Datasets:
Describe the task as judging technical trustworthiness
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ configs:
|
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
# CRJudgeBenchmark
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-
CRJudgeBenchmark evaluates whether a model can judge the technical
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Each example pairs a pull request with one target review comment. It includes the PR description, a base commit, a review patch, linked issues, and a PR activity timeline. The binary `trustworthy` label applies only to the comment identified by `judged_entry_id`.
|
| 30 |
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
# CRJudgeBenchmark
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
+
CRJudgeBenchmark evaluates whether a model can judge the technical trustworthiness of a code-review comment in its pull-request context. It contains **1,199 labeled examples from 124 pull requests across 9 GitHub repositories**, with fixed train, validation, and test splits.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Each example pairs a pull request with one target review comment. It includes the PR description, a base commit, a review patch, linked issues, and a PR activity timeline. The binary `trustworthy` label applies only to the comment identified by `judged_entry_id`.
|
| 30 |
|