Download evaluation/test_run_benchmark.py from doximity/bedside-bench: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 5.12 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/doximity/bedside-bench/resolve/main/evaluation/test_run_benchmark.py
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/doximity/bedside-bench/evaluation/test_run_benchmark.py
-
curl -L -o test_run_benchmark.py https://huggingface.co/datasets/doximity/bedside-bench/resolve/main/evaluation/test_run_benchmark.py
5.12 kB
| #!/usr/bin/env python3 | |
| import unittest | |
| from evaluation.run_benchmark import ( | |
| dataset_sha256, | |
| parse_decisions, | |
| score_case, | |
| summarize, | |
| ) | |
| class ScoreCaseTest(unittest.TestCase): | |
| def test_points_rubric_normalizes_and_applies_penalty(self): | |
| case = { | |
| "grading_method": "points_rubric", | |
| "rubric_items": [ | |
| {"item_id": "a", "points": 2}, | |
| {"item_id": "b", "points": 1}, | |
| {"item_id": "c", "points": -1}, | |
| ], | |
| } | |
| score, components = score_case(case, {"a": True, "b": False, "c": True}) | |
| self.assertAlmostEqual(score, 1 / 3) | |
| self.assertEqual(components["matched_signed_points"], 1) | |
| self.assertEqual(components["available_positive_points"], 3) | |
| def test_points_rubric_clamps_below_zero(self): | |
| case = { | |
| "grading_method": "points_rubric", | |
| "rubric_items": [ | |
| {"item_id": "a", "points": 1}, | |
| {"item_id": "b", "points": -2}, | |
| ], | |
| } | |
| score, _ = score_case(case, {"a": False, "b": True}) | |
| self.assertEqual(score, 0) | |
| def test_f1_weighted_rubric(self): | |
| case = { | |
| "grading_method": "f1_weighted_rubric", | |
| "rubric_items": [ | |
| {"item_id": "a", "points": 3}, | |
| {"item_id": "b", "points": 1}, | |
| {"item_id": "c", "points": -2}, | |
| {"item_id": "d", "points": 0}, | |
| ], | |
| } | |
| score, components = score_case( | |
| case, {"a": True, "b": False, "c": True, "d": True} | |
| ) | |
| # +3/+1/−2/0 → classes 9/7/2/5 → weights 72/3/24/1. | |
| # Recall 72/75; precision 72/97. | |
| recall = 72 / 75 | |
| precision = 72 / 97 | |
| expected = 2 * precision * recall / (precision + recall) | |
| self.assertAlmostEqual(score, round(expected, 4)) | |
| self.assertEqual(components["severe_rate"], 0.0) | |
| self.assertAlmostEqual(components["recall_weighted"], round(recall, 4)) | |
| self.assertAlmostEqual(components["precision_weighted"], round(precision, 4)) | |
| def test_f1_weighted_rubric_severe_omission_is_reported_not_gated(self): | |
| case = { | |
| "grading_method": "f1_weighted_rubric", | |
| "rubric_items": [ | |
| {"item_id": "a", "points": 3}, | |
| {"item_id": "b", "points": 2}, | |
| ], | |
| } | |
| score, components = score_case(case, {"a": False, "b": True}) | |
| # +3/+2 → classes 9/8 → weights 72/24. Missing "a" is a severe | |
| # omission: it is reported, but the weighted F1 stands on its own. | |
| recall = 24 / 96 | |
| precision = 1.0 | |
| expected = 2 * precision * recall / (precision + recall) | |
| self.assertAlmostEqual(score, round(expected, 4)) | |
| self.assertEqual(components["severe_rate"], 1.0) | |
| def test_f1_weighted_rubric_severe_commission_is_reported_not_gated(self): | |
| case = { | |
| "grading_method": "f1_weighted_rubric", | |
| "rubric_items": [ | |
| {"item_id": "a", "points": 2}, | |
| {"item_id": "b", "points": -3}, | |
| ], | |
| } | |
| score, components = score_case(case, {"a": True, "b": True}) | |
| # +2/−3 → classes 8/1 → weights 24/72. Asserting "b" is a severe | |
| # commission: it lands in the precision denominator, not a gate. | |
| recall = 1.0 | |
| precision = 24 / 96 | |
| expected = 2 * precision * recall / (precision + recall) | |
| self.assertAlmostEqual(score, round(expected, 4)) | |
| self.assertEqual(components["severe_rate"], 1.0) | |
| def test_judge_decisions_must_cover_exact_item_ids(self): | |
| case = { | |
| "rubric_items": [ | |
| {"item_id": "a"}, | |
| {"item_id": "b"}, | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| with self.assertRaises(ValueError): | |
| parse_decisions( | |
| case, | |
| '{"decisions":[{"item_id":"a","matched":true}]}', | |
| ) | |
| def test_dataset_digest_uses_canonical_case_content(self): | |
| first = [{"case_id": "a", "prompt": "test", "rubric_items": []}] | |
| reordered = [{"rubric_items": [], "prompt": "test", "case_id": "a"}] | |
| self.assertEqual(dataset_sha256(first), dataset_sha256(reordered)) | |
| def test_summary_includes_reproducibility_metadata(self): | |
| rows = [ | |
| { | |
| "case_id": "a", | |
| "benchmark": "example", | |
| "score": 0.5, | |
| "answer_model": "answer", | |
| "judge_model": "judge", | |
| "answer_temperature": 0, | |
| "judge_temperature": None, | |
| "started_at": "2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00", | |
| "finished_at": "2026-01-01T00:01:00+00:00", | |
| } | |
| ] | |
| summary = summarize(rows, 10, 42, {"a"}, "digest") | |
| self.assertEqual(summary["dataset_sha256"], "digest") | |
| self.assertEqual(summary["answer_temperature"], 0) | |
| self.assertEqual(summary["judge_passes_per_answer"], 1) | |
| self.assertEqual(summary["errors"], 0) | |
| if __name__ == "__main__": | |
| unittest.main() | |