Let $\AA$ be such that no two of its elements are disjoint: :$\forall B, C \in \AA: B \cap C \ne \O$ Then $\ds \bigcup \AA$ ...
Let $A := \ds \bigcup \AA$. Let $D = \set {0, 1}$, with the discrete topology. Let $f: A \to D$ be a continuous mapping. To show that $A$ is connected, we need to show that $f$ is not a surjection. From Connected Set in Subspace, each $C \in \AA$ is connected in $A$. From Restriction of Continuous Mapping is Continuous...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $I$ be an [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]]. Let $\AA = \family {A_\alpha}_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family of Subsets|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $S$, all [[Definition:Con...
Let $A := \ds \bigcup \AA$. Let $D = \set {0, 1}$, with the [[Definition:Discrete Topology|discrete topology]]. Let $f: A \to D$ be a [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]]. To show that $A$ is [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]], we need to show that $f$ is not a [[...
Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Connected_Sets_with_Non-Empty_Intersections_is_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Connected_Sets_with_Non-Empty_Intersections_is_Connected
[ "Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected", "Connected Sets (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family of Subsets", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Disjoint Sets", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Surjection", "Connected Set in Subspace", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Restriction of Continuous Mapping is Continuous/Topological Spaces", "Definition:R...
proofwiki-1891
Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $I$ be an indexing set. Let $\AA = \family {A_\alpha}_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of subsets of $S$, all connected in $T$. Let $\AA$ be such that no two of its elements are disjoint: :$\forall B, C \in \AA: B \cap C \ne \O$ Then $\ds \bigcup \AA$ ...
Let $C \in \AA$. From Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected applied to $B$ and $C$, the union $B \cup C$ is connected. Thus the set $\tilde \AA = \set {B \cup C: C \in \AA}$ satisfies the conditions of the theorem. Hence the result. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $I$ be an [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]]. Let $\AA = \family {A_\alpha}_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family of Subsets|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $S$, all [[Definition:Con...
Let $C \in \AA$. From [[Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected]] applied to $B$ and $C$, the [[Definition:Set Union|union]] $B \cup C$ is [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]]. Thus the set $\tilde \AA = \set {B \cup C: C \in \AA}$ satisfies the conditions of the theorem. Hence...
Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected/Corollary/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Connected_Sets_with_Non-Empty_Intersections_is_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Connected_Sets_with_Non-Empty_Intersections_is_Connected/Corollary/Proof_1
[ "Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected", "Connected Sets (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family of Subsets", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Disjoint Sets", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
proofwiki-1892
Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $I$ be an indexing set. Let $\AA = \family {A_\alpha}_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of subsets of $S$, all connected in $T$. Let $\AA$ be such that no two of its elements are disjoint: :$\forall B, C \in \AA: B \cap C \ne \O$ Then $\ds \bigcup \AA$ ...
Let $\ds H = B \cup \bigcup \AA$ {{AimForCont}} that $H$ is not connected. That is, that $H$ is disconnected. We have that: :$\forall C \in \AA: B \cap C \ne \O$ Thus: :$\exists x \in H: x \in B \cap C$ From the definition of disconnected, there exist separated sets $U, V$ whose union is $H$. So: :$\forall s \in S: s \...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $I$ be an [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]]. Let $\AA = \family {A_\alpha}_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family of Subsets|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $S$, all [[Definition:Con...
Let $\ds H = B \cup \bigcup \AA$ {{AimForCont}} that $H$ is not [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]]. That is, that $H$ is [[Definition:Disconnected Set|disconnected]]. We have that: :$\forall C \in \AA: B \cap C \ne \O$ Thus: :$\exists x \in H: x \in B \cap C$ From the definition of [[Definition:Dis...
Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected/Corollary/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Connected_Sets_with_Non-Empty_Intersections_is_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Connected_Sets_with_Non-Empty_Intersections_is_Connected/Corollary/Proof_2
[ "Union of Connected Sets with Non-Empty Intersections is Connected", "Connected Sets (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family of Subsets", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Disjoint Sets", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Disconnected (Topology)/Set", "Definition:Disconnected (Topology)/Set", "Definition:Separated Sets", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Separated Sets", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Definition:Disconnected (Topology)/Set", ...
proofwiki-1893
Product Space of 2 Factors is Connected iff Factors are Connected
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be topological spaces. Then the product space $T_1 \times T_2$ is connected {{iff}} $T_1$ and $T_2$ are connected.
==== Necessary Condition ==== Let $T_1 \times T_2$ be connected. By Projection from Product Topology is Continuous, $T_1$ and $T_2$ are continuous images under the projections $\pr_1$ and $\pr_2$. Hence by Continuous Image of Connected Space is Connected, $T_1$ and $T_2$ are connected. {{qed|lemma}} ==== Sufficient Con...
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Then the [[Definition:Product Space (Topology)|product space]] $T_1 \times T_2$ is [[Definition:Connected Topological Space|connected]] {{iff}} $T_1$ and $T_2$ are [[Definition:Connected Topological Space|connected]].
==== Necessary Condition ==== Let $T_1 \times T_2$ be [[Definition:Connected Topological Space|connected]]. By [[Projection from Product Topology is Continuous]], $T_1$ and $T_2$ are [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous images]] under the [[Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)|projection...
Product Space of 2 Factors is Connected iff Factors are Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Space_of_2_Factors_is_Connected_iff_Factors_are_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Space_of_2_Factors_is_Connected_iff_Factors_are_Connected
[ "Product Spaces", "Connected Topological Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Connected Topological Space", "Definition:Connected Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Connected Topological Space", "Projection from Product Topology is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Continuous Image of Connected Space is Connected", "Definition:Connected Topological Space", "Definition:Connected...
proofwiki-1894
Set between Connected Set and Closure is Connected
Let $T$ be a topological space. Let $H$ be a connected set of $T$. Let $H \subseteq K \subseteq H^-$, where $H^-$ denotes the closure of $H$. Then $K$ is connected.
Let $D$ be the discrete space $\set {0, 1}$. Let $f: K \to D$ be an arbitrary continuous mapping. From Continuity of Composite with Inclusion, the restriction $f \restriction_H$ is continuous. We have that: :$H$ is connected :$f \restriction_H$ is continuous Thus by definition of connected set: :$f \sqbrk H = \set 0$ o...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected set]] of $T$. Let $H \subseteq K \subseteq H^-$, where $H^-$ denotes the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $H$. Then $K$ is [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]].
Let $D$ be the [[Definition:Discrete Topology|discrete space]] $\set {0, 1}$. Let $f: K \to D$ be an arbitrary [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]]. From [[Continuity of Composite with Inclusion]], the [[Definition:Restriction of Mapping|restriction]] $f \restriction_H$ is [[Defi...
Set between Connected Set and Closure is Connected/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_between_Connected_Set_and_Closure_is_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_between_Connected_Set_and_Closure_is_Connected/Proof_1
[ "Set between Connected Set and Closure is Connected", "Set Closures", "Connected Sets (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Continuity of Composite with Inclusion", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Every...
proofwiki-1895
Set between Connected Set and Closure is Connected
Let $T$ be a topological space. Let $H$ be a connected set of $T$. Let $H \subseteq K \subseteq H^-$, where $H^-$ denotes the closure of $H$. Then $K$ is connected.
Let $T_K = \struct {K, \tau_K}$ be the topological subspace of $T$ whose underlying set is $K$. Let $\map {\cl_K} H$ denote the closure of $H$ in $K$. From Closure of Subset in Subspace: :$\map {\cl_K} H = K \cap H^-$ By hypothesis: :$K \subseteq H^-$ and so by Intersection with Subset is Subset: :$\map {\cl_K} H = K$ ...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected set]] of $T$. Let $H \subseteq K \subseteq H^-$, where $H^-$ denotes the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $H$. Then $K$ is [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]].
Let $T_K = \struct {K, \tau_K}$ be the [[Definition:Topological Subspace|topological subspace]] of $T$ whose [[Definition:Underlying Set of Topological Space|underlying set]] is $K$. Let $\map {\cl_K} H$ denote the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $H$ in $K$. From [[Closure of Subset in Subspace]]: :$\map...
Set between Connected Set and Closure is Connected/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_between_Connected_Set_and_Closure_is_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_between_Connected_Set_and_Closure_is_Connected/Proof_2
[ "Set between Connected Set and Closure is Connected", "Set Closures", "Connected Sets (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Underlying Set/Topological Space", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Closure of Subset in Subspace", "Definition:By Hypothesis", "Intersection with Subset is Subset", "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", ...
proofwiki-1896
Path-Connected Space is Connected
Let $T$ be a topological space which is path-connected. Then $T$ is connected.
{{AimForCont}} $X \mid Y$ is a separation of $T$. As $X$ and $Y$ are non-empty, we can find $x \in X$ and $y \in Y$. As $T$ is path-connected, there exists a path $f : \closedint 0 1 \to T$ with initial point $x$ and final point $y$. Subset of Real Numbers is Interval iff Connected shows that $\closedint 0 1$ is connec...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] which is [[Definition:Path-Connected Space|path-connected]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Connected Topological Space|connected]].
{{AimForCont}} $X \mid Y$ is a [[Definition:Separation (Topology)|separation]] of $T$. As $X$ and $Y$ are [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]], we can find $x \in X$ and $y \in Y$. As $T$ is [[Definition:Path-Connected Space|path-connected]], there exists a [[Definition:Path (Topology)|path]] $f : \closedint 0 1 \t...
Path-Connected Space is Connected/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Path-Connected_Space_is_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Path-Connected_Space_is_Connected/Proof_1
[ "Path-Connected Space is Connected", "Path-Connected Spaces", "Connected Topological Spaces", "Sequence of Implications of Connectedness Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Path-Connected/Topological Space", "Definition:Connected Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Separation (Topology)", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Path-Connected/Topological Space", "Definition:Path (Topology)", "Definition:Path (Topology)/Initial Point", "Definition:Path (Topology)/Final Point", "Subset of Real Numbers is Interval iff Connected", "Definition:Connected S...
proofwiki-1897
Path-Connected Space is Connected
Let $T$ be a topological space which is path-connected. Then $T$ is connected.
Let $D$ be the discrete space $\set {0, 1}$. Let $T$ be path-connected. Let $f: T \to D$ be a continuous surjection. Let $x, y \in T: \map f x = 0, \map f y = 1$. Let $I \subset \R$ be the closed real interval $\closedint 0 1$. Let $g: I \to T$ be a path from $x$ to $y$. Then by Composite of Continuous Mappings is Cont...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] which is [[Definition:Path-Connected Space|path-connected]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Connected Topological Space|connected]].
Let $D$ be the [[Definition:Discrete Topology|discrete space]] $\set {0, 1}$. Let $T$ be [[Definition:Path-Connected Space|path-connected]]. Let $f: T \to D$ be a [[Definition:Everywhere Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]] [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]]. Let $x, y \in T: \map f x = 0, \map f y = 1$. Le...
Path-Connected Space is Connected/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Path-Connected_Space_is_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Path-Connected_Space_is_Connected/Proof_2
[ "Path-Connected Space is Connected", "Path-Connected Spaces", "Connected Topological Spaces", "Sequence of Implications of Connectedness Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Path-Connected/Topological Space", "Definition:Connected Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Path-Connected/Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Path (Topology)", "Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mappi...
proofwiki-1898
Hausdorff Paradox
There exists a disjoint decomposition of the sphere $\mathbb S^2$ into four sets $A, B, C, Q$ such that $A, B, C, B \cup C$ are all congruent and $Q$ is countable.
Let $R \subset \map {\mathbb {SO} } 3$ be the group generated by the $\pi$ and $\dfrac {2 \pi} 3$ rotations around different axes. The elements: :$\psi = \begin {pmatrix} -\tfrac 1 2 & \tfrac {\sqrt 3} 2 & 0 \\ -\tfrac {\sqrt 3} 2 & -\tfrac 1 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \end {pmatrix}$ :$\phi = \begin {pmatrix} -\map \cos \v...
There exists a disjoint [[Definition:Decomposition (Topology)|decomposition]] of the [[Definition:Sphere (Topology)|sphere]] $\mathbb S^2$ into four sets $A, B, C, Q$ such that $A, B, C, B \cup C$ are all [[Definition:Congruence (Metric Spaces)|congruent]] and $Q$ is [[Definition:Countable|countable]].
Let $R \subset \map {\mathbb {SO} } 3$ be the [[Definition:Group|group]] [[Definition:Generator of Group|generated]] by the $\pi$ and $\dfrac {2 \pi} 3$ rotations around different axes. The elements: :$\psi = \begin {pmatrix} -\tfrac 1 2 & \tfrac {\sqrt 3} 2 & 0 \\ -\tfrac {\sqrt 3} 2 & -\tfrac 1 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\...
Hausdorff Paradox/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hausdorff_Paradox
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hausdorff_Paradox/Proof_1
[ "Hausdorff Paradox", "Topology", "Veridical Paradoxes", "Antinomies" ]
[ "Definition:Decomposable Set", "Definition:Sphere/Topology", "Definition:Congruence (Metric Spaces)", "Definition:Countable Set" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Generator of Group", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Countable Set", "Set of Orbits forms Partition", "Definition:Set Partition", "Definition:Orbit (Group Theory)", "Definition:Orbit (Group Theory)", "Definition:Group Action...
proofwiki-1899
Hausdorff Paradox
There exists a disjoint decomposition of the sphere $\mathbb S^2$ into four sets $A, B, C, Q$ such that $A, B, C, B \cup C$ are all congruent and $Q$ is countable.
=== Lemma $1$ === {{:Hausdorff Paradox/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}} === Lemma $2$ === {{:Hausdorff Paradox/Lemma 2}}{{qed|lemma}} Let $Q$ be the set of all fixed points of $\Bbb S^2$ of all rotations $\alpha \in G$. Each such $\alpha$ has $2$ fixed points. Hence $Q$ is countable. The set $\Bbb S^2 \setminus Q$ is a disjoint ...
There exists a disjoint [[Definition:Decomposition (Topology)|decomposition]] of the [[Definition:Sphere (Topology)|sphere]] $\mathbb S^2$ into four sets $A, B, C, Q$ such that $A, B, C, B \cup C$ are all [[Definition:Congruence (Metric Spaces)|congruent]] and $Q$ is [[Definition:Countable|countable]].
=== [[Hausdorff Paradox/Lemma 1|Lemma $1$]] === {{:Hausdorff Paradox/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}} === [[Hausdorff Paradox/Lemma 2|Lemma $2$]] === {{:Hausdorff Paradox/Lemma 2}}{{qed|lemma}} Let $Q$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Fixed Point|fixed points]] of $\Bbb S^2$ of all [[Definition:Space Rotatio...
Hausdorff Paradox/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hausdorff_Paradox
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hausdorff_Paradox/Proof_2
[ "Hausdorff Paradox", "Topology", "Veridical Paradoxes", "Antinomies" ]
[ "Definition:Decomposable Set", "Definition:Sphere/Topology", "Definition:Congruence (Metric Spaces)", "Definition:Countable Set" ]
[ "Hausdorff Paradox/Lemma 1", "Hausdorff Paradox/Lemma 2", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Fixed Point", "Definition:Rotation (Geometry)/Space", "Definition:Fixed Point", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Disjoint Union", "Definition:Orbit (Group Theory)", "Definition:Set", ...