File size: 11,111 Bytes
e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f 48b5133 e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be a03fc9f e7962be | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 | ---
pretty_name: UltraMS MSnLib benchmark (formula-level split A + strict-adduct molecule-level split B)
license: cc-by-4.0
language:
- en
size_categories:
- 100K<n<1M
task_categories:
- other
configs:
- config_name: split_A_formula_split
data_files: split_A_full_msnlib/formula_split.csv
- config_name: split_A_row_formula_fold
data_files: split_A_full_msnlib/row_formula_fold.csv
- config_name: split_A_test_spectra
data_files: split_A_full_msnlib/test_spectra.csv
- config_name: split_A_val_spectra
data_files: split_A_full_msnlib/val_spectra.csv
- config_name: split_A_test_molecules_voting_official
data_files: split_A_full_msnlib/test_molecules_voting.csv
- config_name: split_A_test_molecules_voting_canonical_view
data_files: split_A_full_msnlib/test_molecules_voting_canonical_view.csv
- config_name: split_A_msnlib_rt
data_files: split_A_full_msnlib/msnlib_rt.csv.gz
- config_name: split_B_pos_compound_split
data_files: splits/pos_compound_split.csv
- config_name: split_B_neg_compound_split
data_files: splits/neg_compound_split.csv
- config_name: split_B_pos_val_queries
data_files: queries/pos_val_queries.csv
- config_name: split_B_pos_test_queries
data_files: queries/pos_test_queries.csv
- config_name: split_B_neg_val_queries
data_files: queries/neg_val_queries.csv
- config_name: split_B_neg_test_queries
data_files: queries/neg_test_queries.csv
- config_name: split_B_pos_val_library
data_files: libraries/pos_val_library.csv
- config_name: split_B_pos_test_library
data_files: libraries/pos_test_library.csv
- config_name: split_B_neg_val_library
data_files: libraries/neg_val_library.csv
- config_name: split_B_neg_test_library
data_files: libraries/neg_test_library.csv
tags:
- chemistry
- mass-spectrometry
- metabolomics
- small-molecules
- tandem-ms
- spectrum-library-search
- molecule-retrieval
- benchmark
- ultraMS
---
# UltraMS MSnLib benchmark
Zenodo DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.23963489](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23963489)
Two frozen, independent benchmark splits of the [MSnLib](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-025-02813-0)
tandem mass spectral library, released by UltraMS. The splits are different objects:
* **Split A — UltraMS MSnLib formula-level split** (all 560,084 spectra, all adducts):
21,107 molecular formulas, split 16,885 / 2,110 / 2,112 formulas and
446,667 / 55,980 / 57,437 spectra into train / validation / test. Formula-disjoint. Test
fold: 57,437 spectra, 2,112 formulas, 5,003 source SMILES / 4,889 canonical molecules.
Population for single-spectrum candidate ranking, multiple-spectrum voting, label-blind
grouping, fingerprint prediction and embedding analyses (Figure 2b/2j, 3a/3b/3d/3g,
3a_sp_4, 3a_sp_5, single-spectrum baselines). The **official multiple-spectrum voting
units are the 5,002 MSnLib source-SMILES groups covering 57,436 spectra**
(`test_molecules_voting.csv`); a canonical-SMILES alternative view (4,888 groups) is also
provided (`test_molecules_voting_canonical_view.csv`). Per-spectrum retention times
(`row_index, rt` in seconds) are in `msnlib_rt.csv.gz` for the label-blind grouping and
multiple-spectrum voting analyses.
* **Split B — strict-adduct molecule-level split** (`[M+H]+` and `[M-H]-` only): 41,348 /
21,293 compounds and 301,636 / 140,193 preprocessed spectra, split 70/15/15 per polarity
by RDKit canonical isomeric SMILES, with frozen queries and libraries for
spectrum-to-spectrum library search. Population for Figure 3e/3f/3h, 3h_sp_1 and the
cross-collision-energy task (6,161 positive / 2,999 negative queries).
| split-B task | queries | library spectra | queries with an exact-adduct library positive |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| `[M+H]+` test | 6,202 | 295,434 | 6,201 |
| `[M+H]+` validation | 6,202 | 250,424 | 6,194 |
| `[M-H]-` test | 3,193 | 137,000 | 3,160 |
| `[M-H]-` validation | 3,193 | 116,135 | 3,163 |
> **Disjointness.** Split A is formula-disjoint (no formula in two folds); split B is
> molecule-disjoint within each polarity (the train / validation / test compound sets are
> pairwise empty). The two splits must **not** be merged into a global-disjointness claim:
> about 41 % of split-B compounds lie in a different split-A fold, and a spectrum can be
> split-A test while its compound is split-B train. See the package
> `figures_mapping.md` §2 for the full cross-tabulation.
## Usage
```python
import pandas as pd
base = "https://huggingface.co/datasets/dsadd4/UltraMS-MSnLib-Benchmark/resolve/main/"
# split A — formula-level split of the full library
formulas = pd.read_csv(base + "split_A_full_msnlib/formula_split.csv")
rows = pd.read_csv(base + "split_A_full_msnlib/row_formula_fold.csv") # 560,084 rows
test = pd.read_csv(base + "split_A_full_msnlib/test_spectra.csv") # 57,437 rows
assert formulas.groupby("formula")["fold"].nunique().max() == 1
# split B — strict-adduct molecule-level library search
compound_split = pd.read_csv(base + "splits/pos_compound_split.csv")
queries = pd.read_csv(base + "queries/pos_test_queries.csv")
library = pd.read_csv(base + "libraries/pos_test_library.csv")
positives = library.groupby("canonical_isomeric_smiles").size()
n_pos = queries["canonical_isomeric_smiles"].map(positives).fillna(0).astype(int)
denominator = int((n_pos > 0).sum()) # 6,201
```
With `datasets` (one config per table, see the YAML header):
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
queries = load_dataset("dsadd4/UltraMS-MSnLib-Benchmark", "split_B_pos_test_queries", split="train")
```
Peak data are **not** part of the split tables. Every row is joined back to the spectra by
`row_index` / `msnlib_csv_data_row` / `first_msnlib_csv_data_row`, which point into
`MSnLib.csv`. `MSnLib.csv` and `MSnLib_candidates.json` are hosted in the same dataset; see
**Hosted files** below.
## Columns
* `split_A_full_msnlib/formula_split.csv`: `formula, fold, n_spectra`
* `split_A_full_msnlib/row_formula_fold.csv`: `row_index, formula, fold`
* `split_A_full_msnlib/{test,val}_spectra.csv`: `row_index, smiles, precursor_mz, adduct,
collision_energy, fold, canonical_isomeric_smiles`
* `split_A_full_msnlib/test_molecules_voting.csv`: `group_id, smiles, n_spectra` —
**official** voting units: 5,002 MSnLib-source-SMILES groups covering 57,436 spectra, the
grouping of the published multiple-spectrum voting task (`n_molecules = 5002`)
* `split_A_full_msnlib/test_molecules_voting_canonical_view.csv`: `group_id,
canonical_isomeric_smiles, n_spectra` — alternative canonical view: 4,888 groups covering
the same 57,436 spectra
* `split_A_full_msnlib/msnlib_rt.csv.gz`: `row_index, rt` — per-spectrum retention time in
seconds, aligned 1:1 to the `MSnLib.csv` data rows (560,084 rows)
* `splits/*_compound_split.csv`: `polarity, compound_id, canonical_isomeric_smiles, split,
n_spectra, n_frozen_queries, n_raw_smiles_variants, first_msnlib_csv_data_row`
* `queries/*.csv`: `polarity, split, query_index, compound_id, canonical_isomeric_smiles,
adduct, msnlib_csv_data_row, msnlib_csv_line, precursor_mz, n_peaks, collision_energy,
source_smiles_raw, n_library_positives`
* `libraries/*.csv`: same as queries with `library_index` and `compound_split` instead of
`query_index`; row order is the frozen library order
## Split-B evaluation protocol
1. Score every query against the complete library of its task (no candidate short list).
2. Correct = the top-1 library spectrum has the same canonical compound identity.
3. Empirical FDR = `(accepted − correct) / accepted`; identification recall =
`correct / n_queries_with_library_positive` (6,201 / 3,160 for the two test tasks).
Queries without a library positive enter the FDR denominator but not the recall
denominator; `n_library_positives` is provided per query.
4. The test library contains all preprocessed spectra of the polarity except the selected
test queries; the validation library contains train and validation compounds only.
5. Validation is for model selection only; evaluate the test fold once.
## Hosted files
The dataset hosts the complete manifest plus two large source files. Every file of the
manifest is checksummed in `SHA256SUMS`; the two large files are kept in a separate upload
step (see `hf_upload_commands.sh`, dry-run by default).
| hosted file | bytes | SHA-256 | purpose |
| --- | ---: | --- | --- |
| manifest: `split_A_full_msnlib/`, `splits/`, `queries/`, `libraries/`, `protocol/`, `rebuild/`, docs (59 files) | ≈ 185.2 MiB | see `SHA256SUMS` | the two benchmark splits, verifier, docs |
| `split_A_full_msnlib/msnlib_rt.csv.gz` | 1,483,069 | `994053612db874f7ac7985f278e04cc3463f3b93cd649a195bd167c4c6c7d3d8` | compact per-spectrum retention time (`row_index, rt` in seconds), aligned 1:1 to `MSnLib.csv`; used by the label-blind grouping analysis |
| `MSnLib.csv` | 752,707,651 | `be54b33039cf18675751ea3c6354b592177c899a0cd5df303ae616330133ec07` | full source CSV: one row per MSnLib spectrum (560,084 rows); every row pointer in the split tables resolves here |
| `MSnLib_candidates.json` | 1,368,264,026 | `125a1cdcc57a3fcef8cc76d5322ac0c434cd09b0bfb9e0c9d28bddf052f45fcc` | candidate SMILES lists behind the single-spectrum candidate-ranking task: a JSON object mapping a query SMILES string to its candidate SMILES list (9,886 query entries) |
`MSnLib.csv` is the UltraMS CSV conversion of the MSnLib original release (Zenodo
10.5281/zenodo.11163380, CC BY 4.0), whose 18 per-file MS2 JSONL record lists contain the
same 560,084 spectra. `MSnLib_candidates.json` contains candidate SMILES lists derived from
the MSnLib compound set; both files carry the MSnLib attribution.
## Provenance, verification, license
* Source rows: `MSnLib.csv` (560,084 rows) converted from the MSnLib original release
(Brungs et al., CC BY 4.0; Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.11163380).
* Hosted source files: `MSnLib.csv` (752,707,651 bytes, SHA-256 `be54b330…`) and
`MSnLib_candidates.json` (1,368,264,026 bytes, SHA-256 `125a1cdc…`).
* Frozen split-B manifest, seeds 42 / 43, query seed 119; frozen split-A fold assignment
from the `fold` column of `MSnLib.csv`.
* `SHA256SUMS` covers every file; `rebuild/verify_release.py` is a self-contained verifier
that re-checks every count, ordering hash, disjointness statement, cross-split statistic
and checksum offline.
* License **CC BY 4.0**, with attribution to MSnLib (CC BY 4.0); Apache-2.0 for the two
UltraMS producer scripts. See the package `NOTICE.md`.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{ultrams_msnlib_benchmark_2026,
title = {UltraMS MSnLib benchmark: full-library formula-level split and strict-adduct molecule-level library-search split},
author = {Li, Yifan and Zhong, Yunhua and Liu, Pan and Xia, Jun},
year = {2026},
note = {Derived from MSnLib (Brungs, Schmid, Pluskal; CC BY 4.0, Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.11163380)},
howpublished = {Hugging Face / Zenodo dataset, version 1.0.0}
}
```
Please also cite MSnLib (doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02813-0) and the UltraMS manuscript.
|