File size: 8,451 Bytes
cbda011 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 | # OpenJev — zero-GPU CPU deploy kit
Runs the [OpenJev](https://huggingface.co/openjev/openjev) decision API
([openjev-server](https://huggingface.co/spaces/openjev/openjev-server))
**with no GPU at all**. It serves the exact same
`POST /v1/systemone` contract as the hosted server — a choice / yes-no / score
per question, with a probability for every option, read off the model's first
output position — by pointing the **official, unmodified** `openjev-server` at
[`llama.cpp`](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp) (CPU, GGUF) instead of vLLM.
| | hosted (reference) | this kit (zero GPU) |
|---|---|---|
| engine | vLLM + FP8 on 1× H100 | llama.cpp on CPU |
| weights | `openjev/openjev-FP8` (80 GB) | `openjev/openjev-GGUF` Q4_K_M (16.2 GB) |
| latency | ~125 ms | seconds (see [Benchmarks](#benchmarks)) |
| surface | `/v1/systemone` + ops | identical (official server, unchanged) |
## Why this works (no code hacks)
`openjev-server`'s `vllm` backend is really *"any OpenAI-compatible server that
returns logprobs"*:
- it sends standard `/chat/completions` JSON (`logprobs`, `top_logprobs`,
`allowed_token_ids`, `max_tokens: 1`, `temperature: 0`);
- **exact readout** uses vLLM's `logprob_token_ids = [ids]` extension →
llama.cpp doesn't have it, so the backend's documented fallback kicks in:
top-K logprobs are matched **by label text** instead (see
`openjev_server/backends/vllm.py` → `_scores`, "old protocol").
That single fallback is the whole trick: the official code path runs unmodified,
and `--force` only relaxes the startup probe's letter-mass check if llama.cpp's
text-matched logprobs ever look borderline for your quant.
## What you get
- `POST /v1/systemone` — one request, any mix of `choice` / `noul` / `score`
- `POST /v1/prewarm`, `POST /v1/chat/completions` (passthrough)
- `GET /v1/version` · `GET /healthz` · `GET /readyz` ·
`GET /metrics` (Prometheus) · `GET /docs` (OpenAPI)
- optional bearer auth via `OPENJEV_TOKEN`
- Persistent model storage (HF Spaces) — the 16.2 GB download survives restarts
## Deploy on Hugging Face (zero GPU, free)
1. **Duplicate the runtime Space** (needs a free HF account):
<https://huggingface.co/spaces/broadfield/openjev-cpu-run?duplicate=true>
- SDK: **Docker** · hardware: **CPU basic (free)** · persistent storage:
**30 GB** ($0.50/mo, required for `/data`)
2. Wait for the build. The Docker image compiles llama.cpp CPU + installs
openjev-server and, on first boot, downloads the Q4 GGUF (~16.2 GB) into
`/data`. **Allow ~20–50 min on the first cold boot;** subsequent restarts
load straight from persistent storage.
3. Try the API. By default the Space is public:
```bash
BASE=https://<your-username>-openjev-cpu-run.hf.space
curl -s "$BASE/v1/systemone" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{
"state": "Customer message: I was charged twice for my order last week and nobody has replied.",
"questions": {
"route": {"type": "choice", "instructions": "Which team should handle this?",
"criteria": {"billing": null, "shipping": null, "technical": null}},
"angry": {"type": "noul", "instructions": "Is the customer angry?"},
"urgency": {"type": "score", "instructions": "How urgent is this?",
"criteria": ["can wait", "this week", "today", "right now"]}
}
}'
```
```json
{
"answers": {
"route": {"type": "choice", "choice": "billing",
"probabilities": {"billing": 0.9996, "shipping": 0.0002, "technical": 0.0002},
"confidence": 0.9995},
"angry": {"type": "noul", "noul": 0.56},
"urgency": {"type": "score", "score": 2.04,
"legend": {"0": "can wait", "1": "this week", "2": "today", "3": "right now"},
"probabilities": {"0": 0.02, "1": 0.13, "2": 0.64, "3": 0.21},
"confidence": 0.71}
},
"usage": {"input_tokens": 239, "output_tokens": 0}
}
```
> **Latency honesty right up front** — a 27B model on a shared free CPU is *not*
> 125 ms. Expect **~2–6 s per question** (single reader) on a 16-core Space with
> the Q4 quant. That's a real API — just not a high-QPS one. The reason this is
> still interesting: **a decision API only ever generates 1 token**, so the CPU
> is the *only* slow part, and it stays predictable. Raise `LLAMA_PARALLEL`,
> lower `LLAMA_CTX`, or use a different quant if your workload wants less of it.
## Deploy locally (or on any VPS)
```bash
git clone https://huggingface.co/datasets/broadfield/openjev-cpu-deploy-kit
cd openjev-cpu-deploy-kit
docker compose up --build -d
curl -s http://localhost:7860/v1/systemone ... # same payload as above
```
Or Docker directly:
```bash
docker build -t openjev-cpu .
docker run -d -p 7860:7860 -v openjev-data:/data -e MODEL_FILE=OpenJev-Q4_K_M.gguf openjev-cpu
```
## Env vars
| var | default | what it does |
|---|---|---|
| `MODEL_REPO` | `openjev/openjev-GGUF` | GGUF repo |
| `MODEL_FILE` | `OpenJev-Q4_K_M.gguf` | Q4_K_M · Q5_K_M (18.8 GB) · Q6_K (21.6 GB) · Q8_0 (27.9 GB) |
| `TOKENIZER_REPO` | `openjev/openjev` | tokenizer + chat template for openjev-server |
| `LLAMA_CTX` | `8192` | context window |
| `LLAMA_MAX_LOGPROBS` | `64` | top-K logprobs (must be ≥ number of options) |
| `LLAMA_PARALLEL` | `1` | concurrent sequences (scales memory) |
| `LLAMA_THREADS` / `LLAMA_THREADS_BATCH` | auto | pin core count, e.g. `8` / `8` |
| `OPENJEV_PORT` | `7860` | ingress (HF sets `$PORT`) |
| `OPENJEV_TOKEN` | empty | bearer token required on `/v1/*` |
| `OPENJEV_PROFILE` | `openjev` | `openjev` (published constants) or `uncalibrated` |
| `OPENJEV_SERVED_MODEL_NAME` | `openjev` | model id reported by `/v1/version` |
## Benchmarks
Expected on a **free 16 vCPU CPU Space**, `OpenJev-Q4_K_M.gguf`
(27B, Qwen3-based → ~8-bit KV cache in the llama.cpp fork, 16.2 GB RAM):
| quant | file size | SPE (tokens/s, 8 threads) | RAM | 1-question latency* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4_K_M | 16.2 GB | 2–4 | ~17 GB | ~2–6 s |
| Q5_K_M | 18.8 GB | 1.5–3 | ~20 GB | ~3–8 s |
| Q6_K | 21.6 GB | 1.5–3 | ~23 GB | ~3–8 s |
\* single question ≈ one forward pass: `(prompt_tokens + 1) / SPE`. A 240-token
state ⇒ ~4 s @ 3 SPE. Latency is directly linear in prompt length.
**The decision-API twist:** because `max_tokens: 1`, a *pipeline* of many
questions on one state shares ~all of the prefill. For batch agents, batch the
questions into one `/v1/systemone` call — every extra answer after the first is
nearly free:
| questions in one call | est. per-call latency @ 3 SPE |
|---|---|
| 1 | ~4 s |
| 4 | ~4.5 s |
| 10 | ~5.5 s (10 answers, still one pass) |
## Calling it from code
```python
import httpx
r = httpx.post("http://localhost:7860/v1/systemone", json={
"state": "Customer message: I was charged twice for my order last week and nobody has replied.",
"questions": {
"route": {"type": "choice", "instructions": "Which team should handle this?",
"criteria": {"billing": None, "shipping": None, "technical": None}},
"angry": {"type": "noul", "instructions": "Is the customer angry?"},
},
}, timeout=60)
answers = r.json()["answers"]
print(answers["route"]["choice"], answers["route"]["probabilities"], answers["angry"]["noul"])
```
```typescript
const r = await fetch(`${BASE}/v1/systemone`, {
method: "POST",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
state: "Customer message: I was charged twice for my order last week and nobody has replied.",
questions: {
route: { type: "choice", instructions: "Which team should handle this?",
criteria: { billing: null, shipping: null, technical: null } },
angry: { type: "noul", instructions: "Is the customer angry?" },
},
}),
});
const { answers } = await r.json();
```
## Layout
```
Dockerfile # multi-stage: llama.cpp CPU + official openjev-server
entrypoint.sh # GGUF → /data, llama-server, then openjev serve
docker-compose.yml # local/VPS one-liner
bench.mjs # throughput + latency smoke bench against a running endpoint
runtime-baseline.md # the exact Docker Space spec we recommend
README.md # you are here
```
## License & credit
- Model weights: **CC BY-NC 4.0** — OpenJev is an independent project, not
affiliated with TypeSafe (Jev is their product).
- `openjev-server`: Apache 2.0.
- This kit: Apache 2.0. llama.cpp: MIT. |